Tag Archives: pro

Expected Returns For The Next Ten Years

According to Jack Bogle and Michael Nolan, U.S. stocks are projected to gain about 6% per year over the next decade. Bonds are projected to earn about 3%. These return projections are significantly lower than the long-term averages of 9% and 4.5%, respectively. For the bond market, future returns are expressed as the current yield to maturity. The yield to maturity on 10-year Treasuries is 2.4%, which Bogle and Nolan round up to 3%. (This could be justified by the addition of higher-yielding bonds.) Since today’s 10-year Treasury yield is 2.3%, that estimate looks reasonable. Stock market returns have three components: the market’s current dividend yield the estimated annualized growth in corporate earnings the expected change in the market’s price/earnings ratio Stock Returns = dividend yield + earnings growth +/- (change in P/E ratio) With the stock market today yielding about 2% and historical earnings growth of 4.7%, Bogle/Nolan arrive at a preliminary estimate of about 7% per year, which they reduce to 6% by figuring that today’s P/E ratio will end up ten years from now at its long-term average of 17.8. Enterprise Returns and Speculative Returns Bogle took inspiration from John Maynard Keynes. Keynes believed that the best economic models are as simple as possible, with components and results that are clearly understood. For example, stock returns could be decomposed into two sources: enterprise returns, which are the returns that came from the growth (or shrinkage) of the intrinsic business, and speculative returns, which come from changes in investor psychology. Bogle uses Keynes’ framework to construct his model. Dividend yield plus earnings growth measures the stock market’s enterprise returns. The last Bogle term – the change in the P/E ratio – equates to Keynes’ concept of speculation. What’s An Investor To Do? First, expect lower than usual returns from both stocks and bonds. There’s no way for bonds to achieve high returns, given a starting yield of 2.4%. As usual, stocks offer less certainty. It’s possible that continued low inflation justifies a market P/E ratio of 25 or higher, leading to annualized stock-market gains that approach 10%. But it is also very easy to envision scenarios that fall short of Bogle’s estimate. The 6% estimate is not overly cautious. Second, inflation-adjusted returns look a little less onerous. Bogle’s models don’t take into account the effects of inflation, but today’s bond yields implicitly forecast low future inflation. If that proves true, bonds could eke out a modest real gain. Stocks would of course fare even better. A 6% nominal gain with 2% inflation means a 4% real return, which is respectable if not spectacular by historic standards and flat-out terrific compared with the paltry yields now paid by Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities. Third, the relationship between stocks and bonds looks normal. The historic return premium offered by stocks over bonds has been 4.6%. That would suggest a modest relative advantage for bonds. On the other hand, because bond yields are so depressed today, the ratio of stock-to-bond returns is not particularly low. Bogle and Nolan find no relationship between forecast equity premiums and future stock returns. Investors have to make some important decisions. If they keep their asset allocations as they are, they will probably end up with smaller account balances than they had hoped for in ten years. Bogle and Nolan do not interpret their findings as suggesting that investors should change their asset allocations. If lower account values are not acceptable, investors can either take more risk, or increase their savings rate to make up the expected shortfall. Neither of these is an ideal solution. Taking more risk will not guarantee a better outcome in ten years. And many investors simply can’t increase their savings rate due to already-stretched finances. But it’s important to face up to the fact that the expected returns over the next ten years are going to be lower than usual. Ignoring this warning and hoping for the best is an option, but not a very practical one.

VCSAX: Consumer Staples Don’t Get Much Better Than This

Summary Low expense ratio with great long term returns. High yield for some volatility protection. Good sector diversification and strong holdings. Mutual funds are a good way to improve an investor’s risk adjusted return. Investing in consumer staples is not only a good way to diversify, but also helps with downside risk when the market takes a tumble. The fund I will be looking at is the Consumer Staples Index Fund Admiral Shares (MUTF: VCSAX ) which seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. This index has performed well over the last decade and comes with a decent dividend yield Yield This index has a distribution yield of 2.47%. If you’re looking for a high yield portfolio and seeking to invest in consumer staples, VCSAX is a great fit. Even without needing an income from your portfolio this has been a good investment showing an annual return of 10.39% over the past ten years. A lot of this can be attributed to consumer staples not taking the same hit the S&P took in 2008. Expense Ratio The expense ratio for VCSAX is .12% which is fine for being a passively managed mutual fund. I’m in favor of going the passively managed route for the consumer staples sector. With the Lipper peer average expense ratio being 1.51% it’s not worth the trouble of trying to beat an index. This is a top percentile performing index compared to competitors; When you don’t have to pay a high expense ratio – don’t! Diversification Index is well diversified and attempts to fully replicate its benchmark. The benchmark makes investments in the consumer staples market and should tend to be less sensitive to economic cycles. There is high correlation with the S&P and an investor should expect a lot of volatility if this is a large portion of their portfolio. Here are a list of the top ten holdings: There are 100 holdings and 56% of the weight is in the top ten. Even though this fund has performed very well, I would still like to see more diversification. I would make this a small portion of my portfolio for a more balanced return in the event of another big hit taken by the market. On the bright side, many of the companies in the top ten have been around for a while and shown they can shift strategies when needed. Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ) has been around since 1837 and has changed strategies many times. If there was ever a company to bet on surviving, this wouldn’t be a bad choice. PG has shown a long track record of a rising dividend which will help in a down market. The growth has been iffy lately but PG is making many changes and investing in the future. During an earnings calls management said they had many new products coming out. With the billions they are spending on R&D, if some of the proprietary technologies are successful there may be some serious company growth down the road. If I were to pick a single consumer staples company for my portfolio, Procter & Gamble is an easy choice for a long investment. Performance The following graphs show a major upside to consumer staples over the last decade: Over the past five years VCSAX and the S&P 500 have shown a strong correlation, as I would suspect. Looking at the ten year range there is a large difference. During a market crash a consumer staples index is going to take a punch but people are still going to make purchases. There will be some cutbacks, but nothing like there will be on the market as a whole. The other reason for the index to show lower losses is the high yield which will help protect returns during a down market. Conclusion When it comes to a consumer staples index VCSAX is as good as they come. The low expense ratio is really nice to see and helps with staying close in returns to the benchmark: In addition to having a good five year annual return of 14.54%, there has also been a great ten year return of 10.39%. With the crash in 2008, many investments reacted like the S&P 500 and it really diminished returns over the last decade. Consumer staples is a great way to reduce portfolio risk when it comes to the market taking a dive.

Jeffrey Gundlach DoubleLine Asset Allocation Webcast

By VW Staff Jeffrey Gundlach’s slides from the DoubleLine asset allocation webcast: Probability of Rate Hike (click to enlarge) Sweden/Riksbank Flip Flop (click to enlarge) Central Bank Policy Rates (click to enlarge) The Difference Between Hiking and QE Infinity 50 Bps of GDP? (click to enlarge) Evolution of World GDP Forecasts by Year (click to enlarge) U.S. Industrial Production (YoY) (click to enlarge) U.S. Core CPI and Core PCE (YoY) (click to enlarge) PriceStats U.S. CPI (YoY%) (click to enlarge) U.S., U.K. and EU Headline Inflations (Eurozone Method) (click to enlarge) See full slides below Asset Allocation Core Flex Webcast Slides Disclosure: None