Tag Archives: top-ideas

Best And Worst Q3’15: Telecom Services ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

Summary Telecom Services sector ranks seventh in Q3’15. Based on an aggregation of ratings of six ETFs and 12 mutual funds. PBS is our top-rated Telecom Services ETF and FWRLX is our top-rated Telecom Services mutual fund. The Telecom Services sector ranks seventh out of the 10 sectors as detailed in our Q3’15 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of six ETFs and 12 mutual funds in the Telecom Services sector. See a recap of our Q2’15 Sector Ratings here. Figure 1 ranks all five ETFs and Figure 2 ranks the five best and worst mutual funds in the sector that meet our liquidity standards. Note that even the best Telecom Services ETFs fail to earn an Attractive-or-better rating. Not all Telecom Services sector ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 23 to 55). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors should not buy any Telecom Services ETFs or mutual funds because none get an Attractive-or-better rating. If you must have exposure to this sector, you should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved fund fees. Active management has a long history of not paying off. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 (click to enlarge) * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (NYSEARCA: XTL ) is excluded from Figure 1 because its total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 (click to enlarge) * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The Rydex Series Telecommunications Fund (MUTF: RYMIX ) (MUTF: RYMAX ) (MUTF: RYCSX ) is excluded from Figure 2 because its total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. The PowerShares Dynamic Media Portfolio ETF (NYSEARCA: PBS ) is the top-rated Telecom Services ETF and the Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio (MUTF: FWRLX ) is the top-rated Telecom Services mutual fund. PBS earns a Dangerous rating and FWRLX earns a Neutral rating. The ProShares Ultra Telecommunications ETF (NYSEARCA: LTL ) is the worst-rated Telecom Services ETF and the Rydex Telecommunications Fund (MUTF: RYTLX ) is the worst-rated Telecom Services mutual fund. Both earn a Very Dangerous rating. 43 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Telecom Services stocks, but due to style drift, Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds hold 55 stocks. Inteliquent Inc. (NASDAQ: IQNT ), on the Most Attractive Stocks List in July , is one of our favorite stocks held by Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds and earns our Very Attractive rating. Since 2007, Inteliquent has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 24% compounded annually. In addition to strong profit growth, the company improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) to 28% from 11% in 2012. Despite the strong underlying business performance, IQNT remains undervalued. At its current price of $18/share, Inteliquent has a price to economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.1. This ratio implies that the market expects NOPAT to grow by 10% from its current level. If Inteliquent can grow NOPAT by 7% compounded annually for the next decade, the stock is worth $24/share today – a 33% upside. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (NYSE: CBB ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds and earns our Very Dangerous rating. Over the past five years, Cincinnati Bell’s NOPAT has declined by 19% compounded annually. Even worse, Cincinnati Bell has failed to create shareholder value by failing to generate positive economic earnings for 11 consecutive years. Despite years of poor business fundamentals, CBB is overvalued. To justify its current price of ~$4/share, Cincinnati Bell must grow NOPAT by 9% compounded annually for the next 12 years. Owning this stock and, ergo, betting on the company to pull off such an extended turnaround given its recent struggles is quite risky. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Telecom Services ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs (click to enlarge) Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds (click to enlarge) Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Max Lee receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

UWTI: Forget About Growth

Originally published on August 6, 2015 VelocityShares 3X Long Crude ETN (NYSEARCA: UWTI ) is set to close down strongly on Thursday morning as oil traders worry that the market is far from a takeoff. An Oppenheimer report on the market suggested that the cut in supplies by producers won’t be enough to save them from the glut in the market, and much pain ahead. Fadel Gheit, who wrote the report for the research house, said that recent reports from the oil firms were a sign of shifting market outlook. “The priority now is to discontinue budget spending. The priority is to live within your means. Forget about growth. They are now in survival mode.” Oil pumpers slash budgets Mr. Gheit was commenting the recent changes to outlook seen in the earnings report of some of the biggest oil firms in the world. Chesapeake has cancelled its payouts to shareholders , Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ) has slashed its capital spending and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A ) (NYSE: RDS.B ) has cut more than 6,000 jobs . At the root of the trouble is OPEC . The global oil cartel has decided to keep its supply high despite the price of Brent falling below $50. Shell CEO told investors that his firm is “planning for a prolonged downturn.” Those betting on the VelocityShares 3X Long Crude ETN may want to do the same. Mr. Gheit said that major oil firms were “still not willing to abandon their rosy forecasts,” but, “at least they are addressing the near-term situation that we have to do something now and not wait for oil prices to recover.” Supply of oil is set to fall over the coming years because of lower investment from firms across the world, but it’s still not going to be enough to allow oil makers, or the price of the black liquid, to grow by a huge margin. VelocityShares 3X Long Crude ETN gets crushed After open this morning the VelocityShares 3X Long Crude ETN was trading for $1.28, down 4.1 percent for the day so far. Those who have been trading the ETF in the hope of a surprise oil spike have been hit hard in recent weeks as Iran’s coming entry into the global market keeps pushing prices lower. In the last month the ETN has lost more than 40 percent of its value. It has lost more than 70 percent since the year began. Rumors that VelocityShares 3X Long Crude ETN will be forced into a reverse split have not yet been met with any facts to back them up, but if prices keep crashing there may be no other option. Leveraged ETFs are not for the faint of heart and 3X oil, much like its gold cousins, has been a very difficult market to make money in in 2015. That trend may continue through the second half of the year and those that don’t know what they’re doing should reduce their exposure and stop trying to time a market that’s controlled by a cartel thousands of miles away. Original Post

How To Catch A Falling Knife

Summary The “falling knife” stock is increasingly common. The current economic environment increases risk in falling stocks. One long-established investment technique can minimize the risk. Falling knife: A security or industry in which the current price or value has dropped significantly in a short period of time. A falling knife security can rebound, or it can lose all of its value, such as in the case of company bankruptcy where equity shares become worthless. –Investopedia Remember Boston Chicken? Inspired by the heady days of the late ’90s and my personal effort to improve their top line, I watched BOST decline in price and finally made a major share purchase when it was so low I could not resist. To this day I maintain that no company can go broke trying to sell too much fat, salt, and sugar to the American public. This axiom was overcome by BOST’s incestuous finances and the practice of selling one dollar of chicken for 95 cents, which led to bankruptcy in 1998. A $50 check from the subsequent class action lawsuit did little to assuage my five figure loss. There were many lessons to be had from this experience. The one I want to concentrate on is the value of dollar cost averaging, or DCA, in purchasing stocks that are declining in price. DCA refers to planned purchases in multiple increments over time, in contrast to a one time purchase of the full investment. If I had used DCA with Boston Chicken, my loss would have been much less severe. DCA is useful in many circumstances, but its benefits are magnified in cases where a stock is in a significant decline. The Falling Knife Scenario The classic falling knife scenario consists of an abrupt price change. Yelp is a particularly hair-raising example: A broader definition of “falling knife” is any stock that is in a clear price decline over a period of time. Under this definition there are many falling knives among today’s investment choices. Every day articles appear on Seeking Alpha enthusiastically recommending a purchase because stock X is N per cent off its high. Readers will often note that such articles have appeared since a decline began. Here are three companies in the falling knife category that have had bullish articles all the way down: American Capital Agency (NASDAQ: AGNC ), Emerson Electric (NYSE: EMR ), Chevron (NYSE: CVX ): How long and how severe these declines will be no one knows. At losses from 52 week highs of 22%, 19%, and 30% for EMR, AGNC and CVX there could still be a lot of air underneath them. Other widely held falling knives include: Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM ). Intel (NASDAQ: INTC ), Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT ), Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX ), BHP Billiton (NYSE: BBL ) (NYSE: BHP ), National Oilwell Varco (NYSE: NOV ), and 3M (NYSE: MMM ). The DCA Effect Using Chevron as an example the usefulness of DCA is clear. An investment of $30,000 when CVX had declined 10% from its high of $130 would buy 256 shares: Date Price Investment Shares 10/02/2015 $117 $30,000 256 Value 08/01/15 $88 $22,528 256 An investment in three increments over equal time periods would buy 293 shares: Date Price Investment Shares 10/02/2015 $117 $10,000 85 03/01/2015 $105 $10,000 95 08/01/20015 $88 $10,000 113 Value 08/01/15 $88 $25,784 293 The DCA approach buys 37 more shares, $3,256 more in value, and $159 more in annual income. If CVX returns to $130, the price at which it started, the difference in total value rises to $4,810. It is true that there is a possibility of losing out on some gains if a stock rises in value between purchases. But as Daniel Kahneman wrote in classic book Thinking, Fast and Slow : Losses loom larger than gains. The “loss aversion ratio” has been estimated in several experiments and is usually in the range of 1.5 to 2.5. For the average investor, the good feelings you get from gains are more than wiped out by the bad feelings from losses. Perhaps humans have an instinctual aversion to loss of capital. Why is DCA important now? DCA has strengths that apply to all circumstances, such as reducing risk and replacing emotion with discipline. In today’s markets its benefits are particularly important. After six years of almost uninterrupted rise in stock prices, recency bias is very strong. Recency bias causes investors to believe trends and patterns have observed in the recent past will continue in the future. Investors look at where a stock has been, not where it is going. Complacency among investors is high. New investors have with no experience of a declining market have an inflated sense of their stock-picking ability. Older investors, with six years of mostly positive experience, may think that their prowess has improved more than it has. Price declines reflect changes in the macroeconomic situation. Global growth estimates continue to be lowered. Money is no longer being added to the US system through quantitative easing, and as shown by Eric Parnell and others there has been a strong relationship between QE and stock market performance. In addition, numerous indicators have been flashing warning signs for some time. DCA is agnostic concerning market projections but economic changes do affect results. Conclusions The falling knife conundrum — what to do when a stock we like is falling — is increasingly common. The angel on one shoulder tells us to buy and the angel on the other shoulder tells us not to lose money. Dollar cost averaging is a way to resolve these different impulses. DCA is helpful in many situations, but particularly today when uncertainty is increasing and six years of successful stock-picking may have inflated both our confidence in the market and the perception of our abilities. DCA takes away the pressure of having to make a one-time purchase decision, allows us to act independently of market noise, and reduces risk. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a long position in XOM EMR over the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.