Tag Archives: vti

Tactical Asset Allocation – October 2015 Update

There was a lot of volatility in September in the equity markets. So far it looks like the portfolio signals to go to cash have been valid. Of course, that’s only half the battle. We’ll see what October brings, a historically positive month for equities. Here are the tactical asset allocation updates for October 2015. All portfolio updates are online as part of Paul’s GTAA 13 Portfolio New sheet. First, for the basic portfolios – the GTAA5 and the Permanent Portfolio. GTAA5 is now 20% invested, with IEF going to “invested” this month. For the timing version of the Permanent Portfolio there were no changes this month. (click to enlarge) Now for the more aggressive GTAA AGG3 and AGG6 portfolios. This month I’ve decided to show all 13 asset classes so you can really see where they all stand and what kind of year it had been so far. (click to enlarge) No changes this month for AGG3. For AGG6, VCIT went to “invested” this month. Both portfolios are still in full risk management mode. Performance for the portfolios so far this year is in the table below. Numbers are for each month. The figures are estimates taken from a variety of sources. I don’t do detailed performance tracking until the end of the year. (click to enlarge) If you’re a fan of the Antonacci dual momentum GEM and GBM portfolios, no changes from last month. I’ve also made my Antonacci tracking sheet shareable so you can see the portfolio details for yourself. That’s it for this month. These portfolios signals are valid for the whole month of October. As always, post any questions you have in the comments. Full Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should ever be considered advice, research or the invitation to buy or sell securities. These are my personal opinions only. Share this article with a colleague

Ivy Portfolio September Update

The Ivy Portfolio spreadsheet tracks the 10-month moving average signals for two portfolios listed in Mebane Faber’s book The Ivy Portfolio: How to Invest Like the Top Endowments and Avoid Bear Markets . Faber discusses 5, 10, and 20 security portfolios that have trading signals based on long-term moving averages. The Ivy Portfolio spreadsheet tracks both the 5 and 10 ETF Portfolios listed in Faber’s book. When a security is trading below its 10-month simple moving average, the position is listed as “Cash.” When the security is trading above its 10-month simple moving average, the position is listed as “Invested.” The spreadsheet’s signals update once daily (typically in the late evening) using dividend/split adjusted closing price from Yahoo Finance. The 10-month simple moving average is based on the most recent 10 months including the current month’s most recent daily closing price. Even though the signals update daily, it is not an endorsement to check signals daily or trade based on daily updates. It simply gives the spreadsheet more versatility for users to check at his or her leisure. The page also displays the percentage each ETF within the Ivy 10 and Ivy 5 Portfolio is above or below the current 10-month simple moving average, using both adjusted and unadjusted data. If an ETF has paid a dividend or split within the past 10 months, then when comparing the adjusted/unadjusted data you will see differences in the percent an ETF is above/below the 10-month SMA. This could also potentially impact whether an ETF is above or below its 10-month SMA. Regardless of whether you prefer the adjusted or unadjusted data, it is important to remain consistent in your approach. My preference is to use adjusted data when evaluating signals. The current signals based on August 31st’s adjusted closing prices are below. It will probably come as no surprise that this month all ETFs; the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NYSEARCA: BND ), the SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF (NYSEARCA: RWX ), the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: VWO ), the PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking ETF (NYSEARCA: DBC ), the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GSG ), the Vanguard REIT Index ETF (NYSEARCA: VNQ ), Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ), Vanguard Small Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: VB ), Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (NYSEARCA: VEU ), and the iShares TIPS Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TIP ), are below their 10-month moving average. Last month 7 of the 10 were below their respective moving average. The spreadsheet also provides quarterly, half year, and yearly return data courtesy of Finviz. The return data is useful for those interested in overlaying a momentum strategy with the 10-month SMA strategy: (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) I also provide a “Commission-Free” Ivy Portfolio spreadsheet as an added bonus. This document tracks the 10-month moving averages for four different portfolios designed for TD Ameritrade, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Vanguard commission-free ETF offers. Not all ETFs in each portfolio are commission free, as each broker limits the selection of commission-free ETFs and viable ETFs may not exist in each asset class. Other restrictions and limitations may apply depending on each broker. Below are the 10-month moving average signals (using adjusted price data) for the commission-free portfolios: (click to enlarge) (click to enlarge) Disclosures: None.

VTSAX: An Excellent Mutual Fund For Passive Investing

Summary VTSAX offers slightly more diversification than SPY, but it is also slightly more volatile. Because this is a total market fund, it has large weightings for the S&P 500 that create an extremely high correlation. VTSAX is one of the best mutual funds an investor can use for eligible employer-sponsored retirement accounts. Not all plans will offer this fund. VTSAX is the mutual fund version of VTI, which is one of the best total market ETFs available. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk-adjusted returns. Regardless of how they are handling the holdings, the goal is to maximize returns and minimize risks. When it comes to maximizing the returns while maintaining excellent diversification, Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (MUTF: VTSAX ) is an excellent option. My employer-sponsored retirement accounts are through different brokerages. Mine goes through Schwab, and my wife’s account is with Fidelity. Neither of us is eligible to use VTSAX, but I look for funds that replicate VTSAX, because it embodies most of the things I want in a fund. What does VTSAX do? VTSAX uses an indexing approach to track the performance of the CRSP U.S. Total Market Index. The first thing I’m looking for is diversification, so a total market index seems very attractive. Standard deviation of monthly returns (dividend adjusted, measured since January 2001) The standard deviation is not a problem. Because this is a total market index investors should expect it to be a little more volatile than the S&P 500, and that is exactly what we see. (click to enlarge) Basically, the increase in standard deviation is equivalent to having three percent leverage on a position in SPY. I love low-volatility investments, but when using a retirement account with dollar cost averaging automatically involved, a tiny bit of extra volatility is not problematic as long as the investment is very heavily diversified. Expense Ratio The Admiral shares have an expense ratio of .05%. This is excellent. Largest Holdings The diversification is very good in this mutual fund, and this is easily my favorite thing about the fund. The top 10 holdings appear to be somewhat concentrated, but when you consider that there are over 3800 different securities in the total portfolio, it doesn’t concern me. This is simply a great fund, in my opinion. (click to enlarge) Avoiding Fees There is one downside to Vanguard mutual funds. Vanguard charges a $20 annual account service fee for each mutual fund held in the account with a balance of less than $10,000. If you’re picking VTSAX for a new retirement account and want to save the $20, you can sign up on the Vanguard website for electronic delivery of statements. It appears to me that this fee is largely covering the cost of mailing the investments documents through the postal service. With its huge system in place, being able to send everything by one automated e-mail system saves the company money. I don’t see how it could hold its expense ratio down to .05% without having a way to compel investors to either take electronic delivery or pay for the physical copies. All around, this is a nicely designed system. Want VTSAX from Other Brokerages? You can also effectively invest in the fund using the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ), which holds the same assets and has the same expense ratio. Using VTI should automatically avoid the $20 fee and doesn’t require signing up the electronic delivery. The downside about using the ETF is that you would usually be stuck purchasing entire shares. While VTI, shares have been running $107-110; for dollar cost averaging, it is more convenient to be able to buy into a mutual fund with automatic deposits. Conclusion I like VTSAX enough that I’m holding a significant chunk of my portfolio in VTI, the ETF version. Lately, I had been adding to my cash positions rather than my equity positions, because I’m concerned about the market getting a little frothy. Over the last week, I dropped quite a bit of that into buying more broad market ETFs and mREITs when prices dipped. When it comes to long-term investing strategy for the employer-sponsored 401k accounts, my favorite technique is still to use dollar cost averaging on low-fee index funds and to max out (or come close) the contributions every year. If you really want to use VTSAX for your 401k, but are going through Fidelity, I would suggest looking into the Fidelity Spartan® Total Market Index Fund (MUTF: FSTVX ). That is the major mutual fund that I’m using for my wife’s 401k. It has slightly less holdings, with around 3,400 to 3,500 rather than 3,800, but is close enough for my purposes. The correlation between FSTVX and VTSAX is in excess of 99%. Disclosure: I am/we are long VTI, FSTVX. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: Information in this article represents the opinion of the analyst. All statements are represented as opinions, rather than facts, and should not be construed as advice to buy or sell a security. Ratings of “outperform” and “underperform” reflect the analyst’s estimation of a divergence between the market value for a security and the price that would be appropriate given the potential for risks and returns relative to other securities. The analyst does not know your particular objectives for returns or constraints upon investing. All investors are encouraged to do their own research before making any investment decision. Information is regularly obtained from Yahoo Finance, Google Finance, and SEC Database. If Yahoo, Google, or the SEC database contained faulty or old information it could be incorporated into my analysis.