Tag Archives: shy

Momentum Model Recommends Investors Move To Cash

The momentum model currently recommends investing in SHY or a money market. This model outperforms the VTTVX benchmark. The momentum model also minimizes draw-down. Dual Momentum as well as other momentum models are receiving considerable attention as the momentum anomaly appears to have significant staying power. In the following ETF ranking table and the performance graph, this momentum model demonstrates how one can generate benchmark beating returns while lowering portfolio volatility. The following data table is made up of fourteen ETFs that provide global diversification. ETFs used in this example are also found in the Baker’s Dozen article with one addition, BIV, an intermediate bond fund. The fourteen ETFs are: VTI , VEA , VWO , VNQ , RWX , TIP , TLT , DBC , GLD , PCY , BIV , VOE , VBR , and SHY . This array of ETFs covers the U.S. Equities market, developed international equities, emerging market equities, U.S. REITs, international REITs, bonds, gold, commodities, and treasuries. VOE and VBR are included to take advantage of any value anomaly, should it exist. ETF Rankings: Driving the following rankings are three metrics. Performance over the past 87 calendar days. A 30% weight is assigned to this performance percentage. Performance over the past 145 calendar days where a 50% weight is assigned to this performance percentage. Low volatility is an advantage so a 20% weight is assigned to a mean-variance of 14 calendar days. Based on extensive back-testing and out-of-sample analysis, the above variables provided the best return/volatility ratio. An example of such testing is provided in the second screen-shot. As of 8/17/2015, this momentum model recommends investing 100% of the portfolio in SHY as there are no ETFs outperforming this 1-3 yr. treasury bond. Looking for ETFs that are outperforming SHY is an application of the absolute momentum principle where one does not invest in ETFs if they are under-performing the cutoff or circuit breaker ETF. SHY is that cutoff ETF. (click to enlarge) Performance Data: A frequent question is – how well does such a momentum oriented portfolio perform? Since one set of data or one back-test is insufficient to come to any conclusions, a Monte Carlo analysis is run on this set of ETFs. The portfolio is reviewed every 33 days. We are looking for ETFs that are ranked above SHY (none are in the current ranking) and if there are two, we invest equal amounts in those two securities. Should there be a tie, we invest equal amounts in the top three. ETFs under-performing SHY are sold out of the portfolio. The look-back periods are 87 and 145 calendar days as mentioned above. Beginning on 6/30/2006 we capture two bull markets and a severe bear market. The overall return of the portfolio managed using this momentum model is 287% while the VTTVX benchmark is 78%. Draw-downs (“DDs”) are always of interest and here again the momentum portfolio shines by limiting the maximum DD to 24.1% while the benchmark had a maximum DD of 27%. The average DD for the momentum portfolio was an acceptable 10.4%. The light colored or gray graphs show the 50 runs made for this set of ETFs operating under the stated guidelines. The dark line is the average. Even the worst performing run outperformed the benchmark. Not only does the momentum model provide protection against deep bear markets such as we experienced in 2008 and early 2009, the portfolio also shows a much steeper slope during the bull market since March of 2009. The above momentum model was not selected to generate the very best return. Instead, it was built to be a robust portfolio in all types of conditions. Using SHY as the circuit breaker is our volatility check and should keep one away from the depths of a bear market. The model does require discipline as one needs to review the portfolio every 33 days. The above graph shows the benefits of such discipline. Disclosure: I am/we are long VTI,SHY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: The back-test runs were performed by Ernest Stokely.

ETFReplay.com July Update

Independent research, long/short equity, dividend investing, ETF investing “}); $$(‘#article_top_info .info_content div’)[0].insert({bottom: $(‘mover’)}); } $(‘article_top_info’).addClassName(test_version); } SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function(){ setEvents();}); The ETFReplay.com Portfolio holdings have been updated for July 2015. I previously detailed here and here how an investor can use ETFReplay.com to screen for best performing ETFs based on momentum and volatility. The portfolio begins with a static basket of 14 ETFs. These 14 ETFs are ranked by 6 month total returns (weighted 40%), 3 month total returns (weighted 30%), and 3 month price volatility (weighted 30%). The top 4 are purchased at the beginning of each month. When a holding drops out of the top 5 ETFs it will be sold and replaced with the next highest ranked ETF. The 14 ETFs are listed below: Symbol Name RWX SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF PCY PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt Portfolio ETF WIP SPDR DB International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF EEM i Shares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF VNQ Vanguard REIT Index ETF TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF DBC PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking ETF GLD SPDR Gold Trust ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF In addition, ETFs must be ranked above the cash-like ETF ((NYSEARCA: SHY )) in order to be included in the portfolio, similar to the absolute momentum strategy I profiled here . This modification could help reduce drawdowns during periods of high volatility and/or negative market conditions (see 2008-2009), but it could also reduce total returns by allocating to cash in lieu of an asset class. The cash filter is in effect this month. SHY is the highest rated ETF in the 6/3/3 system. Therefore, all current holdings will be sold and the proceeds used to purchase SHY. The top 5 ranked ETFs based on the 6/3/3 system as of 6/30/15 are below: 6mo/3mo/3mo SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF PCY PowerShares Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt Portfolio ETF VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF In 2014 I introduced a pure momentum system, which ranks the same basket of 14 ETFs based solely on 6 month price momentum. There is no cash filter in the pure momentum system, volatility ranking, or requirement to limit turnover – the top 4 ETFs based on price momentum are purchased each month. The portfolio and rankings are posted on the same spreadsheet as the 6/3/3 strategy. The top 4 six month momentum ETFs are below: 6 month Momentum EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF EEM i Shares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF RWX SPDR Dow Jones International Real Estate ETF HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF VTI, a holding since September 2014 will be sold for a 5%+ gain and replaced by EEM. TLT, a holding since September 2014 will be sold for a 1%+ gain and replaced by HYG. The updated holdings for each portfolio are below. 6/3/3 strategy: Position Shares Avg Purchase Price Purchase Date Cost Basis Current Value Gain/Loss Excluding Dividends Percentage Gain/Loss Excluding Dividends SHY 149 84.86 5/29/2015 & 6/30/15 $12,644.14 $12,644.14 $0.00 0.00% Pure Momentum strategy: Current Positions Position Shares Purchase Price Purchase Date Cost Basis Current Value Gain/Loss Excluding Dividends Percentage Gain/Loss Excluding Dividends EEM 60 39.62 6/30/2015 $2,377.20 $2,377.20 $0.00 0.00% RWX 64 43.99 4/2/2015 $2,815.36 $2,679.04 -$136.32 -4.84% HYG 27 88.8 6/30/2015 $2,397.60 $2,397.60 $0.00 0.00% EFA 39 66.51 4/30/2015 $2,593.89 $2,476.11 -$117.78 -4.54% Disclosures: None Share this article with a colleague