Tag Archives: united-states

Just Energy Group’s (JE) CEO Deborah Merril on Q3 2014 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Just Energy Group Inc. (NYSE: JE ) Q3 2014 Earnings Conference Call February 12, 2015 2:00 PM ET Executives Deborah Merril – President and Co-Chief Executive Officer Patrick McCullough – Chief Financial Officer James Lewis – President and Co-Chief Executive Officer Rebecca MacDonald – Executive Chairman of the Board Analysts Nelson Ng – RBC Capital Markets, LLC Trevor Johnson – National Bank Damir Gunja – TD Securities Operator Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Just Energy Group, Inc. Conference Call to discuss the Third Quarter 2015 Results for the period ended December 31, 2014. At the end of today’s presentation there will be a formal Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the meeting over to Ms. Deb Merril. Deb, go ahead. Deborah Merril Thank you very much. Hi, my name is Deb Merril. I’m the Co-CEO of Just Energy. And I would like to welcome you all to our fiscal 2015 third quarter conference call. I have with me this afternoon Executive Chair, Rebecca MacDonald; my Co-CEO, James Lewis; as well as Pat McCullough, our CFO. Pat and I will discuss the results of the quarter and our expectations for the future. We will then open the call to questions. Before we get going, let me preface the call by telling you that our earnings release and potentially our answers to your questions will contain forward-looking financial information. This information may eventually prove to be inaccurate, so please read the disclaimer regarding such information at the bottom of our press release. Our third quarter showed continued progress in delivering our plan to become the premier world-class retailer of energy management solutions. In order to achieve that vision, significant balance sheet improvement was necessary. Less than a year ago, the company was burdened with more than a $1 billion in debt. We looked at our non-strategic assets and determined that divestiture will provide us the necessary financial flexibility to grow our core business and de-lever the balance sheet. We successfully disposed those businesses and utilized a large portion of the proceeds to bring our debt to $659 million. This is down 34% from a year earlier. We now have a forward pro forma net debt to EBITDA ratio of less than four times and we remain committed to further debt reductions and a lower ratio moving forward. Bringing new value propositions to the market is paramount to our strategy. This quarter, we entered into a comprehensive agreement to address the North American residential solar market. This entry into high growth, high profit solar space requires no CapEx and through our partnership with Clean Power Finance leverages an existing solar fulfillment network across the continent. We are focused on tapping into Just Energy’s unparalleled captive customer base and to leverage our sales and marketing channels. We believe successful execution of our solar strategy will make Just Energy the origination partner of choice in the solar industry. This quarter we will begin test marketing in California and New York. We believe solar has the potential to become a major contributor to the profitability of Just Energy in the near term and is a prime example of the direction Just Energy is taking to become the premier world-class retailer energy management solutions. You can expect us to begin providing further updates on our solar initiative on future calls as our pilot program begins producing tangible results. Overall, we are very pleased with the progress seen in fiscal 2015. We are nine months into our fiscal year and tracking to the high end of the EBITDA guidance that we provided. We believe this progress in performance will provide us with the platform for future growth, specifically double-digit percentage based EBITDA growth in fiscal 2016. Let me now provide some detail on the third quarter results. The quarter continued the trend of very strong customer aggregation. Q3 saw 354,000 additions, 6% more than fiscal 2014, and the third highest total in company history. To-date we have signed 1.1 million customers, 13% ahead of the record pay seen in fiscal 2014. Even more importantly, net customer additions for the quarter were 58,000 up 53% from last year. Year-to-date, net additions are 252,000 up 83% from a year earlier and more than the total added for all of fiscal 2014. Over the past 12 months, our total customer base increased 7% to 4.7 million RCEs. The combined attrition rate for Just Energy was 16% for the trailing 12 months ended December 31, 2014, up 1% from attrition reported in the previous quarter. Consumer attrition at 27% was flat, while commercial attrition at 7% was up 1%. Renewal rates were consistent with those reported in the second quarter. Consumer renewals remain unchanged at 75% and commercial renewals were down 1% to 63% on a trailing 12-month basis. This indicates continued satisfaction with the company’s products and services. Commercial renewals are often subject to competitive bid and will inevitably be more volatile than consumer renewals. Overall, management sees stability and renewals around current levels. Turning now to profitability, the quarter saw lower base EBITDA and cash flow compared to a very strong third quarter and fiscal 2014. This was anticipated in our guidance to the market. Base EBITDA was $50.6 million, down from $62.1 million a year ago. The quarter Base EBITDA was on plan despite $4.5 million in non-recurring legal cost. Year-to-date EBITDA is up 1% with a promising Q4 ahead. We believe our results for the year will be at the upper end of our guidance range of $163 million to $173 million. Let me turn things over to Pat McCullough to talk about the details of the quarter and then I will finish with the discussion of the trends we see in the market for future periods. Patrick McCullough Thank you, Deb. Before diving into the details of a very strong quarter, let me clarify one bit of accounting that I believe could be confusing to many. We reported an IFRS loss of $371 million on continuing operations in the quarter. This loss is entirely due to mark-to-market on our future supply purchases. Future gas and electricity prices declined in the quarter reducing the theoretical value of our positions. I say theoretical, because these positions have all been sold to customers at fixed contract prices. So mark-to-market has no impact on the real value of the position. Over time, we’ve seen wild swings in mark-to-market accounting measures both to the positive and negative. However, these swings have no cash consideration or materiality on our results whatsoever. Let me detail some of the progress towards our financial goals that we’ve seen in the third quarter. Our sales were up 13% reflecting our 7% increase in customers and higher selling prices. Year-to-date sales were up 12%. Our gross margin was up 1% versus fiscal 2014. As Deb noted, we had a very strong comparable quarter with positive reconciliations with the utilities as compared to negative reconciliations this quarter. Year-to-date margins are up 10% in line with our customer growth. This profitability was partly driven by higher new customer margins. We’re able to do this because of our innovative new products that achieved value not only for the customer, but also provide better margins for Just Energy. New commercial customers were signed at $85 annual margin, up from $80 last quarter and $68 a year ago. The higher commercial margin is a conscious decision by management to reduce low margin commercial business and focus on more profitable customer segments. We’ve also benefited from the market exit of a number of smaller low price competitors who are unable to weather the volatility of last winter’s polar vortex. New residential customers were at $191 annually, up from a $160 a year ago. Improved margin per customer has been a focus of management. Higher margin on residential customers is a particularly positive trend as these customers are largely locked into five year contract terms. Our base EBITDA was down compared to a strong third quarter a year ago. Year-to-date EBITDA is up 1%. This was anticipated when we said our guidance for the year and we’re happy to be tracking to the high end of our range despite overcoming $8.5 million in unforeseen legal provisions year-to-date. Administrative cost for the impact of these one-time expenses, they were up 41% year-over-year in the quarter and 27% year-to-date. We have anticipated double-digit growth to fund expansion, previously mentioned non-recurring charges of $8.5 million in legal costs contributed to the year-over-year variance. Selling and marketing expense increased by 17% year-over-year in the quarter compared to the 6% increase in customer additions. Selling cost included amortization of past advances to commercial agents and residual payments to our internet channel. These costs are not associated with customers added during the period. That debt was at the low end of our target range at 2.2% of relevant revenue, an improvement from 2.3%. Our third quarter funds from operations were $21.2 million, down from $37.4 million in fiscal 2014, consistent with our change in EBITDA. Year-to-date funds from operations were $60.5 million down from $71.3 million with our most profitable quarter coming up next. Overall, the third quarter was in line with our expectations and consistent with our guidance. Let me turn it back to Deb to talk about trends for the future. Deborah Merril Thank you, Pat. Through prudent fiscal management as well as a clear strategy for the future, we are in a very solid financial position after nine months of fiscal 2015. Our core business is healthy and growing. We’re generating record numbers of new customers and customer margins continue to improve. We have a leading market position in all our geographic territories. Our experience in marketing expertise allows us to stay in step with the evolving needs of our target customer. As customer awareness and demands change, we are uniquely positioned to rapidly meet the growing need for energy solutions. We will leverage our access to the best technologies and innovative products in the marketplace today to continue to provide value to our growing customer base. We’ve reduced our debt and we’ll continue to improve our balance sheet. We are comfortable with our dividend and anticipate no changes to our policy going forward. Management is committed to delivering our strategy of both building our core business and bring new exciting products to customers. This will allow Just Energy to deliver double-digit growth in fiscal 2016, and ensure the continued success of the company. On behalf of Rebecca, James, Pat and I, we want to thank our employees for their efforts in delivering shareholder value and their commitment to our customers. We’ll now open it up for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Nelson Ng. Nelson, your line is open. Nelson Ng Great, thanks. Congratulations on a strong quarter. Deborah Merril Thank you, Nelson. Patrick McCullough Thank you, Nelson. Nelson Ng First question relates to the Massachusetts settlement in terms of $4.5 million settlement. Has that led to any changes in terms of how you source customers in that stake going forward? James Lewis Nelson, it’s James here. What it allows us to do is continue to focus on bringing value-added product to customers. We wanted to get it behind us, because we believe that Massachusetts and the customer that we have value products and services that we want to deliver from solar and other fixed price products. So it was our decision just to move forward and allow management to focus on bringing value to those customers. Nelson Ng I see, okay. And then the next question is probably for Patrick, but in terms of the debt reduction, I guess, now that you’ve repaid the credit facility, what’s your next focus? And will you be more active in your NCIB regarding the convertible debt? Patrick McCullough Yes, thanks for that question, Nelson. As everyone recognize this, we have a strategy here to improve our financial statements to create a healthy and a strong position to take this business forward. The first move that we’re working on right now is renewing our credit facility, which is going well and we expect to have finalized and closed in the short-term. At that point, we’ll essentially take the cash proceeds that we received from our non-core asset divestitures and be able to utilize those to address things like the long-term debt in the NCIBs that you are referring to. Nelson Ng Okay, thanks. And then just one last question, I want to touch on cash taxes, so they were higher this quarter, I was just wondering whether the – any Just sale contributed to higher taxes, or are you generally expecting higher taxes going forward? Patrick McCullough Yes, let’s talk about the overall tax picture first. As we go forward, we will become a cash tax payer, that will not be happening in the short-term, that will be happening in a year to two-year time period. As you’re aware, we’re doing business in the United States, Canada, and the UK, so we are working to create a tax efficient solution for those jurisdictions. But we will become a moderate cash tax payer, you will see that incorporated as we provide future guidance. As it relates to NHS, I don’t believe, there was a cash tax ramification associated with that, but I will confirm that and get back to you Nelson. Nelson Ng Okay, thank. Those are my questions for now. Deborah Merril Thank you. Operator Our next question comes – oops, my apologies. Patrick McCullough Sorry, this is Pat. Just a follow-up, Nelson. The cash tax reported this period was sales tax. It was not associated with, sorry, state tax, not associated with NHS transaction. Operator Okay. Our next question comes from Damir Gunja. Damir, your line is open. Damir Gunja Thank you. Good afternoon. Just wondering if you can give us a little bit more color elaboration on the double-digit growth expectation for 2016? I guess the – how much of that could be coming from customer growth, or margin expansion, or possibly even a solar contribution? Deborah Merril Yes, I think, it will come from all of those things. It’s – we’ve worked very hard this year to continue to add customers, last year we had a light – relatively light customer net additions, between the net additions this year, as well as the increase in margin that we’re seeing. As we look at 2016, we believe that we’ll be in a place where we can restore that double-digit growth – percentage growth in base EBITDA. So it’s kind of a combination of a lot of things. It’s not only the increase in the customer base, but also the increase in the margins for customers we’re seeing, and we fully expect solar to contribute something in fiscal 2016 as well. So that we’re still in the very early stages of test filing that and really defining our strategy and when we think that money will start really affecting our bottom line. But we’re confident that it will at least have an impact in fiscal 2016 as well. So it’s a combination of lot of things. Damir Gunja Okay. I guess on currency, can you just help us understand, I guess, the impact of the rising dollar. Is that a tailwind to the numbers, or it was on a net basis has that been hedged away, or is that something that is going to help? Patrick McCullough Yes. I think there is a little bit to say here. We do hedge transactional currency risk. So as we think about bringing U.S. dollars to Canada to pay dividends and interest payments, we will take a transactional hedge on those amounts anywhere from 12 months to 18 months period of time. We do not hedge for the translation risk or opportunity. And with the U.S. dollar strengthening, we are seeing an improvement to EBITDA. It’s probably a little bit less than you might be thinking, because our fixed cost is largely distributed with our gross margin. So we have a pretty significant U.S. selling G&A costs. So when we see a 10 percentage point improvement in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar that equates to about $2 million of EBITDA a quarter, so CAD8 million on a full-year basis. Damir Gunja That’s helpful. Thank you. That’s it for me. I’ll get back in the queue. Thank you. Operator [Operator Instructions] And we have a question from Trevor Johnson. Trevor, your line is open. Trevor Johnson Good afternoon, folks. Patrick McCullough Hi, Trevor. Trevor Johnson I know it’s early stage you are going to give us more color going forward. But can you just give us, maybe a basic sense of what the cash flow profile for a residential solar customer may look like? If you can even give dollar amounts, just curious about the timing and maybe the payback that you’ll be looking at on that venture? Patrick McCullough Sure. The origination income part of the deal that we’ve struck with Clean Power Finance is very beneficial to our financial statements, both from a profit and a cash perspective. We are piloting this to understand that ultimate margin question that I think we all have and we’ll know more in a matter of months. But right now, I can tell you how payments will happen. When we close a customer and contract them, so when we get a customer to sign – to a PPA, or lease, or a loan product in a solar residential structure nomenclature, we will then provide that contract pre-permit to Clean Power Finance. They have a contractual obligation to pay us on an average 30-day period from the point of receiving that contract. So we will be paid ahead of the installation of the panels in most cases. So while we’ll be funding OpEx associated with the direct sale of that origination, we’ll be paid quickly behind the incurrence of that cost, and the profit will be reported at the point. So we’ll be taking origination income, which will be the delta between the revenue we’ve negotiated with Clean Power Finance and our direct sales cost to that point. Trevor Johnson [indiscernible] Okay. Now, that’s helpful. Thank you. And then just lastly, I know for fiscal Q4 last year, there was a little bit of noise in the weather, just wondering if you can just talk about maybe the delta and the relative impact that might be year-over-year when you look at this Q4? James Lewis Yes. I think, as we’ve spoken before about $15 million impact last Q4, we can’t predict what the weather is going to look like, but we feel comfortable with the guidance we gave right now. Trevor Johnson Great. Thanks, guys. I appreciate it. Deborah Merril You’re welcome. Operator All right. And we have Damir with a follow-up question. Go ahead, Damir. Damir Gunja Thanks. Just on the new contracts that are coming in, I just wanted to confirm what even roughly what the average life of those deals is on the residential and the commercial side? Is the residential still largely four, five-year… James Lewis You’re correct. What we are seeing on the residential side is that four and five-year mixed debt, and then on the commercial side we have seen the length grow up a little bit between 2.5 years and 3 years. Damir Gunja 2.5 years to 3 years. I know it’s probably early and you’ve actually had some pretty decent customer additions, but is the lower commodity environment are we seeing any push back in terms of trying to from a sales point perspective? James Lewis No, what we’ve seen is good feedback – good response from our customers, and when we get some volatility like we saw in November, a little bit on the gas side, you do get some customers looking up the lock in, even at the low prices on the longer-term. So as we mentioned before, we like volatility, just not extreme volatility. Deborah Merril And Damir, I kind of add to that I think, one of the things you see from us today is that, we have a wide range of products that aren’t necessarily a great product. For instance, and we have our Just Energy Conservation Program that’s a flat bill for $90 a month plus smart thermostat that you get all your gas and power needs from us. So we’re seeing that and one of the big focuses of this team and of our company and all of our employees is to make sure, we’re kind of change in the conversation a little bit around product, so that we’re delivering products that have maybe a different kind of value that volatility is less of an issue around those things. Damir Gunja Okay. So that… Rebecca MacDonald Damir, I would just like to add something, it’s Rebecca. Damir Gunja Yes. Rebecca MacDonald Just the fact, I just want to tell you, I’m still in the room. Anyway over the last nine months, management has been talking about the transition and I think you as analysts have been having the same discussion. The top profile of entire customer base is changing with more addition of a commercial book to the resi book. But what I think is important to note and Pat touched upon it in his remarks is not only as James said that the life of that commercial customer is up. But that margin on that commercial customer is up, and that is the key. We said in the last nine months that we want to take the pain with the attrition of that book to move away the small margin customers that correct in our book over the last three years and clean it up with a higher margin customers. And we’re very pleased that we have been able to deliver effectively on it. Damir Gunja Great. And just the final one for me, I guess outside of solar, can you maybe talk about other bundling initiatives you may be pursuing or other offerings you may be able to add to the mix just leading some of the industry news there seems to be a cost and trend of people partnering up with various entities and offering more product? Deborah Merril Yes, Damir, one I already spoke out is, we’re very happy with results of our bundled smart thermostat with commodity. So far, we continue to expand that product across markets. And one of the things I think we’re really careful at is, the last thing I want to do is just start throwing the things at the wall to see what’s going to stick, the next thing, you are buying washer and dryer from us, so it’s something that probably doesn’t make a lot of sense. So what we’re doing is, we’ve got a great team of people that – with product focus that are constantly out there looking for things that make sense with energy commodity and things that really help to make it easier for our customer to control not only their costs, but also their usage. So I think, you’ll continue to see us, I think that kind of in a prudent way, the last thing I want to do is, like I said, just start point [indiscernible] because that takes time and effort of management and our employees. So far we’ve got a couple of things in the work, but solar is obviously the biggest one that we’ve recently announced, but we’ll keep looking at opportunities to add to that portfolio. Damir Gunja Okay. Thanks very much. Operator [Operator Instructions] All right. And I see we have no further questions at this time. Deborah Merril Great. Well, on behalf of myself, Jay, Pat and Rebecca, really appreciate everybody taking the time to join our call. And if there are any further questions, please feel free to contact any of us directly. Have a good day. Operator Thank you ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today’s conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

SolarCity – Why I’m Selling It And Buying First Solar

Summary SolarCity and First Solar stocks were highly correlated at the start of the fossil fuel price crash of 2014, but decoupled a few months ago. There may be an opportunity to hedge one stock against the other. SolarCity is highly speculative and will not make any profits for many years — if ever. First Solar is an established company with earnings. A pair trade could be a low-risk way to play FSLR and SCTY. Growth in solar energy has been tremendous and will almost surely be strong for the next several decades. According to seig.org (Solar Energy Industries Association): Today, the U.S. has an estimated 20 gigawatts [GW] of installed solar capacity nationwide, enough to effectively power nearly 4 million homes in the United States – or every single home in a state the size of Massachusetts or New Jersey – with another 20 GW in the pipeline for 2015 and 2016, according to SEIA and GTM Research projections. However, there have been major hiccups along the way including (but certainly not limited to) the whimsies of politics and fossil fuel prices. What if there was a way to invest in a solar stock that takes out the uncertainty of those hiccups and even the uncertainty of the overall market? There is a way. Last week I began a new mock portfolio here on Seeking Alpha: the Pairs Trade Portfolio; today I continue it with trades on SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY ) and First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR ). A pair trade is a market-neutral hedge in which an investor essentially pits one company against another. Getting a return on a pair trade is not dependent upon a particular stock rising or falling necessarily, but dependent upon the relative price moves between two stocks (or other financial instruments). I won’t go into details about the hows and whys of pair trading here, as I have already described the theory in detail in a previous article. Please take a look at the link for more information on why pair trades might be a good investment. Correlation Since the start of the oil – and more importantly, natural gas – price crash, we can see from the chart below that First Solar and SolarCity stock prices had a high correlation for a few months before decoupling in early November as Solar City headed pretty much sideways while First Solar dipped substantially more. FSLR data by YCharts The change in correlation gives us our first clue that there might be an opportunity for a pair trade with these two stocks. Should SolarCity have outperformed First Solar? Time to dig a little deeper and see if we think FSLR is a relative bargain compared to SCTY. While the two companies are in the same industry and the stocks have had a high degree of correlation recently, the strategies of the companies could not be more different. SolarCity is pursuing fast growth financed by debt in the residential space while First Solar is a profitable vertically integrated manufacturer and utility-scale operator. Despite the differences in the companies, the macro events that often drive the stocks of most solar companies apply to both. The obvious recent example is the severe drop in fossil fuel prices, but there have been other factors in the past and there will undoubtedly be numerous factors in the future that affect both of these companies. Again, the pair trade largely insulates an investor from external macro events and focuses on one thing only: will one stock outperform the other? I think over the long haul First Solar will outperform SolarCity and below are some reasons. SolarCity: Show Me the Money When and how will SolarCity make money? That’s a big question for anyone interested in the stock and it is an impossible question to answer. At this point, the stock is pure speculation and the company is not expected to post a profit for many, many years. Well, how does one value the company then? SolarCity itself would like investors to focus on “retained value”. In a recent letter to shareholders a retained value number is prominently displayed as one of the highlights of the third quarter. In a presentation used in the third quarter conference call, the company had this slide to show: (click to enlarge) So what is retained value? SolarCity defines it as a discounted cash flow forecast from all megawatts booked as a contract. I won’t go into all of the assumptions that SolarCity makes to compute the retained value figure (much of which is unknown to the public), but I will hit some highlights. First, SolarCity assumes all contracts currently in place or booked to be installed will be renewed after 20 years. This is an outstanding assumption that is obviously flawed. 100% renewals will simply not happen, nor will all bookings even be installed. Second, the company assumes a discount rate of 6%. That is actually high at the moment, so one could argue that the retained value figure should, in fact, be higher than $2.2 billion. However, at some point rates will likely rise – perhaps substantially – and the 6% assumption could be far too low. Third, the company assumes that the technology will be current enough to warrant renewal for 10 years after the initial 20 year period. SolarCity states that the life expectancy of the equipment (not counting inverter replacement) used in its systems is “typically 30 years or more”. I’m going to go into that third point a bit more as I think it is particularly suspect. For one thing, solar panels degrade over time as the following shows: (click to enlarge) (Source: energyinformative.org ) Exact numbers over a long period of time are hard to come by since the vast majority of solar panels in existence have been installed quite recently. Based on my reading, I would estimate that the typical SolarCity customer could expect at least a 10% – 15% drop in power production at the end of 20 years. But more important is that the homeowner’s system will simply be obsolete in 20 years. Efficiency has increased dramatically in the last 20 years and will certainly continue to do so. I would not quite compare a 2015 solar system to using a computer from 1995…perhaps more like 2005. The hypothetical homeowner in 2035 is likely to be better off upgrading a system rather than renewing a lease on an outdated one. SolarCity wants investors to value the company based on this rather dubious metric of Retained Value. The simple fact that there are so many question marks around the computation makes me very nervous about it. Therefore, in my opinion, SolarCity’s retained value metric should be ignored and the company’s assumptions of future cash flows are highly speculative. The risks to the stock are huge. While shareholder’s in SCTY don’t seem to be too concerned about the present situation, let’s look at a more time-honored metric – current cash flow: SCTY Cash from Operations (NYSE: TTM) data by YCharts The above chart shows that the company has grown revenue at a rapid clip since going public but has also been burning through more and more money. Debt has increased substantially recently and will of course continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Right now SolarCity’s debt is financed at very low interest rates, but that could change over the next few years. And perhaps more importantly (and often overlooked by equity investors), it is debt holders that hold the reins to the company as pointed out in Barron’s : Founded in 2006, SolarCity has been consistently unprofitable. Most of its tax benefits and a portion of its future cash flows have been pledged to financing partners whose claims on the company are often senior to common shareholders’. If and when SolarCity begins to have positive cash flow, much of that money is pledged to go to the debt of the company. SolarCity received financing based upon its contract revenue and it has certain obligations to fulfill that exclude stockholders. First Solar: Oh, You Make Money? How Novel! Following up on the cash flow metric charted above, here’s a look at First Solar’s numbers: FSLR Cash from Operations ( TTM) data by YCharts First Solar is not exactly swimming in cash, but it has demonstrated a reasonable track record at generating some decent positive cash flow. In Q3 2014, the company posted an earnings per share of $0.87 and posted full-year guidance of $2.40 – $2.80. Based on 2015 analyst estimates of $4.52 per share, FSLR trades at a forward P/E of only 10.4. Conclusion SolarCity is certainly an interesting speculative play, but the key word there is “speculative”. Actually, the word “interesting” is somewhat key as well, as I prefer my investments to be as boring and predictable as possible. SolarCity is a wild card that may not come to fruition for decades, if ever. First Solar is clearly the lower risk play here. SolarCity is growing far faster, but is not making money doing so and might not ever make a profit. Here’s an interesting tidbit: in Q3 2014, SolarCity posted revenue of $58 million and First Solar posted revenue of $889 million — yet Solar City has a slightly higher market capitalization than First Solar. By going long FSLR and short SCTY, my strategy makes the viability of the solar industry as a whole a largely moot point. If the industry goes into the doldrums for the next 10 years it does not matter as long as FSLR outperforms SCTY. If the market tanks and takes these two stocks down to the single digits, it does not matter; as long as FSLR outperforms SCTY my trade will make money. The Portfolio I’m putting my fake money where my mouth is and buying FSLR and shorting SCTY in my Seeking Alpha portfolio as of about 1:20 pm Eastern Time on Feb 9. Here is what the mock portfolio looks like so far after one week (note that I plan on adjusting, adding, and updating this for years): (click to enlarge) Not much of note yet, but there will be more to come. Be sure to click “follow” if you would like to get real-time alerts on my future articles. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.