Tag Archives: wisdom

The Right International Dividend ETF Right Now

There have been a few international dividend ETFs that have stood firm, indicating that if investors decide to return to ex-US equities, these funds could become leaders. The WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund is up about two-thirds of a percent over the past three months. Bolstering the case for IHDG for the remainder of 2015 is the potential for the Bank of Japan to add to its already massive monetary stimulus program. By Todd Shriber, ETF Professor As international stocks, both developed and emerging markets, have flailed in recent months, the best that can be said of some international-dividend exchange-traded funds is that these funds have only been less bad than their counterparts that are not dedicated dividend ETFs. The good news is there have been a few international dividend ETFs that have stood firm, indicating that if investors decide to return to ex-U.S. equities in a big way, these funds could become leaders. Put the WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: IHDG ) in the more positive group. The Fund And Her Index The WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund is up about two-thirds of a percent over the past three months. Not a jaw-dropping showing, but still solid when acknowledging the laggard performances turned in by an array of international equity ETFs. IHDG, which has needed just 19 months of trading to rake in over $495 million in assets under management, tracks the WisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Index ( WTIDGH ). That currency-hedged benchmark “is comprised of the top 300 companies from the WisdomTree DEFA Index with the best combined rank of growth and quality factors. The growth factor ranking is based on long-term earnings growth expectations, while the quality factor ranking is based on three year historical averages for return on equity and return on assets,” according to WisdomTree , the fifth-largest U.S. ETF issuer. Speaking of being solid, the WisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Index was WisdomTree’s second-best index during the third quarter. “The WisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Index (Int. Hedged Quality Dividend Growth) was the next best. It’s notable that this Index had an exposure of fewer than 50 basis points to the Energy sector, and it also mitigates exposure to movements of the U.S. dollar versus its underlying mix of 12 currencies,” said WisdomTree in a note out Wednesday . IHDG levers to investors to the theme of growing Japanese dividends. Previously stingy, but cash-rich, Japanese companies are boosting dividends and buybacks at a rapid pace by that country’s historically lethargic standards for shareholder rewards. Switzerland, perhaps the steadiest dividend growth market in continental Europe, is IHDG’s third-largest country. Combined, the U.K., Japan and Switzerland are 43.3 percent of the ETF’s weight. The Fund’s Advantage Though neither IHDG’s currency hedge nor its dividend growth emphasis should imply the ETF is immune from downturns in international markets, it is notable that the fund is up 5.2 percent year-to-date compared to a loss of almost 1.1 percent by the MSCI EAFE Index. Bolstering the case for IHDG for the remainder of 2015 is the potential for the Bank of Japan to add to its already massive monetary stimulus program. “We believe it is possible we will see coordinated action from the BOJ and the fiscal side in November and therefore think that Japan exposures should remain in focus-whether from a sector or broader-based approach,” said WisdomTree. Disclaimer: Neither Benzinga nor its staff recommend that you buy, sell, or hold any security. We do not offer investment advice, personalized or otherwise. Benzinga recommends that you conduct your own due diligence and consult a certified financial professional for personalized advice about your financial situation.

Dollar Sensitivity: The New Style And Size Debate

By Jeremy Schwartz When making investment decisions, many are familiar with making allocation decisions between large and small caps or between growth and value stocks. These decisions to over- or under-weight different segments of the market are what drive relative returns, and depending on your allocation mix, the returns can be quite different. Recently, as a result of the divergence in central bank policies, investors have also had to take views on currency risk, with clear winners and losers. Increasingly, we have seen investors shift away from currency risk in the developed international markets-specifically Europe and Japan-and focus just on the equities through currency-hedged indexes. But what about the currency impact on domestic equities? Currency Factor in U.S. Equities Currency moves are not just important to foreign markets. In the U.S., we have also seen U.S. dollar strength impact stocks that are exposed to sales in foreign markets. It is widely known that a significant percentage of the revenues of U.S. companies in the S&P 500 Index comes from abroad. If the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen, this is likely to provide continued headwind for the companies with meaningful revenue from and business exposure in foreign markets. By contrast, if the U.S. dollar reverses, these firms should benefit. WisdomTree designed two new U.S. equity factor Indexes to help position investors according to their view of the U.S. dollar’s direction. WisdomTree Strong Dollar U.S. Equity Index (WTUSSD) – includes only firms that derive more than 80% of their revenues from the United States. These companies tend to be less impacted by a strong-dollar environment-they aren’t focused on selling their goods and services abroad, and their import costs decrease with the dollar’s rising purchasing power. The Index also tilts weight more heavily toward stocks whose returns have a higher correlation to the returns of the U.S. dollar. WisdomTree Weak Dollar U.S. Equity Index (WTUSWD) – includes only firms that derive at least 40% of their revenues from exports. These firms tend to be more impacted by a strong-dollar environment, as they are focused on selling their goods and services abroad. Similarly, during a weak-dollar period, we’d expect these firms to become more competitive in selling their goods abroad. The Index also tilts weight to stocks whose returns are more negatively correlated (or have a lower correlation) to the returns of the U.S. dollar. Below we compare the since-inception performance of the WisdomTree Dollar Indexes, as well as popular size and style indexes, to get a sense of divergence between factors. Index Performance (click to enlarge) For definitions of indexes in the chart, visit our glossary . Dollar Indexes Divergence: we find the 3.98% divergence between WTUSSD and WTUSWD interesting, especially considering the short-term performance period. Despite that and the fact that analyzing just performance is not a robust statistical analysis, it seems there have been clear winners and losers, with WTUSSD coming out ahead. It is also interesting that the discrepancy is larger than the 2.92% difference between the S&P 500 Growth and S&P 500 Value, leading us to believe that the WisdomTree Dollar Indexes are offering differentiated exposures. Performance Differences between Size Indexes: have been the smallest (at 0.23%) of the indexes shown above. The difference is interesting to us because we often hear that small caps should be impacted less by a strengthening dollar because their revenues are typically more domestically focused. We estimate the weighted average revenue from outside the U.S. at 19% and 38% for the S&P Small Cap 600 and the S&P 500 indexes, respectively. Again, the period is short and there could be other factors driving the returns, but it is something we will continue to monitor. Can the Separation Continue? One of the most important macroeconomic forces impacting the markets have been currency changes motivated by diverging monetary policies. If you believe the U.S. dollar will continue to strengthen over the coming years, as is WisdomTree’s baseline view, this could provide the backdrop for continued divergence among U.S. equities. The degree or speed of the divergence is hard to predict, but we think it will be important to continue monitoring the performance differences for this new factor and look to provide commentary around any continued divergence. Important Risks Related to this Article Investments in currency involve additional special risks, such as credit risk and interest rate fluctuations. Jeremy Schwartz, Director of Research As WisdomTree’s Director of Research, Jeremy Schwartz offers timely ideas and timeless wisdom on a bi-monthly basis. Prior to joining WisdomTree, Jeremy was Professor Jeremy Siegel’s head research assistant and helped with the research and writing of Stocks for the Long Run and The Future for Investors. He is also the co-author of the Financial Analysts Journal paper “What Happened to the Original Stocks in the S&P 500?” and the Wall Street Journal article “The Great American Bond Bubble.”

‘The Wisdom Of Insecurity’ In The Stock Market

Over the past few years, the idea of “passive investing” has increasingly resonated with the general public. Money has rushed out of actively-managed mutual funds and into index funds at a rapid rate. Most recently, the passive investing ethos has grown so strong it now reminds me of some hard-core religions that take an unwaveringly literal interpretation of their founding texts. In the case of passive investing, these founding texts are the “efficient-market hypothesis” (EMH) and “modern portfolio theory” (MPT). Created and developed by ingenious men with noble intentions, these theories put forth wonderful arguments for the wisdom of the crowd and the incredible value of diversification, among others. Like most religious texts, however, the main problems arise in their interpretation and implementation. As Alan W. Watts explains in The Wisdom Of Insecurity , “the common error of ordinary religious practice is to mistake the symbol for reality, to look at the finger pointing the way and then to suck it for comfort rather than follow it.” Investors, too, must think critically about the effectiveness of these theories when it comes to practical application rather than take them literally on blind faith. It pays to remember that blind faith in these sorts of mathematical models leads even nobel prize winners to disastrous results. As my friend Todd Harrison likes to say, ” respect the price action but never defer to it .” Clearly, there is value in understanding and incorporating the ideals of these theories. There is also danger in simply deferring to them because the costs of their shortcomings can, at times, overwhelm the benefits of their wisdom. Like the Long-Term Capital boys learned, as soon as you really need to lean on them they vanish like a cheap magic trick. Where these theories go wrong in their practical application is that they both assume there are only rational participants in the markets. While the crowd may be right most of the time, there are clearly times when the crowd is not rational (note the preponderance of manias throughout the history of finance). In fact, the proprietors of these models have acknowledged this Achilles’ heel themselves. The most successful professional investors like Warren Buffett, Paul Tudor Jones, John Templeton, George Soros and Jim Rogers, know this well. Their methodologies are even built upon the idea that an intelligent investor can get ahead by taking advantage of those times the crowd becomes irrational, the antithesis of the EMH and MPT. So saying you believe in passive investing is fine and, in fact, I’ll grant it’s better than most of the alternatives. It will work great most of the time. But know that, just like some fanatics deny evidence that disproves the idea that cavemen and dinosaurs coexisted, you are denying the overwhelming evidence that suggests its foundations are simply not to be relied upon during those rare times when market participants abandon rational thought for panic or euphoria. Make no mistake, those selling this idea of passive investing are selling a very good product. I firmly believe it’s a large step above most of the alternatives out there, more so in the case of those selling it at a minimal cost . But I fear investors are also being sold a false sense of security today. I believe investors passively buying equities today are doing so under one of two false assumptions. They either believe that future returns will look something like they have over the past 40 years or that because the market is totally efficient it’s currently priced to deliver risk-adjusted returns that are acceptable given the current low-yield environment. The first assumption is something I have called the ” single greatest mistake investors make ” and it’s a trap even the Federal Reserve admits it regularly falls into. The second assumption runs into the problem of the evidence which suggests there is a very good likelihood returns from current prices will be sub-par , if not sub-zero over the next decade. And the reason returns are likely to be poor going forward is investors have pushed prices to levels that nearly guarantee it. In my view, passive investors have irrationally relied upon the idea that the market is rational, and therefore attractively priced, in pouring money into equity index funds, sending equity values to heights never before seen (on median valuations) virtually guaranteeing themselves they’ll be disappointed. Just because the future of the stock market is bleak doesn’t mean investors should ignore these facts or have them withheld from them. Ignorance may be bliss but it is not a valid investment methodology. Those with a religious sort of belief in passive investing and its main tenets need not abandon it to acknowledge its limitations. In fact, a little insecurity would go a long way for the growing hoard of passive investors in today’s market.