Tag Archives: yahoo

VWO: Is Now The Time To Add Emerging Market Exposure To Your Retirement Portfolio?

Summary Investing for retirement can be as simple or as complex as you want to make it. One well diversified global ETF with a low expense ratio is a good start. Given the relative under-performance of emerging markets over the last five years, now might be a good time to add exposure to emerging market equities to your retirement portfolio. This article reviews VWO, an ETF that can be added to the core portion of most investors’ portfolios to increase exposure to emerging market equities. Simply Investing – Philosophy Keep investing simple, consistent, diversified and low cost and you will significantly increase your chance of success. One well diversified global ETF with a low expense ratio is all that is required for many people starting to invest in equities, and an ETF that meets these criteria is the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (NYSEARCA: VT ). As an investor’s experience, time dedicated to investing activities and desired risk, increases, many investors add ETFs to the core of their portfolio to gain exposure to new areas or increase exposure to areas that the investor believes will outperform. The next step for many investors is to allocate a percentage of their portfolio to “edge” positions, which offer additional risk and opportunity. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VWO ) This article reviews VWO, an ETF that can be added effectively to the core portion of most investors’ portfolios to increase exposure to emerging market equities. VWO – Investment Synopsis VWO’s objective is to closely track the return of the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Transition Index. VWO invests in stocks of companies located in emerging markets around the world, such as China, Brazil, Taiwan, and South Africa. VWO has high potential for growth, but also high risk. VWO is only appropriate for long-term goals and a small proportion of an investor’s retirement portfolio. VWO performance compared to the S&P 500 (click to enlarge) Source: Yahoo Finance (12/7/2015) As the chart above shows, the S&P 500 has significantly outperformed VWO over the last five years. There are a number of reasons for this including the relative strength of the U.S. economy and the U.S. dollar compared to emerging market economies and currencies. While the out-performance of the U.S. market may continue for some time, after such an extreme period of under-performance by emerging market stocks, now might be a good time to start building or add to a core position in emerging market stocks in anticipation that this under-performance will, at some point, at least partially reverse itself. VWO -Equity Characteristics Source: Vanguard (as of 10/31/2015) As the table above indicates, VWO is well diversified, holding 2,560 stocks. The median market cap is large at $14.9 billion. VWO’s current price/earnings ratio at 16.0 is high compared to historical levels but quite a bit lower than that of the U.S. market as emerging markets have underperformed the U.S. market for several years, as shown in the previous chart. VWO – Top 10 Holdings Source: Vanguard (as of 10/31/2015) VWO’s top ten holdings are very large companies and at 18.1% of total net assets, make up a fairly large proportion of the total holdings. VWO – Country Diversification Source: Vanguard (as of 10/31/2015) Chinese and Taiwanese companies together make up 42.5% of the holdings of VWO. Some investors may not want to concentrate their emerging market exposure in these two countries. Expenses and dividend yield VWO’s expense ratio is 0.15%, this is well below the average expense ratio of similar funds at 1.53%. Given the relatively high price of the global equity markets today and particularly the U.S. markets, it is likely that future returns, at least for U.S. markets, may be lower than those recently experienced. In this environment, it is important that the core of your portfolio is allocated to funds with low expense ratios like VWO. VWO’s forward looking dividend yield is 3.23% based on the last four quarters distributions. Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund and ETF moves to transition index One further consideration for potential investors in VWO is that on November 2, 2015, VWO began tracking a new FTSE transition index that over time will build exposure to small-capitalization stocks and China A-shares. The transition index will be used for approximately one year to reduce the costs associated with trading large amounts of securities in a short period. The fund will sell large-cap and mid-cap stocks on a monthly basis while proportionally adding exposure in China A-shares and small-cap ex China A-shares based on each security’s weight in the index. At the end of the transition period, the fund will begin tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. Given this recent change and we are in the midst of a transition period, VWO may not be an appropriate investment for all investors looking for emerging market exposure. Other Emerging Market ETFs Above is a list of the top 10 emerging market ETFs, listed by assets under management (AUM). For those that want to do further research, additional detail on these ETFs is available on Seeking Alpha’s ETF Hub. Conclusion Your chance of long term investment success increases significantly by keeping your investing simple, consistent and well diversified. Most investors would benefit by building a core position in a well diversified global ETF with a low expense ratio like Vanguard Total World Stock ETF . After establishing this core position, well diversified, low cost, emerging market ETFs like VWO can increase your exposure to emerging markets for those investors looking to do so.

Dynamic Asset Allocation

Identifying the right asset classes and proportions to diversify is difficult for an investor. The scientific methods for diversification, namely Markowitz’s Mean Variance Optimization have not been practically applicable. Investing in all asset classes evenly at all times will reduce risk but lower returns too. A diversification strategy that reduces exposure to asset classes trending down long term has historically outperformed the stock market both in terms of overall return and volatility. Diversification is widely accepted as the most important aspect in building a portfolio. For investors looking to accomplish their long term financial goals, diversification helps reduce risks and volatility as market and economy go through various expansion, contraction cycles. However the specifications on how much to diversify and in what asset classes are often vague and left to the judgment of an individual investor. There aren’t many established or prevalent public tools that would take investor characteristics as an input (for example risk tolerance, time horizon etc.) and output a recommended model portfolio. A recommended portfolio that provides a list of specific asset classes (mutual funds, ETFs or stocks) and propose percentage weights for investor to review and consider as a starting point. Further, the primary goal for diversification is looked at as risk minimization or reduced volatility in your portfolio. That comes at a cost since lower risk leads to lower return. Could diversification lead to lower risk and yet outperform the market in terms of returns? This article proposes a diversification strategy that has historically outperformed the market, with lower drawdowns and can be used by investors to build a long term asset allocation strategy. Background: Let’s start with understanding the history and state of financial theory on diversification. Harry Markowitz’s Mean Variance Optimization (MVO) method developed in 1952 forms the core backbone of financial theory on diversification. The core insight of Markowitz’s work was that by combining assets that are negatively correlated (i.e. they typically move in different directions) one can reduce the overall volatility of a portfolio without impacting the expected return. Markowitz provided a mathematical algorithm that can use this insight to generate the ideal portfolio (named as Markowitz Efficient Portfolio ) with lowest risk/volatility possible. This was a powerful algorithm and Markowitz rightfully won a Nobel Prize in 1990 for it. Unfortunately even though this was a powerful algorithm, it has not turned out to be practically applicable (Reference papers: 1 , 2 , 3 ). It entails complicated mathematics sensitive to minor changes in the input and requires accurate future forecast on potential assets. Historical returns are very poor forecasts. Variations of Markowitz’s algorithm like Black Litterman model have been proposed to overcome these limitations, however even these require sophisticated inputs (like asset market weightings, volatilities and correlations) that may not be easy to provide for by an average investor. Diversification Strategy Options: To build a model that is simple to understand, compute and specific in terms of output recommendations, we start with Markowitz’s key insight: incorporate assets that are negatively correlated in a portfolio. However correlation between two assets can change over time and rather quickly so we don’t want to assume future correlation will be same as past. Instead we incorporate asset classes that have the potential to have negative future correlation. Thus we include assets in the portfolio that are fundamentally or significantly different from each other. To illustrate this with an example, let’s start with Stocks, Gold and Bonds as three available asset classes that are fairly different from each other. Let’s pick a mutual fund or index from each of these to start with diversification in asset class itself and not be exposed to individual stock risk. I picked the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (MUTF: VFINX ), the V anguard Long Term Investment Grade Fund (MUTF: VWESX ) and the Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (MUTF: FKRCX ) to represent stocks, bond and gold in this test portfolio. We could have picked ETFs like the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF ( SPY), the SPDR Gold Trust ETF ( GLD) and the i Shares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF ( TLT) but those have historical data only since 2002. Using VFINX, VWESX and FKRCX as proxies for stock, bond and gold allowed me to back test on historical data going all the way back to 1985 from Yahoo Finance. The simplest diversification without making any future assumptions on expected returns would be to allocate equal one third percentage to each asset class. How would this constant equally diversified portfolio would have worked as compared to staying 100% invested in stocks? Overall, stocks would have generated better returns but they’d have also seen larger volatility as seen in the higher drawdown in table below. The graph below shows how the two portfolios would have grown and the table shows annualized return and drawdown numbers for the duration. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Looking at the above numbers, a simple strategy of equal breakdown across multiple asset classes provided a good start for reasonable growth and yet lower drawdowns. However, could we have generated better returns than being in stocks alone? We can take advantage of being in an asset class rather than an individual stock. Individual stocks can go through wild up and down swings, but asset classes do show longer bull – bear trend. For example, the graph below shows that “Gold – Precious metal equities” have been a 4 year long bear market since 2011. Similarly U.S. stocks went through 2-3 year bear market in 2000 and 2008. (click to enlarge) One improvement that we can make in our diversification strategy is to exclude any asset class that is in its longer term bear market and equally invest in all other asset classes. An asset class can be marked in bear market if its 52 week return is less than -2%. We could use any other indicator too like simple moving average or 52 week minima drop. They will all work. The important thing is to classify it as a bear and exit or reduce your sizing in that asset class. Any heuristic that improves the accuracy of classifying an asset class is in bear market will improve the strategy further. In our proposed dynamic allocation strategy we simply reduce allocation to zero on an asset class which has lost more than 2% over the last one year. All other assets are held in equal proportions to make up 100% of portfolio and balanced weekly. For simplicity we have assumed balancing weekly has zero costs, in reality transaction costs may necessitate balancing over a longer time period like 1 or 3 months. Back testing this strategy on historical data since 1984 returns an annual return of 11.87% with an average drawdown of 3.73%. The worst case drop from a 52 week high was 31.35%. So an outperformance both in terms of returns as well as lower volatility. (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Conclusion: Investors who manage their portfolio on their own, can use the learning above to build their own long term portfolio management strategy. They can extend the above proposed strategy to cover a comprehensive set of asset classes to include all major sectors like real estate, commodities etc. as well as international economies. Including more asset classes should help reduce risk but too many asset classes will decrease the overall return. Investors can try a variations where instead of equal allocation across all asset classes, sectors that are booming have higher weighted allocation versus sectors that are underperforming. Catching a long term bull market in an asset class and over indexing on those asset classes is likely to help improve returns. They can adjust the maximum level of weighting in a single asset class based on their risk tolerance to limit over exposure in a single asset class. Investor can thus build their own diversified portfolio, test its historical performance on returns and drawdown and thus be equipped to make smarter investing decisions for the long term. Disclaimer: The author does not have any holdings in the mutual funds (VFINX, VWESX and FKRCX) used to test described diversification strategy. These funds have been used only for illustrative purpose and the author is not making any recommendations to buy them. We use a proprietary asset allocation technique across global stocks, bonds, commodities, commodities stocks, mutual funds, ETFs and other investment options in our portfolio.

An Interest Hike Doesn’t Mean That Gold Price Must Crash

Summary The Fed chairwoman Janet Yellen stated that the U.S. economy is strong enough for the Fed to start raising the benchmark interest rate. The pace of the U.S. GDP growth and the inflation rate don’t indicate that there is any need to raise the interest rate. Any interest rate hike will be probably only symbolical and it won’t be followed by another interest rate hike anytime soon. History shows that gold and GLD prices often react on the interest rate changes in contrary to the theory and general expectations. Gold price has been in a strong downtrend for the last couple of weeks. The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) reached a new multi-year low, just shy of the $100 level. It represents a more than 10% decline since the middle of October. The decline was driven by increased expectations that the Fed will raise the key interest rate as soon as in December. The probability was further supported by a very strong October job report . Although the November data are a little weaker and some of the economists, including Peter Schiff claim that the state of the U.S. economy is worse than the numbers show, statements of the Fed representatives still indicate that the interest rate may be hiked this month. According to Janet Yellen, chairwoman of the Fed, the U.S. economy is strong enough for the Fed to start raising the benchmark interest rate. Is an interest rate hike needed? The probability of a December interest rate hike is high, although I don’t see any good reason why to raise it. Yellen explained why the Fed wants to raise the interest rate when she stated : Were the FOMC to delay the start for too long, we would likely end up having to tighten policy relatively abruptly to keep the economy from overshooting. Such an abrupt tightening would risk disrupting financial markets and perhaps even inadvertently push the economy into a recession. Yes, the reason is good. The above-mentioned statement makes sense. But the officially-presented data don’t indicate any risk of an overshooting anytime soon. The annual pace of the GDP growth rate is only slightly above 2% and the inflation rate is at 0.2%! Actually, the deflation is much more probable than overheating of the economy, according to the official data. There are a lot of discussions about the accuracy of the officially-presented data. For example, according to John Williams and his website Shadowstats.com , the current inflation rate is close to the 4% level using the 1990 methodology, and it is around 7.5% using the 1980 methodology. In this case, we can start to speak about overheating of the economy. It really seems that the Fed publicly presents one set of macroeconomic data and it makes policy decisions based on another one. (click to enlarge) Source: Trading Economics Moreover, raising the interest rate too much may damage the U.S. economy. The strong USD already has a negative impact on the U.S. exporters. It may also damage the foreign economies, as a lot of the companies around the world have big USD-denominated debts, and they are dependent on revenues denominated in other currencies. As the value of these currencies falls, the companies will have more and more problems with the debt service. There are a lot of reasons why to expect that if there is any interest rate hike this December, it will be only symbolical and it will probably take quite a lot of time before another hike will occur. There are various economists who have the same opinion and they don’t see any good reason to increase the interest rate right now. One of them is Peter Schiff who expects that the Fed will leave the interest rate unchanged or it will raise it by 0.25%. He assumes that both of the outcomes will be positive for gold, as the markets have already factored in substantially more than a 0.25% interest rate growth. How did GLD share price react in the past? Although theory says that GLD price should decline after an interest rate hike and it should grow after an interest rate cut, history shows that this anticipation is often wrong. The financial markets always try to predict the future development, and the interest rate change is often reflected by the asset prices before the rate change itself is officially announced. And if there was a strong trend before the rate change, the trend may get disrupted for some time, although it tends to resume after the dust settles down. 22 interest changes occurred since the inception of GLD. In 12 cases, the interest rate was increased and in 10 cases it was decreased. The table below shows the development of GLD share price 20, 10 and 5 trading days before the rate change and 5, 10 and 20 days after the rate change. It is interesting that on average, GLD price grew before the interest rate change and it was in a slight decline 5 and 10 trading days after the rate change. But 20 trading days after the rate change, it was back in green numbers. Only in 4 out of 12 cases (33.33%), the GLD price recorded any losses 20 trading days after the interest rate hike. It declined by 4.73% on average. On the other hand, in 66.66% of cases, the GLD price recorded gains (5.08% on average). In 4 cases (33.33%), the GLD price just kept on growing, without any reaction on the interest rate hike. After the Fed started to cut the interest rates, GLD was down in 50% of the cases after 20 trading days. After the interest rate cuts on March 18, 2008, October 8, 2008 and December 16, 2008, a strong growth trend turned into a steep decline. It shows that GLD often reacts contrary to the theory not only after interest rate hikes but also after interest rate cuts. (click to enlarge) Source: own processing, using data of Yahoo Finance and the Fed Conclusion If the Fed hikes the interest rate during its meeting on December 15/16, it doesn’t mean that gold and GLD prices must crash. The official macroeconomic data don’t indicate that the U.S. economy should start to overheat anytime soon; moreover, a too strong USD may hurt not only the U.S. economy. Any rate hike will be only symbolical and it will probably take a long time before another one will occur. The markets may actually welcome that the more than a year long saga is finally over, and the GLD price may react positively. As the not-so-distant history shows, it wouldn’t be the first time when GLD price grows after an interest rate hike. Adding to it the problems the gold miners have to face at the current gold prices and the high demand for physical gold, GLD presents an interesting contrarian opportunity.