Tag Archives: open-xhr-start

3 Top Performing Utilities Mutual Funds In 2014 – Mutual Fund Commentary

Even during a market downturn, the demand for essential services such as those provided by utilities, remains virtually unchanged. Utilities funds are therefore an excellent choice for investors seeking a steady income flow through consistent yields from dividends. This is also why they are primarily considered to be a relatively more conservative investment option. In recent times their forays into emerging markets have led to appreciably higher returns and they offer superior returns at a relatively lower level of risk. The US equities have enjoyed another year of strong gains this year. The Dow, S&P 500 and the Nasdaq are up 8.7%, 12.3% and 14.1%, respectively so far this year. Fortunately, the momentum is evident in the Utilities mutual funds as well. With 16.9% gains (as of Dec 23), the Utilities sector is the third highest sector equity mutual fund gainer so far this year. Also, among the S&P industry groups, Utilities Select Sector (NYSEARCA: XLU ) is the second highest gainer this year as it boasts year-to-date return of 24.1%. We will be picking the top 3 Utilities mutual funds this year based on their year-to-date returns and favorable Zacks Mutual Fund Rank among others. However, before doing so, let’s look at the positives for the sector. Keep reading our Mutual Fund Commentary section, where we are reporting on performances and best picks from fund families and other categories. YTD Sector Performance Sector Equity Funds Returns YTD (%) 1 Year (%) Real Estate 29.48 29.51 Health 24.45 25.53 Utilities 16.94 18.07 Technology 13.95 15.12 Global Real Estate 12.22 13.31 Consumer Defensive 11.81 13.22 Industrials 9.02 10.5 Energy Limited Partnership 7.04 8.95 Financial 6.35 7.06 Consumer Cyclical 6.17 7.56 Communications 2.77 4.52 Miscellaneous Sector 0.19 1.97 Natural Resources -11.68 -9.9 Equity Energy -15.39 -14.39 Equity Precious Metals -15.58 -12.19 Source: Morningstar Strength in Utilities Sector The biggest positive as well as the fundamental strength of the utilities is that there is hardly any viable substitute for their services. The global invasion of electrical gadgets and therefore the endless need for electricity and utility services is an added advantage. The utility operators generate more or less stable earnings unless there are severe factors disrupting their operations. These operators likewise reward their shareholders through the payment of stable and growing dividends. In their pursuit to improve the standard of services, utility operators have relentlessly pursued research and development work. Keeping the rise in demand and efficient use of power in mind, the operators have brought new smart meters, transmission and distribution lines, and gas pipelines into operation. Utility operators are also benefiting from ongoing research work in the solar photovoltaic (PV) sector. Solar energy is a growing alternate energy source and the new solar cells with higher conversion rates allow operators to generate more power with fewer solar panels. This enables the operators to lower the cost of generating power from alternate sources as these are generally more expensive than fossil fuel sources. Apart from spreading business organically, the players in the utility space make strategic mergers and acquisitions, which lead to cost synergies and better utilization of resources. We believe that in a mature energy market like the United States, mergers and acquisitions represent a sure way to enhance market share. Best Performing Utilities Mutual Funds We will pick 3 top utilities mutual funds that carry a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy) as we expect the funds to outperform its peers in the future. Remember, the goal of the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is to guide investors to identify potential winners and losers. Unlike most of the fund-rating systems, the Zacks Mutual Fund Rank is not just focused on past performance, but the likely future success of the fund. These funds also have high returns year to date. The funds have relatively low expense ratio and carry no sales load. The maximum initial investment required for these funds is $5000. Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (MUTF: FSUTX ) seeks growth of capital. It invests most of its assets in companies related to the utilities industry or firms that earn most of their revenues from utility operations. The non-diversified fund uses fundamental analysis and also looks into market and economic conditions for taking investment decisions. FSUTX has returned 20.3% year to date. The fund carries an annual expense ratio of 0.80% as compared to category average of 1.28%. FSUTX carries no sales load. Fidelity Advisor Utilities I (MUTF: FUGIX ) invests a majority of its assets in utilities companies and those deriving most of their revenues from utilities sector. The fund invests in both US and non-US companies. FUGIX has returned 20.2% year to date. The fund carries an annual expense ratio of 0.84% as compared to category average of 1.28%. FUGIX carries no sales load. MFS Utilities I (MUTF: MMUIX ) seeks total return. The fund invests a lion’s share of its assets in utilities companies, which are engaged in production, generation and distribution of electric, gas or other types of energy, and those involved in telecommunications and cable business. The fund mostly invests in equities, but may also invest in debt instruments. MMUIX has returned 12.8% year to date. The fund carries an annual expense ratio of 0.76% as compared to category average of 1.28%. MMUIX carries no sales load.

Direxion To Shut Down BARS, The 3x Gold Bear ETF – ETF News And Commentary

Direxion – a renowned player in the leveraged and inverse leveraged ETF world – which was recently in the news for opting for a reverse split of its 2 leveraged ETFs – Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Bull 3x Shares (NYSEARCA: JNUG ) and Direxion Daily Russia Bull 3x Shares (NYSEARCA: RUSL ) – has now decided to shut down an inverse ETF targeting the gold bullion market. The product, Direxion Daily Gold Bear 3x Shares (NYSEARCA: BARS ), which was launched in April this year will cease trading on December 26 and its assets will be liquidated on December 30. BARS tracks the Gold Benchmark Futures Contract to provide three times the daily inverse performance of gold futures (read: Direxion Opts for Reverse Split for 2 Leveraged ETFs ). Given that the fund has returned roughly 8% since its inception, the closure comes as somewhat of a surprise. However, Direxion believes that the fund’s inability to garner sufficient assets has forced it to close the fund. BARS currently manages less than $5 million assets and is quite pricey with 1.56% as expenses. The high expense fee might have been a factor for the fund’s failure to lure sufficient investor interest. Moreover, BARS faced stiff competition from other bear products on gold such as ProShares UltraShort Gold (NYSEARCA: GLL ), PowerShares DB Gold Double Short ETN (NYSEARCA: DZZ ) and VelocityShares 3x Inverse Gold ETN (NASDAQ: DGLD ). While GLL has managed to garner $88.4 million since its inception, DZZ and DGLD currently manage assets worth $73 million and $16.9 million respectively (see all Precious Metals ETFs here ). It’s worth noting that Direxion Daily Gold Bull 3x Shares ( BAR ) , which was launched together with BARS and manages an AUM base of just $2.8 million and is as pricey as BARS, will continue to trade. Apart from the recent closure, Direxion had announced closures of five of its inverse 3x ETFs this September. The ETFs in question are Direxion Daily Brazil Bear 3x Shares (BRZS), Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bear 3x Shares (EURZ), Direxion Daily Japan Bear 3x Shares (JPNS), Direxion Daily South Korea Bear 3x Shares (KORZ) and Direxion Daily Natural Gas Related Bear 3x Shares (GASX) (see all Leveraged Equity ETFs here ). Including the recent fund closure, more than 65 ETF products have been shut down or are scheduled to be closed this year. In comparison with this, we have seen roughly 192 new product launches this year, as per ETF.com. With the recent launches, the fast evolving U.S. ETF industry now has more than 1,660 products in the market with a total market cap of $1,943.05 billion.

Cambria Introduces A Global Core Portfolio ETF With Zero Management Fees

Summary Mebane Faber’s Cambria Funds has added another ETF to its stable. The fund is a fund-of-funds comprising a core global portfolio of stocks, bonds, commodities and real estate. Cambria charges no management fees for the ETF. Acquired fees for the component funds are 0.29%. A Global Core Portfolio ETF With Zero Management Fees The latest ETF from investment iconoclast Mebane Faber is poised to be an industry disrupter. The Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (NYSEARCA: GAA ) is a fund of funds offering a global portfolio of stocks, bonds, commodities and real estate. “So,” you say, “what’s so disruptive about that?” Well, the ETF has no management fee beyond the acquired fees of the component funds. None. Acquired fund expenses amount to a mere 0.29%. Fig. 1. Still from Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948). More on the fee structure later, let’s take a look at the fund first. The Fund The fund is a designed as a core global market portfolio, what Faber describes on ETF.com as a “one-stop shop for core global allocation… for super-low cost.” He goes so far as to ordain the fund the “global benchmark.” The table below lists the current portfolio. Fund Ticker Percent of Holdings Vanguard Tot Bond Mkt ETF (NYSEARCA: BND ) 8.09% Vanguard Emerging Mkt ETF (NYSEARCA: VWO ) 6.75% United States Comm Index (NYSEARCA: USCI ) 6.58% Vanguard Intl Bond ETF (NASDAQ: BNDX ) 5.07% Vanguard Emerg Mkts Gov B (NASDAQ: VWOB ) 4.90% Ishares MSCI USA Momentum (NYSEARCA: MTUM ) 4.09% Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: VO ) 4.08% Vanguard Viper (NYSEARCA: VTI ) 4.07% Vanguard Europe Pac ETF (NYSEARCA: VEA ) 3.94% Mkt Vectors Em Lc Bd ETF (NYSEARCA: EMLC ) 3.85% Cambria Gloabl Value ETF (NYSEARCA: GVAL ) 3.80% Market Vectors Emer Hy (NYSEARCA: HYEM ) 3.77% Vanguard Reit ETF (NYSEARCA: VNQ ) 3.10% Cambria Shrhldr Yld ETF (NYSEARCA: SYLD ) 3.04% Ishares Lehman 7-10yr Trs (NYSEARCA: IEF ) 3.04% Ishares Iboxx Inv Gr Corp (NYSEARCA: LQD ) 3.03% SPDR Barclays TIPS ETF (NYSEARCA: IPE ) 3.00% Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHP ) 3.00% Vanguard Gbl X U.S. Re ETF (NASDAQ: VNQI ) 2.95% Ishares 20+Yrs Treas ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) 2.07% Vanguard St Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: BSV ) 2.01% Vanguard-S/T Corp ETF (NASDAQ: VCSH ) 2.01% Cambria Forgn Shrhldr ETF (NYSEARCA: FYLD ) 2.00% SPDR Barclays Int Corp (NYSEARCA: IBND ) 1.99% Vanguard Ftse All World (NYSEARCA: VSS ) 1.99% Spdr Barclays High Yield (NYSEARCA: JNK ) 1.99% Wisdomtree Em Small Cap (NYSEARCA: DGS ) 1.96% Market Vectors Intl (NYSEARCA: IHY ) 1.94% Cash 0.97% Wisdomtree Emg Mkts Eq (NYSEARCA: DEM ) 0.94% Here’s a couple of charts breaking the portfolio down at high-level geographic and asset class allocations. In the charts I’ve categorized the funds as Global (all-world), International (global ex. U.S.), Developed Markets ex. U.S., Emerging Markets, and Domestic (US) based on the individual funds’ mandates. I’ve not made any effort to break down the holdings by sub-categories within the funds. Obviously, Global would encompass all of the funds and International would encompass the two ex. U.S. categories but I’ve not done that here. (click to enlarge) Fig 2 and 3. Portfolio composition of Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF . Charts by author. Data from Cambria . As we see, the portfolio breaks down to about half U.S. and half international. Slightly under half of the holdings is in bonds which cover sovereign and corporate debt at a full range of durations. There’s a 6.6% allocation to commodities, and 6% to real estate split equally between U.S. and international. The 36.7% that’s in stocks is split with about half in U.S. equity. If one adds the U.S. portion of the global funds, the mix would be slightly more than half in domestic securities. Zero Management Fee Now, about those fees. Or shall I say, the lack of fees? Surely no one opens an ETF without some reasonable expectation of turning a profit on it. How can they do that without charging fees? Two factors contribute to answer this question. First, according to Faber, this is an extremely low-cost fund to manage. GAA is essentially buy and hold. Although one assumes there will be some periodic rebalancing, the details are not discussed in the literature I examined. Furthermore, Faber claims that management is sufficiently lean and the fund is sufficiently cost-efficient that should it fails to raise a single dollar, the cost to Cambria will only be about $100,000. Or, to put it another way, the fund need only generate that $100,000 for Cambria to break even on it. But, with no fees, how can they generate even that amount? This raises the second point, and it is the key to making GAA viable. Three of the holdings are Cambria funds: SYLD, FYLD and GVAL, representing 8.84% of the portfolio. Faber claims that for a fund value of about $100M for GAA, the fees from those funds will generate sufficient revenue to Cambria for GAA to break even. To sum up, I see GAA an intriguing experiment. It provides exposure to a core global portfolio of 29 ETFs at absolutely minimal cost. An investor could buy the world market in its entirety with this single fund and simply forget about it. Doing so provides a truly passive, index investment. It will be interesting to follow how investors respond. If it succeeds it may well be remembered as the disruptive force Faber considers it to be.