Tag Archives: reaves-utility

Reaves Utility Income Fund: What To Make Of The Rights Offering

Reaves Utility Income Fund intends to do a rights offering. Forget about the minutia of the actual offering. Think – instead – about the reason for the offering. Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSEMKT: UTG ) is one of my favorite closed-end funds, or CEFs, for those seeking utility exposure and dividend income. Its dividend history is nothing short of impressive and it has historically been a solid performer on a total return basis. That said, what should you make of the recent announcement of a rights offering? Impressive record One of the most notable aspects of UTG is its monthly distribution. Since the CEF first initiated a distribution in 2004, it has been increased eight times, most recently in December of last year. The distribution has never been cut, despite the fund living through the deep 2007 to 2009 recession. And, perhaps more impressive, the distribution has never included return of capital. Although the 6% or so distribution yield won’t excite those looking for 10% yields, it’s high enough to be meaningful and yet low enough to be sustainable. History has, so far, proven that out. Performance, meanwhile, is solid. The fund’s trailing 10-year return through September is an annualized 9% or so. That’s notably above Vanguard Utility ETF’s (NYSEARCA: VPU ) 6.6% annualized gain. Both numbers assume the reinvestment of distributions. To be fair, UTG’s mandate is broader than VPU’s, allowing it to invest in areas like oil, but the comparison provides at least a reasonable benchmark. That said, the more recent performance has been, well, not as good. UTG was down roughly 10% through September while VPU was down just 6.6% or so. It has been a bad year for utilities as well as some of the other areas in which UTG invests, so this doesn’t look like it’s an issue of management losing its way. Still, it’s not a good thing to see the value of an investment you own fall 10%. So why is UTG raising cash? Which might lead some investors to wonder why UTG recently announced a rights offering . Shareholders can get one right for every UTG share and buy a new share for every three rights they own. On the surface, this could look like a risky proposition since the fund is doing relatively poorly this year. If you are really cynical you might even suggest it’s a way to cover up a shortfall on the dividend front by spitting out the new cash as return of capital distributions. But step back and think bigger picture. Yes, UTG is doing poorly this year performance wise. Which, in turn, means its holdings aren’t doing so well, since UTG is nothing more than a pooled investment vehicle. If management believes this is an opportunity to buy good companies at depressed prices, its only option is to sell other holdings or raise more cash. But it can’t do that easily because it’s a closed-end fund. Thus, it has to go with a rights offering. In fact, the last time UTG did a rights offering was in 2012 . That was a relatively weak year for the fund, with a total return of around 5.8% compared to 2011’s over 14% gain (which was down from 2010’s 27% gain). In the CEF’s 2012 annual report it explained : “In August the Fund raised $144 million from a transferable rights offering. We view the rights transaction as a long‐term positive outcome for the Fund and its investors. The offering proceeds were invested principally in proven, current holdings of utility equities, increasing their portfolio weighting from just over 41% to 53%. The new investments enhanced the Fund’s current and potential future dividend yield. The outlook, after the offering, for Fund returns over the long term, gave us the confidence to announce in September the sixth increase in the monthly dividend rate since the Fund’s inception in 2004.” Essentially, the fund used the cash raised from the rights offering to buy more companies it knew well and believed were undervalued. It isn’t a stretch to think management is looking to do essentially the same thing this time around, too. If you are a Reaves shareholder this is probably a good deal for you. Will it be a good deal in the next six months? Maybe, maybe not. But longer term the CEF appears to be of the opinion that now is a good time to put money to work. And that should work out for you if you plan to stick around for some time.

Reaves Utility Income Fund: Monthly Payout Currently Offering A 6% Yield

Summary Reaves Utility Income Fund is a CEF that invests in a broad range of utilities. Reaves is selling at a discount to NAV and offers a relatively safe 6% monthly yield. Reaves is not likely to outperform of underperform the utility indexes. About a year ago someone offered Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSEMKT: UTG ) as a better alternative to my list of utilities in the comments section of an article I had written. I have been following the fund since that time and have placed this fund in some of the accounts I manage. UTG recently released its semi-annual report as of 4/30/2015. Total assets of the fund were $76,000 short of $1 billion and the net asset value (NAV) of the fund was $32.71 per share. UTG is currently selling for around $29.75 per share with a NAV of $30.37 as of 7/10/15. The recent underperformance of interest rate sensitive stocks has hurt both the NAV and selling price of the fund. UTG currently yields 6.1% with a monthly payout at just over $0.15 monthly. The price fluctuation of utilities does not affect the payouts of the companies so it may be an opportune time to consider this fund and/or utility stocks if one believes that interest rates will not rise shortly. UTG is a CEF or closed-end fund that aims to provide a high level of after-tax total returns consisting of tax-advantaged dividend income and capital appreciation. It targets 80% of its investment in dividend-paying common and preferred stocks as well as debt instruments of utility companies. The other 20% can be invested in other types of securities and/or debt instruments. It also uses options of utility companies in the search for returns. The historical returns of the fund when compared to the historical returns of the S&P Utilities Index and the Dow Jones Utility Average are shown in the table below: (click to enlarge) Source: UTG Semi-annual Report UTG also offered a graph showing the allocation of funds in its quarterly report as well. It is shown below: (click to enlarge) Source: UTG Semi-annual Report This graph shows that the fund’s definition of utility is rather broad. The fund holds railroads, roads, and oil and gas MLPs as well as REITs and media companies. UTG has loans for $290,000,000 with an interest rate of around 2%, which it uses for leverage. The top 10 holdings of the fund as of 3/30/15 were: NextEra Energy 5.27% ITC Holdings Corp 4.74% Union Pacific Corp. 4.67% Verizon Communications 4.26% American Water Works Co., Inc 3.96% Duke Energy Corp. 3.66% Scana Corp. 3.65% Dominion Resources, Inc. 3.59% BCE, Inc. 3.46% Sempra Energy 2.98% Expenses of this fund are about average for a closed-end fund. Investment advisory and administration fees last year ran $9.6 million or a little over 1% of the asset value of the fund. Other fees and interest on the loans add on another .5%, making a total of 1.5% to run the fund. Leverage probably covers the costs of administration with the additional dividend income it produces. Conclusion: This CEF is a good option for someone who wants to add utilities to their portfolio without the concern of researching individual companies. It appears to be a good bet for the retiree since it offers a monthly payout where much of the dividend qualifies for the 15% tax rate. The fund’s returns have kept up with the major utility indexes over its lifetime and will probably continue to do so in the foreseeable future. One should not expect to outperform the utility indexes with this CEF, but one will not likely underperform them either. Disclosure: I am/we are long UTG. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Share this article with a colleague