Tag Archives: nysemcd

Choosing Which Stocks To Sell For A Big Purchase

Summary This article outlines the thinking process of needing to sell some stocks for a big purchase. Know how much cash is needed to liquidate from stocks, so as not to sell more than needed. Must keep emotions in check, and sell stocks based on company valuation and future prospects of the business. Here’s a little background story to my situation. The Situation of Being Carless I recently sold my 2001 Toyota Echo. I bought it used about three years ago. The odometer indicates mileage of over 320,000km. While I owned it, other than the usual maintenance, I replaced the battery and the exhaust pipe. I managed to sell it for $500 less than my buying price. Not too shabby. I’m not one who drives a lot, but I only noticed how inconvenient it is after I sold the car. Now, I’m looking for another car. I’m still debating whether to buy a new car or a pre-owned one. Someone that knows a lot more about cars than me said that it’s probably better to buy a new one now that I got several years of driving experience down my belt. Further, it could be risky buying a pre-owned car because I don’t know its history. The previous owner could also have hid facts about crashes the car had experienced or changed the odometer. The ideal situation is that I anticipated I’ll need to “invest” in a car a couple years before and actually saved up for it. As we know, the general principle is to not put money into the stock market if you plan to use it within 5 years. The reality is I did not save up, and I don’t have a lot of cash on hand. So, other than to stop buying stocks in the meantime, I also needed to sell some of my shares. Emotionally, I don’t want to sell at a loss, and some of my holdings are in the red, especially energy companies. At the same time, I also want to take profit in my biggest winners. However, the better way is to try to suppress my emotions, and look at valuations and future earnings estimates instead. So, I should be looking at the valuations of all of my holdings and deciding which ones are possible sells. I especially don’t want to sell my core holdings, but if they’re excessively overvalued, or I feel less comfortable with them for some reason, it might make sense to take some shares off the table and take some profit. Unfortunately, I made some sales before I wrote this article. I notice I’m much more logical and less emotional when I rethink the process in writing. How did I Choose What to Sell? It is through this event that I realize more prominently that I’m less comfortable with some stocks than others. In other words, this exercise more critical helps me determine what I should be holding or not. Further, I also look at valuation, as well as compare a holding’s future prospects with others. Another consideration is gains. The market is uncertainty; it could drop 25-50% for whatever reason at any time period. Still, I would probably regret later by selling some shares in my winners, as some would be against clipping the wings of their winners. Royal Bank of Canada Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE: RY )’s shares are fairly-valued today. F.A.S.T. Graphs shows consensus analyst estimates of 4.7% earnings growth going forward. Adding that to its current yield of 3.9%, it indicates an estimated return of about 8.6% in Royal Bank shares today, which is an acceptable return for a blue chip investment. In Q2 2015, 63% of Royal Bank’s revenue came from Canada. The housing bubble has been the topic at the dinner table in recent years, especially in popular cities such as Vancouver and Toronto. The fear is that the average income cannot pay for the average housing prices. In January 2015, the Huffington Post’s article shows the income you need to buy an average house across Canada . In Toronto, an average household income of C$113,009 is needed for an average-priced house or condo of C$587,505 at the low mortgage rate of 2.99%. The monthly mortgage payment turns out to be C$2,560. If rates rose to 6%, the 2005 rate, the required household income would be raised to C$143,182. It’s worse in Vancouver. An average household income of C$147,023 is needed for an average-priced house or condo of C$819,336 at the low mortgage rate of 2.99%. The monthly mortgage payment ends up being C$3570. If rates rose to 6%, the 2005 rate, the required income would be raised to C$190,581. Of course these numbers are just that — an average. And it also makes a difference how much down payment a family has saved up. Still, it doesn’t change the fact that housing prices have been on the rise for over a decade in those cities. And with income levels misaligning with housing prices, there could be a ripple effect if the prices started to drop. I sold some shares in Royal Bank, and will continue monitoring, but I want to emphasize that if I had cash on hand to make my purchase, I wouldn’t have sold my shares. Baxter International I started a position in Baxter International (NYSE: BAX ) as a non-core. Then, I made it core. And now I sold out of it. It was a small position and I suppose I wasn’t strongly attached to it. I sold it essentially at breakeven. I might still receive a tiny position in Baxalta, as I sold it on June 16, but the settlement date is a few days later, while the company spins off the Baxalta shares to shareholders as of the record date of June 17. If I do receive shares of Baxalta, I’ll be monitoring it and decide if I want to add to the position later on. Starbucks Some of you might stare in disbelief that I sold some shares of Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX ). It has been one of my biggest winners with 50% gain. The high P/E is scaring me a little. I certainly wouldn’t add shares at a P/E of 36. Looking at the F.A.S.T. Graph below, it’s at the high end of its valuation. (click to enlarge) If it trades sideways again, so that earnings catch up some, I might add to my position again. Actually, I should have sold McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ) before selling Starbucks because Starbucks has better future prospects. However, my McDonald’s shares are below my breakeven point, and psychologically, it’s hard for me to separate from those shares at present levels. That said, in hindsight, I shouldn’t have bought McDonald’s at the price that I did. And a thought just came to me…I should have sold McDonald’s at a small loss and kept my Starbucks shares because I believe Starbucks will outperform McDonald’s in the future. Whoops, I guess I should have written this article before I took action. I’m still a bit short on cash, so I might revisit my decision on McDonald’s next week. Microsoft Lastly, I sold some shares in Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ). The other technology companies I hold are International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM ) and Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM ). IBM is a core holding that I believe is much more undervalued than Microsoft. IBM’s P/E is under 11 and Qualcomm’s is under 14, while Microsoft’s is under 18. Consensus analyst estimates Microsoft’s earnings to grow at 6.7% in the near term, Qualcomm’s to grow at 1.3%, and IBM’s to grow at 5.1%. If I didn’t need the money, I wouldn’t sell the Microsoft shares because they’re not excessively overvalued. In Conclusion Looks like I couldn’t keep my emotions entirely at bay, but in writing this article, I believe my thought process became clearer and less sentimental. It would certainly have helped if I had a set of rules for selling stocks ahead of any sales based on allocation, diversification, quality, valuation, and future prospects. Ask Yourself Do you need to sell some of your stocks to make a purchase? Do you have a set of rules to determine what to sell when you need to? Do you ever sell for the sake of taking profit off the table to preserve gains and capital? If you like what you’ve just read, please consider clicking the “Follow” link at the top of the page, above the article title, to receive an email notification when I publish a new article. Disclosure: I am/we are long IBM, MCD, MSFT, QCOM, RY, SBUX. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I’m not a certified financial advisor, and this article is not advising to buy or sell any security. Please use it as initial research.

How To Increase The Dynamic Energy Of Your Portfolio

In physics, the dynamic energy of an object is a measure of how much energy the object can release under favorable conditions. In a similar way, a stock portfolio has higher dynamic energy when it consists of stocks with great upside potential thanks to a headwind and its resultant sell-off. The article suggests replacing some stalwarts, whose growth has stumbled but still trade at elevated P/E, with some oil stocks that have been extremely punished due to the oil plunge. In physics, the dynamic energy of an object is a measure of how much energy the object can release under favorable conditions. To clarify this through an example, two objects that are still, with the one at the sea level and the other one on the top of a hill, both have zero kinetic energy. However, the one on the top of the hill possesses much greater dynamic energy because a minimal push can make it start moving at an increasing speed, whereas the other one will remain still under any conditions. Given this definition, investors should try to build a portfolio that has high dynamic energy, i.e., its stocks will greatly appreciate under favorable conditions. Of course this does not involve purchasing extremely high-risk stocks that will return great profits under extremely specific conditions, which have minimal chance of prevailing. Instead this strategy involves purchasing stocks that have asymmetrical reward to risk, as they have been beaten to the extreme due to a temporary headwind despite their strong fundamentals. In the past, it was much easier to build a portfolio with high growth potential. More specifically, all an investor needed to do was to purchase some stalwarts, such as Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO ), PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP ), McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD ), Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT ), General Mills (NYSE: GIS ), Philip Morris (NYSE: PM ) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ), and hold them forever without even checking on them. As these companies have historically grown their earnings per share [EPS] at a rate higher than 10%, they have historically offered excellent returns to their shareholders. However, as these stalwarts have now expanded to almost every country, further growth has become much harder to accomplish and hence their EPS growth has stumbled in the last 2 years, as shown in the table (data from morningstar.com for 2013-2014 and finance.yahoo.com for 2015): KO PEP MCD WMT GIS PM PG 2013 growth -4% 10% 4% -3% 19% 2% 6% 2014 growth -2% 5% -8% -2% 1% -5% 4% 2015 growth [Exp.] 0% 4% 5% 5% 0% -10% -2% P/E TTM 21 21 19 17 22 16 21 Given the low growth rate of the above stalwarts, their high market cap and their relatively high P/E, investors should realize that a portfolio consisting largely of such stocks possesses limited upside (fortunately it also has limited downside, as these stocks greatly outperform the market during a downturn). Therefore, investors should add some stocks that have been unfairly beaten to the extreme due to a temporary headwind. At the moment, there are some off-shore drillers and oilfield service companies that possess strong balance sheets and great managements but have been sold off to the extreme due to the sell-off of their entire sector. Investors should realize that oil is very cyclical in nature and hence it will not remain for many years at its current level, which is half of the level that prevailed in the last 4 years. To be sure, the number of oil rigs has consistently decreased in the last 10 weeks, reaching the level of March-2010, and will keep declining if oil remains pressured. Moreover, all oil companies have significantly curtailed their capital expenses for future growth, which will ultimately result in lower production levels in the future. Thus it is a question of time before oil returns to a more reasonable range, which will render more rigs profitable than the current price does. The table below includes some stocks with strong earnings and low amounts of debt, which will strongly recover when oil returns to a more reasonable level, around $70-$80. The table depicts the decline of these stocks off their peak in the summer, the upside from their current price to their peak and the upside from their current price to half way till their peak, which will correspond to an oil price within $70-$80. NOV HAL ESV NOV Decline off peak 41% 42% 46% 40% Upside to peak 69% 72% 85% 67% Upside if oil rises to $70-$80 35% 36% 43% 33% P/E TTM 9 11 5 6 Given the extremely low P/E of Ensco (NYSE: ESV ), its low debt and its high dividend yield (10%), it is the stock with the greatest upside potential if oil rises to $70-$80. Noble Energy (NYSE: NE ) has a very low current P/E but its forward P/E is higher, around 9, while the company also carries a much higher relative amount of net debt ($7 B) than Ensco, standing at about 9 years’ earnings. National Oilwell Varco (NYSE: NOV ) has a low P/E and high backlog, which can fully protect its profitability for at least one more year, while its balance sheet is essentially debt-free, as its net debt ($2 B) is worth only one year’s earnings. Halliburton (NYSE: HAL ) has a low P/E but its earnings are expected to plunge almost 50% this year so it is a riskier choice. To sum up, investors should always look for stocks that have strong fundamentals but have been punished due to a temporary headwind, thus possessing great upside potential. As the market always overreacts to headwinds and any factor of uncertainty, it is only natural that asymmetric reward to risk shows up whenever an unforeseen headwind emerges. Of course this does not mean that an entire portfolio should consist of such stocks, particularly in the case of defensive investors. Nevertheless, when a stock of a portfolio reaches an overvalued level that leaves very limited further upside, it is prudent for investors to exchange that stock with another one as shown above so that their portfolio maintains high dynamic energy. Disclosure: The author is long ESV, NOV. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Update On American Express And Investing Tips

American Express is down $10 a share from our entry price. Nevertheless we are staying the course and holding this stock long term. We will not be shorting stocks in our 1% portfolio. There are many more “long” millionaires than “short.” Our new position, BND, is performing well. It will be a good anchor for our portfolio as its volatility seems to be very low. So finally the ECB has decided to resort to quantitative easing like the U.S. It actually is going to spend 60 billion euros a month instead of the 50 billion figure leaked yesterday. Will it work? Has quantitative easing worked in the U.S.? The bulls would say yes with 5% GDP and low unemployment. The bears would say no with trillions of extra debt and an upcoming dollar crisis. I’m with the bears on this one. All throughout history printing money has always lead to inflation and a weak currency. Would you prefer to live in Switzerland where the Swiss central bank has decided to stop printing money (finally) or Spain where the ECB is going to print 720 billion euro this year alone? The “unintended consequences” will soon start to emerge as all fiat currencies will begin to lose substantial purchasing power. At this inflection point, the public will rush into hard assets such as Gold and Silver. Our portfolio is doing well with now close to $400k invested. I want to touch on American Express Company (NYSE: AXP ) as a follower asked me about its validity going forward. We bought the stock at $94 and currently the stock is trading at around $84 a share. Also the portfolio received a dividend payment of $69 last week. The stock is selling off today due to earnings that were announced in the last 24 hours. Furthermore the company announced recently that it is cutting at least 4000 jobs. Irrespective of the negativity surrounding American Express lately, we are not selling our position. Yes the dividend yield is low at 1.2% but the company has committed to increased dividends and subsequently has increased its dividend for the last three years. However there are many more reasons to hold this stock long term. First of all it dominates its industry and when a company has this much market share, it recovers from recessions quicker than other companies ( see its recovery in the chart below since 2008). The company is still well-priced at these levels and its market cap just continues to grow over time. Have the courage to hold it. In the long term it will do very well. We as fundamental investors who will continue to collect dividends and option premium and wait for the stock price to recover. (click to enlarge) The follower is fearful the stock may drop ( and it may do – in the short term). As investors we need to invest with the end goal in mind. We can’t be taken off course just because of sharp movements in our underlyings. We stay the course and we stick to our plan. Fear also exists on the way up. One such example is the gold market. Long term gold investors are long and will stay long for the long haul. Gold is up 10% already this year. Do these long investors sell and take their profits? No way. These gold bulls are in it for the long haul and that’s how the big profits are made. In one way, holding physical gold is better than holding an ETF or stock. You can’t sell your asset as easily as you can sell an ETF that tracks the Gold price like the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ). Here lack of liquidity is an advantage. Therefore If you believe in your investment, have the courage to hold it through thick and thin. Be prepared to “ride the bull” as that’s where the big profits are in a healthy bull market. Shorting stocks or ETFs also wont happen in this portfolio. There are many distinct disadvantages when shorting underlyings in your portfolio. You are borrowing shares from your broker. You do not have 100% control and sometimes your broker will “call away” your shares at very short notice because the lender wants his stock back. This happens especially when many investors are shorting the same stock. Losses can be infinite (multiple times your initial trade). You need a margin account to short so you pay monthly interest on your bet. Finally I mentioned the other day that the portfolio bought the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NYSEARCA: BND ). I must say that I like its action. Its going to be a good anchor for this portfolio (at least in the short term until the bond trend changes). This ETF tracks 3000 U.S. bonds (all types) and has a 2% annual yield. What’s interesting today is that the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) and the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: IEF ) are down but our ETF is unchanged. I believe this is the best place to be in the bond sector but we will be watching closely for a trend change and at that point we will put more capital to work in this sector. Automatic profits were taken on positions in McDonald’s Corporation (NYSE: MCD ) and IBM (NYSE: IBM ) this week and new positions were opened (see the screen shot below). (click to enlarge) Current Balances – Making Progress – Slow & Steady wins the race. Now that you’ve read this, are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Sentiment on ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Why are you ? Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague