Tag Archives: yahoo

BKLN: Higher Yields Without The Duration Risk

Summary BKLN holds loans that primarily have maturities within 2 to 10 years, but the fund doesn’t move with typical junk bond movements. The loans in the ETF benefit from having LIBOR based loans so their coupons reset on a regular basis. When high yield bonds were dipping during the taper tantrum, loans like these were much steadier. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. One of the funds I’m looking into is the PowerShares Senior Loan Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: BKLN ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. I’ll cover the holdings of the fund and then look at its performance in what I would consider a reasonable portfolio. Expense Ratio The net expense ratio is .66%. That’s fairly high compared to the junk bond funds I would normally consider. On the other hand, BKLN is holding a senior loan portfolio rather than a simple junk bond portfolio and the expense ratio is in line with the norms for this sector. Maturity The portfolio has a fairly simple standard of holding loans with a maturity from 1 to 5 years. These senior loan ETFs will be following an index and when those indexes are updated they often exclude any loans with a maturity of less than one year. It might seem like this would cause the fund to have quite a bit of interest rate risk, but as you’ll see, that isn’t entirely the case. Interest Rate Sensitivity The following chart shows the price movements on two indexes. Note that these are indexes being measured rather than directly measuring the performance of any single ETF tracking that index. The normal high yield funds suffered much worse than the loan index. Even though both are exposed to a material amount of credit risk, BKLN has loans with their coupons resetting based on LIBOR. Because of this resetting feature the duration exposure is substantially lower. This should make the loan ETFs an interesting option for investors seeking for acceptable yields while already holding enough bonds that they are concerned about the duration risk. Credit Credit risk is still a factor here. That shouldn’t be a surprise since we are talking about a high yield portfolio. Building the Portfolio This hypothetical portfolio has an aggressive allocation for the middle aged investor, but should be fairly reasonable for a younger investor. Investors nearing retirement should aim for a significantly more conservative portfolio unless they have a high risk tolerance and a high ability to actually bear the risk. Retirees depending on the portfolio value should aim for something more conservative than this. A total of 40% of the portfolio value is placed in bonds. That makes it appear to be a fairly reasonable allocation for the middle aged investor. However the position in junk bonds is highly susceptible to losses at the same time as the equity positions because fear in the market will cause junk bonds to be sold off along with equity. You’ll also notice that emerging market bonds also have a positive correlation with domestic equity markets due to the influence of fear. The portfolio assumes frequent rebalancing which would be a problem for short term trading outside of tax advantaged accounts unless the investor was going to rebalance by adding to their positions on a regular basis and allocating the majority of the capital towards whichever portions of the portfolio had been underperforming recently. Because a substantial portion of the yield from this portfolio comes from REITs and interest, I would favor this portfolio as a tax exempt strategy even if the investor was frequently rebalancing by adding new capital. The portfolio allocations can be seen below along with the dividend yields from each investment. Name Ticker Portfolio Weight Yield Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF VYM 30.00% 3.16% iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF IYR 10.00% 3.82% Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF VEA 10.00% 2.94% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO 10.00% 3.12% Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index ETF VWOB 10.00% 4.73% Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index ETF VCLT 10.00% 4.54% Vanguard Long-Term Government Bond Index ETF VGLT 10.00% 3.12% I include the yield from each investment to aid investors looking for a higher yielding portfolio. If nothing else, this should provide a very quick reference point for which other ETFs mentioned here might also be useful in constructing your own portfolio. I picked VYM as a replacement for SPY in this portfolio due to it having a significantly stronger dividend yield and the assumption that domestic equity would be the core of the portfolio. The next chart shows the annualized volatility and beta of the portfolio since October of 2013, courtesy of Investspy.com. (click to enlarge) Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. To make it easier to recognize the risk impact of the various positions, I’ve built this portfolio to be equal weight with the exception of the position in VYM. Since this is the core of the portfolio, I’ve allocated 30% to the ETF. You can also see that VGLT has a negative total risk impact on the portfolio. When you see negative risk contributions in this kind of assessment it generally means that there will be significantly negative correlations with other asset classes in the portfolio. The position in VCLT is also very low in the impact on total portfolio risk. That is because these are very long duration high quality bonds. Even though they are not treasuries, they have a much higher correlation with treasury securities than with equity securities. Thinking of Modifications If an investor wanted to use something like this as a high yield portfolio while significantly reducing the risk, one way to do it would be to cut the allocations to VEA and VWO and to increase the allocations to VGLT and VCLT. That would create a lower risk portfolio overall and it would strengthen the yield on the portfolio. It should be noted that this modification would reduce the expected level of returns over the long term. A quick rundown of the portfolio I put together the following chart that really simplifies the role of each investment: Ticker Role in Portfolio VYM Core of Portfolio IYR Yield and exposure to equity REITs VEA International diversification VWO International diversification VWOB Strong Yield with International Diversification VCLT Moderate yield, moderate risk VGLT Strong Negative Correlation to Equity Correlation The chart below, created by Invest Spy shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio. Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) Conclusion The difference between BKLN and a typical high yield fund can be seen by factors such as its fairly low correlation with other debt instruments. Even VWOB, the emerging market bond fund, is only showing a 35% correlation with BKLN. It is interesting to note that BKLN has a higher correlation with VYM and SPY than any other investments in the table. In short, the credit exposure in the portfolio is the dominating factor in price movements as the ETF will generally move up and down with the rest of the economy rather than trading with other bond portfolios. That means this kind of ETF is better suited to the risk averse investor that is overweight on bonds and looking for a small allocation to increase yields without having it go up down with his other bond investments. Just keep in mind that this is still a high yield fund, even with very little duration exposure.

DEX: This Balanced Closed-End Fund Is Trading At A Big Discount

Summary DEX is a leveraged, global balanced CEF about 60% equities, 40% bonds. The 17+% discount to NAV is at three year highs. High distributions produce alpha by capturing some of the discount with every monthly payout. The Delaware Enhanced Global Dividend and Income Fund (NYSE: DEX ) was formed in June, 2007. It invests globally in income-generating securities across multiple asset classes. (Data below is sourced from the Delaware Investments website unless otherwise stated.) The Fund’s primary investment objective is to seek current income, with a secondary objective of capital appreciation. The Fund also uses enhanced income strategies by engaging in dividend capture trading, option overwriting, and realizing gains on the sale of securities, dividend growth and currency forwards. There could be a good medium-term trading opportunity in DEX setting up from now until year-end because of tax loss selling. Over the last year, the average discount to NAV has been -12.75%, while it is currently around -17%. The 1-year discount Z-score is -2.20, which means that the current discount to NAV is more than two standard deviations below the average. Source: cefanalyzer Three Year Historical Premium/Discount for DEX (click to enlarge) From an overall asset allocation perspective, DEX is similar to a global 60-40 balanced fund, but because of the leverage and wide range of asset classes, it is much more diverse than a typical balanced fund you would find at Vanguard or Fidelity. Under normal conditions, the Fund will invest: At most 60% of its net assets in securities of U.S. issuers. At least 40% of its net assets in securities of non-U.S. issuers (but the fund managers have discretion to lower this percentage to 30% if they feel market conditions are unfavorable). This was the asset allocation breakdown as of June 30, 2015: Asset Allocation Breakdown Large-Cap Value 11.54% Real Estate 2.80% International equity 29.76% Emerging markets equity 6.51% Convertible securities 13.13% High yield bonds 32.68% Investment grade bonds 2.36% Other 1.24% DEX has had about average long term NAV performance. But it may be good for a swing trade now because of the very high discount to net asset value. Since inception, it had one big losing year in 2008 when the net asset value fell -38.52%, and it is also struggling so far this year. Here is the total return NAV performance record since inception along with its percentile rank compared to Morningstar’s World Allocation category: DEX NAV Performance World Allocation NAV Percentile Rank in Category 2008 -38.52% -39.30% 50 2009 +48.43% +46.71% 38 2010 +16.60% +23.98% 50 2011 -1.44% -3.21% 38 2012 +17.68% +19.81% 34 2013 +19.01% +11.07% 34 2014 -0.46% +6.14% 90 YTD -7.10% -5.76% 73 The “Top 5” tables below are all as of June 30, 2015: Top 5 Countries United States 51.02% Japan 7.96% France 5.79% United Kingdom 5.24% Canada 2.88% Top 5 foreign equity holdings Teva Pharmaceutical (NYSE: TEVA ) 1.35% Mitsubishi UFJ Financial ( OTCPK:MBFJF ) 1.30% AXA S.A. ( OTCQX:AXAHY ) 1.15% Novartis AG (NYSE: NVS ) 1.14% Toyota Motor (NYSE: TM ) 1.12% Top 5 U.S. equity holdings CA Inc. (NASDAQ: CA ) 0.55% AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T ) 0.52% Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE ) 0.49% ConAgra Foods Inc. (NYSE: CAG ) 0.49% Merck & Co. Inc. (NYSE: MRK ) 0.48% Top 5 U.S. fixed income holdings Inter-American Development Bank 0.46% NuVasive Inc. 0.42% Meritor Inc. 0.41% Blackstone Mortgage Trust Inc. 0.39% Cardtronics Inc. 0.38% Top 5 foreign fixed income holdings Indonesia Govt. Intl. Bond 0.73% Mexican Bonos 0.65% Mexico Govt. Intl. Bond 0.56% Indonesia Govt. Intl. Bond 0.53% Australia & N. Zealand Banking 0.49% Bond Rating Distribution AAA 8.38% AA 0.15% A 5.40% BBB 9.73% BB 24.63% B 36.34% CCC 15.24% CC 0.09% D 0.04% DEX is run by a large team of eleven portfolio managers, which is helpful because of the many asset classes held in the fund. Nine of the managers have earned the CFA designation. The lead manager is Roger A. Early, CPA, CFA. Roger is a Managing Director, Head of Fixed Income Investments with 39 years industry experience. He has been with the fund since 2008. Alpha is Generated by High Discount + High Distributions The high distribution rate of 9.34% along with the 17% discount allows investors to capture some alpha by recovering some of the discount whenever a distribution is paid. Whenever you recover NAV from a fund selling at a 17% discount, the percentage return is 1.00/ 0.83 or about 20.5%. So the alpha generated by the 9.34% distribution is computed as: (0.0934)*(0.205)=0.01915 or about 1.92% a year. Note that this is more than the 1.13% baseline expense ratio, so you are effectively getting the fund managed for free with a negative effective expense ratio! Here are some summary statistics on DEX: Delaware Enhanced Global Dividend and Income Fund Total Assets: 273 Million Total Common assets: 186 Million Annual Distribution (Market) Rate= 9.34% Last Regular Monthly Distribution= $0.075 (Annual= $0.90) Fund Baseline Expense ratio: 1.13% Discount to NAV= -17.44% Portfolio Turnover rate: 56% Credit Rating: Fixed income holdings are mainly high yield Effective Leverage: 30.35% Average Daily Volume (shares)= 65,160 (Source: Yahoo Finance) Average Dollar Volume = $630,000 DEX is only a moderately liquid stock and usually trades with a bid-asked spread about two cents. There is often limited size available on both the bid and asked, so some care must be taken when trading DEX. DEX is an attractive purchase at current levels when the discount to NAV is 15% or higher, although there may be even additional opportunities later this year when tax loss selling kicks in. A reasonable trading approach may be to scale in gradually over the next few months.

What Happens In The Real World: The Average Joe Broad Market Portfolio Q3 Update

Summary About the Average Joe broad market portfolios. The Q3 drop in the major averages. The results of the portfolios. Introduced to the SA audience earlier in the quarter ( here ), the Average Joe Broad Market portfolio(s) seek to provide a methodology and platform for the Average Joe to perform real world comparisons to the broader market. Since these are passively managed portfolio(s) requiring little interaction, they can also be used to amass a decent retirement account with a minimalist approach. There a lots of ways to make money out there. Some of them are a bit slower. Alright, a lot slower. The third quarter of 2015 is now in the books so let’s review the changes and results to the portfolios. The AJ Broad Market Portfolio concentrates its investments in three broad market index funds, the State Street Global Advisor’s SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ), Invesco’s Powershares QQQ (covering the NASDAQ 100(NASDAQ: QQQ ), and another State Street Global Advisors product covering the Dow Jones Industrial Avg., the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average (NYSEARCA: DIA ). A new portfolio was started each year beginning 1/1/2000 with weekly data provided by Yahoo (Author’s note: Yahoo weeks are listed as the “week of _____.” These portfolios therefore are not on a fiscal nor calendar quarter. Instead, they begin with the first Monday of every quarter and end on the last day of the week of the last Monday of the quarter. This could actually fall into the following calendar quarter as it does in this Q3 review.). For other rules applied to the input of cash and the methods used to make purchases, please see Part 1. About the Averages The S&P 500 began the fiscal quarter at 2076.72 and ended down 125.36 (-6.036%) to 1951.36. While this is a steep drop for the quarter, the October 2nd fiscal close puts the decline for the year at a more manageable -4.57%. In an article/video published on 10/5 on Yahoo, Estimize ( estimize.com ), the open financial estimates platform, reported that current expectations for S&P 500 Q3 earnings will reflect a 2.2% decline. That leads to a big question. Are the earnings baked into the prices yet or do we still have more losses ahead. The NASDAQ 100 followed suit for the quarter dropping 152.7 from the beginning of the quarter (4420.15), ending at 4267.45 (-3.454%). The index is still in positive territory for the year, but trimming its gain to just 54.07 points or 1.283%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average continued the trend for Q3, losing 1288.04 points to finish at 16472.37. This is a -7.252% drop for the quarter and a -7.132% drop for the year. The Average Joe Broad Market Portfolios With a new portfolio starting every year since 2000, there’s never a shortage of data to crunch. First, let’s start with the beginning and ending positions of each fund. Fund Start SPY Shares End of Q2 SPY Shares End of Q3 QQQ Shares End of Q2 QQQ Shares End of Q3 DIA Shares End of Q2 DIA Shares End of Q3 2000 54 54 55 55 46 54 2001 46 46 46 46 38 46 2002 38 38 38 38 38 38 2003 31 39 31 31 31 31 2004 31 31 23 23 23 23 2005 23 23 23 23 19 19 2006 19 19 19 19 15 15 2007 15 15 15 15 11 15 2008 11 11 11 11 11 11 2009 11 11 11 11 7 7 2010 7 7 7 7 7 7 2011 5 7 5 5 5 5 2012 5 5 3 5 3 3 2013 4 4 2 2 2 2 2014 2 2 2 2 1 2 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 Next, the update on the values including input, quarterly gain/loss and gain/loss since portfolio inception. Fund Start Portfolio Value End of Q2 Q3 Cash Input Cash Position Investments Value Total Value Q3 Gain or Loss Q3 % G/L G/L since Inception 2000 $26,021.14 $585.00 $136.08 $25,137.33 $25,273.41 ($747.74) -2.87% $9,162.41 2001 $22,599.90 $507.00 $533.42 $21,324.68 $21,858.10 ($741.79) -3.28% $8,050.10 2002 $18.821.95 $455.00 $661.12 $17,616.04 $18.277.16 ($544.79) -2.89% $6,451.16 2003 $16,645.10 $403.00 $273.46 $15,930.90 $16,204.36 ($440.74) -2.65% $6,152.36 2004 $13,170.75 $351.00 $603.34 $12,222.26 $12,825.60 ($344.75) -2.61% $4,336.60 2005 $10,888.78 $299.00 $623.81 $10,004.02 $10,627.83 ($260.95) -2.40% $3,493.83 2006 $ 8,790.39 $247.00 $432.99 $ 8,149.70 $ 8,582.69 ($207.70) -2.36% $2,595.69 2007 $ 7,149.38 $221.00 $ 76.86 $ 6,953.70 $ 7,030.56 ($118.82) -1.66% $2,008.56 2008 $ 5,921.86 $195.00 $728.06 $ 5,099.38 $ 5,827.44 ($ 94.41) -1.59% $1,670.44 2009 $ 5,104.82 $169.00 $588.54 $ 4,441.06 $ 5,029.60 ($ 75.22) -1.47% $1,627.60 2010 $ 3,711.20 $143.00 $424.97 $ 3,245.06 $ 3,670.03 ($ 41.17) -1-11% $ 919.03 2011 $ 2,807.31 $117.00 $ 72.60 $ 2,707.88 $ 2,780.48 ($ 26.83) -0.96% $ 576.48 2012 $ 2,112.36 $104.00 $112.27 $ 1,988.74 $ 2,101.01 ($ 11.36) -0.54% $ 353.01 2013 $ 1,488.12 $ 91.00 $186.71 $ 1,317.14 $ 1,503.85 ($ 6.93) -0.47% $ 163.85 2014 $ 962.40 $ 78.00 $ 56.42 $ 927.16 $ 983.58 $ 21.18 2.20% ($ 5.42) 2015 $ 614.91 $ 65.00 $190.02 $ 463.58 $ 653.60 $ 38.69 6.30% ($ 36.40) And the dividend and yield data: Fund Start Dividends Received Q3 Yield (on Value) Yield (on Cost) 2000 $123.46 1.90% 2.75% 2001 $109.31 1.93% 2.92% 2002 $ 93.47 1.99% 2.98% 2003 $ 76.25 1.83% 2.77% 2004 $ 64.60 1.93% 2.96% 2005 $ 51.76 1.90% 2.86% 2006 $ 41.93 1.91% 2.74% 2007 $ 34.29 1.92% 2.59% 2008 $ 27.06 1.83% 2.88% 2009 $ 22.25 1.74% 2.88% 2010 $ 17.22 1.86% 2.74% 2011 $ 12.30 1.75% 2.18% 2012 $ 9.89 1.87% 2.32% 2013 $ 6.93 1.86% 2.32% 2014 $ 4.44 1.85% 1.87% 2015 $ 2.46 1.60% 1.95% Current Expectations The intent of these portfolios is to show the real results of the market, one that even the little guys, the average Joe’s can build. It will amass to wealth over time, but it is slow moving and prone to many whip-saw antics in the short run. This quarter is a perfect example of how a quarter can change long-term projections. The tables below shows the current growth rate and the expected portfolio value at 20, 25, 30 and 35 years based on the Q2 and Q3 closes. The Q3 dip did considerable damage to the older portfolios while the newer ones fared better based on the size of the cash input rather than market changes. 2000 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 8.4353% $54,269.54 $112,121.92 $214,894.36 $389,271.82 Q3 7.4110% $49,722.27 $100,719.91 $188,832.05 $333,778.68 Difference -1.0243% ($ 4,547.27) ($ 11,402.01) ($ 26,062.31) ($ 55,493.14) 2001 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 8.9419% $56,744.68 $118,457.28 $229,688.59 $421,488.74 Q3 7.7992% $51,377.73 $104,834.63 $198,151.43 $353,429.82 Difference -1.1427% ($ 5,366.95) ($ 13,622.65) ($ 31,537.16) ($ 68,058.92) 2002 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 8.9246% $56,657.42 $118,232.41 $229,159.78 $420,328.64 Q3 7.7529% $51,176.13 $104,331.32 $197,006.19 $351,003.16 Difference -1.1717% ($ 5,481.29) ($ 13,901.09) ($ 32,153.59) ($ 69,325.48) 2003 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 9.9939% $62,427.06 $133,331.41 $265,246.35 $500,865.21 Q3 8.7847% $55,959.67 $116,438.32 $224,950.44 $411,116.55 Difference -1.2092% ($ 6,467.39) ($ 16,893.09) ($ 40,295.91) ($ 89,748.66) 2004 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 9.3866% $59,052.89 $124,444.74 $243,866.38 $452,819.50 Q3 8.0701% $52,581.31 $107,852.39 $205,048.52 $368,112.68 Difference -1.3165% ($ 6,471.58) ($ 16,592.35) ($ 38,817.86) ($ 84,706.82) 2005 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 9.6044% $60,232.88 $127,534.63 $251,255.28 $469,317.85 Q3 8.2226% $53,276.59 $109,605.63 $209,079.28 $376,747.06 Difference -1.3818% ($ 6,956.29) ($ 17,929.00) ($ 42,176.00) ($ 92,570.79) 2006 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 9.4431% $59,356.13 $125,236.94 $245,756.14 $457,028.17 Q3 7.9500% $52,042.67 $106,499.14 $201,949.24 $361,500.35 Difference -1.4931% ($ 7,313.46) ($ 18,737.80) ($ 43,806.90) ($ 95,527.82) 2007 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 9.5552% $59,963.08 $126,826.43 $249,557.47 $465,516.79 Q3 8.0202% $52,356.29 $107,286.55 $203,751.34 $365,342.29 Difference -1.5350% ($ 7,606.79) ($ 19,539.88) ($ 45,806.13) ($ 100,174.50) 2008 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 10.4279% $65,006.71 $140,230.05 $282,110.25 $539,404.49 Q3 8.6808% $55,449.00 $115,129.74 $221,891.10 $404,446.28 Difference -1.7471% ($ 9,557.71) ($ 25,100.31) ($ 60,219.15) ($ 134,958.21) 2009 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 12.8882% $82,817.34 $190,156.98 $410,397.39 $848,582.02 Q3 10.8746% $67,820.57 $147,855.41 $301,011.00 $583,235.22 Difference -2.0136% ($14,956.77) ($ 42,301.57) ($ 109,386.39) ($ 265,346.80) 2010 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 11.3194% $70,792.82 $156,020.83 $321,542.12 $631,570.31 Q3 9.0629% $57,359.89 $120,045.72 $233,431.60 $429,717.73 Difference -2.2565% ($13,432.93) ($ 35,975.11) ($ 88,110.52) ($ 201,852.58) 2011 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 11.0573% $69,020.03 $151,137.06 $309,226.75 $602,488.89 Q3 8.3983% $54,094.82 $111,678.09 $213,866.13 $387,051.38 Difference -2.6590% ($14,925.21) ($ 39,458.97) ($ 95,360.62) ($ 215,437.51) 2012 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 11.3342% $70,894.80 $156,302.99 $322,256.82 $633,266.39 Q3 7.9611% $52,091.81 $106,622.44 $202,231.19 $362,100.92 Difference -3.3731% ($18,802.99) ($ 49,680.55) ($ 120,025.63) ($ 271,165.47) 2013 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 10.0768% $62,908.74 $134,612.77 $268,361.34 $507,942.33 Q3 6.1444% $44,837.55 $ 88,828.93 $162,473.94 $279,438.99 Difference -3.9324% ($18,071.19) ($ 45,783.84) ($ 105,887.40) ($ 228,503.34) 2014 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 4.3849% $39,170.40 $ 75,523.24 $134,060.28 $223,109.02 Q3 -0.0829% $27,668.78 $ 50,273.02 $ 83,687.16 $130,019.77 Difference -4.4678% ($11,501.62) ($ 25,250.22) ($ 50,373.12) ($ 93,089.45) 2015 Start Quarter Growth Rate 20 year Value 25 year Value 30 year Value 35 year Value Q2 -5.5230% $21,424.38 $ 37,624.45 $ 60,433.49 $ 90,530.88 Q3 -9.7270% $17,664.10 $ 30,381.94 $ 47,773.74 $ 70,100.49 Difference -4.4678% ($ 3,760.28) ($ 7,242.51) ($ 12,659.75) ($ 20,430.39) With apologies to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor’s Authority for paraphrasing their slogan, What happens in the “Real World”, happens.