Tag Archives: transportation

Pampa Energía Is A Good Option For Normalization In Argentina

Summary Pampa Energía works in a highly distorted regulatory framework, where frozen tariffs have led to a critical situation for the utility companies. Even in this scenario Pampa Energía has managed to reach a price earning of 5 years. With a new government about to be elected, great improvements could be in the way. Pampa Energía S.A. (NYSE: PAM ) is the largest integrated electricity company in Argentina and through its subsidiaries participates in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, as well as natural gas transportation and production. (click to enlarge) Source: Pampa Energía. Pampa Energía owns indirectly: 84% of the generation assets. 26% of the transmission business (TRAN.BA). 52% of the distribution business with Edenor (EDN). 26% of the natural gas transportation business with Transportadora de Gas del Sur (NYSE: TGS )(pending government approval). 50% of the Oil and Gas exploration and production business with Petrolera Pampa (PETR.BA), associated with Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales (YPF). As of August 17th, 2015 the market cap of the above mentioned: (click to enlarge) Source: Yahoo Finance Reminder: Transener and Petrolera Pampa stocks are only listed in the Merval Index, the market cap is expressed in Argentine Pesos -AR$-. Exchange rate as of August 17th: ARS/USD= 9.15. Updated quotes and market cap expressed in USD here . Scenario: Pampa Energía works in a highly distorted regulatory framework where frozen tariffs have led to a critical situation for the utility companies. From 2001 onwards the tariff was converted to AR$ and had practically no adjustments and no longer provides for a reasonable return on capital/assets. Full tariff reviews are pending. High inflation and regulated tariffs that took place since 2006 and 2001 respectively, have led to deep margin erosion for utility stocks. The Argentine utility stocks have underperformed their Latam and EM peers since 2001, these poor returns are explained by significant erosion in real electricity tariffs (frozen since 2001). Gross margin captured by utilities as a percentage of the GDP fall from 0.3% to 0.02%, setting the scope for a possible recovery in profits, if the upcoming political situation leads to a normalization of the current imbalances. For example, the comparison between the residential electricity cost in Argentina and regional peers shows clearly how distorted the public services tariffs are. (click to enlarge) Source: Pampa Energía. Subsidies for electricity and gas purchases cost the government around 4.5% of GDP, and the burden is growing. Some tariffs would need to triple or even be multiplied by seven times to reach market prices. With just a small correction, companies like PAM will perform better. A presidential election is coming in Argentina as of October 25, and the main contenders (Daniel Scioli, Mauricio Macri and Sergio Massa) have expressed its understanding about the need to lift some tariffs caps, in order to reduce the fiscal deficit, which is unsustainable at these levels. As the company’s aren’t capable of fulfilling the investment needs in electricity of the country, and several blackouts occur during the last quarters, the actual government is taking some measures to improve the situation. Two relevant facts take place during 2Q15 for Pampa Energía: 1) “SE Resolution No. 482/15: Increase in the Electricity Generation Remuneration Scheme On June 10, 2015, the Secretariat of Energy issued SE Resolution No. 482/15, in which it updates retroactively the remuneration for electricity generation as of February 2015 commercial transactions.” 2) “Gas Transportation Tariff Increase for Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. On June 8, 2015, the National Gas Regulatory Authority -ENARGAS- issued Resolution No. 3,347/15, which grants TGS a tariff increase for gas transportation and operation and maintenance fees of 44.3% and 73.1%, respectively, both retroactive to May 2015.” Source: Pampa Energía 2Q15. This and other measures have improved Pampa´s EBITDA and Profits. In the 2H15 : Consolidated sales revenues of AR$3,457.6 million ($378 million) for the six-month period ended on June 30, 2015, 18.4% higher than the AR$2,921.4 million ($319 million) for the same period of 2014. Adjusted consolidated EBITDA of AR$1,693.3 million ($185 million) for the six-month period ended on June 30, 2015, compared to AR$27.1 million ($9 million) for the same period of 2014. Consolidated profit of AR$1,365.1 million ($149 million) during the six-month period ended on June 30, 2015, of which a profit of AR$963.0 million ($105 million) is attributable to the owners of the company, compared to an AR$80.4 million loss (-$8.8 million) attributable to the owners of the company in the same period of 2014. With a market cap of $900 million, earnings per ADR in the 1H15 of $1.7, and foreseeable earnings of nearly $180 million a year, the forward P/E looks compelling. Just thinking about the replacement cost of its fixed assets, it´s easy to see how PAM is undervalued, and this is mostly caused by a regulatory environment which could improve soon. As a change in the government is approaching, it could be expected that some distortions will disappear, I´m not talking here about free market prices, as it´s “politically incorrect” to raise tariffs by 200% in a single move, but given the current situation, where PAM is trading at a forward P/E of 5, and making money under this difficult scenario, any improvement will boost earnings and improve the company´s situation. Risks: Currency risks are present since it’s widely expected that the new government will depreciate the local currency, but that depreciation will certainly include better tariffs for the utilities as the energy price is partly dollar linked as well as the importations of energy. Political risks are another factor to bear in mind, but as the current government deficit is unsustainable, some adjustments are needed. To conclude PAM is under the current conditions deeply undervalued, and that could increase if the pending integral tariff revision comes in place. If the Argentinean economy is going to improve, massive capex in the electricity sector would be needed, and PAM is in the better position to profit from that. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in PAM over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

GreenHunter Resources’ (GRH) CEO Gary Evans on Q2 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

GreenHunter Resources, Inc. (NYSEMKT: GRH ) Q2 2015 Earnings Conference Call August 14, 2015 10:00 AM ET Executives Gary Evans – Chairman and CEO Serene Prat – Head of IR Kirk Trosclair – EVP and COO Ronald McClung – CFO Analysts Operator Good morning. My name is Kamey and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the GreenHunter Resources Second Quarter 2015 Financial and Operating Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Mr. Gary Evans, you may begin your conference. Gary Evans Thank you, operator and thank all of you for dialing in today. My name is Gary Evans, I’m Chairman and CEO of GreenHunter Resources and Magnum Hunter and again with me here, Kirk Trosclair our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer as well as Ron McClung, our Chief Financial Officer. And before we get into the meat of the discussion today to talk about our second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2015 financial operating results, we need to let our listeners have a little forward-looking statement. So Serene Prat our Head of Investor Relations, is going to read that for us. Serene? Serene Prat Thank you. Before we begin with the content of today’s call, I’d like to advice you that Safe Harbor include forward-looking statements within the meanings of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following discussion provides information, which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties that may include statements regarding our expectation, beliefs and intentions, or strategies regarding the future. Actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. This discussion should be understood in conjunction with the financial statements accompanying notes and risk factors included in our SEC filings. The discussion should not be construed to imply that results contained herein will necessarily continue into the future or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment by our management. Actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. This disclaimer is an effect for the duration of this conference call. Gary Evans Thank you — that was outstanding. Let’s now get started with respect to the call today. We filed our quarterly financial statement press release earlier this morning. So, hopefully, you received that. And I thought before we got into the specifics about the company and its operations for the quarter, I might talk a little bit about the macro picture that we’re all experiencing in the energy industry today and how it affects or doesn’t affect GreenHunter. So, as many of you know that are involved in energy arena, we had a change with respect to OPEC’s decision to basically flood the world market with oil beginning around Thanksgiving and that we’ve experienced a precipitous decline in crude oil prices worldwide from around $100, $105 a barrel down to in the $42 a barrel day range today. The purpose of doing this is to regain market share that OPEC lost due to the significant success that independent oil and gas companies have had in the shale plays here in the United States over the last five years. And so, it’s had a dramatic effect in the entire energy industry has called the rig count to the cut significantly down to historically low levels and is creating a huge amount of layoffs and just basically a much reduced capital spending level by all energy independence. People are in a preservation of capital mode not knowing how long these lower prices will persist. It’s also had an affect with respect to natural gas prices which is really, we’re more involved with respect to the Marcellus and Utica plays that we typically handle most of our water with up in the Appalachian Basin. The gas prices are down about $1 to $1.50 from where they were a year ago and that has also created a slowdown in drilling activity in our region not as much as other parts of the country but it’s definitely impacted it. So, we continue to stay busy but not as busy as we want to be, that’s causes to have to work a who lot harder get new accounts, we feel real good about some new prospects that we’re working on and our ability to continue to keep our wells full and we believe that this part of the country being the Marcellus and Utica in the south, West Virginia, Southeast Ohio will continue to garner a significant amount of capital. So, there is any place in the country I would rather be its this area, there is no other play I want to be active in. We continue to have the best margins, we continue to have the lion’s share of the business. And we continue to add capacity to allow us to gather and inject greater volumes of water going forward. So we’re going giving you a lot more detail as to some of this today. One thing that’s very important for you to understand Magnum Hunter has announced as of about a week ago that we have entered into a letter of intent for $430 million drilling program over in Ohio which encompasses about 50 Utica wells, that program will began in October. And GreenHunter will have a 100% of the water business there. So, while we’re having a little slack here over the next last few months and we’re continuing to fill our wells, there’s going to be a whole slug of new activity and that activity will continue for about two years. So, because of the [sister] relationship between Magnum and Green that’s going to definitely benefit GreenHunter going forward and there is more details on that if you want to look at the filings that Magnum has made publically over the past week and many analyst research reports have been written about that as well. So, with that I’m going to turn the call over to Kirk — give you specific details of our activities during the second quarter and update you on what we are working on. Kirk? Kirk Trosclair Thanks, Gary. Before we going to the specifics, I do want to add a couple of comments on the numbers in Appalachian as it relates to volumes and trucking hours and things like that across our portfolio. First the rig count decline since 2014 in Appalachia has decreased 42% in Utica and 21% in the Marcellus. The keyword across all the presentations that we’re listening to from all the E&P companies is efficiencies and efficiencies translate to price reductions across the entire service industry as it relates to service providers in the oil and gas business. The effective lower total rig count, basically equals significant reductions in flow back volumes and a slightly less, lower production volumes across the board with the most being significant reductions from flow back. Secondly the E&P capital expenditures that Gary mentioned earlier were lowered again in the second quarter and companies were voluntarily asking service companies to help by reducing rates to match the falling commodity prices. We feel that these have now hit the bottom across our industry in the Appalachia region and we should be able to maintain from here on out. On appositive side, as he mention with the Magnum Hunter JV, GreenHunter has strategic alliances with certain operators in the Appalachian Basin that will help curtail some of the overall effects of the downturn in the industry and the increased flow back volumes just from that JV and the production volumes that will come from it will help the company tremendously going forward. We probably won’t realize those affect into the GreenHunter side from flow backs to the latter part of fourth quarter of this year but we’ll see significant increases starting in the first quarter of 2016. So, what does it mean for GreenHunter for the remainder 2015, we’ll continue to fight the fight, manage our expenses and start to gain additional market share, something we haven’t — have not had to do in the past. We’re having to go out and grab new market share, enhance some operating efficiencies and be the best service provider of Oilfield Fluid Management Solutions in the industry. Our team in Appalachia has done a great job through this downturn and they are to be commended for it. So to get you to the specifics of the second quarter, on July 27, you guys remember we sent out a press release and we turned on two new disposal wells at our Mills Hunter facility located in Southeastern Ohio. These wells were — we were pleasantly surprised at some of the increased rates we had once we turned the wells on, our initial injection rates told us we were going to 3,000 to 4,000 barrels per day and with the combined two wells, we think we can push the 8,000 barrels per day limit on these two wells. The increased injection capacity basically takes our overall capacity of the company and increase it by 50% and takes us to 21,000 barrel, so permitted injection capacity. Just recently, we added some additional trucks in the latter part of July, I think it was like the last day of July our self, we took the delivery of two new Peterbilts, we sent those to the shop in West Virginia to have the 407 tanks put on the trucks and we just recently as of two days ago received four additional trucks at the shop and those are being outfitted to haul condensate and water by having those sets to DOT 407 related trucks. We plan to have the two that were in the shop first out to the out on the street and actually hauling in the next couple of weeks and then the other four will probably be two to four weeks behind as they continue to come out the shop and then that will leave us with two remaining trucks from the user proceeds from our senior lenders. And those will hit sometime in October. Some of the things to point out that we continue to improve our operating margins on quarter by quarter basis, we’re getting a lot better at doing our business in the Appalachia region and we’ve increased those from 38% in the second quarter 2014 to 49% in the second quarter of 2015. The other thing that we need to point out and it’s really is our internal trucking, we mentioned this in our first quarter call, we learned a lot by hiring third party transporters and trying to grab volumes from additional trucking companies and running it through our own services but that was not beneficial to the company and we’ve learned to utilize our own internal trucking and those numbers have jumped dramatically from 18% of second quarter of last year to 40% in second quarter of this year. Now, of course some of that has to do with fuel pricing and things like that but our overall expenses in-house for the operations for these units has gone down. Also, at the unit in these times of tough commodity prices we’re cutting back, we’re running a lean shop here and we’ve decreased that by 1.6 million and total decrease of 21% and something that we’re very proud of, we’ve produced positive adjusted EBITDA for the first and the second quarter of 2015 and the second quarter at 316,000 of the positive EBITDA here in house. So, those are some of like the key highlights of what happened in the second quarter, obviously we have a lot of things that came out and we’ve been working on in the third quarter, we were delayed on a lot of this construction efforts for some new wells, you can see in the press release, we spoke about what contributed to those, some of it was the funding delay initially, then it was permitting and new processes and things like that that’s going on with the Ohio department of natural resources and on the West Virginia side with the [environmental] protection. It’s a new ballgame out there, which is not a bad thing for us, we’re complying with all the rules and rigs which we always have and we’re going to be a leader in that industry and learn from the past in how things transition to new rigs and responsibilities and we’ll get more efficient at that. The last couple of years — permitting of a new well would take us 45 to 50 days, now that’s gone up to about six months, we think we can get that timeframe down in the four to five month range but that will be the new norm from here going forward. So, that was some of the delays that we had at the mills Hunter facility, we’re nearing completion of that, we should have the third of the four wells additionally that we’re tuning on at mills here in next 30 to 45 days, we should begin injection into that well and then the final well which is the furthest well away from the pumping facility, will probably come online sometime in late October. I know you guys mentioned the Ritchie Hunter 2 which is the West Virginia well that we have ready to go. The well itself, the facility, the flow line everything is completed, we’re just waiting the final approval from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and that’s impressive, we met with those guys at their office in Charleston two weeks ago and we should receive that final permit here in the next 30 to 45 days. So, that’s kind of the operational highlights of what’s been going in Appalachia, with that I’ll turn over to more details through Ron McClung on the financials. Ronald McClung Well, as both Gary and Kirk have said, it’s been a tough environment in the second quarter in terms of people have stopped drilling as much, flow back and so forth so, we’ve had a corresponding decrease in the revenues, a year ago our revenue in total was 6.8 million or second quarter in this year was 4.6 million. Our two main sources of revenue, water disposal revenue was down $434,000 and our trucking revenue was down $384,000, water disposal was down 13% in revenue and trucking was down 20% revenue, but also as Kirk said, we had not only corresponding decreases in our expenses for those two main lines of business but additional percentages of decrease in our expenses, so for example, where our water revenue was down 13%, our disposal expense for that related revenue was down 33%. So was that 20% more than revenue was and we so the same thing on the trucking side, where trucking was down 20% in revenue, we had a 41% decrease in trucking expense. And as Kirk said some of that was due to fuel cost being less than they were last year, but it’s also a consolidated effort on behalf of management to decrease cost and then we saw additionally as he pointed already a 20% decrease from last year in SG&A. Now what all that means to us is that we think we have a structure in place to — that’s ready for the growth that we think we’re about to experience and don’t expect any significant increases in those cost, of course there’ll be some, but we think we are setup to experience good margins on there as we’re able to put these new wells and trucks in service and not only that but because of the fact that our wells are 100% joined to current offload facilities, the incremental expense related to those will be minimal and so we expect to benefit from the savings that we’ve experienced from our cost cutting activities and benefit greatly from that as we put these new assets on loan. You’ll also note that for in the press release that our net loss per share from continuing operations was $0.08 this year compared to $0.13 last year and so we’re looking forward to seeing that even cut further and moving toward profitability because these new assets come online in the coming months. Kirk? Kirk Trosclair Thanks, Ron. So, I think we want to talk a few more about the things that we have coming and then I’ll turn the call back over to Gary and then I think we’ll take some questions. But as far as the project is concerned down at Mills, we only have two wells left to turn on there. We have the one well in West Virginia that we are just awaiting the final approval to turn on at this point. So, those are some things we can look forward to happening in the remainder of 2015, the third and fourth quarter. We received the additional trucks that are scheduled to come in, the last few in October and we’ll see those hitting the roads as well. The other thing I wanted to touch on I guess would be, we’ll have some questions later. We are making some progress with the Coast Guard efforts on the barging situation. We have not started construction of any of the docks at this point but we have had several meetings with the Coast Guard, the meetings are going very well, nothing is set in stone at this point, they haven’t approved anything, most things are still in the same status as far as the regulations go but we have made significant progress with their team on coming up to a common solution to let this happen sometime in the near future. With that I’ll turn the call back over to Gary. Gary Evans I just want to emphasize a few things that were mentioned to which I think are really, really important. Many of us here have been in this business a long time, I’ve been in it for over 30 years and we’ve recognized a downturn was coming early on back in January and so, your management here began taking the efforts to reduce our cost. We knew that to be able to survive through a down turn you got to have lower cost. So, those are reflected in the numbers that we reported today and so as we continue to add volumes which we’re doing on a weekly basis that’s going to really drive our EBITDA and while we all look for better times in the energy industry we’re counting on year, year and half down turn. So, we’re not building the business with the anticipation that all of the great things that were happening in the prior three years are going to happen now. So, by being a leaner meaner machine we will become much more competitive with our existing competition in the region. We will continue to add capacity because we know its coming and then we got these joint ventures with a number of companies that are going to continue to add new volume. So, I’m actually quite excited about our future and I’m very excited that the wells that we put on at the Mills Hunter facility have taken so much water and so that in itself drives margin because we don’t have to put as many wells on because the volume take away capacity is much greater. We do believe we’re getting close as Kirk mentioned on the Coast Guard resolution. We continue to have a number of meetings with the Coast Guard, just to get dialogue and we believe we have some actions that we can take in the near future to begin barging and we’re keeping those close to our best for competitive reasons but when we do begin barging you will hear about it. So, with that let’s turn over the call to our listeners and operator and we’ll take our first question. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question is come from [Dan Murphy] with Shareholders. Unidentified Analyst Good morning, gentlemen. Question on your preferred stock, noticed you didn’t pay dividend in July, there was nothing in the press release. Can you update us on the status of when you plan to pay or what’s going on with the preferred shares? Gary Evans Yes. The management board decided to because this is accumulative preferred to delay dividends at this time and so, we do not have an answer for you as to when we will begin paying dividends obviously something that we’re going to address but at this point in time the dividends will accumulate and we do not plan on paying in for at least a month or two. Operator Your next question comes from [indiscernible] Securities. Unidentified Analyst Yes, Gary, what concerned me more about the suspension of the dividend is that you didn’t see fits [indiscernible] signing the dividend. I mean, that’s [our pay], why didn’t you do that? Gary Evans Send the letter? Unidentified Analyst You didn’t send the letter; we’ve called the Investor Relations, nothing. Gary Evans Well, there is a real big reason for that. We were in negotiations with our lender; we did not know what the outcome of those negotiations were going to be and those negotiations did not conclude till about 30 minutes ago, so that’s the reason. I can’t tell you something that I don’t know about. Unidentified Analyst Yes, but, so in other words, your lenders are preventing you from making the dividend payments? Gary Evans That is correct. Unidentified Analyst Okay, now as follows the [code’s part of] concern, I’ve been following you, I’ve been a shareholder from several years now, and it’s like the same story with the [cold start], encouraging next month, next week, next year and it keeps going on and on, what is the problem? Gary Evans Hey, there’s a lot of problems with it, we’re dealing with a governmental agency, things take time and it’s not just a straight forward process. Unidentified Analyst But did they give you a reason why or they just say we’re not ready to talk about it? Gary Evans We have several reason why and we’re working with the Coast Guard to establish a policy that will be regulated by the Coast Guard and that we will adhere to. The basic answer to your question is that the reason we are not barging water today like we thought we’d be doing two years ago is bureaucratic backlog and we’ve had many meetings, we’ve had U.S. senators, U.S. congressmen involved, we’ve gone to Washington, we had many-many meetings and if you want to blame anybody, you blame this administration, they’ve tried to everything they could do to interfere in our business. So, we’re taking all measures possible to resolve the situation, we think we have a path that will resolve it. The Coast Guard I believe realizes there are issues here and for competitive reasons we don’t believe it’s an appropriate for us to disclose this or other companies would like to be doing what we’re hopefully going to be doing soon, but it is a bureaucratic mess and we have been trying to clean up the mess for two years and we have spent an ordinate amount of time in resources, in capital and trying to fix it so, if you want to pick up the phone and call the U.S. Coast Guard or call your Congressmen, I welcome it. Unidentified Analyst Now, that’s a possible thought and a final question is just short time ago, you were announcing that you had more business than you could handle, I mean you didn’t have enough capacity of salt water disposal to get all the water into the ground, has the drought been that severe in the past month? Gary Evans It is, it’s actually been that severe in the past two months, yes, a lot of our business is handling flow back water and when there’s a lack of drilling there’s a lack of water, now we do as I said believe we can fill these wells up and we’re in the process of doing that, we have many contracts and negotiations to fill these wells up, so we believe this is a short term operation but at the same time that we turned on our new wells, the same time the business dropped. Unidentified Analyst And the final question is, in the last conference call you stated that the actual flow down was actually a benefit to your company and I don’t remember exactly why but you said because the company’s behalf it was differently, they would be doing things with the water and like I said I don’t recall exactly why, but you said, we’d be actually be getting better margins, what happened to that? Gary Evans So, let’s talk about that, when drilling stops, the water that’s reused, in other words, it might go into pit, it might go in to tanks, it’s being reused for additional fracking, that can only sit there for so long and then that water has to eventually be disposed of and so, we’re beginning to see that right now, that’s just beginning to happen is that this water is stored down these areas the local state governments, the DEP, the EPA, they’re not going to allow the companies to let that water sit there, so, they have to go dispose of it, because they are not reusing it for refrack, so that’s what we’re referring to and companies have been sitting on that water a lot longer than we anticipated but we do see a whole swell of that business coming. Operator Your next question comes from Kevin [Rineheart] with [Derivates] Capital. Unidentified Analyst I’m wondering at what point is this company sustainably profitable? Gary Evans As we get these wells filled up, I mean these existing disposal wells filled up, I don’t think you saw the EBITDA reported this quarter but we reported good positive EBITDA so we’re getting there, if you look at cutting the cost that we’ve done and now if we get the water we need, we’re getting very close so, closer than we’ve been in a long-long time, is that right Kirk? Kirk Trosclair That’s absolutely right, we’re positioning ourselves for when the market does take a turn to the north to have really tremendous results, especially as it relates to EBITDA. Gary Evans I can see it’s been profitable next year just in relation to the 430 million Magnum Hunter drilling program in Ohio, I mean it’s going to keep GreenHunter extremely busy. Unidentified Analyst Another couple of questions, what is the current plan on retaining $13 million debt and the possible uses of the $3 million credit facilities still available. Gary Evans Well the $13 million debt has its own amortization schedule, so that’s how the plan is that’s outlined in the 10-Q. Additional $3 million is for predominantly the terminals that we need with respect to the barging. So, Kirk, Kirk Trosclair I mean that’s inside the $13 million that we’ve already taken in but the additional $3 million is for future projects that we have a six month window that we can go to the lender and if approved by them we can move forward with those projects. We have a list of probably $10 million to $12 million worth of projects that we have on a wish list. So we’re preparing that now, we’re prioritizing it and we’ll present that to them prior to the deadline and determine at that point if it makes sense as a management team to move forward and take the additional $3 million or to suspend that and move away from it. Operator Your next question comes from [Michael Huntsman] with [indiscernible] Unidentified Analyst Hi, Gary and Kirk. Just clarify a couple of items. There is a fair amount of production still happening in Utica, Marcellus, and it’s a pretty high water cut. So, is that the share you’re going after is to capture more produced water in the absence of the drilling activities through the first half and second half of this year, ex what Magnum Hunter is talking about doing? Gary Evans Michael this is Gary. We’ll take any order, reduced water, pull back order, whatever it is, we’re not that choosy right now but the one thing that’s kind of hurt our area is that with oil prices down that’s caused NGL and condensate prices to be down. So, Marcellus wells which were very, very active in our neck of the woods are not being drilled today and that’s because the cost of processing that condensated NGLs is today it’s a cost rather than it benefit, we used to get a $1.50 in McF uplift for McF on gas because of the rich liquids that associated with the Marcellus. Today, because of those low prices it cost money, a producer has to pay the cryogenic processing plant to process those liquids. So, that is really hurt the economics of Marcellus wells and so that’s been a huge drop in the drilling activity. On the flip side, the Utica wells, the dry Utica wells which is what Magnum just announced they’re going to be doing are very profitable, at $3 gas with no processing, with the takeaway capacities we have today, rates of return in the 40% to 50% range. So, you’re seeing a whole swell of switching from Marcellus and Utica and that’s all happening now and so you’re going to see this drilling activity pick up towards the latter part of the year with a number, there is new permits, Ontario which is one of our largest customers just permitted three new wells, two in [indiscernible] county, one in Dodgers county. So, we’re beginning to see that switch over occur and we think, that activity will definitely help us, because we have always been so full, it’s been so easy for us from the standpoint to get business as we have people waiting in line. Now we’re actually having to go out and get the business and we’re taking business from others and that’s what’s occurring, now we have two sales people, working full time in conjunction with Kirk and his team and he’s negotiating contracts every day. So, we see this as a very short-term aberration of we’ve turned on two significant wells that are doing much better we thought and guess what? The volumes weren’t there but they’re coming and you might just elaborate a little bit on that Kirk. Kirk Trosclair Yes, I don’t want to mention any specific names of the operators we’re working with Michael but we have new contracted take or pay capacity agreements out to three major E&P companies in that area, which total excess of 12,000 barrels per day, a take-or-pay capacity and one of those looks like it will probably be signed here by September 1 and the other one should be shortly after. The negotiations have been going on for a couple of weeks. It’s really tough to go out and sell something, when you don’t actually have the product in inventory. So, injection volumes was our inventory until we actually had the wells on, once we turned the wells on then we can actually hit the streets, people won’t talk to you until you actually have the volumes because it’s a one of those things where what do you have for me today. Gary Evans Yes, decisions are made today no, okay, well you have volumes on month well [indiscernible] now we got the volumes they just been turned on, we’re able to go get the new business Unidentified Analyst Okay. And I’m not trying to ask this, where I stand critical, but I’m catching the sense that the change in drilling happened so fast that, you were full for so long and not really worrying about sourcing, that when it changed so fast, your reaction time to fill it, the combination means that’s why we got this gap until — Kirk Trosclair It is somewhat of the gap Michael and one of the things that is probably to our determent at some points, but it’s also is going to a help us in the long-term, is all of that flow-back volume 75% or so of our fluids are traditionally production volumes. The 25%, or so has been flow backs and the majority of that flow back was coming from Triad. So we were saving space for Triad because of the agreements we have with them in place and then once those volumes dropped off, they dropped off the face of the earth, I mean really, really quick, we saw it coming, but yet we were still trying to chase some additional flow backs from different customers but that also dried up at the same time and then we turned on to new wells with increased capacity, so that’s why you see the utilization numbers down because of the increased capacity and we think that’s going to be short lived, we’re trying to grab additional production volumes right now, but we also have to be cognizant of the fact that this new JV program with Triad will be sending a tremendous amount of flow back volumes starting at the latter part of this year. Unidentified Analyst And then, one other things you’ve believed in the past Gary about the river of transport barging, was that — you could in fact do this despite the Coast Guard, what’s changed in that regard? Kirk Trosclair There’s a regulation out there, on the [indiscernible] 787, it’s an older regulation that was an addition to the existing rig and we had an avenue that we thought we could use and we still remain confident that we could have done that. Now would that have been the best thing to do, probably not, that’s why we kind off pulled back our horses, hey let’s all get at the same table and come to a common agreement. And we started working more diligently with the Coast Guard, being involved in meetings with those guys in DC and formulating a new angle to see this thing finally come to fruition. The rate itself that they proposed were going to see some changes to the rate that they had sent out in the latter part of 2013, and so we’re privy to some of that information , we’re not going to let it out at this point, we are doing some sampling this week for those guys of some [indiscernible] fluids and we’ll see what those results comeback and it really looks good and promising for us. I can’t tell you the timeline because obviously we don’t know that with the government, but this will happen eventually. Gary Evans I think maybe to summarize this, we had kind of gotten in because we were so frustrated into a bit of an adversarial position with the Coast Guard on this and started butting heads pretty bad and then we got some congressmen involved and things started changing so, we have a local congressmen in the West Virginia Ohio area that are having calls with the Coast Guard to try to understand why this has become such a logjam and a big issue and I think it’s a combination of some poor regulations that were written initially that were not understood and of course the Coast Guard had to sent this to the OMB, now OMB looks at it, they do their mental review and it goes back to the Coast Guard so, when I say that we’ve been tied up into a regulatory logjam, that’s a mild understatement and we have kept the pressure on and we have been using congressmen to do that and we’ve been having much more fruitful meetings off lately then we’ve had in the past. And that we think we’ve got the right people involved now, they understand the issues and it’s being addressed so, we do have some ways that we could begin barging pretty quickly that we’re working with the Coast Guard on, we’re not disclosing that for competitive reasons but we think all this talk about the Coast Guard can be put to bed for too long. Unidentified Analyst Can we talk about the price per barrel of disposal trends at the well-head and then transportation pricing as well? Kirk Trosclair Yes, sure, in the immediate onset of the downturn, everything was pretty steady and then going into the second quarter we started feeling quite a bit of a pricing pressure on transportation, that’s always the first thing that hits Michael, across the board out of any [all field] service company is on the transportation side. We’ve seen rates decline in transportation from probably $10 per hour, some places in excess of $15 per hour depending pretty much steady across the board from depending on which type of the truck it is, those have been the rate reductions that we’ve seen. Those are holding pretty steady, I think we’ve finally pretty close to the bottom on that, I don’t know if anyone can really go much further. Gary Evans There’s been some trucking companies going out of business. Kirk Trosclair The number of units out on the road have gone down, the disposal pressure really didn’t show it’s faith, so we actually opened our own wells and all this flow back material went by the wayside and we’re out their chasing production volumes, you have to make some modifications but what we’ve done to combat that is to go to the large E&P companies and even the smaller guard and offer longer term contracts for reduction in rate. So, with that being said, we’ve kind off offset those declines in pricing pressure with longer term contracts which are much beneficial to us. We’ve been offering some discounts from month or two to get them in the door and that’s worked up pretty well. Right now, with again no drilling going on of any significance. There is some pressure. We see that change, there is a dramatic shift going to this dry Utica can emphasize that enough and we think this is a very short list situation. Unidentified Analyst So, we still over $3 a barrel? Gary Evans Yes Kirk Trosclair [Indiscernible] number right here to be — but if you look in the — we were actually $3.39 a barrel for average compared to $3.14 last year. That’s probably peaked, but we raised rates just on the count spot rate to $3.75 last fall and we’re still benefiting from that. Unidentified Company Representative So, you got to see things remain pretty close to around $3 range Gary Evans We’re not talking dramatic, Michael. Unidentified Analyst Okay, alright. And then I suspect that the lender for the $13 million is — you are not paying any cash out so I make sure you’re paying me, do you have to get back to that $1 million of EBITDA, before on a LTM basis, before they would let you do this seriously? Gary Evans No, we have an amendment that’s been executed this morning that gives us flexibility and yours truly will probably be the one putting some more capital in to get back to paying the dividend. So, our goal is to get back to paying those dividends sometime before the end of the year. Unidentified Analyst Okay. And how quickly can you catch up on the accumulated part? Gary Evans We can do it tomorrow, if we wanted to. Unidentified Analyst Okay. Gary Evans There is no — we make sure that the amendment that we just executed gave us lots of flexibility and we have that. Operator Your next question comes from the line of Gene [indiscernible]. Unidentified Analyst Just a couple of questions, I think we haven’t talked about for a while. First is the MLP, is that just the financing that you’ve gotten from your senior lender take that out of the question and what is the status with the IRS? Gary Evans Good question. We definitely believe this business is conducive for an MLP, you’re seeing more and more midstream companies put water business in their portfolios, so I’d midstream, gas gathering processing company and so we are still waiting for our revenue [indiscernible] letter, we’ve had our law firm working with IRS on that, we do believe that is a much cheaper form of financing for us in the future and that will likely not happen in 2015, it will be a 2016 event. Unidentified Analyst Okay. And is there any read through, obviously, you haven’t closed anything but you have — you make it in discussions, Magnum Hunter for the sales 45% [Eureka Hunter], is there any read through that you can get from there, in terms of what the MLP appetite is for these kind of assets, I mean, obviously it’s not exactly like [Eureka Hunter] but it’s not so Gary Evans The appetite for anything in this part of the country is exceptional, we’ll be announcing the eventual winner of the [Eureka Hunter] here over the next week to 10 days hopefully. It’s been a frothy exercise with tremendous amount of interest and we’ve had companies trying to circumvent the process whatever they could do to get the assets, so, we’re obviously trying to get the most value we can and we don’t see anything different with respect to the water business going forward. So, this part of the country is where every midstream guys wants to be because it has the highest growth potential because of the raw characteristics of the region. Unidentified Analyst And I guess along this lines another, I think that you talked about before was the pipeline, you have been working with nature pipeline obviously they couldn’t get the financing, is that still an option for the future and is that the sort of — were you far enough down the road there where you have rights of ways and things like that or is that more just an idea? Gary Evans We did buy any rights to way but we continue to talk to producers about consolidating their trucking operations in certain areas. So, that is still something that we are looking at and pursuing, it’s just the slowdown in activities caused everybody to kind of pull in their reigns a little bit and look at their base of business. So for us, our main focus is to get these wells filled and then we will be looking at these other opportunities. Operator And there are no further audio questions at this time. Gary Evans Thank you operator and thank all of you for listening in. It’s been a bumpy quarter but we did get lot accomplished and we look forward to reporting our ability to fill up our disposal wells going forward and other activities we have going on again. I think the new JV that Magnum is doing with these private equity partners are going to have a huge benefit for GreenHunter in late 2015, early ’16 actually goes for two years or 24 months, so we’re going to continue to keep our costs down, continue to cut them where we can, as Kirk mentioned these new 407 trucks are coming in, we’ll have them fully utilized as they hit the streets because of the type of vehicle they are and we’ll continue to look at adding additional capacities, so you think we’ll, gosh you haven’t filled up your existing wells, why are you looking for new capacity. We know what’s coming and we know we have to have additional capacity, so we’re working hard to do that. So, with that, feel free to call if you have any specific questions to our investor relations area and we’ll get back with you. And thank you for your time today. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, this does concludes today’s conference call and you may now disconnect.

Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) Andrew Littlefair on Q1 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (NASDAQ: CLNE ) Q1 2015 Earnings Conference Call May 11, 2015 4:30 PM ET Executives Tony Kritzer – Director-Investor Relations Andrew Littlefair – President, CEO & Director Bob Vreeland – Senior VP, CFO & Accounting Officer Analysts Eric Stine – Craig Hallum Capital Group Carter Driscoll – HC Winrate Rob Brown – Lake Street Capital Noah Kaye – Northland Capital Markets Andrea James – Dougherty & Company Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James & Associates, Inc Operator Greetings, and welcome to the Clean Energy Fuels First Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only-mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions].As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host Tony Kritzer, Director of Investor Relations. Thank you, Mr. Kritzer. You may now begin. Tony Kritzer Thank you, operator. Earlier this afternoon, Clean Energy released financial results for the first quarter ending March 31, 2015. If you did not receive the release, it is available on the Investor Relations section of the company’s website at www.cleanenergyfuels.com, where the call is also being webcast. There will be a replay available on the website for 30 days. Before we begin, we’d like to remind you that some of the information contained in the news release and on this conference call contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Words of expression reflecting optimism, satisfaction with current prospects, as well as words such as believe, intend, expect, plan, should, anticipate, and similar variations, identify forward-looking statements. But their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of performance, and the company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in such statements. Several factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are described in detail in the Risk Factors section of Clean Energy’s Form 10-Q, filed May 11, 2015. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this release. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements or supply new information regarding the circumstances after the date of this release. The company’s non-GAAP EPS and adjusted EBITDA will be reviewed on this call, and exclude certain expenses that the company’s management does not believe are indicative of the company’s core business operating results. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. The directly comparable GAAP information, reasons why management uses non-GAAP information, a definition of non-GAAP EPS and adjusted EBITDA, and a reconciliation between these non-GAAP and GAAP figures is provided in the company’s press release, which has been furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K today. Participating on today’s call from the company is President and Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Littlefair; and Chief Financial Officer, Bob Vreeland. With that, I will turn the call over to Andrew. Andrew Littlefair Thank you, Tony. Good afternoon, everyone. And thank you for joining us. I am pleased to review our first quarter 2015 operating results with you today. We reported 75.2 million gallons delivered this quarter, up 27% from the 59.3 millions gallons we delivered in the first quarter of 2014. Revenue was $85.8 million in the first quarter versus $95.3 million a year ago. Revenue decreased primarily due to three factors. We had a $9.1 million in construction project that were essentially complete at the end of the first quarter, but the revenue cannot be recognized. And most of this money is in the bank so this is just a timing matter. Lower natural gas commodity prices which in turn affected our revenue by $3.7 million. And finally IMW was a challenge as we told you would be on our last call due to a global equipment slowdown resulting from declining oil prices. As well as the strength of the US dollar which impacted international sales? Despite all of these our margins increased $0.02 to $0.28 per gallon and because of the increased volumes our fuel sale revenues increased by $8.4 million. Despite the decline in oil, we continue to see significant investments across the entire natural gas vehicles industry. Just last week, I attended the alternative Clean Transportation Expo in Dallas and there were several major announcements that will continue to develop and strengthen the NGV industry. Rush Enterprises, the largest truck dealership network in the country announced a new venture to manufacture, sell and stall and service new light weight compressed natural gas fuel systems for class VI through VIII trucks. Cummins Engine Company and Agility Fuel Systems announced strategic partnership that will include hardware and software tech natural gas engines and Agility Fuel tanks. Cummins Westfort announced that it will begin testing their spark ignited natural gas engine which is capable of producing near zero Nox emissions years ahead of the 2023 PA requirement. Ford motor company announced that in 2016 the F150, the best selling vehicle in the country will come with gas prepped engine. And Ford Landi Renzo announced they will be offering new F150, F250 and F350 natural gas trucks after market. Power Solutions International acquired power train integrators which will give PSI much greater reach in the GM on road engine and platform capabilities. This will open new opportunities for them through freight line or GM and other OEM offerings. And last month Peterbilt introduced two new models LNG powered truck configurations to their line up of natural gas vehicles. One silver lining of this lower oil prices is that the industry is responded by working to reduce incremental cost in natural gas trucks. Partly due to our tank programs with Agility and Chart. In certain truck configurations we’ve seen tank and engine prices come down more than 25%. This is great news as it helping to drive adoption. Turning for the market to the specifics of Clean Energy, we made progress across all of our market segments in the first quarter. In trucking, Raven Transport is deploying 115 additional heavy duty LNG trucks. This is a great example of adoption from long haul multi state trucking customer. They will now be fueling a 184 LNG trucks at 14 Clean Energy stations in eight states throughout the South East. We signed an agreement with Potelco in Washington to fuel 75 heavy duty LNG trucks. We opened two additional truck friendly stations in Arizona and Kansas City to support 58 CNG trucks for seaboard transport. We signed an agreement with Dean Food to build a private CNG fueling station to fuel 64 trucks at their Oak Farms Dairy plant in Houston, Texas. We have also expanded our fueling agreement with Dillon Transport who currently operates over 200 CNG trucks and we expect their volume with us to triple year-over-year. And in our rough use market we are building a third CNG station for Burrtec Waste in California. We completed a new station in Tampa for Progressive Waste for their 75 new trash trucks and we are building a fourth CNG station for Waste Pro in Sanford, Florida to support their 90 new trash trucks. Led by our customers’ waste management and republic services, we believe the refuse industry is picking up the pace over previous year. We should build over 35 stations projects for our customers this year, a record number. And we expect a record number of trucks to be deployed. Currently, we feel about 8,900 trucks for our refuse customers each day. In a transit market, Dallas area rapid transit added 63 new CNG buses. They now operate a natural gas fleet of 568 buses in 232 para transit vehicles that fuel at the four stations we built for them. We built a private station for Torrance, California’s municipal fleet of 35 trash trucks and 29 transit buses. In our fleet services market we opened Orlando airport station which can accommodate vehicles ranging from passenger cars to buses to heavy duty trucks. Year-to-date we’ve completed 16 station projects for ourselves and our customers in our various market segments. Let me now spend a moment on IMW. As we mentioned on the last call we anticipated that they would be challenge in the first quarter. Some of that is due to the global decline in oil which soften their sales and some of that is due to the strength in US dollar. However, we have right sized the business and made significant product enhancements. We standardized our compressor design which will decrease our time to ship and make our manufacturing more efficient. So IMW was somewhat of a drag in Q1, it is getting better in Q2. There are still global demands and we recently receive orders from China, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, Canada and Mexico. IMW remains strategically important for us as we account for roughly 20% of their production for our own station builds. Turning now to our renewable fuels division. Last week UPS signed an agreement to purchase our Redeem branded renewable natural gas fuel at their stations in Sacramento, Fresno and Los Angeles. We estimate that these three stations will provide approximately 1.5 million gallons of renewable fuel annually to roughly 400 CNG vehicles that UPS has deployed in California. This was a significant step in the expansion of our Redeem business. As you know, we’ve been supplying redeemed all of our public stations in California since launching it about a year and half ago. Over the last six months, municipalities, universities and now UPS, the largest logistics company in the country have signed long-term deals to guarantee they will receive renewable natural gas that is rated 90% clean than diesel. This deal sends a strong message to the transportation industry. UPS continue to be leader in the deployment of natural gas vehicles with their recent announcements of increased orders of both LNG and CNG of over 800 tractors and 600 delivery vans. In fact, UPS is on record saying they haven’t purchased a diesel truck in the last two years. We sold 8.9 million gallons of Redeem in the quarter compared to 2.8 million gallons during the first quarter of last year. Redeem is nice a contributor to our margin and revenue and we continue to be very bullish on the growing an environmentally relevant business. Our new virtual CNG pipeline business NG Advantage has made solid progress. They are recently awarded a contract to provide compressed natural gas to international papers by Ticonderoga New York paper mill which we expect to add at least 5 million gallons this year. This is a significant opportunity for NG Advantage and we look to expand this business as new opportunities emerge to lower our customers’ fuel cost while meeting with their environmental goals. Our two stations that support NG Advantage accounted for over 4.7 million gallons combined in the first quarter. Regarding our CapEx plans for the year we are still on track to spend $38 million for Clean Energy and $21 million related to NG Advantage growth opportunities. Remember, this is down from $87 million last year. At the end of the first quarter, we had $220 million of cash and investments on the balance sheet. Overall, our core business is doing very well with growing volumes and expanding margins in relatively difficult environment. Although there was pressure on EBITDA this quarter, I want to reiterate that we still expect to be adjusted EBITDA positive for the full year. And with that I’ll turn the call over to Bob. Bob Vreeland Thank you, Andrew. And good afternoon, everyone. It is my pleasure to go over our financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2015. I’ll address some highlights as well as some of the challenges. The financial highlights of the first quarter fall under four areas. Volumes and the associated increased revenue, margin for gasoline gallon equivalent, SG&A spending and cash flow. The growth in volume of 27% over the first quarter of 2014 came from all of our sectors. The most notable growth coming from the following. The trucking increased 35%, refuse increased 24%, transit increased 14% and our industrial sector more than doubled. From a product standpoint, our fuel gallons increased 29% and our gallons associated with operating and maintenance services increased 28% compared to the first quarter of 2014. Revenues related to gallons delivered increased 15% or $8.4 million when comparing the first quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2014. Our margin per gasoline gallon equivalent was $0.28 compared to $0.27 in the first quarter of 2014 and compared to $0.26 in the fourth quarter of 2014. This gain in margin is attributed to product mix essentially more fuel gallons, declines in natural gas cost and additional RIN credits. Our SG&A spending remain under control at approximately $30 million for the quarter, an improvement of nearly 10% over year ago and flat with our most recent quarter. On cash flow, we collected all of our 2014 volumetric excise tax credit in March which contributed to our positive cash flow from operations of $20.9 million for the first quarter of 2015. As Andrew mentioned upward our cash and investments at $220 million at the end of March 2015. Now the challenges we face in a quarter were the anticipated lower revenue volume from IMW, the timing of revenue recognition on station sales and to a lesser degree the impact on revenue of price declines from lower commodity costs. IMW revenues were impacted by a slowdown in orders on the international front and the government sectors due to low oil prices and the strength of US dollar. Also when comparing IMW revenue between the first quarters of 2015 and 2014, IMW’s first quarter of 2014 was exceptionally strong due a large custom project in process at that time and other orders that carried over from 2013 which we knew would not be repeated in the first quarter of 2015. On our station sales we had three large station projects that did not meet our revenue recognition accounting requirements and thus will be recognized in the second possibly third quarter depending on certain external factors outside our control. This was about $9.1million in station revenue that was deferred outside the first quarter and which Andrew indicated as well, most of that’s been collected. On the price front, we will always have certain fluctuations in pricing. This first quarter saw some rather meaningful price declines, driven by the lower gas commodity cost. That impacted our top line revenue by $3.7 million when compared to 2014, although most of this did not drop down into our margin and due to the lower cost. Our adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2015was negative $5.6 million compared to negative $6.8 million in the same period in 2014 despite having $9.5 million less in revenue in the first quarter of 2015 versus 2014. We were positively impacted by our increased volumes and steady margin per gallon between the periods and negatively impacted by the lower station sales in IMW revenue. We expect quarterly adjusted EBITDA to improve as we continue to leverage our station and cost infrastructure and grow volumes. We still expect to be positive adjusted EBITDA for 2015. From a balance sheet perspective the most notable change from December was the collection of volumetric excise tax credit. We also have done some financing of capital expenditures principally CNG trailers supporting our industrial sector namely NG Advantage. Now we generally get a question on our convertible notes coming due at the end of August, 2016 in the amount of $145 million. As a reminder, these notes are payable in cash or common stock at our election. We continue to actively address these notes and we are evaluating a variety of alternatives. In addition to the equity aspect available, we also have over $500 million in encumbered long-term asset along with our own internally generated cash as we look forward towards positive EBITDA and a possibility of further VETC or asset sales. The key takeaway here is we are actively addressing this matter and we have a variety of choices. Our goal is to satisfy the notes in an effective manner while maintaining adequate cash and operational flexibility beyond August 2016. And with that operator, we will open the call to questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Eric Stine with Craig Hallum. Please proceed with your question. Eric Stine Hi, everyone. Wondering if you can just talk about what are you seeing from shippers in the market? What role that played in the Raven deal and what role that’s playing in some of the other contracts out there? Andrew Littlefair Yes, Eric. That continues. Just to — for our friends who maybe aren’t quite as familiar recall that shippers, we use that term to the companies like Procter and Gamble or MillerCoors, these are large consumer companies that may not have their own trucking fleet and they actually go out and hire contracting fleet — contacted carriers for them. And as you know we talked to dozens if not more than hundred of these companies trying to make sure they understand the sustainability games by natural gas and also that the cost of the fuel. And we do it now in a constructive manner with our trucker friend because obviously the shippers and the truckers are very close. And so we continue to see the shippers, Eric, move forward. Procter and Gamble as you know I think has 20% mandate in place for its carriers. Raven fit in their — they do some Procter and Gamble work as I think they also do some for MillerCoors. We have seen MillerCoors would be aggressive wanting to have hauling at a lot of their different breweries move this direction. Kroger has their own fleet but they are also been very aggressive. So we continue to see these shippers Colgate Palmolive, Home Depot and others. So I think it is going to be a bigger and bigger move because they are savings on the fuel and there is a great sustainability gains to be have. They wanted to do in a constructive manner with their hauler. They have to have good relations with their trucking company but on the other hand they pay for the fuel. So we continue to see the shippers move in this direction and work with their truckers. Eric Stine Got it, okay. And then on that Raven deal, I know that enabled to you — that was your anchor fleet to open another three to four stations. Just curios how that deal has — having those stations in place has changed conversations in that area of the country and just what you see going forward? Andrew Littlefair Yes. I mean I think to the extent that some people thought we obviously build lot of stations and didn’t have — we haven’t had them open yet because of the slower deployment of trucks and the kind of year delay in those trucks. But you know what the Raven is a perfect example. If we didn’t have those stations built right now they wouldn’t have made that deal, they wouldn’t have been able to make that deal and have those routes to satisfy the Procter and Gamble business. And so it totally changes the discussion and it means that right now as Raven begins to take those delivery of those trucks we are able to open these stations at our previously where we spent the capital and we are ready to open them in a matter weeks not in a matter of year if you have to build it from scratch. One other thing I think is important the Raven deal and of course these are LNG trucks. We are not– we have seen a lot of urban kind of regional haulers use compressed natural gas and we feel a lot of those, this is really one of the biggest deployments of real long haul trucks. These are irregular routes going over night, hitting many different cities and our network is able to accommodate that. So LNG is a very good fuel for that and I think that’s why Raven went with 150 LNG tractors. Eric Stine Got it. Maybe to sticking with LNG stations, you have now got a number of cold LNG tank solutions in the market for Spark ignited. Is that — are there actual instances where that enables you to open a station on 20 trucks versus kind of the historical levels more like 30 plus? Andrew Littlefair Yes. We in fact we have kind of altered our position where — this is for LNG of course, where we can open those station out with 20 trucks. And in fact we have done it with less, we’ve done it with 15. So which is nice because that is — that’s kind of in the wheelhouse in terms of the number of trucks that these guys are beginning to take and it allows to open stations. We’ve opened — in the first quarter we opened another four plus one mobile five, we opened actually a station Friday which adds to that number six and plus three more mobile fuelers. So we are able open them now for 20 trucks and as I said earlier we can open them in a matter of weeks when we are ready to go. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Carter Driscoll with HC Winrate [ph] Please proceed with your question. Carter Driscoll Hi, guys. How are you? First question just given the depressed prices for several quarters, I am sure maybe hopefully you are thinking the competitive environments maybe waned a little bit and obviously purchasing stations in the past, has your thinking changed there might be some strategic assets or stations in particular out there that you might be able to cherry pick or maybe even a group of stations and how that does or doesn’t fit in with your current CapEx plans and then obviously with the bullet payment you have due next August. Andrew Littlefair Well, right. And I think that the downturn in oil prices has probably put some strain on players that have few stations and then they might be a few truck friendly stations in a given region. We have a history of kind of take advantage of those opportunities when we see them. As you know we bought stations from SoCalGas Public Service Colorado, Lone Star Gas and Brooklyn Union Gas. So we made acquisition from time to time. I think you will see a couple of packages come up. I can’t say much more about that right now. We obviously have to weigh whether or not we think they are appropriately loaded or if they help our network, we have 257 stations that we own, I guess we actually co-own about 10 of those and then we operate another 301 so when you look at network, I think our next largest competitor maybe has 70 or 80. So if there will be occasions where there maybe an order to that will fit in nicely and if couple of these bigger packages comes up, we will look at them. You are right we have to weigh our cash and or stock prices and our ability to take that on. And we have to make sure that’s it is going to fit our network. Some of these smaller players and smaller stations, they might be situated at a convenient store; it doesn’t really fit our model. So we wanted to be careful on what we look at. Carter Driscoll Right. Now that makes lot sense. And then you have seen lot of — well you have seen some activity in terms of moving more towards the leasing model and trying to get maybe discount on the fuel or have it amortized within that leasing price. Can you update us on your efforts in that regard with your partnership? And then I have one more follow up if I may. Andrew Littlefair Okay. Well, you know we’ve been doing that for a long time. I mean you probably – I mean we actually did some of deals like that in fact Boone talked about it, did some with school districts 15 years ago. So this is something that we looked at for a long time. You know we have partnership, relationship with GE to do that. Of course that arm is for sale right now. But it’s business as usual. Our sales team and theirs are canvassing about 150 different fleets. We’ve had 46 different proposals from customers through GE lease with our field rep into that. We’ve actually made handful so better that I think about 10 of those deals have actually consummated. I think in the leasing scenario right now as you are looking at, at least what we saw little bit of GE with that with the down deep into the fuel price. It put some pressure on gas or diesel product to really scratch their head more and if they wanted to now go and leasing that for gas truck. But I think it is — one of our competitors recently announced deal like this. It is good way to go. There is enough fuel savings in there where you are really able to put somebody into a natural gas truck at a similar same price as a diesel truck where you offsetting the incremental and you are able to make it up with the fuel price over time with the fuel contract. So it makes a lot of sense and it is part of our package, our 80 sales men, they all have this is one of their tools in their bag and so yes we will see more of it. Carter Driscoll Okay. And then maybe if you could just give us an update on — well, maybe not an update but maybe your qualification of what you’ve learned with the NG Advantage structure right now? What’s been maybe ahead of schedule? What’s been maybe behind schedule? Or in terms of signing up customers, has that been faster or slower, maybe even kind of the average size of what you’ve done so far? I know it’s been relatively few in number so far but if you could just qualify how you’re performing in that –? Andrew Littlefair Yes. We are very pleased with NG Advantage. And even in this tighter oil environment versus fuel because we are competing with fuel oil mostly in that but we are still able NG Advantage is still able to offer 25% to 30% saving. So the international paper, this is different than the trucking business where there is thousands of fleets and millions of trucks all over the place. There is more defined geographic location and also there are only 10 or 15 international paper plants. So now they are huge consumers of fuel and we are very proud of that international paper deal because I mean in that one deal is 5 million gallons and so we are really very focus NG events of those type of customers. They are in the North East, they are in the Middle Atlantic and we are pleased the way that’s going. We’ve signed up several more customers since we acquired that business, fact you know it is a high class problem. We are getting ready to be out of capacity those two stations that we have one in New Hampshire, one in Vermont. We are going to add capacity to it. So we have high hopes for the way that business continues to develop. Carter Driscoll Okay. And maybe just squeeze in one more and I’ll ask kind of the ubiquitous question. From a trucking perspective, have you seen any noticeable shift between CNG and LNG? Is it really still more of a return to base focus for CNG and longer haul, more focused on LNG — do you still have that expertise — Andrew Littlefair Well, I still think that’s the case. I mean I have been clear, we like the way we are positioned because we do both. And I think right now we are at 70% LNG, I mean 70% CNG and 30% LNG. Obviously we had some big wins recently on a couple of LNG fleet. I do think that when you are in an urban environment, return to base, CNG is probably the right fuel. And when you are longer haul, over the road, irregular route, LNG is going to make a lot of sense for fleet. And so we are well positioned to do both. Lot of our truck friendly stations, about half of them now the ones that we both have CNG as well as LNG. So it is whatever the customer needs. But I think you are right, over time longer haul will probably shift little bit towards LNG and I think we turn to base in urban environment, it is pretty tough to compete with the CNG. I think that would be the preferred fuel. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rob Brown with Lake Street Capital. Please proceed with your question. Rob Brown Good afternoon. On your Redeem business, what’s sort of your gallon capacity in that business? Can you continue to grow that sort of without limit? Or is there a limit there? Andrew Littlefair Well, if you ever heard our man who runs that business, Harrison Clay, he will tell you to, he will give you very large numbers. I mean if you look at the country and you look at digesters and agriculture and land fill, you can get to see very large numbers. I mean many tens of billions of gallon. So I think in fact I was talking with Boon about this about a week ago, he wondered how big could that business really be. It is pretty large. Now there will be certain areas where it will make more sense and maybe too far away from the transportation market or too far away from the grid to be able to put that fuel in. I think it can be very large. We expect to grow our Redeem business more than double at this year. And we are now bringing more of third party gas we ever before with certain deals that we are doing so we are bringing a lots of fuel. The advantage that we have over many others in this business is that we have the stations to be able to get this in the transportation fuel. So that’s give us a leg up. So we have some fairly large third party producers that are bringing this fuel and they want to get it to us to be able to get into our transportation network. That’s where you get the full value of this is to be able to do get on the land fill or get out of digester but get into the vehicle tank. We are uniquely positioned for that. So we are beginning to see more and more traction where for instance LAMTA is going out to look for Redeem at least 50 or 60 million gallons a year. So you are beginning to see fleets recognize the importance of being able to use really the cleanest commercial fuel available like in the country, in the world for that matter. So we like it. Our customers as evidenced by UPS and others like it and understand it. When they look at wanting to be sustainable, I know this sounds touchy feely when you start talking about sustainability but they are serious about it, these big companies. So it is one of the most impactful things they can do to hit their sustainability goals. And so, yes, it adds revenue for us and it adds nice margin for us. And our customers like it. Rob Brown Okay, great, thank you. And then you mentioned the Agility deal a little bit. Where are you at with that? How many sorts of trucks have you sold there? And how is that being received in the market and your customer? Andrew Littlefair Right. So just as everybody else Rob, we’ve made some we call them tank deals right. So we made some deals with Chart and Agility where we have been able to get some special pricing for Clean Energy customers. We pass that pricing on to the customers. We’ve — our first offering with the Chart was over subscribed and so we are moving on to the next tranche of LNG tanks there. Agility as you know it wasn’t signed as early as the Chart one. So we are just kind of getting going on that. But I’ll tell you what is one of the things I mentioned in my remarks is when you are able to really bring 20%, 30% out of the cost of the tank package, you get the customers’ attention. And it is meaningful and it really offset this reduction in the savings between diesel and natural gas. So it is really meaningful and I have no doubt that over the course — especially with this new deal with Cummins Engine Company. Agility that really makes this I think even a better offering. And I have no doubt that it will before the year is out we will make substantial progress on moving through all those tanks. Rob Brown Okay, good. And then last question just sort of big picture. What’s sort of your latest thinking on the penetration rate in the trucking market this year with the current commodity environment? I guess the refuse market as well? Andrew Littlefair Well, the refuse market, I am out of the business to predicting how many trucks right. So you are going to have to — if you want truck numbers you are going to get that from Cummins or somebody that’s little closer to it. We haven’t seen Rob a fall off. And in the fact that I think if you put in new big UPS order for the 2015, I think we are going to be all pleasantly surprised that it is holding up very well. We haven’t seen customers — that the few customers that we have that have been on the fence are still on the fence. And but the customers that, this 600 or 800 so that we have on our pipeline, we haven’t seen anybody run for the exits because of this, they know that price of oil and diesel is volatile. I think frankly we’ve already seen the price come up here in California diesel is about $3 and $0.30 some odd, the other parts of the country it is lower. Gasoline, is of course is up dramatically nationwide and here in California so we are seeing the price kind of come back. I really think that with these big investments that you have seen these companies and there are products that are available and more product offerings. I feel pretty good about the way that the adoption rate is going. We see more customers taking more trucks and we still have some that are starting out with the 10 or 15 but the Raven is a good example where they had 75 trucks, now they have taken another 115. They are talking about taking even more, deal in trucking are very good example. What UPS has done. You know, Ryder is quietly fielded 900 natural gas trucks and Penske I think it is up to a couple of hundred. So you are beginning to see these really major fleets continue to take trucks and so obviously much higher oil price and diesel price would probably give more acceleration to it. But I feel pretty comfortable that we are — it is going along pretty well. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Noah Kaye with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question. Noah Kaye Thank you for taking my question. Just wanted to follow-up on the question on Redeem. The RIN markets for Cellulosics that continue to be valuable, as you start to expand this part of the portfolio; can you talk a little bit about where your margins are at right now for Redeem? And how much of that is coming from the credits? Is there a way to think about that? Bob Vreeland Yes, well, I mean certainly part of that margin comes from the credit, probably go out get into exactly what that margin is but the thing is that with the Redeem those credit there is real market out there. That’s one of the things that we really seen driving this whole product line is that with the — being 90% cleaner to diesel and the whole renewable, sustainable environment, it is driving a lot of big players to say they want some of it. So that’s making the credits a very valid — there is a very valid fluid market for that and so it is kind of factors in there like we are doing most all of other fuel deals where we’ve got kind of cost of gas plus right. And so that factors into the equation. It is just — I can’t tell you exactly what that number is but it is meaningful. And it aligns with the flow of gas. So it is not kind of separate credit it is dangled out there. It is as we fuel those credits are generated. And so it goes right lock-toe in step with the flow of green gas as we call it. Noah Kaye And there’s plenty of runway in your view for the growth of biogas within that tranche of the RFS, correct? Bob Vreeland Correct. Yes, that’s one thing is that the supply — so the supply market is — there is definitely supply out there, absolutely. And it is plentiful. I mean there are a lot of landfills out there. They are producing a lot of methane they just going up in smoke and burning into the atmosphere. And so that’s where the supply is coming from. And we are a good taker of the supply because of our distribution network. Noah Kaye The methane has to be upgraded to your pipeline quality biogas, correct? Bob Vreeland Right. Noah Kaye So you are — but you believe that there’s plenty of biogas supply out there for takers? So is this basically a takers’ market for you right now? Or are you supply-constrained in any way? Bob Vreeland We are not supply constrained at the moment but I mean as folks realize that they are going to put kind of essentially on the same natural gas into whatever they are fueling, but yes this is renewable, truly renewable gas. 90% cleaner than diesel then all of a sudden it start to get pretty attractive. Now and so there is a lot of economics, it surrounds all that but for these clients are pretty substantial that you put on these landfills and dairies whatever it is to capture the stuff but the supply is growing. Andrew Littlefair Obviously, Noah, if you had for instance in this — in the California market or Southern California market, if the LAMTA which is the largest transit fleet in the United States, if they shifted over to bio-methane we would like to think for Redeem, that would be 60 million gallons right annually that we would show up. And so that would make a big impact on the availability. But right now there is a plenty of– there is plenty of supply available. It is more than what people would imagine. Noah Kaye Okay, great. Finally one unrelated question. You touched on NG Advantage and obviously the transportation market. Can you give us an update on the rail opportunity, what you’re seeing out there? Any major tenders coming? How would you kind of characterize that market opportunity? Andrew Littlefair Right. I think the rail opportunity is going to be very large. And as we’ve discussed on these calls before, it is a 3 or 4 billion gallon annual market with just a handful of players. I know one of the top tier players has 6,600 locomotives that on average use 800 gallons a day. So you are talking about significant usage and savings. What I can’t tell you is right now the two — the only two locomotive manufactures in the US are both bringing natural gas product to market. And three at least three may be four, but I know for sure three of the tier one rail companies are all in test. One of them are think is little further along than the others. Well, they are out actually on open track before different locomotives right now. So, yes, they are moving along of course these are long-lived assets; the locomotives are 30 years assets. So you are going to see a lot of the fleet be converted, I am told right now that they are feeling pretty comfortable they can get to 70% displacement i.e. they reduce 30% diesel and 70% natural gas. That’s significant savings. And so yes it takes a while, there is a Federal Railway Administration rules and there is a couple other groups they got to go through in terms of the LNG tank car tenders, but all of this is doable and all workable. And I think you will see the rails on next year or so begin to bring this into their fleet in a meaningful way. I think frankly it is going to go faster when it goes than the marine. Noah Kaye And you expect this will be an LNG opportunity rather than CNG? Andrew Littlefair Yes. It will be LNG. And just so unclear but we are not really allowed to say too much here. We are working with all those tier one firms right now. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Andrea James with Dougherty & Company. Please proceed with your question. Andrea James Hi, thanks for taking my questions. The gallons delivered were up nicely sequentially and year-over-year at a better mix. The question is how much of that is tied to some of the recent announcements you’ve made? Or I guess put another way what’s sort of the time between you announce something like the Raven or the most recent UPS deals and when it shows up in the numbers? Andrew Littlefair Well, I’ll let Bob, let me tell you what I think it is then Bob if he had some that– I am not quite familiar with so like the Raven, we haven’t seen any volume yet. We have some existing business with Raven but those new 115 haven’t been delivered yet. So it kind of depends I would say anywhere between — it kind of depends on what they’ve ordered and you are talking about from the time they are willing to let us announce or the fleets willing to announce by the time they receive a truck, that could be three or four months. Now the UPS, let me make a caveat there, the UPS volumes, those trucks are fueling already in Southern California and so that can start immediately. And when we made a recent– I don’t know that we have an announcement but we made recent addendum to our national fuel agreement with Dillon. Well, Dillon trucking is already running trucks and so now they are going to begin to use three or four of other stations, so that we’ll come on immediately. Well, when it is a new ground up they have to get those trucks, we may have to build the station and so there is lag, gradual, it is gradual Bob Vreeland So we will some of that but it doesn’t all hit at once but it is moving. Andrew Littlefair The other thing that we see is in just a little bit more mature entry is like refuse, there is a very established pattern of when they go before their companies and do their budgets and then they order their trucks. So when they begin to take delivery of the trucks, that’s why we always got to see a little bit of low over the winter time in the first quarter and they begin to — because they do their budgeting I think like September or something, then they begin to take all those trucks, begin to show up March through kind of the third quarter. So we seek kind of bulge coming on the refuse side. Andrea James And how many stations are you guys operating now? Andrew Littlefair Well, we operate over 500 to 700 I think. We only own about 257 and we operate about 300 Andrea James And America’s Natural Gas Highway, how many of those are open? Andrew Littlefair So there are about 40 as of few days ago, there are about 43 of those open right now. Andrea James And that’s double year-over-year? Andrew Littlefair Yes. Andrea James And how many are like kind of built but ready to go? Andrew Littlefair 50 Andrea James Okay, so you’re almost — you’ve almost — Andrew Littlefair We are making headway and we’ve got eight more that will be open, that already slated to be open by the end of August and then we have about another four that are kind of little bit — we are just waiting to sign those deals and there will be other issues. So I hope we can’t control this exactly. It is kind of depends on the adoption rate of the trucks. But I hope that over the course of the year we will get another 20 or so open so then we will be down to where we only have about 20 to go or so in that number. Andrea James Okay. And then forgive me this one; your diluted shares outstanding fell a little bit. Can you please remind us again what that’s tied to? Bob Vreeland It is exercise of options and how much you talked about? During this quarter or kind of from last year like the year-over-year? Andrea James Well, yes it was like little bit. Go ahead Bob Vreeland We had back and late 2014, we took out about 4 million shares related to a warrant with GE and just the accounting treatment was — we determined that — those shares wouldn’t be in our outstanding share so there was about 4 million that just kind of came out at the end of last year. So when you compare say this year to last year, you are seeing same quarter — you are seeing that fairly significant number come out of shares which was just kind of an accounting entry if you will. Andrea James Got it. And even sequentially, they’re down a little bit too? Bob Vreeland Yes. That’s just normal exercise activity, lot of options or not, yes. Operator Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Pavel Molchanov with Raymond James & Associates, Inc. Pavel Molchanov Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Of your volumes in Q1, how much came from NG Advantage? Andrew Littlefair What’s in the industrial? What’s your industrial number? Bob Vreeland Yes, close to 5 million, just little shy, probably over 5 million. Andrew Littlefair I think it is like 4.7 or — Pavel Molchanov Yes, okay. And that reflects a full quarter of your ownership or majority interest I should say? Bob Vreeland It does. Andrew Littlefair It does. Pavel Molchanov Okay. And on the — when I look at the income statement, the minority interest income that this quarter looks like the positive $380 million, I assume that — $380,000, I’m sorry. Yes, Indeed. That includes the debit for external owners of NG Advantage? Bob Vreeland Correct. That’s what it relates to. Pavel Molchanov Okay. And any other kind of variable interest entities in there? Andrew Littlefair No. Pavel Molchanov In that minority interest line? Andrew Littlefair Correct. Operator There are no further questions at this time. I’d now like to turn the floor back over to management for any closing or additional remarks. Andrew Littlefair Thank you, operator. And thank you everybody for joining us today. We look forward to updating you on our activities in the next quarter. Operator This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. And thank you for your participation.