Tag Archives: xle

Lipper U.S. Fund Flows: Risk-On Despite Uncertainties

By Tom Roseen During the fund-flows week ended October 21, 2015, investors pushed the markets back and forth without strong conviction either way. Third quarter earnings news was hit and miss, with growth fears at the back of investors’ minds. Mixed economic reports kept many on the sidelines, with the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book and the October Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index magnifying fears about the economic recovery. Offsetting those worries during the week, the number people applying for first-time jobless benefits fell for the most recent week, coming in below expectations. Gains in defensive sectors during the flows week helped prop up the major indices to highs not seen since August, sending them to their third straight week (Friday to Friday) of gains. The Shanghai composite posted a 6.5% weekly return as some investors looked to Beijing to continue to provide more stimuli to the Chinese economy. Nonetheless, expectations of a slowing global economy kept oil prices in the cellar. On Monday, October 19, global markets reacted cautiously to news that Chinese economic growth slowed to 6.9% for Q3, beating expectations but missing Beijing’s target. The reported slowdown in fixed-asset investments and industrial production weighed heavily on the price of oil, pushing it down to $45.89 per barrel. This sharp decline pressured oil stocks as well. Despite reports coming out during the latter portion of the flows week of a jump in home builder confidence in October and housing starts being near eight-year highs, mixed corporate results, China’s slowing growth, the EIA’s report of a big jump in crude oil supplies, and the Fed’s inaction kept some investors wary. Nonetheless, investors were net purchases of fund assets (including those of conventional funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), injecting a net $6.3 billion for the fund-flows week ended October 21, 2015. Investors turned their back on money market funds, redeeming $2.6 billion for the week, but they were net purchasers of the other three fund macro-groups, injecting some $4.4 billion into taxable bond funds, $4.3 billion into equity funds, and $0.2 billion into municipal bond funds for the week. For the second week in a row equity ETFs witnessed net inflows, taking in $4.5 billion. Despite continued concerns about the Q3 earnings season, authorized participants (APs) were net purchasers of domestic equity ETFs (+$3.2 billion), injecting money into the group for a second consecutive week. They also padded the coffers of nondomestic equity ETFs (to the tune of +$1.3 billion) for the sixth week running. As a result of the relative increase in risk-seeking behavior at the beginning of the week, APs turned their attention to a broad spectrum of domestic equity offerings, with the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA: IWM ) (+$0.6 billion), the SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (NYSEARCA: MDY ) (+$0.4 billion), and surprisingly-given the slide in oil prices for the week – the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLE ) (+$0.4 billion) attracting the largest amounts of net new money of all individual domestic equity ETFs. At the other end of the spectrum the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) (-$424 million) experienced the largest net redemptions, while the Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLI ) (-$423 billion) suffered the second largest redemptions for the week. Once again, in contrast to equity ETF investors, for the fourth week in a row conventional fund (ex-ETF) investors were net redeemers of equity funds, redeeming $0.2 billion from the group. Domestic equity funds, handing back $0.8 billion, witnessed their fourth consecutive week of net outflows. Meanwhile, their nondomestic equity fund counterparts witnessed $646 million of net inflows-attracting money for the first week in four. On the domestic side investors lightened up on equity income funds and real estate funds, redeeming a net $0.9 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively, for the week. On the nondomestic side international equity funds witnessed $0.6 billion of net inflows, while emerging market equity funds handed back some $187 million. For the second consecutive week taxable bond funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net inflows, taking in a little less than $2.3 billion for the week, for their second largest weekly inflows since the week ended May 20, 2015. Corporate investment-grade debt funds suffered the largest redemptions for the week, witnessing net outflows of $0.8 billion (for their thirteenth consecutive week of redemptions), while corporate high-yield funds attracted the largest net new money for the week, taking in $2.3 million (their third largest weekly net inflows on record). For the third week in a row municipal bond funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net inflows, taking in $148 million this past week.

XLE: Energy Stocks Still Overvalued Relative To The Oil Price

Oil may find a bottom this fall at $35-$40 — but that doesn’t mean oil stocks will find a bottom. The XLE energy stock ETF remains highly inflated, as compared with the oil price. Oil and the broader stock market have been trading together since volatility spiked in August. If the S&P 500 goes down another leg to the 1680 range this fall, XLE will fall even farther than the S&P and the oil price will. Don’t buy oil stocks yet — in fact, consider shorting XLE. Ever since the oil price crashed in the fall of 2014, investors have been trying to call a bottom and find an opportunity to invest in the energy sector at bargain values. But so far, the market has frustrated would-be value investors in energy, as the oil price and energy stocks of all types have continued to fall farther and farther. The low to date was reached in the market selloff of August 24-25, when WTIC oil settled at $38.22 and the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLE ) fell to $59.22. Some investors are now hopeful that these prices were the bottom that they have been waiting for, and they think now is finally the time to buy energy stocks and make big profits on the oil price rebound in the coming years. I believe they are half right, but unfortunately it is not the most profitable half. The oil price itself was probably very close to the bottom when it fell into the $37-$40 range for a few days, below $40 for the first time since February 2009. But the large-cap and mid-cap energy stocks in XLE probably have a lot farther to fall. XLE was in the low $40s in February 2009, and it could fall another 33% from its current price before it reaches that level again. The point is that large-cap and mid-cap energy stock prices are influenced both by the oil price and by the performance of the broader stock market in general. Their prices were very low in February 2009 because the oil price and all stock prices were very low. Their prices held up relatively quite well from fall 2014 through spring 2015 because the whole stock market was holding up well then. Investors had confidence that the big oil companies would ride out the oil price drop and continue to prosper along with the entire economy when oil prices recovered. But since the return of volatility in all markets since August, oil stocks no longer have the assurance of the broader market to fall back on. Stocks have dropped decisively from their highs earlier in 2015, and the technical charts point to further declines coming this fall, which of course is a historically weak seasonal period for stocks. Numerous technical indicators signal that if the S&P 500 cannot hold support in the 1820-1867 range, a drop all the way to 1680 is the next likely step down. Moreover, in the current period of volatility, stocks and oil are trading together. When one goes down, so does the other. A bearish market trend and linkage of stocks and oil is very, very bad news for the energy stocks in XLE. One chart shows clearly how much more room XLE has to fall: (click to enlarge) This chart shows the ratio of the share price of XLE to the actual price of WTIC oil, over the entire history of XLE as an ETF, from 1999 to the present. Notice how elevated the XLE price remains today, as compared with the oil price. The ratio has retreated from its all-time highs earlier this year, but it still remains very high compared to most of the past decade and a half. If the broader stock market takes another turn for the worse, this charts shows that XLE has plenty of room to fall along with it, even after the oil price itself nears a bottom and stops falling so steeply. Notice in the chart that until last year, the XLE:$WTIC ratio normally stayed in a range from 0.6 to 0.8. With all stocks in a downward trend, there is no particular reason to expect that XLE will stay elevated above that range, and every reason to expect the likelihood of XLE returning to that range. For example, if the oil price settles at $40 and the XLE:WTIC ratio even returns to the top of the old range at 0.8, that would mean an XLE share price of $32, almost a 50% drop from its current price. If the oil price settles at $35 and the ratio falls to the bottom of the old range at 0.6, that would mean an XLE share price of $21, a 66% drop from its current price. I am not predicting that XLE will crash to $21 or even $32 this fall. I am just pointing out that it is well within the realm of reasonable possibility and would not represent an extreme change in the historical performance of XLE relative to the oil price. More likely is a decline to the low $40s or high $30s this fall, the range that XLE fell to in the crash of 2008-2009. The overall stock market would not have to crash 2008-style for XLE energy stocks to fall to those levels. The process will look very different because in 2008, stocks crashed first and then the oil price dropped, whereas this time the oil price dropped first and stocks are falling later. Actions to take: First of all, don’t buy oil stocks yet! The knife is still falling. More aggressive investors can consider shorting XLE. As a hedge, investors can short XLE and buy The United States Oil ETF, LP ( USO) to play a decline in the XLE:$WTIC ratio.

Consider Adding Some CRAK To Your Portfolio.

Summary The Market Vectors Oil Refiners ETF launched this week is a compelling play in the energy sector. I conduct a review of the ETF itself and the opportunities & risks associated with the ETF. I believe CRAK is worth considering because of its strong performance in comparison to other energy segments. In this article, I will be reviewing the new Market Vectors Oil Refiners ETF (Pending: CRAK ), which launched yesterday. I believe investors should consider adding some CRAK to their portfolio because the refiners have been the lone bright spot over the last year when oil prices have collapsed. The following chart from the CRAK fund profile page shows that refining and marketing stocks are the only sub-segment of the energy sector (NYSEARCA: XLE ), which has posted a positive return over the last year. Crack Spread One of the most important things to consider when looking at refining stocks is to look at the crack spread. The crack spread is the difference between the cost purchasing the crude oil and the price of the products that the crude oil is refined or “cracked” into. I created the following chart using the ThinkorSwim platform that has the crack spread plotted over the last two years, as well as the performance of Valero (NYSE: VLO ), which is one of the largest holdings in CRAK. The chart shows that over the last two years Valero’s performance [Blue Line] has been highly correlated to the crack spread. (click to enlarge) [Chart from ThinkorSwim Platform] Opportunity The opportunity for refining stocks is promising because crack spreads are higher than a year ago, which will show up in the form of year/year earnings growth. In a troubled energy environment where oil companies/drillers etc cannot earnings, the refiners stand out above other energy segments. Using Valero as an example, you can see in the chart below for the last four quarters, EPS has been trending upward, even as oil prices had fallen to near $40, went back to $60 and are now back at $40. As long as the crack spread remains somewhat stable at these elevated levels, the refiners will continue to outperform the rest of the energy sector. (click to enlarge) Risks The primary risk of CRAK is that it is highly concentrated within its top 10 holdings. The top 10 holdings account for nearly 65% of the portfolio, therefore when considering CRAK investors should be comfortable with this fact and the underlying companies that are in the top 10 holdings. Second, another item to watch for is currency risk. As the following chart from the portfolio analytics section of the CRAK fund page shows, CRAK has a large international currency exposure. With nearly 50% of CRAK priced in foreign currencies investors who are also, bullish on the dollar could potentially pair a purchase of CRAK with the small-hedged position in the PowerShares DB USD Bull ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ) or the WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish ETF (NYSEARCA: USDU ) to mitigate the foreign currency risk. Closing Thoughts In closing, because CRAK just launched this week and I believe it should be added to investors watch lists for a period to make sure there is interest in the product. If there is adequate volume and CRAK attracts assets the refiners are a compelling choice when considering investing in energy because they have performed very well during this tough energy environment in comparison to other energy sector segments. Disclaimer: See here . Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Share this article with a colleague