XLY: Do You Need More Aggressive Allocations?

By | September 19, 2015

Scalper1 News

Summary XLY offers investors a fairly aggressive portfolio that is more volatile than the market but benefits from diversification. Most of the allocations seem very reasonable, but MCD looks like a fairly conservative option. If an investor is going to buy into this aggressive fund, they should have a rebalancing plan in place. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve the risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. One of the funds that I’m reviewing is the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLY ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so the goal is to design portfolios that perform well on a risk adjusted basis, not portfolios that necessarily beat the market. Expense Ratio The expense ratio for XLY is .15%. That isn’t too bad. I’m usually expecting to see high expense ratios that drain away the investor’s money, but XLY scores well in this regard. Largest Holdings (click to enlarge) The top of the holdings for XLY is Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ). For investors seeking to find companies trading at low fundamentals such as P/E ratios, Amazon’s history of not turning a meaningful profit may be a concern. While earnings are a concern for Amazon, sales have been an area of strength as the company blossomed over the last 15 years and has become a household name. The difficulty for this portfolio is the reliance on discretionary spending. This is a reason for the portfolio to show some substantial volatility when investors are concerned about another recession and falling personal expenditures. The interesting holding here is McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ) coming in as the 5th holding. I would not put MCD in the same category as the other top holdings. MCD pays a very strong dividend, has a long history of doing so, and in a bad economy the restaurant can pick up new customers that are trading down to buy McDonald’s products rather than more expensive food. The rest of the top 10 holdings are all companies that I would expect to perform best when consumers are readily disposing of income. Building the Portfolio This hypothetical portfolio has a fairly aggressive allocation for the middle aged investor. Only 25% of the total portfolio value is placed in bonds and a fifth of that bond allocation is given to high yield bonds. If the investor wants to treat an investment in an mREIT index as an investment in the underlying bonds that the individual mREITs hold, then the total bond allocation would be 35%. Given how substantially mREITs can deviate from book value, I’d rather consider the allocation as an equity position designed to create a very high yield. This portfolio is probably taking on more risk than would be appropriate for many retiring investors since a major recession could still hit this pretty hard. If the investor wanted to modify the portfolio to be more appropriate for retirement, the first place to start would be increasing the bond exposure at the cost of equity. However, the diversification within the portfolio is fairly solid. Long term treasuries work nicely with major market indexes and I’ve designed this hypothetical portfolio without putting in the allocation I normally would for equity REITs. An allocation is created for the mortgage REITs, which can offer some fairly nice diversification relative to the rest of the portfolio and they are a major source of yield in this hypothetical portfolio. The portfolio assumes frequent rebalancing which would be a problem for short term trading outside of tax advantaged accounts unless the investor was going to rebalance by adding to their positions on a regular basis and allocating the majority of the capital towards whichever portions of the portfolio had been underperforming recently. Because a substantial portion of the yield from this portfolio comes from REITs and interest, I would favor this portfolio as a tax exempt strategy even if the investor was frequently rebalancing by adding new capital. The portfolio allocations can be seen below along with the dividend yields from each investment. Name Ticker Portfolio Weight Yield SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY 35.00% 2.06% Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF XLY 10.00% 1.36% First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF FXG 10.00% 1.60% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO 5.00% 3.17% First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF FXU 5.00% 3.77% SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term High Yield Bond ETF SJNK 5.00% 5.45% PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury Portfolio ETF PLW 20.00% 2.22% iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF REM 10.00% 14.45% Portfolio 100.00% 3.53% The next chart shows the annualized volatility and beta of the portfolio since April of 2012. (click to enlarge) A quick rundown of the portfolio Using SJNK offers investors better yields from using short term exposure to credit sensitive debt. The yield on this is fairly nice and due to the short duration of the securities the volatility isn’t too bad. PLW on the other hand does have some material volatility, but a negative correlation to other investments allows it to reduce the total risk of the portfolio. FXG is used to make the portfolio overweight on consumer staples with a goal of providing more stability to the equity portion of the portfolio. FXU is used to create a small utility allocation for the portfolio to give it a higher dividend yield and help it produce more income. I find the utility sector often has some desirable risk characteristics that make it worth at least considering for an overweight representation in a portfolio. VWO is simply there to provide more diversification from being an international equity portfolio. While giving investors exposure to emerging markets, it is also offering a very solid dividend yield that enhances the overall income level from the portfolio. XLY offers investors higher expected returns in a solid economy at the cost of higher risk. Using it as more than a small weighting would result in too much risk for the portfolio, but as a small weighting the diversification it offers relative to the core holding of SPY is eliminating most of the additional risk. REM is primarily there to offer a substantial increase in the dividend yield which is otherwise not very strong. The mREIT sector can be subject to some pretty harsh movements and dividends from mREITs should not be the core source of income for an investor. However, they can be used to enhance the level of dividend income while investors wait for their other equity investments to increase dividends over the coming decades. If you want a really quick version to refer back to, I put together the following chart that really simplifies the role of each investment: Name Ticker Role in Portfolio SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF SPY Core of Portfolio Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF XLY Enhance Expected Returned First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX ETF FXG Reduce Beta of Portfolio Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO Exposure to Foreign Markets First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF FXU Enhance Dividends, Lower Portfolio Risk SPDR Barclays Capital Short Term High Yield Bond ETF SJNK Low Volatility with over 5% Yield PowerShares 1-30 Laddered Treasury Portfolio ETF PLW Negative Beta Reduces Portfolio Risk iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF REM Enhance Current Income Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. Despite TLT being fairly volatile and tying SPY for the second highest volatility in the portfolio, it actually produces a negative risk contribution because it has a negative correlation with most of the portfolio. It is important to recognize that the “risk” on an investment needs to be considered in the context of the entire portfolio. To make it easier to analyze how risky each holding would be in the context of the portfolio, I have most of these holdings weighted at a simple 10%. Because of TLT’s heavy negative correlation, it receives a weighting of 20% and as the core of the portfolio SPY was weighted as 50%. Correlation The chart below shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio. Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) Conclusion XLY offers investors a fairly aggressive allocation that is heavy on companies that should succeed when the market is doing well and should struggle more during a market downturn. To take advantage of the investment investors would want to be ready to buy into the ETF when fear is stronger in the economy. In my opinion, the most effective way to do that would be to set up an automatic rebalancing schedule or use allocation bands and buy in/sell off whenever the allocation was exceeding the desired range. Due to some diversification benefits, a small allocation can be used in a portfolio without driving up the total risk of the portfolio. However, investors aiming to use the ETF for more than 10% or so of the portfolio may find their volatility across the portfolio increasing. An investor could counteract some of that additional risk by increasing their allocation to treasury securities with an ETF like PLW where the correlation between the two funds is a negative .4. Despite a fairly low expense ratio, if an investor is using a large enough portfolio they may still find it worthwhile to imitate the portfolio by buying up the major holdings because so much of the portfolio is held in the top 10. For the investor that wants to get a little more aggressive without a large enough portfolio to replicate XLY, it looks like a fairly solid option for the sector. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis. Scalper1 News

Scalper1 News