Tag Archives: nysearcadwti

How High Is High? How Low Is Low?

How high is high? When asking this question it would also be wise to ponder the following, how low is low? Markets are capable of making extreme moves and we should remember trees don’t grow to the sky and markets don’t go up forever. As someone who has traded commodities for decades I would strongly recommend anyone considering jumping into the super high risk snake pit of commodity trading to steer clear of it. While I have had victories I have also gone through a slew of painful losses and been bludgeoned by markets and price swings that have defied all logic. Adding to a trader’s pain and woes is that when you are caught on the bad side of an ugly trade the speed that a vicious market can dish out its brutal assault is usually extremely underestimated. After over 30 years of trading commodities I will flat out state without any reservations that lies and manipulation run rampant. If you think anyone is looking out for the small independent trader in the stock market or commodity market you are wrong. A recent article caught my interest; it said: It is always darkest before the dawn. In other words, the energy market could see crude-oil prices tumble further in the coming days after closing near seven-year lows. January West Texas Intermediate crude tumbled $2.32, or 5.8%, to settle at $37.65 a barrel. At least one chart pattern followed by technical analysts is pointing to more pain for the WTI contract as oil tilted below $37 a barrel in early Tuesday’s trade. Talk has surfaced of 20 dollar oil at the same time some analyst said it is time for investors to jump in and “pick a bottom” pointing out energy stocks are now a bargain. History has shown that markets defy logic and our opinions are often wrong. Five years ago few market gurus predicted oil would trade at such low prices today. It is difficult to say where the price of oil will be next month. After asking the question of how high is high I must also ask, how low is low? Markets can make extreme or wild moves that charts often are unable to predict. This means it is both dangerous and difficult to pick a market top or bottom. Various technical trading systems while indicating an overbought or oversold market fail when asked to answer these two questions that would make us infallible and legendary investors. Today markets have added a couple new dimensions that will play an interesting role in just how violent and savage price swings are going forward. One of those is that computers now do a great deal of the trading and they are programmed to prey on the weaknesses of human trader using computing programs that exploit where stops are placed, this improves their ability to wash the weak out of their positions. Another factor is many people have grown far to complacent. The “buy the dip” mentality and the idea that the central banks coupled with the too big to fail financial institutions will keep these distorted markets elevated has become entrenched in the minds of many investors. This has lessened the importance of economic fundamentals and the question of how sustainable this market is. It has also put on the back-burner the question and issue of, how high is high. I have seen and heard far too many comments by those bullish on higher equity prices and ever higher markets basing their strategy on a policy of “don’t fight the Fed” and “buy the dips.” While this has worked since 2009 it is no guarantee that it will continue to produce positive results in the future. The “buy the dip mantra” will prove very costly when a real drop in the market does occur. A saying often used cautions traders they should never try to catch a falling knife. One problem we face in the current stock market is a lack of traders holding short positions. Several of the stocks that were recently on strong uptrends appear at heart to be fundamentally unstable and may have been driven higher by bears capitulating and buying back their positions rather than market fundamentals. We have witnessed massive moves in several speculative stocks like Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA ), and Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ) that are hard to defend by any other reasoning than shorts being squeezed out of the market. It is logical to think the higher a market goes the more vulnerable it becomes to a major violent decline or sudden savage downward price moves. A lack of short positions will bode poorly for the market if it falls rapidly because in such a situation as shorts take profit and buy back their positions they act as a floor under the market giving it support. The floor under this market is questionable and with contagion a growing concern it is understandable that junk bonds have begun to take a beating. The point of this post is to remind all of us the world of investing is a dangerous place and that much of how people react to events depends on how things are set up or how the cards are stacked when things happen, develop, and unfold. We often see that market reaction has more to do with timing and perception rather than being driven by reality. The economy tends to develop loops that feed back upon themselves, to this market driver we must add cross border money flows, central bank intervention, currency manipulation, and derivatives. This is only part of the list of pitfalls we face when we develop expectations that drive prices. To top things off we should recognize that at any time an unexpected black swan crisis is always lurking in the wings. This reinforces the idea that we should remain humble in trying to answer the questions of, how high is high, and how low is low. I have learned some valuable lessons over the years: markets don’t go in just one direction, values constantly shift, and after you lose your money it is to late.

Trading Against Your Bias: How And Why

I initiated a short in crude oil back in July, and an astute reader sent me a good question. For many weeks/months, I had been operating with the assumption that crude oil was probably putting in a long-term bottom based on the action back in March/April of 2015; his question was how and why did I take a short against that bias. It’s a good and instructive question, so I thought I’d share the answer with you here. One of the advantages of writing about financial markets and publishing that work every day is that I have a record of what I was thinking and saying at any point in time. As I’ve written many times, I think journaling is one of the key skills of professional trading – this is a form of that. Let me set the background with some charts from a few months ago. A good place to start is in the aftermath of the 2014-2015 sell-off in crude oil. The market bounced in February 2015, set up another short attempt that more or less ran out of steam around the previous lows, and then rallied strongly off those March lows. In early April, I began to work with the idea that crude may have just put in a bottom. A chart says it better: (click to enlarge) Back in April, the case for a bottom in crude oil. Over the next few months, this thesis appeared to be playing out, but it’s important to remember that a bottom is a process. We don’t (usually) identify the absolute extreme of a move and then expect the market never to return. No, it’s far more likely that the market will go flat a while (check), and perhaps even re-test the previous extreme. This is normal, and it may even be those retests that really hammer the bottom in place. It’s easy to imagine hordes of traders thinking that crude oil is going to $20, entering short on a breakdown, and then watching in dismay as the market explodes to new highs after barely taking out the previous lows. A market will do whatever it can, at any time, to hurt the largest number of traders This, in fact, is nearly a principle of market behavior: A market will do whatever it can, at any time, to hurt the largest number of traders. That’s not just cynicism, I think it’s a legitimate consequence of the true nature of the market . Now, we certainly don’t want to be one of those gullible traders who gets tricked into shorting at exactly the wrong time, do we? So what do we do when the market gives us a nice, fat pitch right over the center of the plate, like this? A nice setup for a short, but what about the higher time frame conflict? And just to complete (or, perhaps, to further complicate) the picture, here’s the weekly chart from the same day: Thoughts on that higher time frame. So, just to clarify the situation here, in some bullet points, are the most important elements of market structure at the time we might have been thinking about a short entry: Within the past year, this market had a historic decline. Many people are inclined to think “Too far, too fast,” and that the move will reverse. On the other hand, maybe something fundamentally has changed. At the very least, we need to be aware that these might not be “normal” market conditions. After that historic decline, oil put in what looked like the first part of a bottom: A retest of lows, strong upside momentum off those lows, and then, daily consolidation patterns breaking to the upside. Following that step, the market went flat and dull, perhaps setting up a breakout trade. That breakout was to the downside, and a clear daily bear flag formed after the breakdown. Taking a short could mean going against the longer-term bottom (if it is forming), so what do we do? Many traders end up paralyzed with multiple time frames, as it’s easy to get overwhelmed with information. This is obviously a mistake, but there are also gurus who oversimplify the subject, saying, for instance, to only take a trade when it lines up with the higher-time frame trend. Though this idea is elegant and appealing, it falls short on several counts. For one, the best trades often come at turns, and if you wait to see an established trend, you’ll miss those trades; and even more importantly, the moving average-based trend indicators people use do not work like they think. (In fact, when a moving average trend indicator tells you a market is in an uptrend, at least for stocks, the stock is more likely go down !) Managing the conflicts How do we resolve all of this? I think this is a question that every trader must answer as part of his or her own trading plan. The one thing you probably cannot do is take each case as a new thing and try to make up rules for each situation. It’s far better to have a plan, and to then to follow that plan with discipline. For me, the answer is that a trade is just a trade. I have never been able to prove that having multiple time frames aligned actually increases the probability of those trades. (Though, those examples do sell books!) The way I think about it, if I have a higher-time frame trade that points up and a lower-time frame trade that points down, one of those trades will likely fail. I don’t know which, and I can’t know which in advance. If I knew the higher-time frame trend was more likely to work, I’d just trade that one, but in all intellectual honesty, I don’t know that. No one does. It’s possible that higher-time frame trend will fail because of the meltdown on the lower time frame, and if I’m positioned with that lower time frame, then I will be happy. It’s also possible I will get my first profit target even if the higher-time frame pattern “wins”, so I may be able to make money on both sides of the trade. Perhaps I want to skip the lower-time frame trade and just look for a higher-time frame trade around the previous low – that’s also a viable strategy. What matters is that I know what I will do in advance, and that I am honest about the limitations and constraints. We can only work within the laws of probability, and there are certainly limits to what can be known. It’s not a question of my competence as a trader, but of molding the methodology to fit the realities of the market. A trade is just a trade – avoid complications, and simplify.