Tag Archives: political

Continental Europe Materializing As Intermediate-Term Beta Play

In a mid-February address in front of the European Parliament, ECB President Mario Draghi highlighted both the progress of the Eurozone’s economic recovery as well as the evolving challenges still confronting the region, particularly as it relates to mounting concerns over emerging market economies and broader geopolitical risks. In his speech , however, Draghi helped eliminate one of the big question marks facing investors in the region when he affirmed unequivocally that the European Central Bank “will not hesitate to act” if required to help put the euro-area economy on still firmer ground. This, in addition to other catalysts, is among the key factors driving optimism around European equities, as the region could provide one of the more attractive destinations for investors over the next 12 to 18 months. As most marketwatchers are well aware, the economic travails in Europe in the years following the 2008 financial crisis left many investors in the region with white knuckles and lingering suspicions around the durability of any recovery. But today, some 18 months after the U.S. economy has stabilized, it’s becoming evident that European business and economic cycles have finally established a foundation from which more growth will likely come. With an improving macro-economic picture and Mario Draghi affirming his commitment to maintain an accommodative monetary policy, investors in the region can still benefit from valuations that on a relative basis reflect the region’s plodding, indirect path to recovery as opposed to the improving opportunity set now materializing. And while renewed global economic unrest and market volatility may give pause to investors still battle worn from the region, we believe the improving macro picture, the ECB’s ongoing commitment to stimulus, and the attractive valuations, together, make Continental Europe one of the more compelling areas for investors seeking returns amid a volatile global environment. Normalizing Growth In a lot of ways, the opportunity for equities in Continental Europe resembles a coiled spring. The double-dip recession served to defer the start of the region’s economic cycle, but with real GDP growth now beginning to accelerate, the gap between the euro area and the rest of the world is quickly closing (see charts, below). Click to enlarge And while the OECD recently lowered its global growth forecasts , it still projects the Eurozone economy to expand by 1.4% and 1.7% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Even as the macro picture doesn’t necessarily signal the likelihood for rapid growth, the transition to more consistent and steady expansion will lend itself to improved performance at the corporate level. As companies in the region have focused on cost-cutting initiatives over the previous seven years, the transition back to a growing economy means a large proportion of these businesses are well positioned to increase revenue and earnings and improve margins. Moreover, even as the banking sector in Europe remains an area of concern, bank balance sheets have improved and significant reforms have been implemented, which together have translated into a more robust capital markets environment with available capital to support business expansion. Coupled with GDP growth, the added liquidity is a critical catalyst as most key sectors in Europe seek to resume a growth trajectory. According to S&P Investment Advisory Services, eight out of 10 sectors from the Euro 350 are expected to show significant earnings growth in 2016. Of the eight sectors expected to grow profits, seven are pegged to show double-digit increases this year, led by Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Only the Energy and Materials sectors are currently projected to show year-over-year profit declines. Click to enlarge Incoming Wave of Liquidity While the European Central Bank was slower to respond than the United States Federal Reserve coming out of the financial crisis, since 2014 the ECB has made up for lost time. In June 2014, the ECB pushed the deposit rate into negative territory, while subsequent interest rate cuts have left the deposit rate at negative 0.4 percent, the most recent cut coming in the second week of March. The ECB also enacted its version of quantitative easing at the start of 2015 and alongside its March interest rate cut, also boosted its bond-buying program from €60 billion a month to €80 billion and made euro-denominated non-bank corporate bonds eligible for the first time. These efforts have had a positive effect, reflected in both economic growth as well as a gradual recovery in credit conditions. In 2015, loans to both non-financial corporations and households showed material increases. (See charts, below.) Click to enlarge For those parsing the minutes from the ECB’s February monetary policy meeting , it was clear that the European Central Bank remains intent on using all means necessary to ensure the recovery stays on track. The ECB, four separate times, underscored that it expected policy rates to remain at current or lower levels for an extended period of time, and reinforced that policy makers were reviewing the technical conditions to ensure “the full range of policy options” would be available if needed. And when the ECB met again in March, it followed through with a 10 basis point cut and the expansion of its QE program. In its decision to include corporate bonds in the QE program, the minutes released in April reveal that the ECB premised the move on an anticipated spillover effect for small and medium-sized enterprises. Finding Value The renewed urgency from the ECB stems from worries over weak energy prices that while positive to household income and corporate profits, are also helping to frame an uncertain backdrop along with skittishness over emerging market growth and renewed geopolitical tensions. Since the ECB’s December 3 policy announcement, the STOXX 600 index had lost as much as 15% leading up to Mario Draghi’s comments in front of the European Parliament in mid February. But as an intermediate-term play, these near-term worries overshadow the fact that on a historical basis, the stock market capitalization of European equities remains near its nadir. Click to enlarge Going back to 2009, the S&P 500 has significantly outperformed the STOXX 600, and European equities today remain far less expensive than US stocks. This is true on both an absolute and relative basis, using a cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio. (See charts, below.) Moreover, as of March 31, 2016, the forward-looking price-to-earnings ratio of 15.2x for the STOXX 600 index remains below the index’s long-term average. When coupled with the consensus expectation of an 11.5% increase in earnings, the upside potential to investors in Europe is clear. Going Passive From the perspective of fund investors, the opportunity set can perhaps be best realized through pure exposure to Continental Europe, excluding the United Kingdom, whose equity markets, today, more closely resemble US stocks on a valuation basis. We also see Europe as a beta play, as current valuations and the ECB’s commitment to stimulus provides a floor for investors offering downside protection, whereas the potential for alpha, via stock selection through actively managed funds, is somewhat muted given the efficiency of the large-cap segment in the region. Of course, those familiar with Europe understand too that several unknowns still weigh on equities. Ongoing efforts to fix the European banking system, which has moved in fits and starts, remain critical to future growth, and marketwatchers already understand that Europe has considerably more exposure to China than U.S. equities. These are two of the primary drivers behind the volatility witnessed at the close of 2015 and into 2016. Not to be overlooked, the left-leaning Socialist movements are another cause for concern, especially as the market witnessed what can happen when the Greece debt crisis unfolded last year, necessitating a third bailout agreement. Today, the biggest unknown facing European equities is around a potential “Brexit” and whether or not UK voters will opt to stay in the European Union. Should voters decide to depart the EU, Britain’s exit would have significant spillover across the continent. On top of all of this, investors have to contend with the “unknown” unknowns, be it terrorism, world affairs or other unforeseen, black swan events. All that being said, over the intermediate term few regions in the world today can match the catalysts currently favoring European equities – benefiting from the improving macro environment, the ECB’s commitment to stimulus and historically attractive valuations. Even as the near-term promises more noise and the long-term may see valuations level off, over the intermediate term, continental Europe represents one of the more attractive destinations for investors in a market suddenly devoid of obvious alternatives. Michael A. Mullaney is a Vice President and Chief Investment Officer in the Boston office of Fiduciary Trust Company ( fiduciary-trust.com ), having joined the firm 15 years ago. Disclosure: The opinions expressed in this publication are as of the date issued and subject to change at any time. The materials discuss general market conditions and trends and should not be construed as investment advice. Any reference to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute legal, tax or accounting advice and clients should discuss any proposed arrangement or transaction with their legal or tax advisors. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: The opinions expressed in this publication are as of the date issued and subject to change at any time. The materials discuss general market conditions and trends and should not be construed as investment advice. Any reference to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute legal, tax or accounting advice and clients should discuss any proposed arrangement or transaction with their legal or tax advisors.

Smart Beta ETFs Not So Smart?

Smart beta ETFs that were on fire for quite some time now appear to be losing some momentum. Smart beta strategy helps to exploit market anomalies by adding extra selection criteria to the market cap or rules-based indices. These include among other strategies value – stocks trading cheap but performing better than stocks trading at a higher value, momentum – based on ongoing trend, dividend – stocks paying high dividend perform better in the long run and volatility – stable stocks perform better any day (read: How to Play the Choppy Market with Cheap Smart Beta ETFs ). In fact, the popularity of smart beta has soared to such a point, where a Create-Research survey has found that smart beta ETFs make up for around 18% of the U.S. ETF market. The U.S. markets are experiencing extreme volatility and the factors responsible for it are global growth concerns, escalating geopolitical tensions, a surge in the U.S. dollar and uncertainty over the timing of the next interest rate hike. Against this backdrop, investors look for smart stock-selection strategies to alleviate market risks. But nothing works forever, not even smart strategies. This is as true for smart beta ETFs as for market anomalies. Per a report by Research Affiliates’ analysts, one of the primary reasons why smart beta strategies have been performing well is because of their growing popularity, which led to higher valuations rather than structural alpha. The latter is the quality of the strategy and its potential to beat the benchmark on a sustainable and repeatable basis. This does not mean that one should reject smart beta ETFs altogether. If any inefficiency is spotted in the market, smart beta ETFs enable investors to exploit it at a cheap cost. However, it should be noted that not all smart beta ETFs have fulfilled their promise of delivering market-beating returns (read: Smart Beta ETFs That Stood Out Amid Market Volatility ). Below we have highlighted a few ‘Smart Beta’ options that underperformed the broader U.S. market ETF SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ), which has gained about 1.6% so far this year (as of March 30, 2016) First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (NASDAQ: FV ) This ETF tracks the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, which provides targeted exposure to the five First Trust sector and industry-based ETFs that Dorsey, Wright & Associates (DWA) believes have the highest potential to outperform other ETFs in the selection universe. It is a popular ETF with AUM of $4.6 billion and trades in solid volumes of around 2.2 million shares a day on average. The fund charges a higher 89 bps in fees. The ETF has lost 8.2% in the year-to-date period (as of March 30). Guggenheim S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: RZG ) This fund tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Index. The product has a wide exposure across 146 stocks with each holding less than 2% share while healthcare and financials are the top two sectors accounting for over 20% share each. The ETF has AUM of $192 million but trades in light volume of about 28,000 shares a day on average. It charges 35 bps in annual fees and fell 2.4% in the year-to-date period. SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (NYSEARCA: ONEO ) The fund tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index and holds a broad basket of 903 securities that are widely diversified with none holding more than 0.82% of assets. ONEO has accumulated $340.2 million in its asset base. It charges a lower fee of 20 bps per year and trades in solid volume of around 137,000 shares. The ETF fell 0.5% in the year-to-date period (read: 5 Very Successful ETF Launches of 2015 ). Original Post

The BRICs To Consider Now

Once considered the darlings of the emerging market world, the BRICs have faced economic and political challenges lately. However, certain BRICs still offer opportunities for investors. BlackRock’s Terry Simpson explains. artpixelgraphy_studio / Shutterstock Many BlackRock fund managers have raised their emerging market (EM) allocations lately, and we’ve warmed up in general to the asset class after a long underweight . EM valuations overall, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, look cheap, and we see value for long-term investors. A Fed on hold and a weaker dollar are good news for the asset class (see the chart below), and there are signs of progress on structural reforms in certain EM countries. Click to enlarge Which BRIC country do you like best? Join in. You may be wondering, however, what we think of the so-called BRIC countries in particular – otherwise known as Brazil, Russia, India, and China – especially given the recent political scandal and slowing growth headlines surrounding some of these countries. Despite the economic and political challenges facing these one-time darlings of the EM world, we still see long-term opportunities within the BRIC universe. We like Brazil The words impeachment, corruption, bribery, and recession are all too synonymous with Brazil these days. And perhaps with justification, Brazilian gross domestic product (( GDP )), on the decline since 2010, finally entered negative territory in 2015 at -3.0 percent. Economists expect to again see negative economic activity in Brazil this year, with growth at -3.4 percent, according to Bloomberg data. Local inflation remains high, forcing the Brazilian central bank to leave its policy rate unchanged since July 2015. With so much bad news emanating from Brazil, one might ask what’s there to like about this BRIC? We believe Brazil offers value, as there’s potential for a significant turnaround story. Much of the bad news about Brazil appears already priced into the market. Brazilian equities, as measured by the MSCI Brazil Index, are 20 percent cheaper than their 2014 highs on a price to book basis. This means we could see Brazilian stocks move higher if confidence in the market is restored. We think sentiment toward Brazil has just begun to turn, as many long-term investors remain on the sidelines. In addition, lower real wages and declining labor costs are making the country more attractive for foreign business when measured against regional Latin American peers. However, an investor confidence recovery ultimately will rest on whether we’ll see real political change and reforms. We’re neutral toward Russia Undoubtedly, Russia is the BRIC member with the most to gain from recovering oil prices. Russia reaped the benefits of the oil price boom starting in the early 2000s, averaging 7.1 percent GDP for the six years ending in 2008. Last year, oil revenue accounted for 45 percent of Russian government revenue, according to an analysis of data accessible via Bloomberg. But Russia’s economy has suffered more recently, following declining oil prices and economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. and Eurozone. The country entered a recession in 2015 and is expected to produce negative growth again in 2016, based on consensus forecasts available via Bloomberg. A flexible currency has allowed Russia to quickly adjust to economic difficulties, and Russian markets are receiving inflows following rebounding oil prices. However, we need to see sustained economic momentum and a more sustainable long-term economic growth model not so dependent on oil. Thus, in the context of an EM portfolio, we advocate remaining neutral this BRIC. We favor India India is a bright spot within the BRICs and stands out in a world where economic growth is sparse. In 2014 and 2015, the country expanded at 6.9 percent and 7.3 percent, respectively. According to the IMF, India’s 2016 GDP is forecasted to grow at 7.5 percent. Yet even with this rosy economic picture, India’s market performance has waned since reaching a post-crisis peak in January 2015, weighed down by a rising U.S. dollar and slow progress on fiscal reforms. Looking forward, we are encouraged that the Indian government has committed to keeping the fiscal deficit in check. Furthermore, the government is expected to spend 0.3 percent of GDP on public infrastructure that should support growth. As such, we’re likely to see fiscal and monetary policy makers working in unison to spur growth. This, combined with a reasonable valuation for the S&P BSE Sensex Index, bodes well for Indian stocks into 2017. We like China Sentiment toward China began deteriorating in August of 2015, with the domestic stock market crash and less transparent currency management . Long-term issues remain, and the country’s reforms have slowed due to cyclical pressures. However, the reforms that have been implemented are ones that are supportive to growth. In addition, the Fed’s delay has eased pressure on China, and we’re encouraged by the slowing of capital outflows from the country. Finally, Chinese stocks (measured by the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index) have trailed their Brazilian counterparts (measured by the Ibovespa Index) and moved in lock step with Russian equities (represented by the MICEX Index) since late January, based on Bloomberg data, and their low valuations are poised to potentially rise in a risk-on environment. Looking forward, we could see Chinese multiples increase as investors regain confidence in the country’s outlook. Within China, we prefer the offshore market vs. the domestic market, as well as domestic sectors and companies that could benefit from expected Chinese structural reform. The main takeaway from all of this: Investors should be cognizant that EM is no longer a homogenous asset class, and each market faces its own challenges. Even within the BRICs, there is growing heterogeneity across countries. This post , originally appeared on the BlackRock Blog