Tag Archives: nysec

Conservative Total Return Portfolio: Sells A Winner And Welcomes Back An ‘Old Friend’

Summary The CTR sold VLO after less than a month following double digit gains. While money was left on the table, the market in this name seemed a little “frothy”. After recently selling BX, the combination of a price drop and company strategic moves prompted the equity to be “welcomed back”; BX is still best-in-breed. AAPL is nearing an inflection point, while IBM may be nearing a breakout. GM is universally hated, but that has to change (or does it). I introduced the ” Conservative Total Return ” or CTR portfolio in August 2014 and try to provide monthly updates. The general philosophy of this method has allowed me to cumulatively beat, since 1999, the S&P 500 by a wide margin. As the market has “evolved”, so have the holdings. While the investments in the CTR are conservative, the portfolio is dynamic (as is the market and its “favorites”). In the June report, I noted broadening the portfolio base to add a transport (American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL )) and an energy company (Valero (NYSE: VLO )). Unfortunately for the diversification strategy (but fortunate for the portfolio), VLO appreciated significantly and I exited the position. Why did I exit below my target price? Simply put, VLO appreciated fast in a short time. In reviewing my investing mistakes, I have learned that in the past I have been reluctant to sell; waiting for the market to “get it right” and hit my target price. Often my stubbornness has been costly. In recent years (with a lot of prompting from my wife), I have been more prone to take a quick profit as I am skeptical of “one-way elevator rides”. So when VLO jumped more than 10% in less than a month, I decided not to be greedy and took profits. Subsequently, VLO has considered to appreciate. While the greedy side of my wishes I held on, the logical side of me believes the market is over-reacting to perceived good news and is happy I sold. I will continue to monitor VLO and my re-enter if 1) the core value has changed and/or 2) pricing becomes favorable. During the month, I re-entered a favorite (Blackstone- (NYSE: BX )) that I had previously sold for reasons similar to VLO. In that case, BX had become “everyone’s favorite stock”, which always makes me nervous. I sold my position at $42.80 and re-entered at $39.45. While I was absent from the stock, BX made some moves I “approved of”, including accelerating the sale of US single family homes. The worsening energy market also makes it more likely BX will be able to deploy recently raised funds productively (previously I was concerned too much money was chasing too few deals and the funds could underperform). Even while selling (and subsequently adding KKR & Co. (NYSE: KKR )), I maintained BX was “best of breed”. I am happy to once again be holding this winner. An error I made was not being focused enough on the markets during the short-lived Greece/China crisis. I have been looking to increase exposure to financials, but at more attractive prices. Frankly, I wanted to buy Citigroup (NYSE: C ) and missed out. I may still enter C, or another financial, but the post-Q2 earnings response to the group was a little too optimistic for my tastes; there may be another opportunity during the next mini-crises or when enthusiasm pulls back. I am OK with missing an opportunity, if it means not overpaying and having my risk/reward skew too heavily toward risk. The Conservative Total Return Philosophy The essence of the CTR method is to combine a strong value bias with flexibility, opportunism and an ability to assimilate and respond to new information. The core philosophy will always be the same; however, as the economic cycle grows older, identifying the appropriate time to “harvest” becomes increasingly important. In assessing the prospects for all of the portfolio members, I feel good that the risk-reward dynamic is positive and, on a risk-adjusted basis, market beating (taking into account the strong value provided by dividends). Feedback from readers has been a partial motivator in my broadening my market segment exposure. The Individual Stocks The core stocks in the portfolio are (alphabetically): AAL, Apple (OTC: APPL ), Blackstone Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS ), Ford, (NYSE: F ), GE, General Motors (NYSE: GM ), Harley Davidson (NYSE: HOG ), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM ), JPM, KKR and Siemens (OTCPK: SIEGY ). (click to enlarge) As the above chart confirms, my positions will generally have a strong bias toward dividends, reasonable valuation and a moderate (in most cases) PEG. Below are comments summarizing my interest in the equity. The chart also contains the appropriate metrics (valuation, fair value, potential gain). Holdings Apple – APPL has a bit of room to run, whether upward valuation is based on more than iPhone sales will be clarified following Q2 earnings. I believe the watch is a non-event (a disappointment for some bulls) and payments have potential. By the end of the year, AAPL has to demonstrate the catalyst for further appreciation or risk being “dead money” (or worse). I am not a “perma-bull” on APPL (though I use the Company’s products). Blackstone – As noted above, BX was re-introduced at a price reflecting a sold risk/reward opportunity. Still the best of breed, well-funded and poised to profit from market distress and volatility (especially in energy). The harvest of US residential is viewed by the author as a positive. Discover Financial – DFS should be worth more. The stock is trading below levels of Q1, when it announced some bad news. I continue to believe the US economy is very strong, and DFS will benefit (and reflect the growth in higher EPS and stock price). Ford – F has underperformed due to the (predictable) ramp-up of the F150. The industry in general is out of favor, with investors using the excuse de jure to send stock prices lower. Yes China is slowing, but Europe is recovering and the US economy continues to do well. While not quite as cheap as General Motors , F offers nice appreciation potential and is a good “partner” to GM in the portfolio. General Electric (NYSE: GE )- I am thrilled about GE’s medium-term future. The near-term makes me a little nervous as the stock is near fully valued and there is uncertainty with respect to the Alstom and Electrolux transactions. Higher post-GE Capital tax rates also make stock appreciation more challenging. General Motors – Even more than F, GM is the stock everyone loves to hate. Looking at the numbers, it is hard to see much downside (or at least the risk/reward looks very favorable). As with F, China is concerning, but solid progress in Europe and the US should continue. Low gas prices for the foreseeable future put a backstop on highly profitable truck and SUV sales. I believe analysts are too concerned with unit sales and not focused enough on product mix. Harley Davidson – I may have bought HOG too early. However, HOG is an iconic brand and will, over time, garner the premium multiple it deserves (and has held historically). At the current 12.2x forward earnings, it is hard to see much downside (and a lot of upside). Housing prices in the US are rising; historically, HOG sales increases have been incredibly strongly correlated to appreciating housing prices (wealth effect x more retiring baby boomers). International Business Machines – IBM has been a disappointing investment. However, the Company has repositioned and is making solid progress. Improving Europe and progress in “Cloud” should drive a break-out sometime in the next 3 (or at the most three) quarters. Trading at less than 11x forward, there is little downside and much (potential) upside; a 3% dividend provides a bit of a reward for waiting. JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM )- JPM has performed very well, as have the financials. The stock has grown into its valuation and I am confident in twelve months the stock should perform well. As I have mentioned, I would like to add more in the sector, but recently investors have been a bit too eager. Siemens – Continues to be a play on recovering Europe and a weak US dollar. After GE and Honeywell (NYSE: HON ) have performed and appreciated, SIEGY remains a “show me” laggard. It may take a while, but SIEGY should deliver appropriate total returns through the investment period. Position Summary In my opinion, the positions continue to provide a nice balance of innate conservatism, multiple and earnings driven appreciation potential and exposure to a more mature stock market. Please keep in mind that my portfolio also consists of actively managed real estate, index funds (international, emerging markets and domestic) and bond proxies. I this in response to readers who thought the noted stocks were 100% of my investments and lacked diversity (if that were the case, I would agree). The CTR is a portfolio of stocks that in my opinion are conservative (strong reward vs. risk bias) and well positioned to outperform with below-average risk. I own all of the stocks in the CTR (I also own other positions which I consider speculative or otherwise inappropriate to recommend). I appreciate any feedback on individual securities and recommendations on equities to add to the CTR. This article reflects the personal opinions of the author and should not be relied upon or used as a basis in making an investment decision. Investors should always do their own due diligence prior to making an investment decision. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Disclosure: I am/we are long AAL, AAPL, BX, DFS, F, GE, GM, HOG, IBM, JPM, KKR, SIEGY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Top Investments For 2015

2014 Year in Review Well 2014 turned out to be another interesting year. It was a strong year for investment returns despite numerous issues going on around the world. China is clearly slowing down, Europe is facing deflation, and Russia annexed Crimea. As I said last year, uncertainties are always abound but capitalism continues to unleash human potential. Commodities and oil & gas in particular got slammed again in 2014, following up on steep losses in 2013. I have been recommending that investors avoid commodities for a couple years now ( Canada – Headed for a Crash & Canada: A Storm Brewing in China ). Also I have commented numerous times on how the high oil prices don’t make sense ( Saudi America & US Oil and Gas Drilling ). Before discussing what oil did in 2014 and last year’s market returns, I want to remind readers of what I said last year at this time ( Top Investments for 2014 ). I find it remarkable how oil prices have held up in 2013. US oil production has been off the charts, going up in a parabolic curve. US dependence on foreign oil fell to a 27 year low ( Click Here ). In 2005, the US imported 60.5% of their oil requirements and last year that fell to only 34%. This is a result of the shale oil revolution in the US where oil production is up 46.5% or 2.36 million barrels a day since 2007. If oil prices fall in 2014 that will be another significant headwind for the Canadian economy. Fellow Canadians could have benefited from the fall in commodities by not owning Canadian Dollars. Canadians who invested in the US not only realized out sized gains this year, they also realized foreign currency gains that contributed an additional 7% to their returns. I figured it was only a matter of time before oil fell and boy it did fall off a cliff in 2014. Similarly, the falling Canadian dollar was another theme that continued in 2014. As I have said before, this is a great way to be short commodities since the Canadian dollar is very closely tied to commodity prices. I will be returning to both of these themes throughout this post. 2014 Market Returns Market returns were strong again, making it the sixth straight year of solid gains. Just like 2013, Canadian investors could have benefited from the drop in commodity prices by owning US companies, realizing over a 9% gain from the falling Canadian Dollar. I would still recommend avoiding Canadian dollars as the loonie will likely fall further in 2015 as our economy stalls. Last year I included this chart from JP Morgan that puts market returns into context: (click to enlarge) Commodities As already mentioned commodities got slammed this year. Below is a list of the damage. Oil and natural gas were both down significantly in 2014. Metals also fell as well as agricultural commodities. The only bright spots were the 3Cs – Cattle, Cocoa, and Coffee. For those wondering why oil was down, the answer is shown below. (click to enlarge) Source: Carpe Diem Blog Now if anyone would have said back in 2005 to 2008 that US oil production would rise by over 4 million barrels per day by the end of 2014, everyone would have considered them crazy. Look at that graph again, US oil production has almost doubled in 4 years. Let me say that again, oil production went up 4 million barrels per day in 4 years. That is an economic miracle and we should be thankful for the entrepreneurs who made this happen. To me this is the fantastic part of capitalism, as we all enjoy the benefits of what these entrepreneurs have created. For investors, the above graph shows 4 million reasons to avoid oil investments going forward. Don’t get me wrong there is money to be made in the oil, but just like airlines, it is hard to pick the winners from the losers. We are in the top of the first innings of the shale oil revolution and if you don’t think this isn’t a paradigm shift, you need to look at that graph again. In the words of Henry David Thoreau, “It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.” 2014 Stock Recommendations So how did the stock recommendations for 2014 turn out? Total returns include dividends and I also included what the total returns were in Canadian dollars (CAD). Overall the results were decent with the exception of Lightstream Resources ( OTCPK:LSTMF ) [TSE: LTS]. I have more to say about Lightstream below. Here is what those yearly returns looked like throughout the year. (click to enlarge) Looking at the graph, Lightstream was up over 40% in May before going on an epic slide erasing nearly all of the equity value of the company. Of course, I pick these stocks for fun and use the year end as arbitrary start and end points but much higher gains can be had for those who sell once the facts change or when the company approaches its intrinsic value. As I said last year, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC ) has been like shooting fish in a barrel. After being up 110% in 2012, it returned 34% in 2013, and returned a respectable 15% in 2014 (with dividends). Like last year, Bank of America is recommended once again for 2015. It is still selling below its intrinsic value. The same can be said for Citigroup (NYSE: C ). Citigroup’s poor returns in 2014 are mostly attributable to failing the Federal reserve’s stress test. That likely won’t happen again this year. Like Bank of America, Citigroup is once again recommended for 2015. POSCO (NYSE: PKX ) and Ezcorp (NASDAQ: EZPW ) are both very cheap and again recommended for 2015. POSCO, a steel producer, is still profitable but struggling to earn decent returns. The steel industry is over-capitalized, iron ore prices have plummeted and the outlook is uncertain. With a book value of $140/share and the current quote of $63.81/share, the stock is cheap. They are a low cost producer so they will be fine. Comments on Lightstream Lightstream was recommended last year but as some readers know I subsequently changed my mind on the company after reading the year end reserve report released in late March (I have made comments elsewhere on an internet investment forum). At the time when I recommended LTS, it was selling for $5.88/share. Looking back at 2012 (the most recent reserve report) they had spent just over $320 million in capital, added 27 million barrels of reserves, and the cost looked very reasonable at around $12 per barrel. I also did a quick and dirty analysis of the company’s proved reserve value and came up with a rough Net Asset Value (NAV) of about $9/share. This has been their NAV for a while, ever since I said it was a poor company back in 2010. (There are several other posts on there about PBN & PBG, If you want some fun reading… do a search on my blog as I had some interesting debates on the company in the past. Click here for an example. ) Anyway, once the reserve report and annual financial statements were released in late March, it became clear LTS had deteriorated significantly. First of all, they spent $719 million in capital in 2013 and added 12.3 million barrels in reserves, This gave them a finding and development cost of over $70 per barrel. That was only the beginning. Obviously, they spent a pile of cash and generated NO value. This can clearly be seen in the annual report where they wrote off the $1.4 billion in goodwill they were carrying. The annual report also revealed to investors how they justified the carrying amount of their assets on their balance sheet. A careful read would have found this comment buried in the details. In addition to discounted cash flows, the Company also considered a range of market metrics in assessing fair value less cost to sell for certain CGUs. Market metric information was obtained from recent transactions involving similar assets.” Ok, so they used “market metrics” to justify the fair value, not the reserve report which is as close to reality as you can get given the assumptions. Anybody looking to acquire a property would do the same analysis and also adjust for drilling opportunities. Market metrics is exactly what most of the people who invest in oil and gas do to justify their overvalued holdings. The problem is every property has different costs and netbacks, so blanket metrics do not work well. Going back to their reserve report, they had a pile of technical revisions and it really makes you question if management was being candid with shareholders. I would also add that the NAV got a 5% boost due to higher commodity prices. They won’t be getting that boost this year. Given the fact that LTS has a very short reserve life, the reserve value will take a huge hit. I have calculated this for LTS and I estimate a 50% haircut to their reserve value. The last thing I determined from the reserve report was that the NAV was less than $2/share after taking into account other assets and all liabilities. This result was based on the over $90 per barrel oil price used in the reserve report. So basically the company destroyed 60-70% of their value with a terrible return on a huge amount of capital. The capital is gone and the equity investors have lost their capital. Anyways, that is what happened to LTS this year. I actually spent a decent amount of time this year analyzing the reserves and asset values for 68 of the 108 oil and gas companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. I didn’t find a single company to invest in. 2014 Other Recommendations For 2014 I also recommended IBM (NYSE: IBM ) in the Safe & Very Cheap category. Here are the results. Clearly the market is still worried about future of IBM. Most of what I have read is concern over IBM’s falling revenue. I really don’t understand what all the fuss is about. IBM has had flat revenue for 10 years. Revenue per share is up 6.5% over the past 10 years and as an owner that is what counts. Also, IBM has been shedding divisions that generate billions in revenue and generate little-to-no profits. That’s right, some lose money. IBM is currently selling one division that generates $7 billion in revenue but loses $500 million per year. I’m looking forward to the higher earnings when that earnings drag isn’t getting in the way. This is a common situation at many companies when you dig into the details. IBM falling 11% does bother me in the least. Revenue and earnings were higher on a per share basis in 2014. It now offers outstanding value. Top Investments for 2015 IBM (NYSE – IBM, $160.44) Ezcorp (NASDAQ – EZPW, $11.75) Bank of America (NYSE – BAC, $17.89) Citigroup (NYSE – C, $54.11) POSCO (NYSE – PKX (ADR), $63.81) If you want investment commentary on these stocks, see what I wrote last year ( Click Here ). For Canadian investors, I believe owning US dollars will once again be advantageous in 2015. I’ll likely discuss a few interested tidbits from the Ezcorp annual report next year. I’ll leave them for you to find. As mentioned last year, be sure to do your homework on any investment. The markets are at all-time highs and while that shouldn’t alarm you, it should invite caution. All of these companies have wide appreciation potential but anything can happen in the short term. All of the recommended companies have short-term headwinds that will clear over time. Cheers to another great year! Disclosure: I own BAC common, BAC Class A warrants, EZPW, & IBM. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.