Tag Archives: weather

NiSource (NI) Joseph J. Hamrock on Q3 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

NiSource, Inc. (NYSE: NI ) Q3 2015 Earnings Call November 03, 2015 9:00 am ET Executives Randy G. Hulen – Vice President-Investor Relations Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Donald E. Brown – Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer Analysts Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Steven Isaac Fleishman – Wolfe Research LLC Operator Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the NiSource Third Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, today’s conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your first speaker for today, Randy Hulen. You have the floor, sir. Randy G. Hulen – Vice President-Investor Relations Thank you, Andrew, and good morning. On behalf of everyone at NiSource, welcome to our quarterly analyst call. Joining me on the call this morning is Joe Hamrock, Chief Executive Officer and Donald Brown, Chief Financial Officer. As you know, the focus of today’s call is to review NiSource’s financial performance for the third quarter of 2015 as well as to provide an overall business update on the utility operations and our growth drivers. We will then open the call up to your questions. As a reminder, we will be referring to our supplemental slides that are available on the NiSource website. Before getting into the key takeaways for the quarter, I wanted to remind everyone that we successfully completed the separation of Columbia Pipeline Group, July 1. Results for CPG are now classified as discontinued operations. And finally, before turning the call over to Joe, I’d like to remind all of you that some of the statements made on this call will be forward looking. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Information concerning such risks and uncertainties is included in the MD&A and Risk Factors sections of our periodic SEC filings. Having covered all those reminders, I’d like to turn the call over to Joe. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Thanks, Randy. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. Today, we’ll briefly cover our third quarter 2015 results and earnings drivers before discussing specific highlights for several of our utilities. We’ll close with the review of our investment proposition and long-range business plan. And we’ll leave plenty of time for your questions. As you’ll hear throughout today’s call, our results and our look ahead reinforced the strength of our 100% regulated utility business model. During the quarter, we continued our disciplined execution of infrastructure and environmental investments complemented by regulatory initiatives which are providing long-term safety, reliability and environment benefits for our customers and the communities we are privileged to serve. Let’s first highlight a few key takeaways for the quarter on slide 3. Our results were solidly in line with our expectations. The NiSource team delivered net operating earnings of $0.06 per share in the recently completed quarter versus a loss of $0.03 per share in the same period in 2014. In addition to the successful separation of Columbia Pipeline Group, the NiSource team sustained execution of our well-established plan during the quarter. For example on the regulatory front, in Massachusetts, we received a final order from the DPU approving our base rate case settlement. The approved settlement supports our effort to modernize and replace aging pipeline infrastructure to ensure continued safe and reliable service. In addition, we reached a settlement agreement with parties in our Pennsylvania base rate case filed earlier this year and also received final commission approval of a settlement in our Virginia base rate case as well as approval of a five-year extension of our infrastructure modernization program in Virginia. And in Indiana, we filed our first electric base rate case in five years. I’ll provide additional details on these regulatory developments later in today’s call. On the capital investment front across all of our companies, we remain on track with our planned total capital spend of approximately $1.3 billion in 2015. Before turning the call over to Donald to highlight our financial results in more detail, I want to reinforce our 2016 guidance and long-term outlook. As previously announced, we expect to deliver non-GAAP net earnings per share of $1 to $1.10 in 2016 with planned infrastructure enhancement investments of approximately $1.4 billion. And in the years ahead, we remain committed to our annual projected dividend and earnings growth range of 4% to 6%. Now, let me turn the call over to Donald to review our financial results in more detail which are highlighted on page 4 of our supplemental slides. Donald E. Brown – Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer Good morning everyone. As Joe mentioned, we delivered non-GAAP net operating earnings of about $19 million or $0.06 per share which compares to a loss of about $9 million or $0.03 per share in the third quarter of 2014. On an operating earnings basis, NiSource was up about $31 million. As a reminder, these results no longer include the CPG reportable segment financials which are classified as discontinued operations. The continued solid financial performance you see today is driven exclusively by our utility businesses. On a GAAP comparison, our income from continuing operations was about $15 million for the third quarter versus a loss of about $17 million for the same period in 2014. Now, let’s take a closer look at the third quarter operating earnings performance at our two business segments. Our Gas Distribution segment came in at about $22 million compared with $1 million for 2014. Net revenues excluding the impact of trackers were up nearly $19 million, primarily to increases in regulatory and service programs in Ohio, Virginia and Pennsylvania. Operating expenses excluding the impact of trackers decreased about $2 million. Our Electric operations delivered nearly $102 million in operating earnings compared to about $90 million for the prior year period. Net revenues excluding trackers were relatively flat due to increased infrastructure investment revenues offset by lower industrial load. Operating expenses excluding the impact of trackers decreased by about $12 million, primarily due to lower employee and administrative costs. As Joe mentioned, these results are solidly in line with our expectations. Full details of our results are available in our earnings release issued and posted online this morning. Now turning to slide 5, I’d like to briefly touch on our debt and credit profile. Our debt level as of September 30 was about $6.7 billion with a weighted average maturity of approximately 14 years and an interest rate of 5.86%. On the liquidity front, our $1.5 billion revolving credit facility went into effect at separation. And at the end of the third quarter, we maintained net available liquidity of about $1.6 billion. Our credit ratings at the three major agencies are solidly investment grade, something we remain committed to as we continue to execute on our $30 billion in infrastructure investment opportunities. As you can see, the financial foundation for our continued growth as a pure play utility is strong, on track and consistent with our investment proposition. Now, I’ll turn the call back to Joe to discuss a few customer, infrastructure and regulatory highlights across our utilities. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Thanks, Donald. As noted, our teams remain on track with our utility investments. These investments further improve reliability and safety, enhance customer service and reduce emissions, all while generating sustainable long-term shareholder value. Let’s turn to a few highlights from our Gas operations on slide 6. As I mentioned at the start of the call, in early October, the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities approved the settlement that Columbia Gas of Massachusetts reached with parties in its 2015 base rate case. Rates went into effect on November 1 and the approved settlement provides for an annual revenue increase of approximately $33 million, with an additional $3.6 million annual increase expected in November 2016. In August, Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania reached a settlement in its base rate case pending before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The settlement provides for a $28 million increase in annual revenues and notably also includes mechanisms to support the expansion of natural gas service into unserved areas. A commission decision is expected to authorize new rates by the end of this year. Also in August, Columbia Gas of Virginia received final approval of its 2014 base rate case. The Virginia Commission reaffirmed the $25 million annual revenue increase that went into effect in October 2014. The difference between the settled amount and as filed rates is now being refunded to customers following the final order. The order supports continued capital investments by CVA to modernize its system and accommodate customer growth as well as initiatives to enhance safety and reliability. More recently, the Virginia Commission approved a five-year extension of our SAVE program, with our proposed 20% increase in annual investments. As a reminder, the SAVE program is our infrastructure modernization plan in the state. One item worth noting on CVAs modernization plan, in the past few weeks, the team completed all planned cast iron pipe replacement in the state. At NIPSCO Gas, we filed our semi-annual tracker update in August, which provides support for the remaining five years of our seven-year $817 million natural gas system modernization program. This program involves enhancing existing gas infrastructure and extending gas service to rural areas. Before moving on from gas operations, I’d like to say how encouraged we are by our strong performance across the board on the recent J.D. Power natural gas customer satisfaction surveys. In fact, Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania is a J.D. Power award winner for the second year in a row. And Columbia Gas of Virginia was recognized as one of the most improved brands in the nation. They also ranked as a top brand nationally in communications. This strong performance is a demonstration that our ongoing infrastructure programs are designed to benefit customers and that our team of approximately 7,500 employees is focused on the right things, and that’s serving our customers safely and reliably each day. Now, let’s turn to our Electric Operations on slide 7. Consistent with the May 26 settlement NIPSCO reached with the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor and NIPSCO’s largest industrial customers, the company filed a base rate case on October 1 and is expected to file a new seven-year electric infrastructure modernization plan with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission or IURC by early 2016. NIPSCO’s first electric rate case in five years seeks to recover the current costs of generating and distributing power plus ongoing investments which are delivering substantial benefits to customers, including a 40% reduction in the duration of power outages. The request also seeks to create a bill payment assistance program for low income electric customers during the summer cooling season. A decision by the IURC is expected in the third quarter of 2016. NIPSCO’s flue gas desulfurization unit at its Michigan City generating facility is set to be placed in service by the end of the year on schedule and on budget. The approximately $255 million project, supported with cost recovery, improves air quality and helps to ensure NIPSCO’s generation fleet remains in compliance with current environmental regulations. It also helps ensure that NIPSCO can continue offering low-cost reliable and efficient generating capacity for its customers. Progress also continued on two major electric transmission projects designed to enhance region-wide system flexibility and reliability. Right of way acquisition, permitting and substation construction are underway for both projects. These projects involve an investment of approximately $500 million for NIPSCO and are anticipated to be in service by the end of 2018. We believe our investments are paying off for our customers in Northern Indiana, and we saw evidence of that in the recent J.D. Power residential electric customer survey. NIPSCO’s electric overall customer satisfaction index score increased 30 points over 2014 and was among the most improved electric utilities in the Midwest. So as you can see, our teams continue to execute on our well established infrastructure, environmental, customer and regulatory plans. Before turning to your questions, I’d like to reaffirm the value proposition that we believe differentiates NiSource. Following the separation of Columbia Pipeline Group, we are well aligned with our aspiration to be a premier regulated utility company. Our plan represents a best-in-class risk-adjusted total return proposition with continued progress on our $30 billion of long-term 100% regulated utility infrastructure investment opportunities with significant scale across seven states, transparent earnings drivers and constructive regulatory environments. To that end, we’re focused on leading in the areas that matter most in our industry, enhancing value to our customers and communities, stewarding our assets to ensure safe, reliable, affordable and efficient service, engaging and investing in the communities we serve, and ensuring through disciplined execution that we deliver on our financial and other stakeholder commitments. This transparent, sustainable growth is expected to drive enhanced shareholder value well into the future. Thank you all for participating today and for your ongoing interest in and support of NiSource. We look forward to sharing continued updates on our progress. Now, let’s open the call to questions. Andrew? Question-and-Answer Session Operator We’ll begin with a first question from Paul Ridzon from KeyBanc. Your line is open. Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Good morning. How are you? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Good morning, Paul. How are you? Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Fine, thank you. You had a pretty nice swing at the LDC operations. I know it’s on (16:46) new rates, but was there any rate design in there and maybe more fixed cost recovery? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director No, nothing substantial in terms of the shift in the rate design on the LDC side of the business; just continued execution of the investment plan and regulatory cadence across really all of the states with the mix of base rate case outcomes and tracker mechanisms contributing to the revenue side of the equation. And I would add disciplined expense control across the business as well. Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Thank you. And what are you seeing as far as demand from your steel customers and kind of what’s the outlook there for the next 12, 18 months? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, those are as you know very important customers to us, a critical part of the Northwest Indiana economy. And we’ve been very tuned in to the pressure they’ve been under from international trade and have seen signs of moderation in that this year, but still a very flat load profile on the industrial particularly the steel side. It’s important to note that 2014 was a bit of an anomaly in terms of the load from that sector with them depending more on our generation than their own internal generation in that year due to weather conditions and operating conditions. But nonetheless, on a moderate to mid-term basis, we’re off by probably 7% or so on a year-to-date basis on the steel load in Northwest Indiana and we’d expect slow recovery, slow and steady recovery. The other side of that though, Paul, is we’re seeing really strong signs of economic development in other parts of the Northwest Indiana economy that while not completely offsetting the steel issues, certainly provides some stability for us. Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Can you give us a sense of the difference in margin between selling to a steel customer and just selling on the open market? Donald E. Brown – Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer Well the open market these days is pretty flat in the MISO region. So in the short-term view, I’d say that’s not a very favorable equation in general. But I couldn’t give you offhand a difference in the margin between the two and it’s certainly part of the electric rate case that’s filed that’s in front of us for next year. Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Thank you very much. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Thank you, Paul. Have a good day. Paul T. Ridzon – KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. You too. Operator Our next question comes from the line of Andy Levi from Avon Capital. Your line is open. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Hi. Good morning guys. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Good morning Andy. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital I may be the last one, because I just dialed in. So let’s see. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director You’re welcome. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital But just on the (19:35), you mentioned that last year was abnormally high. Was that what, like some co-gen units down or something like that or? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, that’s exactly right. Last winter was the harsh operating conditions in the weather. Some of the industrials were not able to run internal generation, so we served that load and that contributed to an uptick in the 2014 industrial load profile relative to what I would call normal in the prior couple of years. So if you looked at 2015 over versus maybe a three to five year strip of the prior of years, it’s pretty consistent with the prior years in general but off of 2014 because of that. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital So really I guess for that sensitivity, what you’re saying is go back to 2013? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, that’s a good, probably a good representative indicator of what we might see in a quote/unquote normal year. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital So on a – again, I won’t hold you to the exact number but maybe you can give us a ballpark. On normalized basis, any idea where you think industrial sales are down, because of steel or just in general? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, I’d call it relatively flat on a normalized basis right now, and the outlook will be continued relatively flat load from that sector. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Okay, that’s good to hear. And then as far as, so when you file this rate case in Indiana, I guess there won’t be any reason to incorporate in your rate case a lower sales level for industrial or will that be a component of it? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director It’s always a part of any rate case and just in terms of revenue allocation across different customer groups. Keep in mind the test year goes through end of March of this year, 2015, so that’s the load profile. That’s the starting point for the rate case and reflects a little bit of that but doesn’t give you a full picture of the outlook for industrial. So you’ll see a little bit of that in the rate case. A little bit of adjustment for that. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Okay. And then my last question is, obviously since your last call, there have been two acquisitions within the sector that had some unbelievable premiums paid, which was what your stock – basically, if you kind of took the PE ratio, it was almost double, so maybe not quite. But the point being is, just what are your thoughts on that and does that change the dynamics of your thinking going forward? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, yeah. I haven’t seen anything that would double, but that would be interesting. I won’t speculate on M&A, Andy. Certainly we’re watching with interest the recent announcements in our space. But we remain very focused on our plan, which delivers sustained growth through the clearly identified $30 billion of regulated infrastructure investments. And as you know, that’s well supported by our stakeholders. And we’re well capitalized with significant scale to continue to execute on that. So that’s what we’re focused on and we’ll remain focused on that. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Okay, and one more question. Just, you had thrown out a growth rate – or earnings estimates I should say, and a growth rate, when you came off the spin. Any way to categorize kind of how you’re doing relative to plan, just specifically on the rate cases? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, I’d say we’re on plan as we speak, as we look at the 2015 performance year to date. We’re on plan. Lots of puts and takes within the plan, but certainly right about where we would expect to be. Our outlook remains confident around the range we’ve provided for next year as well as the long-term growth rate of 4% to 6% EPS and dividend growth. Andrew Levi – Avon Capital Thank you very much. Thank you, guys. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Thank you. Have a good day. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Charles Fishman from Morningstar. Your line is open. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Good morning. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Good morning, Charles. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research I realize you’re not giving any CapEx forecast beyond 2016, but just in sort of a big picture look – electric, you got Schahfer, Michigan City, will be winding down if not done by 2017. Will the modernization plan you think kick off by then that you’ll still maintain a CapEx spend on the electric side of about $400 million plus per year? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, Charles, that’s a good way to describe it. We’ve always portrayed the electric (24:32) ramping up over time. In the original filing, the original plan, that’s what it reflected. As you know, we’ll file a new plan starting with 2016 investments by the beginning of next year. And you would expect to see that same kind of a ramp rate in that plan as we go forward. We remain very committed to those investments. We think they’re essential. And it will basically fill in, if you think about NIPSCO’s total CapEx profile, it will basically fill in over time as the generation investments ramp down and ramp off. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Yeah, and is that your plan to give like a two-year forecast going out on CapEx so you’ll roll this sometime next year or early next year? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, we haven’t stated that. We haven’t indicated that we’ve put a specific two-year plan in place. But I would say the $1.4 billion that we’ve committed to for 2016 is a good indicator of where we expect to be over the long run with a modest general upward bias to that number. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research And just, I just opened my model and I have rate base growth of around 8% on the Electric side, but I think that’s pre-separation. Is that still a decent number or close number? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Or do you update that? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director In general – you said on the electric side. In general across NiSource, we’re going to run 6% to 8% rate base growth over the long run. And that’ll move a little bit between Electric and Gas. But it’s a good range for both segments. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Okay. I tell you what, I got a couple more but I’ll save them for EEI. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director All right. Look forward to seeing you. Charles J. Fishman – Morningstar Research Thank you. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steve Fleishman from Wolfe Research. Your line is open. Steven Isaac Fleishman – Wolfe Research LLC Yeah, hi. Good morning. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Good morning, Steve. Steven Isaac Fleishman – Wolfe Research LLC Hi. So just on the guidance for 2016, just any color where you think you might be tracking within that range looking ahead? And just, I guess the industrial – Indiana maybe a little pressure. The gas utility is doing really well. Just maybe any high level thoughts on how you’re tracking for looking into next year? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Yeah, that’s a fair question. We’re not yet ready to narrow or revise guidance for next year. So, certainly not in that position yet. And I think you’ve fairly characterized some of the major drivers. If you look at really any given year in our planning horizon, regulatory outcomes are the likely swing factors within the guidance. And so as we look at the electric case at NIPSCO, certainly one of the factors that could move the needle a bit within guidance. But we’re confident in that range and very confident in the kind of the middle of that range. Steven Isaac Fleishman – Wolfe Research LLC Okay. And then going forward, I’m just curious, will you continue to give kind of a one-year forward or two-year forward guidance or it was just kind of because it was the first year of the breakup, i.e., in early 2016 are you going to give a view for 2017 as well? Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director We have not decided that yet. We certainly guided early for 2016 because of the separation, and we thought it was appropriate to come out as we separated NiSource and CPG for both sides to give a good look at the first full year of operations. Whether we’ll look that far out in the future is yet to be determined. Steven Isaac Fleishman – Wolfe Research LLC Okay. Thank you. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director Thank you. Have a good day. Operator Thank you. I’m not seeing any other questioners in the queue at this time, so I’d like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks. Joseph J. Hamrock – President, Chief Executive Officer & Director All right, Andrew, thank you very much. And thank you all again for participating today and for your ongoing interest in NiSource. We certainly look forward to sharing continued updates on our progress, and meeting with you, many of you at EEI next week. So have a great day. Take care. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, thank you again for your participation in today’s conference. This now concludes the program and you may all disconnect your telephone lines at this time. Everyone have a great day.

The Generation Portfolio: Main Street Capital And Williams Companies

Summary This week, I added Williams Companies (WMB) and Main Street Capital (MAIN) to the Generation Portfolio; The nonfarm payroll report on Friday suggested that a rate hike is less likely to occur this year, which helped the rate-sensitive positions in the portfolio and hurt the banks; With earnings season about to start, we should get a better read on the economy and perhaps some more buying opportunities. Background This is the latest addition in a weekly column that I write. The main focus is on a stock portfolio that I manage for others, The Generation Portfolio . I also comment about recent market events and my outlook for the market with reference to the Fed, the global economy and whatever else may impact future share prices. My general theory about the markets is that they have become increasingly herd-like. By that, I mean that the huge growth in index funds is the “elephant in the room” that (to mix analogies) has become to traders like the weather: something that always has an impact but that really can’t be changed. Buy and sell decisions made by index fund holders affect good and bad stocks indiscriminately. Whereas in the past the herd tended to build up speed slowly over time, index funds accelerate waves of buying and selling to daily and, increasingly, intra-day moves that used to take weeks or even months. While I have nothing against index funds, which are perfectly suited to casual investors, their status as a panacea is highly suspect. They are particularly dubious in volatile markets when massive buy and sell orders swamp order desks. This, in my view, has created new opportunities and dangers in the market for the individual, which is to the advantage of nimble investors. Thus, this series focuses on stock-picking, not funds. The Week That Was The week of 28 September 2015 was like the month of April: in like a lion, out like a lamb. The market was down sharply on Monday, serving as an echo of the extreme volatility that has characterized the market since late August. It then stabilized on Tuesday before moving steadily higher for the remainder of the week. The key event was the October jobs report on Friday morning. It missed expectations, and even worse, reduced the jobs for previous months by a total of 59k workers. After a period of volatility, the major averages continued moving higher, closing the week near the highs. Transactions I made the following purchases for the Generation Portfolio this week: Williams Companies (NYSE: WMB ); Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN ). I made those on Monday, then sat tight for the remainder of the week as volatility decreased. Generation Portfolio To Date The Generation Portfolio currently stands as follows. The Generation Portfolio as of 3 October 2015 Stock Purchase Date Purchase Price Recent Price Change Since Purchase WFC 8/25/2015 51.75 51.30 (0.95%) DIS 8/25/2015 98.75 103.00 4.30% BMY 8/25/2015 59.75 62.52 4.30% MFA 8/25/2015 7.05 6.89 (2.27%) OHI 8/31/2015 33.95 35.40 3.86% CVX 9/02/2015 77.90 81.55 4.69% PG 9/03/2015 69.95 72.42 3.53% CYS 9/04/2015 7.68 7.41 (3.52%) KO 9/09/2015 38.50 40.39 4.91% MPW 9/10/2015 10.89 10.99 0.92% WMT 9/10/2015 64.40 64.97 0.85% VTR 9/10/2015 52.80 56.06 6.17% KMI 9/11/2015 29.95 29.60 (1.07%) WPC 9/14/2015 56.75 58.12 2.41% T 9/17/2015 32.50 32.64 0.43% VZ 9/17/2015 44.95 42.90 (4.69%) MMM 9/18/2015 139.90 143.20 2.36% JPM 9/22/2015 60.89 60.75 (0.20%) PX 9/23/2015 101.30 101.41 1.83% VER 9/25/2015 7.87 7.75 (1.27%) WMB 9/28/2015 39.48 41.02 3.90% MAIN 9/28/2015 27.47 27.55 0.98% All prices and percentages are those supplied by the broker (TD Ameritrade) as of the close on Friday, 2 October 2015. Percentages may differ from those suggested by the latest closing prices most likely due to after hours action. A large legacy position in Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F ) and some other legacy positions are not shown. There are 15 positive positions at the moment and 7 negative ones. According to a spreadsheet that I maintain, the Generation Portfolio overall currently is up by between 1-2%. This is similar to last week, though then the market closed on a low and this week it closed on a high. The dividend flow, which is one of the prime aims of the Generation Portfolio, has begun. Dividends Received To Date Stock Date Received Type Amount VTR 9/30/2015 Ordinary 146.00 KO 10/01/2015 Qualified 82.50 TOTAL     228.50 For now, at least, I am receiving the dividends in cash and will reinvest them as they accumulate. Some dividends have accrued but have not yet been paid, such as a large dividend for CYS. They will be accounted for as they reach the account. General Strategy The Generation Portfolio was 100% in cash (save for legacy positions) for about six months after I sold off positions in early 2015. During the period of market turbulence that began in late August 2015, I finally began adding positions. As I discussed in a previous article, I side with those who prefer wide diversification, both between sectors and within them. Given a choice, I would rather own smaller positions of two Quality Stocks (as I define them here ) in a sector rather than place all of my chips on just the leader. Accordingly, the Generation Portfolio is shaping up to have about 40 positions, each with a projected weighting of roughly 2% (though that is just an average). It currently has 22 positions, and all pay dividends. In accordance with the overall objective mentioned above, the overwhelming majority of positions will pay solid, dependable dividends. I like the tax advantages and strong cash flow of REITs and BDCs, so they form a substantial subset of the Generation Portfolio. This will give the Generation Portfolio a certain rate sensitivity, which will be somewhat offset by some bank positions. I have no problem at all about investing in several companies with similar risk profiles as long as there is overall diversification. It’s all about tactics, and bad tactics can ruin the best strategy. Analysis of Holdings There have not been any huge surprises yet, but the volatility of some of the positions has surprised me. After I picked up WMB on Monday, for instance, it went on a crazy ride due to market reaction to it being acquired. At one point during the week, it was down over 10% and was not looking like a particularly good pickup. However, the deal was valued at well over my entry point, and the market seemed to recognize that more and more as the week went by. Fortunately, the position now shows a nice profit. I wrote an article about MAIN this week which summarized my view of the stock. This position also surprised me with the ferocity of its move to the downside. My analysis of the chart, though, suggested that the move lower would be short and sweet, and fortunately it was. This position also showed a gain after being down several percent. The REITs had a fairly good week due to growing agreement that a Fed rate hike in 2015 is unlikely. There are many good reasons for this, which I summarized here , and the week jobs report on Friday added to that consensus. The banks went slightly lower as anticipated, so those two positions to some extent cancelled each other out in terms of volatility. The big winners to date are Ventas, a health care REIT, and Coke. The Coke position is even better due to the dividend already received. The biggest losers are Verizon and Wells Fargo. I’m not concerned about WFC, which is performing fine as a counterweight to the REITs, but VZ needs to pick up the pace should the market continue higher and leave it behind or else it gets sent to the cornfield. General Discussion The market has remained enthralled by what I kindly refer to as rate hysteria. However, earnings season kicks off this week, with PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP ) reporting on Tuesday and Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA ) on Thursday. Next week will see the flood of earnings, so they shouldn’t be a major factor for the time being. So, before the focus really zooms in on earnings, the market may still be transfixed by rates. The FOMC minutes get released on Wednesday afternoon, and the market will probably be somewhat subdued until they are behind us. (click to enlarge) The nonfarm payrolls report released on Friday, at least in my opinion, put the dagger in the heart of the hopes (or fears) that the Fed would begin its rate hike cycle at its meeting later this month. It also severely damaged the view that a rate hike would occur in December. There is no sign of any trend higher in job growth, and in fact, the trend over the past six months has been lower. With inflation remaining quiet and not expected to increase to the Fed’s target of 2% until 2018, it appears unlikely that the Fed would advance its dual mandate of stable prices and full employment by increasing rates now. In fact, doing so would hurt employment by raising the dollar, which would hurt US exports (and thus cost the US jobs) and decrease inflation (by making foreign goods less expensive). A recent Bloomberg article found that opinion is split about when the Fed will raise rates. Economists still think it will happen in December. (click to enlarge) However, as the same article points out, federal funds futures show only a 40% chance of that happening. I said back in February, when many were still expecting a rate hike in March or at the latest June, that all we could say at that time was that it was more likely than not that the Fed would raise rates by the end of 2015. At this point, though, I have to agree with the futures market. The data do not support a rate hike in 2015. Not only is a rate hike unlikely, but the odds of a recession arriving before the end of next year are growing with each weak jobs report. This past week’s report was full of disturbing information disguised by the deceptively low 5.1% official unemployment rate: the number of unemployed persons (7.9 million) remained little changed despite Chair Yellen’s requirement that there be further improvement in the labor market before any rate hike; the number of newly unemployed (less than five weeks) grew; the civilian labor force participation rate fell again, to 62.4%, after holding steady at 62.6% for the previous three months; average hourly earnings were actually down a penny, and the average workweek also was down; the July nonfarm payroll totals were revised down 22k, and August was revised down 37k, suggesting accelerating declines; Average job growth in 2015 so far has been 198k, versus 260k in 2014, a decline of 24%. There was scattered good news in the report – the number of part-time workers forced into that for economic reasons declined – but the report in general was very weak. It would be counterproductive, given all this weakness, for the Fed to raise rates and make it harder for most companies to make money. Since my view is that rates are unlikely to increase any time soon, I feel comfortable maintaining and adding rate-sensitive positions. In general, I am most comfortable with defensive positions that have good brand visibility and pay dividends. The dividends eventually will be plowed back into new positions, in line with my philosophy of treating accounts as businesses requiring both profitability and healthy cash flow. Actionable Ideas I will continue looking for value in Quality Stocks with good defensive attributes. I am eyeing Big Lots (NYSE: BIG ), which I wrote an article about this week and has an oddly high attraction to short sellers. It would have to dip a bit to make it more interesting, though. Some of the stalwarts like General Mills (NYSE: GIS ) also remain on my radar screen, depending upon price action. Conclusion So far, the Generation Portfolio has performed well. It has maintained its value despite the market volatility and begun to produce a healthy cash flow stream. With earnings season right around the corner, the market may finally shift its focus away from the Fed and worries about a rate hike. Earnings should give us a much better view of the real state of the economy, which, from recent data such as the October nonfarm payrolls report, appears to be drifting in slow-growth mode.