Tag Archives: united-states

My Investment Plan For 2016

Summary I’m overweight on domestic equity (non-REITs) and want to scale it down over the next year. Raising my international allocations looks attractive with policies that favor GDP growth in Europe. I have 22% in equity REITs and intend to bring that allocation higher. The most attractive equity REIT sector for me right now is the triple net lease REIT. My personal tax planning and preference for low expense ratios will push me to continue sending cash to domestic non-REIT equity. I may sell some of my domestic ETFs to offset that allocation. With 2015 nearing a close, I’m looking over my holdings and asking myself what I want my portfolio to look like for the next year. Followers will now I’m primarily a buy and hold investor. I will occasionally sell of shares to make an adjustment to the weights in my portfolio or to harvest a tax loss after a terrible investing decision, but for the most part my investing philosophy is to focus on buying quality and diversification at a reasonable price and then planning to hold that position for decades. I’ll make an exception when it comes to mREITs because there are market failures that indicate very clear opportunities to exit or opportunities to make a short term buy. My Portfolio Investors can see my precise allocations as of late November. For this piece I want to reference my allocation by sectors because that is a major area I expect to modify over the next year: (click to enlarge) Domestic or International? My allocations to the domestic market excluding REITs are over 50% of my portfolio value. That is too high for my taste going into 2016. With the Federal Reserve planning to raise interest rates and with the dollar having strengthened materially against the Euro, I’m expecting the growth rate of GDP in the United States to suffer and growth rates throughout Europe to pick up. Based on expectations of higher growth rates for the general economy there, I want to increase my positions in companies that perform most of their operations outside the United States. To be fair, my domestic equity allocation includes a substantial exposure to large cap multi-national companies that earn substantial revenues abroad. However, I would still like to increase the my exposure to that area. I’ll be looking at a combination of the Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHC ) and the Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHF ) to get that job done. Why those funds? Because my investments accounts are with Schwab so I get the benefit of free trading on those ETFs. That serves as the tie breaker. Without free trading on those ETFs I would find Vanguard’s funds for that allocation to be very comparable. Those two funds currently combine to be just 1.44% of my portfolio. I’d really like to increase that over the next year. The small-cap companies are particularly interesting to me because I expect them to have more localized exposure to their markets and to see a larger boost in sales. If we were to look at the financial statements of those companies in USD (United States Dollars) the stronger dollar would make their earnings and dividends look weaker. On the other hand, strength in exports should mean more economic activity including more people being hired which should cut down on unemployment. The values should look weaker in the short term, but I would expect better growth over the next several years. Therefore, I think there may be enough short term weakness to get my positions established without having to sell off any current investments to fund it. I’d rather fund the acquisitions by earning more money and sending it to my brokerage account. Equity REITs I work hard to get my assets into tax advantaged accounts. By making that a major part of my investing philosophy, I’m able to hold higher exposure to REITs without concerns about tax implications. While the Federal Reserve is aiming to increase short term rates, I don’t think they’ll be successful in raising rates as quickly as they would like to raise them. If the rates remain low the equity REITs should provide solid value to the portfolio from a combination of dividends and growth in dividends. Share prices may not move perfectly with the dividend growth, but with a holding period measured in decades, I’m just going to treat any low prices as sale prices. While I do a substantial portion of my investing with ETFs, I may be adding a couple individual names here. I started doing some research on Realty Income Corporation (NYSE: O ) a while ago and found the structure of their business was excellent. After that I took a quick look at National Retail Properties (NYSE: NNN ) and found their operations were also exceptional. I see the triple net lease REIT space as being very attractive because of the structural benefits it offers. The way leases are handled in the triple net lease system results in a better alignment of interests because it makes the tenant responsible for most costs. This is a win/win situation for the REIT and the tenant because it allows the property to be held in a more efficient format. However the REIT and the tenant split up the savings created by financing the property through the triple net lease REIT, it is still possible for both sides to profit from the deal. Looking at the combination of dividend yield and growth and AFFO (adjusted funds from operations) yield and growth makes me feel pretty comfortable with either of those REITs. I recently transferred more cash into my brokerage account and I’m looking to open a position in a triple net lease REIT. I’ll probably end up with shares in both of these triple net lease REITs, though I’ll be looking at a couple other options in the sector as well. The timing on my entry will largely be a function of price. Overweight on mREITs I’m already quite overweight on mREITs. I might still make a few short term plays in the sector and I’ve got my holdings set to reinvest dividends, but I don’t expect to be adding more long term positions in the space. I think 10% allocation is fairly heavy so 20% is definitely more than enough. Adding More Domestic Than I Want Remember how I said it was a big priority for me to focus on tax advantaged accounts? My wife’s retirement plan through her employer has very limited choices. After researching the funds available I found precisely one fund that I liked as a long term investment due to intelligent diversification and low costs. Unfortunately, the fund is purely domestic large capitalization. Since I aim to shove as much money as possible into tax advantaged accounts each year, I pick the lowest fee allocation with an intelligent exposure and then build around that using my other accounts. Fortunately, using a solo 401k I have a great deal of flexibility in my holdings. The most likely candidates for sales would be shares in the Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHB ) or the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) since these holdings are in accounts where I have full control. Conclusion Over the next year I want to increase my allocations to equity REITs and international ETFs. I’ll try to do it by adding new cash to the portfolio to keep buying, but I may need to liquidate some of my domestic allocations within my accounts to accommodate for buying more through my wife’s retirement accounts. I see the Federal Reserve policies offering Europe a path to higher GDP growth and lower unemployment, but I don’t see enough large rate increases in the near future to push me away from wanting to buy the triple net lease REIT sector.

How To Find The Best Style ETFs: Q4’15

Summary The large number of ETFs hurts investors more than it helps as too many options become paralyzing. Performance of an ETFs holdings are equal to the performance of an ETF. Our coverage of ETFs leverages the diligence we do on each stock by rating ETFs based on the aggregated ratings of their holdings. Finding the best ETFs is an increasingly difficult task in a world with so many to choose from. How can you pick with so many choices available? Don’t Trust ETF Labels There are at least 60 different All Cap Blend ETFs and at least 281 ETFs across all investment styles. Do investors need 23+ choices on average per style? How different can the ETFs be? Those 60 All Cap Blend ETFs are very different. With anywhere from 29 to 3792 holdings, many of these All Cap Blend ETFs have drastically different portfolios, creating drastically different investment implications. The same is true for the ETFs in any other style, as each offers a very different mix of good and bad stocks. Large Cap Value ranks first for stock selection. Small Cap Blend ranks last. Details on the Best & Worst ETFs in each style are here . A Recipe for Paralysis By Analysis We firmly believe ETFs for a given style should not all be that different. We think the large number of All Cap Blend (or any other) style ETFs hurts investors more than it helps because too many options can be paralyzing. It is simply not possible for the majority of investors to properly assess the quality of so many ETFs. Analyzing ETFs, done with the proper diligence, is far more difficult than analyzing stocks because it means analyzing all the stocks within each ETF. As stated above, that can be as many as 3792 stocks, and sometimes even more, for one ETF. Any investor worth his salt recognizes that analyzing the holdings of an ETF is critical to finding the best ETF. Figure 1 shows our top rated ETF for each style. Note there are no All Cap Growth or All Cap Value ETFs under coverage. Figure 1: The Best ETF in Each Style (click to enlarge) Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings How to Avoid “The Danger Within” Why do you need to know the holdings of ETFs before you buy? You need to be sure you do not buy an ETF that might blow up. Buying an ETF without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. No matter how cheap, if it holds bad stocks, the ETF’s performance will be bad. Don’t just take my word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter. PERFORMANCE OF ETF’S HOLDINGS = PERFORMANCE OF ETF If Only Investors Could Find Funds Rated by Their Holdings The ValueShares US Quantitative Value ETF (BATS: QVAL ) is the top-rated All Cap Blend ETF and the overall best ETF of the 281 style ETFs that we cover. The worst ETF in Figure 1 is the State Street SPDR S&P Small Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: SLYG ), which gets a Neutral rating. One would think ETF providers could do better for this style. Disclosure: David Trainer and Blaine Skaggs receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme

No Winter Cheer For Natural Gas ETFs?

Broad commodities have gone off the deep end on sluggish trends with the energy market rout deserving a special mention. Among the issues wrecking havoc on the energy market, rising supplies and falling demand on global growth worries are primary. In such a situation, the Saudi-led OPEC’s decision of not cutting production and even scrapping the regular production limit to save their market share sent oil and other energy-based commodities into a tailspin. In such a scenario, the only hope for the natural gas market was the Arctic Chills, which gives a fresh lease of life to this commodity every winter. The cold snap boosts electricity demand across the region putting natural gas in focus. In fact, in 2014, the Polar Vortex caused natural gas prices to jump over 50%. As almost 50% of Americans use natural gas for heating purposes, withdrawals in natural gas supplies push up the commodity’s prices. The latest weekly inventory release from the U.S. Energy Department also gives the same cues. Natural gas supplies have seen a bigger than expected decline following the season’s first withdrawal. Stockpiles fell by 53 billion cubic feet (Bcf) for the week ended Nov 27, 2015, higher than the guided range (of a 46-50 Bcf draw). The decrease was also higher than both last year’s drop of 42 Bcf and the 5-year (2010-2014) average decline of 48 Bcf. Still, broad-based energy market worries and the possibility of a warmer weather this winter (due to El Nino) did not let natural gas prices enjoy the drawdown in supplies. Oil lost about 10% since the OPEC meeting. Plus, predictions that warmer weather might go into late December – key heating period also dampened investor mood. Energy commodities have now slipped to a more than six-year low. In fact, January 2016 might not imitate the previous two comparable same months due to a protracted and stronger El Nino, which causes weather disruptions in many regions around the world. The effect of El Nino includes drought in some regions and flooding in others due to abnormal warming of the Pacific Ocean. As per Weather Services International, El Niño is expected to cause below-normal temperatures across the southern Plains and into the Southwest, while above-normal temperatures will likely prevail in the eastern and northern parts of the U.S. This weather pattern would result in lower heating demand in the northern hemisphere this winter. WSI also predicted gas-weighted heating degree days to tally about 3,600, suggesting 10% less demand than the year-ago winter. ETF Impact As a result, an ETF tracking the natural gas futures – T he United States Natural Gas ETF (NYSEARCA: UNG ) – has lost about 45% so far this year and was off 16.4% in the last one month (as of December 8, 2015). So investors can avoid these natural gas ETFs in the near term (see all Energy ETFs here). UNG in Focus Investors seeking direct exposure to natural gas, a key fuel source for power plants, may find UNG an attractive option. It is the most popular ETF, having amassed about $478 million in assets. The product looks to track the changes in percentage terms of the price of natural gas futures contracts that are traded on NYMEX. The fund takes positions in the near month futures contracts on expiry and rolls over to the next month futures contracts. As the prices of the next month futures contracts exceed that of the near month futures contracts (also called “contango”), the fund loses on rolling. Hence, UNG is vulnerable to the prolonged period of contango. At present, the fund holds two contracts namely NYMEX Natural Gas NG Jan16 and ICE Natural Gas LD1 H Jan16. The fund charges 60 bps in fees. iPath Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas ETN (NYSEARCA: GAZ ) This is an ETN option for natural gas investors. It delivers returns through an unleveraged investment in the natural gas futures contract plus the rate of interest on specified T-Bills. The product follows the Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas Total Return Sub-Index. The note is less popular with AUM of $4.4 million. It is a high cost choice, charging 75 bps in annual fees. GAZ is down 77% in the year-to-date frame and lost about 33% in the last one month (As of December 8, 2015). United States 12-Month Natural Gas ETF (NYSEARCA: UNL ) This product seeks to spread out exposure across the futures curve in order to mitigate contango, a huge problem in the natural gas ETF market. It is done by tracking the average of the prices of 12 contracts on natural gas traded on the NYMEX, including the near month to expire (except when the near month is within two weeks of expiration) and the contracts for the following 11 months, for a total of 12 consecutive contracts. It has amassed just $12.6 million in its asset base and charges 75 bps in fees per year from investors. UNL is down 32.4% so far this year and was off 8.7% in the last one month. Original Post