Tag Archives: premium-authors

Volatile Trading Week Produces Somewhat Muted U.S. Fund Flows

For the fund-flows week ended Wednesday, September 2 the U.S. equity markets experienced a roller coaster ride. The Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced four triple digit move days (two up and two down) to close the week with a gain of 0.4%. This volatility was spurred on by the continued fears about the economic slow-down in China (the down days) counter balanced by strong U.S. economic data (sharply revised upwards second quarter GDP numbers) and a bounce in oil prices. Underscoring the increased volatility in the market was the increase in the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) which spiked at greater than 30. Any value above 20 for the VIX is a warning sign to investors that the market is ripe for wide shifts in momentum. This week’s fund flow results did not reflect the up and down nature of the trading as most of the data produced was a continuation of current trends. Breaking down this week’s fund flows information by macro groups (equity funds, taxable bond funds, municipal bonds and money market funds) and by fund type (mutual funds and ETFs) we saw that all of the mutual funds groups experienced net outflows. Taxable bond mutual funds (-$4.3 billion) suffered through their sixth straight week of negative flows. Within the taxable bond fund group investors took money out of Lipper’s High Yield Funds (-$714 million) and Loan Participation Funds (-$451 million) in what can be viewed as fight to safety in this time of uncertainty. Municipal bond mutual funds and equity mutual funds also extended their recent losing streaks with their second and third consecutive weeks of net outflows, respectively. Contradicting the other groups, money market funds did reverse their current trend with outflows of over $10 billion after four consecutive weeks of net inflows which totaled almost $50 billion. There was some positive news within the ETF universe as equity ETFs (+$4.8 billion) and taxable bond ETFs (+$4.3 billion) both were the beneficiaries of sizeable net inflows. For equity ETFs it was third net inflow in four weeks as SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA: SPY ) paced the field by taking in $7.2 billion of net new money. The inflows into taxable bond ETFs marked their third consecutive week of positive results with almost $7.3 billion net inflows during the time period. (click to enlarge) Share this article with a colleague

The One Thing You Must Do When The Market Tanks

By Tim Maverick It’s a scenario that repeats itself during every stock market downturn: At the first sign of distress, mom and pop investors head for the hills. And the year 2015 is no exception. During July and August, investors withdrew money from both stock and bond mutual funds. According to Credit Suisse, this is the first time withdrawals have occurred in both categories in consecutive months since 2008. That was, of course, during the last financial crisis. I believe Yogi Berra said it best: “It’s like déjà vu all over again.” Here’s What You Need to Do I’ve been in the investment business since the 1980s and have been through every market selloff since 1987. Even though I’m no longer a professionally licensed advisor, I do have a few thoughts on investor behavior during selloffs. First of all, if you’re in your 20s, 30s, or 40s, don’t worry. The stock market’s long-term track record is undeniable. For those of you in your 50s or 60s, I would’ve, at one point in time, warned about bear markets possibly lasting as long as a decade. But with the Federal Reserve reacting to every market sniffle with lots of money, the dynamics have changed. Look at last week’s turbulence. Already, prominent voices like Bridgewater Associates Founder Ray Dalio have said that further turmoil would encourage more quantitative easing (QE). Thus, for regular investors, the only real danger point – as I’ve described in a previous article – is shortly before and shortly after your retirement . And if you’re in such a time frame, your stock allocation should’ve already been lowered. Thus, the one thing investors should do during this current downturn is take a serious look at their portfolios and make sure everything is allocated properly. Most likely, a rebalancing is in order. Rebalancing Really Works Rebalancing a portfolio between stocks, bonds, and cash is important – and it can actually improve your returns. In 2012, Columbia Business School professor Andrew Ang conducted a study. He looked at returns from January 1926 through December 1940, a period that includes the Great Depression. Here’s what he found: A portfolio of 100% stocks returned 81% with dividends reinvested. A portfolio of 100% government bonds returned 108%. But a portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, rebalanced quarterly, returned 146%! Now, I don’t think rebalancing quarterly is necessary. And you definitely shouldn’t rebalance in the midst of market volatility. Instead, get your game plan in order now, and put it in place after the dust has settled. That will likely be in a few months. After all, we’re in that nasty seven-year cycle period (1987, 1994, 2001, 2008, 2015) when bad things tend to happen to the stock market. One final point: If you do rebalance in a taxable account, there will be tax consequences. How to Reallocate What do I mean by reallocating or rebalancing your assets? Well, I use the words of legendary investor Sir John Templeton as a guide. He recommended “to buy when others are despondently selling and to sell when others are greedily buying.” This translates to a counter-intuitive action: Sell a portion of your winners and add those funds to lagging categories. But only do so if your percentages are seriously out of whack. Here’s a hypothetical, simplified example: A year ago, in the stock portion of your portfolio, you had 20% in technology and biotechnology stocks, and 20% in energy and emerging market stocks. But now, with tech and biotech red-hot, these stocks represent 30% of your portfolio. Meanwhile, ice-cold energy and emerging markets stocks are down to 10% of your holdings. You should sell where the greed is – where analysts are saying the “trees will grow to the sky” – and buy where investors are fleeing en masse. In other words, bring them back into balance at 20% each. This strategy will still keep you exposed to the current winning sectors while also boosting your exposure to tomorrow’s winners. Take a look at this data from Franklin Templeton on emerging markets. It shows that the bull phases are longer and stronger than the bear phases in these markets: Thus, you want to be positioned to take advantage of such situations. You also don’t want to be highly exposed to a hot sector if it crashes, a la tech stocks in 2000-01. John Wooden on Investing To summarize, I’d like to quote legendary basketball coach John Wooden: “If you’re too engrossed and involved and concerned in regard to things over which you have no control, it will adversely affect the things over which you have control.” That’s a great philosophy for life – and it applies to investing, as well. Don’t worry about the stock market. You can’t control it. On the other hand, you can control how you put your money to work for you. Original Post

There Are No Holy Grails

When the markets get volatile, many strategies start performing poorly. Even your most basic diversified low fee indexing strategy will start to look weak, even though it likely beats most professional fund managers. And when these strategies start to weaken, many investors will start getting impatient. You probably know that nothing works 100% of the time, but that still doesn’t stop the allure of the green grass elsewhere. I know, the gold strategy looks so good in the short run. That fancy hedge fund strategy has outperformed since the S&P 500 (NYSEARCA: SPY ) peaked. That short-only fund looks really smart now. But the problem is that most of these fancy-sounding strategies are charging you high fees to underperform 80% of the time. And unfortunately, they lure in most of their assets during that 20% of the time when the markets look weak. But here’s the thing – there are no holy grails. Nothing works all the time. If you don’t hate something in your portfolio most of the time, then it probably means you’re not diversified. But be careful about the difference between being diversified and being diworsified. Diversification is best done when it’s simple, low-fee and tax-efficient. Diworsification occurs when you’re just layering on expensive and tax-inefficient strategies that provide far less benefit over the course of an entire market cycle than you think. And most importantly, find a good strategy and stick with it. You’ll be better off in the long run if you find a diversified, inexpensive, tax-efficient and systematic investing process, as opposed to constantly flipping in and out of strategies and searching for that holy grail that doesn’t exist. Share this article with a colleague