Tag Archives: nysearcavym

VYM: A Quality Dividend Growing ETF

Summary Features great dividend growth and diversification across sectors. Traditional low Vanguard expense fees keep your costs down. Lags, though closely follows the S&P for total return. Fund 10% down for the year creates a buying opportunity. Solid ETF choice to balance with SCHD for long-term income generation. Introduction The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) is a quality ETF by Vanguard, the leader in low-cost ETFs. The fund tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index which tracks stocks that are forecasted to have above-average dividend yields. The fund applies no type of quality metric or additional screening to the companies. It also excludes REITs. It currently has 434 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.10%. The Holdings VYM holds a wider variety of stocks than the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF ( SCHD), which I wrote about in another article . (click to enlarge) To compare, both funds are light on materials while SCHD is also very light on utilities, financials and telecommunications. A few basic stats, the top 10 holdings make up 30% of VYM, 42% of SCHD, and the top 25 makes up 58% of VYM vs. 74% for SCHD. Dividend Growth VYM has also featured great dividend growth the last several years. We need to see what the December dividend is, but using the trailing 12-month period (last raise announced 9/23/15), it grew 12.4% this past year, and has a 3-year average of 12.7%. Performance Inception to-date performance vs. the S&P has slightly lagged as mentioned in the summary. This return is assuming all dividends reinvested. Data courtesy of DividendChannel. (click to enlarge) I like to compare this with SCHD’s inception to-date results to get a closer apples-to-apples comparison of a dividend based ETF. (click to enlarge) SCHD has lagged VYM since its inception by a percentage point each year. One other comparison point between VYM and SCHD is looking at their top holdings. Since their top holdings make up the majority of the funds, it’s important to see how they are similar and where they differ. This information may help an investor decide which fund to buy into (if it’s an either/or scenario) based on the business prospects of a company(ies) that may be absent from a fund. The green colors mean the company is contained within both funds, red means that one is not contained within the other (for example Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC ) and AT&T (NYSE: T ) are not in SCHD) and yellow denotes they are in the other fund, just not the top 30. Why Now? The market has been off its highs in 2015 as there are now several factors weighing on the market. Looking at the past 5 years, the yield has never been higher. It briefly touched over 3% during the corrections of 2011 and 2013, but has sustained 3%+ for the last few months of 2015. This offers a historically good entry point. The sharp rally of the past week has pushed the yield down however from approximately 3.42% to 3.25%. VYM data by YCharts Conclusion VYM is another great ETF product by Vanguard. The fund has had a solid track record of performance, delivering growing dividends while closely following the performance of the S&P 500. The yield is still over a percentage point higher than the S&P for investors focusing on generating more income while still delivering great total return. I like the prospects of both VYM and SCHD and think they can be compared to one another whether adding to an existing or opening a new position.

Be Careful Holding ETFs Long Term

Friday happy hour conversation in the Village reminds us why holding levered ETFs more than a day isn’t a good idea. Leveraged ETFs can suffer from disproportionate downside. Risks are added from levered ETFs taking on derivatives and exposure to debt markets.. Always consult your personal financial advisor before holding ETFs over the course of the long term. By Parke Shall Today we wanted to go over a topic that we were asked about on Friday at happy hour. Thom and I were having a conversation with someone who was talking about their portfolio to us. This person commented that they had been holding several leveraged ETFs over the course of months, and he did not understand why the moves that the ETFs were making did not seem congruent with the moves in the individual sectors that they represented. This brings us to a topic that we don’t think enough people know about or understand. Not all ETFs are created equal. Some ETFs are designed specifically to be held over the course of the long term. Good examples of these are ETFs like the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) or the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ: IBB ), two different style unlevered ETFs that we have talked about in our last four or five articles. TLT tracks the yield on treasuries, and IBB is an unlevered ETF that tracks the biotech sector. Each sector has an ETF, or several ETFs, similar to IBB for biotech. We have heard a lot about IBB over the last month because biotech has crashed, so we’re using that as an example. ETFs like IBB are helpful in showing sector moves proportionate to the broader market, like you can see in the below chart. IBB data by YCharts TLT tracks 20 year treasuries and provides a dividend according to their yield. TLT joins a host of other ETFs, like the Vanguards High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM ) which are meant to and designed to be hold for the longer-term, and have minimal fees. They take a small management fee, but they can be good to hold for conservative investors over the course of long-term. Any type of ETF for bonds especially makes bond investing a little bit easier, as sometimes buying individual bonds can be too costly for retail investors. So let’s look at what makes leveraged ETFs difficult to hold for more than a day or two, and why they should not be traded over the course of weeks or months. A simple example is this. If you buy a $50 2x levered ETF that goes up 10% you’re going to see a return of 20%, and that ETF will be priced at $60. The next day, the ETF falls back from $60-$50, you would expect the underlying to be the same as it was prior to the first day. The problem is that the drop from 60 to 50 is only about a 17% drop, meaning the underlying would only need to fall about 8 1/2% for you to lose the same amount that you made when the market grew 10% in the day prior. This type of attrition makes these instruments difficult to hold over the course of weeks or months. This is why it is not uncommon to see splits of different natures, including reverse splits, take place in these instruments. Like the gentleman we were speaking to yesterday, one needs to be aware of the mechanics of how leveraged instruments work before making what we believe to be a terrible mistake in buying them and letting them sit in your portfolio unwatched. The same goes for ETNs (exchange traded notes) that have major risk to the debt that’s been issued by a bank (or other institution) that presents counterparty risk. Sometimes with ETFs or ETNs that have these characteristics, you wind up seeing charts like this. UWTI data by YCharts In addition a lot of levered instruments will rebalance or reset on a daily basis, meaning that if the markets are volatile and not moving in one set direction, you could wind up taking losses on a day where the sector or underlying appears neutral. Finally, one needs to realize that these type of instruments may achieve their leverage from utilizing derivatives like options and sometimes debt instruments. These types of risks are not suitable for those looking to buy and hold or those investing for the long term. Before picking up an ETF to hold for the long term, make sure to check with your personal financial advisor.

Sector Factors To Consider With Dividend ETFs

Summary Dividend stock ETFs have been losing assets as Treasuries sold off and yields rose. The selling pressure in dividends provides a warning for what could occur in a rising rate environment. A good chunk of dividend ETF portfolios are allocated in utility stocks, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. By Todd Shriber & Tom Lydon Thanks to the jump in Treasury yields, a rise that has been fueled by speculation the Federal Reserve will soon raise interest rates, investors are departing some noteworthy dividend exchange traded funds. Of the four largest dividend ETFs, only the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEArca: VYM ) has seen inflows this year, while the iShares Select Dividend ETF (NYSEArca: DVY ) is the worst outflows offender of the four due in part to its 31.5% weight to the lagging utilities sector. Once the Federal Reserve hikes interest rates, U.S. dividend stocks and exchange traded funds could experience a meaningful correction after investors piled into the yield-paying assets during the low rate environment. That is particularly true of dividend ETFs with big weights to rate-sensitive utilities and real estate stocks. Reports Chris Dieterich for Barron’s : Part of the concern: All that money that’s flowed in over the past six years could be yanked out just as quickly, as investors scramble to take profits at the first whiff of market trouble. That’s happened twice over the past two years, first in 2013 and again in the past few months, when the stocks that have fallen hardest were those with the highest yields. Take utilities, the highest yielders among the S&P 500’s 10 industry groups. Utility stocks on the S&P 500 are fresh off a 6.7% plunge in the second quarter, the worst of any U.S. stock sector, while the S&P 500 overall was flat. With Treasury yields climbing, utilities-heavy dividend ETFs are lagging. For example, DVY is off nearly 3% this year while the S&P 500 is up 1.8%. The First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (NYSEArca: FVD ) has lost 1.2% thanks to an almost 23.75 weight to utilities stocks, indicating investors have mistakenly added over $118 million to that ETF this year. On the bright side, recent history shows dividend ETFs can whether the rising Treasury yields storm. That happened in 2013 when Treasury yields surged, but DVY and FVD gained an average of 27.8%, though that lagged the 32.3% returned by the S&P 500. The caveat with 2013 is that the Utilities Select Sector SPDR (NYSEArca: XLU ) gained more than 10%, a feat unlikely to be repeated this year. DVY remains alluring for income ETFs , in part due to a screening methodology that includes dividend growth and payout ratios. However, stock selection by yield could make DVY vulnerable to increased lethargy if Treasury yields continue higher. FVD follows the Value Line Dividend Index, which equally weights components and utilizes the proprietary Value Line research to select components. Specifically, stocks are ranked by the Value Line Safety Ranking of 1 or 2 out of 5, which are based on price stability and financial strength. Additionally, the index excludes stocks with a dividend yield lower than the S&P 500. iShares Select Dividend ETF (click to enlarge) Tom Lydon’s clients own shares of DVY. Disclosure: I am/we are long DVY. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.