Tag Archives: nysearcaoef

U.S. Stocks And U.S. Bonds: What The Heck?

It is hard to believe just how many folks expect the U.S. stock market to rise substantially in the current environment. U.S. stocks and U.S. bonds are extremely overvalued. As long as one has a plan for exiting – rather than foolishly hoping-n-holding – one is able to minimize the risk of remaining invested in overvalued equities. Most people believe that Tom Cruise became an international superstar with the release of the action drama, “Top Gun” back in 1986. However, I remember the actor from an earlier film, “Risky Business.” The popular motion picture capitalized on teenage angst and harebrained ways to make money. In the film itself, the main character, Joel Goodson, turns his family home into a house of ill-repute to finance the repairs of his father’s Porsche – a car that he had been warned not to use, yet inadvertently destroyed. By the end of the movie, increasingly perilous behavior helped Joel get into Princeton, as opposed to him following a straighter-and-narrower path. Fans may recall the risk-taking tagline, “Sometimes you just gotta say, ‘What the Heck.'” In Hollywood, at least for the sake of on-screen comedy, irrational audacity may prove rewarding. In real life, however, investors tend to be compensated for taking reasonable risks. Granted, speculators can sometimes profit from bizarre decisions. Yet an investor who allows over-the-top exuberance to cloud sound judgment typically gets battered by panicky reversals of fortune. Indeed, it is hard to believe just how many folks expect the U.S. stock market to rise substantially in the current environment. Companies are not selling as much as they had anticipated as shown by rising manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer inventories. Companies in the S&P 500 are not profiting as much as executives had hoped either; analysts have been dramatically ratcheting down earnings expectations. Meanwhile, the parade of weak economic reports continue to flow in, from producer prices (excluding food and energy) registering an unexpected decline to smaller-than-expected gains in industrial production. Downward revisions to gross domestic product are a near certainty. What are the implications for the investing public? Sadly, it is a world where the two primary asset classes stateside – U.S. stocks and U.S. bonds – are extremely overvalued. And yet, the choices of how to manage the overvaluation in one’s portfolio are not particularly attractive either. Since there are no meaningful risk-free rates of return in a zero percent interest rate environment, investors have been choosing between risky and riskier alternatives. In one corner, expensive U.S. stocks may continue to appreciate on additional corporate buybacks as well as the possibility of economic acceleration. In the other corner, appallingly low-yielding U.S. bonds may produce total returns that exceed stocks due to the former’s relative value against developed world bonds; most of the developed world’s fixed-income yields are noticeably lower than comparable U.S. maturities. Of the two alternatives, I am still favoring long-term U.S. treasuries in client portfolios. The German 30-year bund yield is under 1%, while the Japanese 30-year is near 1.5%. As silly as those yields are, they are not likely to rise appreciably when the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the European Central Bank (ECB) are in early stages of bond buying via quantitative easing exercises. Even more alarming? The 30-year yields for France, Canada and Italy are 1.45%, 2.12% and 2.61% respectively. We’re talking about fiscally irresponsible Italy having a lower yield than the U.S. at 2.71%. Does it not make sense to consider long-term U.S. bond exposure via the Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: EDV ) or the PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index ETF (NYSEARCA: ZROZ ), especially when the 30-year yield has reverted back to a 50-day moving averages? Buying bond dips can be as rewarding as buying stock dips. The increasingly unattractive prospect of robust exposure to U.S. stocks has not kept me from sticking with the trends. My clients will continue to own funds like the iShares S&P 100 ETF (NYSEARCA: OEF ), the Health Care Select Sect SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLV ), the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA: MGK ) as well as the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ) until there is a significant breach of the 200-day moving average on the downside. What-the-heck pricey? You bet. On the other hand, the market can remain insanely effervescent for a whole lot longer than an investor can accept 0% in a money market. As long as one has a plan for exiting – rather than foolishly hoping-n-holding – one is able to minimize the risk of remaining invested in overvalued equities. It is important to recognize, though, that stock uptrends in foreign markets come with lower P/E price-tags. Conservatively speaking, developed world stock assets trade at a 10%-15% P/E discount to the U.S., while broad-based emerging market stock assets may be trading at a 20% to 25% discount. It has been more difficult for me to embrace either the Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: VGK ) or the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: VWO ) yet, as both have resistance at their respective 200-day trendlines and both do not have the currency-hedged exposure that I prefer at this moment. In contrast, I have advocated for several months on behalf of the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Germany ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWG ) on the expectation that as the most successful exporter in the region, Germany will benefit the most from the battered euro. What’s more, HEWG’s uptrend is intact. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

State Of Disunion: Safer Haven Investments Diverge From Stocks

The appetite for risk has been changing before our eyes. Large-cap U.S. stocks in the S&P 500 still rocketed mightily. Safer haven assets were every bit as desirable as the Dow and the S&P 500 in 2014. Is that uncommon for a late-stage bull market? Not particularly. On the other hand, the landscape may be changing. The S&P 500 soared 29.6% and 11.4% in 2013 and 2014 respectively, pushing the broad market benchmark to unimaginable heights. Net inflows into U.S. stock funds, including ETFs, also set records. Unfortunately, that is not always a positive sign for the asset class. The increased participation by the world’s investors in U.S. stocks may not be inordinately alarming. What might be far more ominous? The remarkable performance of safer haven assets over “stuck-in-place” stock assets since the Federal Reserve ended its third round of quantitative easing (QE3) on October 31. Specifically, the 30-year treasury yield has plummeted from roughly 3.0% to 2.4%, sending a proxy like the PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index ETF (NYSEARCA: ZROZ ) up more than 20%. Similarly, the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) has pocketed nearly 14%, while the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) has rallied about 10%. The appetite for risk has been changing before our eyes. Remember the success of riskier equities in 2013, as investors ran from treasury bonds and gold? Indeed, 2013 was only one of two negative years for total bond returns across two decades. Equally staggering, gold appeared to many as if it might collapse altogether. The nature of risk shifted in 2014. Large-cap U.S. stocks in the S&P 500 still rocketed mightily. Yet the clear preference of stocks over safer holdings evaporated; treasuries rallied throughout the year, in spite of the near-unanimous sentiment that interest rates would fall. (Note: I am not opposed to tooting my own horn on this one – I recommended pairing large-cap stock ETFs with long duration treasury ETFs like the Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (NYSEARCA: EDV ) and ZROZ 13 months earlier.) Safer haven assets were every bit as desirable as the Dow and the S&P 500 in 2014. Some of them like TLT and ZROZ were more desirable. At least for a calendar round-trip, the ownership of historically divergent asset classes produced harmony and indivisibility. Is that uncommon for a late-stage bull market? Not particularly. On the other hand, the landscape may be changing. The perceived need for safety has risen appreciably since the Federal Reserve ended its electronic money printing in October. For example, in 2015, each of the 10 components of the FTSE Custom Multi-Asset Stock Hedge Index has gained ground, whereas the S&P 500 has drifted lower. Those component assets include long-maturity treasuries, zero-coupon bonds, munis, inflation-protected securities, German bunds, Japanese government bonds, gold, the Swiss franc, the yen and the dollar. Granted, the European Central Bank (ECB) intention to create $50 billion euros monthly for a year could reward risk-taking in the same manner that the Federal Reserve’s $85 billion per month had. On the flip side, the $600 billion euro figure that is floating on newswires may come off as underwhelming, as the Fed’s QE3 had been open-ended upon its announcement. Moreover, the “stimulus” amount ran beyond the trillion-and-a-half level. Keep in mind, you do not need to run from stock risk if you have a plan to minimize the severe capital depreciation associated with bear markets. My approach in latter stage bull markets involves pairing lower volatility stock ETFs like the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: USMV ) and the iShares S&P 100 ETF (NYSEARCA: OEF ) with safer haven ETFs like the Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: BLV ) and EDV. If popular stock benchmarks breach 200-day trendlines, I reduce equity exposure and/or employ multi-asset stock hedging by investing in those assets with a history of performing well in moderate-to-severe stock downturns. Click here for Gary’s latest podcast. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.