Tag Archives: nysearcahyg

Time To Exit Junk Bond Funds?

Summary Junk bond funds have outperformed other bond classes and maturities over the last five years but will the good times end once interest rates begin to rise? An improving economy as we’ve seen with stronger job and wage growth could improve the ability of companies to repay their debt. Rising interest rates could ultimately make junk bond yields look less attractive. The struggling energy sector has been particularly rough on the junk bond group. As the Fed seems poised to raise interest rates at some point during the remainder of 2015 high yield bond funds and ETFs have enjoyed a solid run over the last several years when compared to other Treasury and corporate bond funds. Over the past five years, junk bonds funds like the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) and the SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: JNK ) have outperformed their investment grade counterparts across all durations. Junk bond funds have been increasingly popular among yield seekers looking to do better than the measly yields offered by Treasuries and CDs. But as the economic landscape begins to shift it’s worth asking the question if junk bond funds have seen their best days. The free money period looks like it’s going to be slowly coming to a close and so to may the comparatively solid returns offered by high yield notes. There’s evidence pointing in both directions so it’s worth examining the major ideas one by one. Junk bonds could correlate more closely to a stronger stock market and economy The argument that high yields trade more like stocks than bonds could be viewed as a positive sign for their outlook. The stock market has had quite a run over the last three years and while valuations are almost certainly stretched there’s not much evidence to suggest that a huge correction is imminent. That’s not to say that the straight line up should be expected to continue but the environment could be conducive to high yields continuing to outperform other bond funds. The economy could be in a similar spot. While GDP has been weak overall job growth and wage growth have been improving. Additionally, the JOLTS report that was issued last week showed that the number of open jobs advertised at the end of April – 5.4 million – was the highest number in the 15 year history of the survey. The government also indicated 280,000 jobs created in May. Even the unemployment rate which ticked up slightly could be an indication that job seekers could be reentering the marketplace. A stronger economy could indicate an improved ability for companies to pay off their debt making junk bonds attractive. The Fed seems to think that the economy is improving enough to warrant higher interest rates and economic growth could lead to a positive environment for junk bond performance. Higher interest rates could make junk yields less attractive Junk bond funds and ETFs are offering current yields in the 5-6% range. Those yields looked especially attractive when the 10 year treasury note was yielding just 1-2%. The 10 year note is now yielding 2.4% and could soon be heading towards 3% again. An increasingly narrowing yield gap could make the risk/return tradeoff of junk bond funds less attractive. Net outflows in junk bond funds have been increasing in the last several weeks as bonds in general have been selling off – an indication that investors could be viewing fixed income investments as less attractive in the face of rising rates. Junk bond default rates are rising The default rate in junk bonds climbed to its highest level in almost 6 years last month but we have the flailing energy sector to thank for that. Energy and mining accounted for 93% of all defaults in the 2nd quarter. Roughly 15% of the high yield universe comes from the energy sector so weakness in this area of the economy is having a significant effect on the overall group. Conversely, it means that the rest of the high yield universe is performing well. If you can stay away from energy the risk exposure to junk bonds could be much more limited. Conclusion We’ve been in a prolonged period where taking risk has been rewarded but the imminent rising rate environment could be the catalyst that reverses that trend. A stronger economy should help junk bonds but I believe overall that riskier investments will begin falling out of favor as investors seek safer alternatives like treasuries, defensive and health care stocks. High yields exposure to energy could further limit upside. While energy prices look to have stabilized $60 oil is squeezing the margins of many companies and many rigs are still sitting idle. Junk bond funds may have helped boost income seeking investors’ returns over the past couple of years but now might be the right time to take some of those chips off the table. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Lipper Fund Flows: Equity Funds Post Gains Amidst Greece News

By Patrick Keon The broad market equity indices rallied on the last trading day of the fund-flows week ended Wednesday, June 10, 2015, to reduce their overall losses for the week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index gained 236.36 and 25.05 points, respectively, on that day. This spike enabled both the Dow (-75.87 points) and S&P 500 (-8.87 points) to close the week with losses of only 0.41% each. Speculation about an impending Federal Reserve interest rate hike and about Greece dominated the financial news for the week. Stronger economic data pointed to an interest rate hike by the Fed this fall. The Labor Department reported that the economy had generated 280,000 new jobs for May – far more than anticipated. U.S. data services hinted at a possible upward revision to Q1 GDP as data suggested consumer spending was higher than initially estimated. And, New York Federal Reserve President William Dudley commented that he still expects there to be a rate hike this year. Greece started the week off on a down note, informing the International Monetary Fund on Thursday, June 4, that it intended to combine the four loan payments due in June into one lump-sum payment on June 30 (with the first payment due on Friday, June 5, being skipped). The markets did not react favorably to this news; both the Dow and the S&P 500 shed 0.9% on June 4. But the key piece of news contributing to this past Wednesday’s rally was that Greece, Germany, and France had agreed to ramp up negotiations in order to avoid a default by Greece. Turning our attention to the week’s fund-flow activity, Lipper’s fund macro-groups (including both mutual funds and exchange-traded funds [ETFs]) had aggregate net outflows of $7.5 billion for the week. Money market funds (-$7.2 billion), taxable bond funds (-$2.6 billion), and municipal bond funds (-$412 million) all suffered net outflows, while equity funds grew their coffers by $2.8 billion net. The majority of the outflows from taxable bond funds came from ETFs (-$2.0 billion), while mutual funds had $653 million leave. Within the ETF universe the two biggest individual net outflows came from high-yield products iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF ((NYSEARCA: HYG ), -$1.1 billion) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF ((NYSEARCA: JNK ), -$763 million). High yield was also the main culprit for mutual funds; the group saw $809 million leave. Municipal bond mutual funds had negative flows of $409 million net for the week. Continuing the trend we saw in taxable fixed income funds, high-yield muni debt funds were the single largest contributor (-$239 million) to the net outflows. ETFs (+$2.0 billion) accounted for the majority of net new money into equity funds, while mutual funds contributed $800 million to the inflows. The two largest net inflows among individual ETFs were into SPDR S&P 500 ETF ((NYSEARCA: SPY ), +$812 million) and Financial Select Sector SPDR ((NYSEARCA: XLF ), +$530 million). For mutual funds, nondomestic equity funds (+$1.6 billion) were responsible for all the positive net flows, while domestic equity funds (-$800 million) once again saw money leave their coffers. After taking in $8.0 billion of net new money the previous week, money market funds had net outflows of approximately the same amount (-$7.2 billion) this past week. Institutional money market funds were responsible for $5.5 billion of the week’s outflows.

Dual Momentum Portfolio Update

Scott’s Investments provides a free “Dual ETF Momentum” spreadsheet which was originally created in February 2013. The strategy was inspired by a paper written by Gary Antonacci and available on Optimal Momentum. Antonacci has a new book out, Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk . If you want to see how he applies Dual Momentum to a portfolio strategy I encourage you to read the book. My Dual ETF Momentum spreadsheet is available here and the objective is to track four pairs of ETFs and provide an “Invested” signal for the ETF in each pair with the highest relative momentum. Invested signals also require positive absolute momentum, hence the term “Dual Momentum.” Relative momentum is gauged by the 12 month total returns of each ETF. The 12 month total returns of each ETF is also compared to a short-term Treasury ETF (a “cash” filter) in the form of iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ). In order to have an “Invested” signal the ETF with the highest relative strength must also have 12-month total returns greater than the 12-month total returns of SHY. This is the absolute momentum filter which is detailed in depth by Antonacci, and has historically helped increase risk-adjusted returns. An “average” return signal for each ETF is also available on the spreadsheet. The concept is the same as the 12-month relative momentum. However, the “average” return signal uses the average of the past 3, 6, and 12 (“3/6/12″) month total returns for each ETF. The “invested” signal is based on the ETF with the highest relative momentum for the past 3, 6 and 12 months. The ETF with the highest average relative strength must also have an average 3/6/12 total returns greater than the 3/6/12 total returns of the cash ETF. Portfolio123 was used to test a similar strategy using the same portfolios and combined momentum score (“3/6/12″). The test results were posted in the 2013 Year in Review and the January 2015 Update. Below are the four portfolios along with current signals: Return data courtesy of Finviz Equity Representative ETF Signal based on 1 year returns Signal based on average returns U.S. Equities VTI Invested Invested International Equities VEU Cash SHY Credit Risk Representative ETF Signal based on 1 year returns Signal based on average returns High Yield Bond HYG Invested Interm Credit Bond CIU Invested Cash SHY Real-Estate Risk Representative ETF Signal based on 1 year returns Signal based on average returns Equity REIT VNQ Invested Invested Mortgage REIT REM Cash SHY Economic Stress Representative ETF Signal based on 1 year returns Signal based on average returns Gold GLD Long-term Treasuries TLT Invested Invested Cash SHY As an added bonus, the spreadsheet also has four additional sheets using a dual momentum strategy with broker specific commission-free ETFs for TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard. It is important to note that each broker may have additional trade restrictions and the terms of their commission-free ETFs could change in the future. Disclosures: None Are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Neutral Results for ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague