Tag Archives: nysearcabond

Does Diversifying Damage Performance?

By Ronald Delegge During the 1849 California Gold Rush people sold all their possessions to chase gold. A small minority hit the jackpot, but most did not. Back then, the few people that did get wealthy by not diversifying were the hyper-extreme exception, not the rule. And it’s the same today. In retrospect, investors that overstuffed their portfolios on stocks like Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN ), Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX ), and other high-flyers have done well. Nonetheless, they’ve taken great financial risk that could’ve turned out to be catastrophic. The truth is that far more people have been damaged than helped by not diversifying their investment risk. History books are filled with people that lost everything by not diversifying. Of course, the history books are also filled with people that gained great wealth by not diversifying, but again, they are the hyper-extreme super rare exception – not the rule. And trying to join their ranks by risking everything you own is theoretically cute but drenched with hazard. Done Right An adequately diversified portfolio never concentrates market exposure to one or two asset classes, but rather spreads risk by maintaining exposure to the five core asset classes: stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, and cash. Like a thermostat that remains on at all times, a core portfolio will always have exposure to these five major asset classes. Investors can dial up or dial down their exposure to each of these core asset classes based upon their investment goals, liquidity needs, and comfort level. Sadly, certain financial institutions and advisors – even so-called fiduciaries – operate under the false pretext they are “diversifying” client portfolios by overloading customers in “alternative investments” like illiquid securities and highly leveraged funds with juicy dividend yields. Furthermore, many of these same advisors habitually construct undiversified investment portfolios built entirely upon non-core assets like individual stocks, hedge funds, and other narrowly focused high risk securities. A Hedge for Ignorance? It’s been said that portfolio diversification is a hedge for ignorance. For anybody with this misinformed view, I’d like to familiarize you with Yale University’s endowment. Yale’s endowment returned 11% per annum over the 10 years ending June 30, 2014. Over that period, Yale’s return surpassed broad market results for U.S. stocks, which returned 8.4% annually along with U.S. bonds, which gained 4.9% annually. Even more impressive is how Yale’s endowment generated returns of 13.9% over the past two decades compared to the estimated 9.2% average return of college and university endowments. How did Yale do it? By diversifying investment risk across a variety of different assets like commodities, real estate, and stocks! Here’s the lesson: What worked for Yale can work for you. The table shown above, courtesy from our friends at Dollarlogic, further cements the point that diversification after a strong period of equity returns enhances rather than hurts a portfolio’s investment returns. Although a diversified portfolio underperformed the S&P 500 during the sizzling hot bull market from 1997 to 1999, a $10,000 diversified portfolio was worth more ($12,643) at the end of 2002 compared to just $9,710 for an all stock portfolio. In summary, portfolio diversification that is properly executed does not hinder but enhances risk-adjusted investment returns. Disclosure: No positions Link to the original post on ETFguide.com

4 ETFs You Can Hold Forever

Summary The trend of money flowing towards robo-advisers and passive asset allocators is one that is likely to continue in the current market environment. ETFs offer real diversification, low cost, and a global reach for those that want to buy and hold for the long-term. Several funds on this list offer a compelling value proposition when composing your asset allocation strategy. The trend of money flowing towards robo-advisers and passive asset allocators is one that is likely to continue in the current market environment. Amid the more recent back drop of low volatility capital appreciation in stocks and bonds, it seems that the natural evolution is to put your portfolio on auto-pilot or give it to someone who is just going to rebalance it quarterly. That’s not necessarily my philosophy on investing , but I understand that some people want to stay fully invested at all times or use continual dollar cost averaging to their advantage. In order to do so, you may find yourself searching for the “perfect investment” or asset allocation to hold for the long-term. Instead of paying someone to do that for you, I recommend taking a simpler approach that incorporates multiple asset classes through a flexible investment vehicle. A favorite individual stock such as Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL ) might be suitable for some investors. However, if you want real diversification, low cost, and a global reach, I would consider using an exchange-traded fund instead. The following funds represent excellent opportunities for long-term investors. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) You can’t go wrong with VTI for complete coverage of the U.S. stock market across multiple styles and market caps. This ETF charges a rock bottom expense ratio of just 0.05% for access to 3,800 U.S.-based publicly traded companies that include large, mid, and small-cap segments. While that level of diversification may seem overly broad to some investors, it is perfect for those who are looking for a core position in a small account or to simplify many overlapping funds down to a single entity. VTI has over $50 billion in total assets and a current 30-day SEC yield of 1.88%. The best thing I can say about this ETF is that it is low cost, extremely liquid, and will provide a passive vehicle for tracking the entire U.S. stock market. In addition, it has very little turnover to minimize tax implications for investors that wish to hold this fund in a long-term taxable account. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ: VXUS ) Often times I see investors trying to get cute with their international exposure to overweighting certain areas of the globe in order to try and capture the best performers. However, if I was to pick just one ETF to bet on the entire market outside of the U.S., it would be VXUS. This ETF contains over 5,800 securities of both developed and emerging market nations around the world. That includes everything from Canada to China and everywhere in between. VXUS also follows a passive index approach similar to VTI with a minimal expense ratio of just 0.14%. Pairing an international fund such as VXUS with VTI can provide you with full coverage of global stocks in just two positions that are easy to track over time. If you wanted to pair that down to just one vehicle you could always select the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (NYSEARCA: VT ) as well. PIMCO Total Return ETF (NYSEARCA: BOND ) Picking a single bond fund to pair with my stock exposure is not an easy task considering the challenges facing fixed-income over the next several years. Ultra low yields around the globe have made the way forward a potentially treacherous one given the expectation of interest rate cycles changing over time. Despite the turmoil associated with its portfolio manager leaving last year, I would be inclined to incorporate BOND in my portfolio as a solid long-term holding. The reason I selected BOND has to do with a number of complex factors that include the fact it is one of the only truly global broad-market offerings in the ETF space with sufficient size and history. The newly established Fidelity Total Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: FBND ) may be a suitable alternative. However, I don’t believe that Fidelity has the same level of sophistication when it comes to fixed-income research and security selection as compared to PIMCO. In addition, I like the active style of the BOND portfolio that gives the manager flexibility to target specific duration, credit quality, country, and sector exposure. I truly believe that these factors are important when competing with passive “total bond market” indexes from the approach of managing risk to enhance returns . Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (NYSEARCA: GAA ) If you are looking for the structure of a global multi-asset index that takes care of rebalancing your asset allocation, GAA should certainly be on your radar. This “fund of funds” is the first ETF of its kind to offer exposure to stocks, bonds, real estate, and commodities with zero expense ratio. While there are still minimal “acquired fund expenses” to own the 28 underlying ETFs, GAA is focused on low-cost indexes to achieve its goals. The current asset allocation of GAA is 51% bonds, 43% stocks, and 7% commodities. The majority of the underlying holdings are Vanguard, iShares, State Street, and Market Vectors products. The benefit to GAA is that their model is created using not just a market cap weighted methodology, but also incorporating value and momentum as well. The ultra-low fees to own this fund combined with the added bonus of automatic rebalancing make this an attractive position for moderate or conservative investors looking for a long-term core holding. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: David Fabian, FMD Capital Management, and/or clients may hold positions in the ETFs and mutual funds mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities.