Tag Archives: spy

Despite The Market Rout, U.S. Fund Investors Pull Out Just $5.5 Billion For The Week

By Tom Roseen During the fund-flows week ended August 26 world markets were whipsawed by concerns of slowing global growth, the devaluation of the Chinese yuan, fears about China’s slowing economy, and the continuing plunge of commodity prices. Oil prices slid below $40/barrel for the first time since February 2009 as a result of a decline in global demand and a glut in oil supply. An early measure of China’s factory activity declined to a six-and-half-year low in August, putting additional pressure on the market. As a result the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) jumped almost 99%-from 15.25 on Wednesday, August 19, to 30.32 on Wednesday, August 26 (but down from a closing high of 40.74 on Monday, August 24), after the main indices posted their largest weekly declines in four years. During the week the U.S. broad-based indices were down at least 10% from their recent market highs, entering what many define as a market correction. At one point on Monday the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined more than 1,000 points before bouncing back slightly, but it still closed down 588.47 points (3.6%) for the day (its largest one-day percentage decline since August 2011). Despite the People’s Bank of China’s cutting its benchmark interest rate 0.5 percentage point on Tuesday and injecting 150 billion yuan into the financial system to prop up China’s market, the Shanghai composite lost 22.85% during the flows week. Nonetheless, on Wednesday U.S. stocks broke a six-day losing streak and witnessed their largest one-day gain in nearly four years as investors pushed stocks higher on news of the PBOC’s new easing efforts, better-than-expected economic news, and comments by New York Fed President William Dudley that the case for a rate hike in September is less compelling, given the volatility in global markets. As one might expect, given the meltdown in the global markets, fund investors were net redeemers of fund assets (including those of conventional funds and exchange-traded funds [ETFs]); however, they redeemed only a net $5.5 billion for the fund-flows week ended August 26, 2015. Investors redeemed some $17.8 billion from equity funds, $2.6 billion from taxable bond funds, and $345 million from municipal bond funds, but they were net purchasers of money market funds, injecting $15.2 billion for the week. For the first week in three equity ETFs witnessed net outflows, handing back $15.2 billion (their largest amount since the week ended August 6, 2014). With concerns about a slowing global economy, authorized participants (APs) were net redeemers of domestic equity funds (-$10.4 billion), withdrawing money from the group for a sixth consecutive week. They also redeemed money from nondomestic equity funds (-$4.9 billion) for the first week in four. Given the selloff in domestic equities, APs turned their attention to the beleaguered small-cap space and safe-haven plays, with the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA: IWM ) (+$467 million), the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ) (+$342 million), and the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) (+$333 million) attracting the largest amounts of net new money of all individual ETFs. At the other end of the spectrum the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) (-$4.3 billion) once again experienced the largest net redemptions, while the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) (-$1.0 billion) suffered the second largest redemptions for the week. For the second consecutive week conventional fund (ex-ETF) investors were net redeemers of equity funds, redeeming $2.6 billion from the group. Domestic equity funds, handing back $1.4 billion, witnessed their seventh consecutive week of net outflows. Meanwhile, their nondomestic equity fund counterparts witnessed $1.2 billion of net outflows-handing back money for the first week in six. On the domestic side investors lightened up on mid- and large-cap funds, redeeming a net $0.5 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, for the week, while equity income funds attracted some $0.7 billion of net inflows. On the nondomestic side international equity funds witnessed $1.0 billion of net outflows, while global equity funds handed back $0.2 billion. For the fifth week in a row taxable bond funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net outflows, handing back a little less than $4.7 billion (their largest weekly outflows since the week ended August 5, 2014). Corporate investment-grade debt funds suffered the largest net redemptions, witnessing net outflows of $2.2 billion (for their fifth consecutive week of redemptions), while government-mortgage and government-Treasury & mortgage funds were the only fixed income groups attracting net new money for the week, taking in $452 million and $270 million, respectively. For the fourth week in five municipal debt funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net outflows, giving back $406 million this past week.

ALFA: A Market-Beating ETF About To Go Market-Neutral

Summary ALFA allows the retail investor to “invest with the best”. ALFA has shown market-beating performances since inception, with superior upside and downside capture ratios, but also higher volatility. Barring a final-day rally, ALFA is about to go into market-neutral mode. The AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF (NYSEARCA: ALFA ) is an ETF that tracks the AlphaClone Hedge Fund Long/Short Index. This index contains U.S.-listed equity securities to which hedge funds and institutional investors have disclosed significant exposure. An interesting feature of the index is that it uses AlphaClone’s proprietary “Clone Score” methodology to aggregate the ideas of hedge funds for which historically it has made the most sense to follow based on their disclosures. Additionally, index constituents are equal weighted but have an overlap bias (i.e., securities held by twice the number of managers have twice the weight). In a recent article entitled ” The AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF May Be The Safest Equity Ticker ,” Seeking Alpha author Fred Piard elegantly summarizes the methodology of ALFA as thus: ALFA selects fund managers based on their past performances after publication of their holdings…In other words, past performances must be good, and also replicable. Investing in ALFA therefore allows the retail investor to “invest with the best” (while avoiding 2 and 20 fee structure associated with investing in hedge funds). Only holdings from top managers are chosen for inclusion in the index – holdings from mediocre managers are not considered. ALFA was incepted in May 2012, and charges an expense ratio of 0.95%. Another hedge fund-duplicating ETF is the Global X Guru Index ETF (NYSEARCA: GURU ). Performance The following chart shows the total return performance of ALFA and the U.S. market (NYSEARCA: SPY ) since inception of ALFA. ALFA Total Return Price data by YCharts We can see from the chart above that ALFA has pretty much led SPY wire-to-wire since inception. However, the higher return of ALFA has been accompanied by higher volatility. The following chart shows the 3-year annualized standard deviation (volatility), return, Sharpe and Sortino ratios for ALFA and SPY (source: Morningstar ). We can see from the above chart that ALFA has been about 30% more volatile than SPY over the past three years. This has led to ALFA’s Sharpe ratio of 1.78 being lower than SPY’s at 1.93. Interestingly, however, the Sortino ratio, which unlike Sharpe ratio only takes into account downside (and not upside) volatility, slightly favors ALFA at 4.36 vs. SPY at 4.26. This is consistent with ALFA’s impressive upside and downside capture ratios over the past 1 and 3-year periods, as shown in the chart below (source: Morningstar ). The chart above shows that over the past 3 years, ALFA has managed to return an extra 7% over the S&P 500 in positive months for the market, while decreasing 18% less than the S&P 500 in negative months for the market. Its 1-year upside and downside capture ratios are even more impressive, at 130% and 52% respectively. Obviously, SPY captures 100% of both the upside and downside of the S&P 500. Additionally, ALFA has had a 0.84 correlation with SPY since inception (source: InvestSpy ). Holdings The higher volatility of ALFA compared to SPY may be partially attributed to the fact that ALFA’s portfolio is quite concentrated, with the top 10 holdings accounting for 31.85% of assets, compared to only 173.03% for SPY. Moreover, ALFA currently holds only 73 stocks, compared to the 500 in the S&P 500. The following table shows the top 10 stocks held in ALFA and SPY. ALFA SPY Stock Ticker % Assets Stock Ticker % Assets Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL ) 7.25 Apple Inc. AAPL 3.75 Valeant Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: VRX ) 7.19 Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT ) 2.03 Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG ) 2.55 Exxon Mobil Corporation Common (NYSE: XOM ) 1.78 Horizon Pharma plc (NASDAQ: HZNP ) 2.53 Johnson & Johnson Common Stock (NYSE: JNJ ) 1.49 Allergan PLC (NYSE: AGN ) 2.41 Wells Fargo & Company Common St (NYSE: WFC ) 1.46 The Priceline Group Inc. (NASDAQ: PCLN ) 2.36 General Electric Company Common (NYSE: GE ) 1.41 Transdigm Group Incorporated Tr (NYSE: TDG ) 2.22 Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (NYSE: BRK.B ) 1.4 Oracle Corporation Common Stock (NYSE: ORCL ) 2.05 JPMorgan Chase & Co. Common St (NYSE: JPM ) 1.37 Biogen Idec Inc. (NASDAQ: BIIB ) 1.79 Pfizer, Inc. Common Stock (NYSE: PFE ) 1.19 Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Common St (NYSE: SKX ) 1.5 AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T ) 1.15 Besides AAPL, which constitutes 7.25% and 3.75% of ALFA and SPY, respectively, the two funds do not have any top-10 holdings in common. Hedging mechanism ALFA has an interesting hedging mechanism, which when enforced shorts the S&P 500 in an amount equal to the value of the fund’s long holdings. In other words, ALFA becomes market neutral when the hedge is activated. The trigger for the activation is simple – almost too simple, at first glance – it’s when the S&P 500 falls below its 200-day simple moving average [SMA] at month’s end. Why month’s end, which seems like an arbitrary day to choose? Why not the 15th of each month, or the 19th? Surprisingly, choosing the end of each month as the trigger was more effective than the seemingly more logical “5 consecutive days below 200 SMA” rule on data from 1950 to 2014, presumably because the portfolio was hedged less in a long-term secular rising market. Which brings us to the main purpose of this post, which is to inform investors that, unless the S&P 500 gains in excess of 4.35% (from 1988.87 to 2075.41) on the last trading day of August, i.e. in one trading day’s time, ALFA’s hedging mechanism is about to be activated for the first time . Interestingly, this is not the first time that the S&P 500 has dipped below its 200 SMA since ALFA’s inception. As can be seen from the chart below, this has happened at least twice since May 2012. But now let’s take a closer look at each of those two instances. The first event took place in November 2012, around the time of the “fiscal cliff” negotiations. We can see from the above chart that the S&P 500 dipped below the 200 SMA in mid-November, but then recovered above the 200 SMA by month’s end. Hence, ALFA’s hedge was not activated. A similar phenomenon was observed in October 2014: Takeaway What does this mean for investors? If you already own ALFA, you have two basic choices (assuming that the S&P 500 does not rally 4.35% over the weekend). HOLD . You prefer to take a “passive” approach to market timing (an oxymoron, perhaps), and are comfortable with ALFA’s hedging strategy. You understand that ALFA will probably return close to flat in the month of September, plus or minus ALFA’s alpha, and then for every month after that until the S&P 500 breaks above its 200 SMA at month’s end. SELL . You have a strong conviction that the market will resume its uptrend in September and in the months beyond. You do not want to have part of your holdings invested in a market-neutral position, so you sell ALFA and replace it with SPY or another long-only instrument. You will only rotate back into ALFA when the S&P 500 breaks above its 200 SMA at month’s end. For investors who do not yet own ALFA and are considering whether or not to buy this fund, they should be aware that the ETF, if purchased in September, will be a market-neutral fund for at least that month, and then for every month after that until the S&P 500 breaks above its 200 SMA at month’s end. Disclosure: I am/we are long ALFA. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Stocks Higher 10 Years From Now

Before the onset of the market weakness in the early part of last week and the end of the prior week, S&P Dow Jones Indices released a report highlighting rolling 10-year annualized returns for the S&P 500 index. The report seems prompted by a response Warren Buffett made to a question on timing the market. Buffett noted he was not a market timer, and simply responded, “Stocks are going to be higher, and perhaps a lot higher, 10 years from now. I am not smart enough to pick times to get in and get out.” In the report, S&P notes: “Since 1947, the S&P 500’s price return was up in 72% of calendar years. Add in dividends reinvested and that batting average jumped to 80%.” “And if one is worried that the S&P 500 has gone too far since the conclusion of the 2007-09 mega-meltdown bear market, consider that the rolling 10-year CAGR through Q2 2015 was +7.9%, nearly 400 basis points below the long-term average.” “… there have been times when things didn’t work out too well for investors, but these times were few and isolated. Of the 278 quarters of rolling 10-year CAGRs from Q1 1946 through Q2 2015, only eight were negative, and they all occurred between Q4 2008 and Q3 2010.” (Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices ) The S&P report contains additional detail on sector returns going back to 1990 and investors should find the entire report a worthwhile read. One sector highlight noted in the report is the fact that, “… each sector recorded very high monthly 10-year CAGR batting averages, or frequencies of positive observations, from 100% for consumer staples, energy, materials and utilities, to 79% for telecom services and 67% for financials. The S&P 500’s average was 87%.” In short, timing the market can be a difficult endeavor for many investors. Last week’s heightened market volatility is an example of this, especially for those who sold out of stocks on Tuesday. Share this article with a colleague