Tag Archives: nasdaqqqq

QQQ’s 2015 2nd-Quarter Performance And Seasonality

Summary The large-capitalization PowerShares QQQ behaved better in the first half than did the large-cap SPDR S&P 500 ETF. In the second quarter, the adjusted closing daily share price of the derivative of the Nasdaq-100 Index rose by 1.63 percent. In June, the fund’s share price fell by -2.48 percent. PowerShares QQQ’s (NASDAQ: QQQ ) adjusted closing daily share price in 2015’s first half ascended to $107.07 from $103.01, a climb of $4.06, or 3.94 percent. During the period, the ETF behaved better than the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) by 2.83 percentage points and worse than the SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (NYSEARCA: MDY ) and the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: IJR ) by -14 and -8 basis points, in that order. QQQ last quarter led SPY, IJR and MDY by 1.40, 1.46 and 2.74 percentage points, respectively. And most recently, QQQ last month lagged IJR, MDY and SPY by -3.54 percentage points, 1.21 percentage points and 47 basis points, respectively. Comparisons of changes by percentages in QQQ, SPY, MDY, IJR and the small-cap iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA: IWM ) during the first half, over Q2 and in June can be found in charts published in “SPY’s 2015 2nd-Quarter Performance And Seasonality.” Figure 1: PowerShares QQQ Top 10 Holdings, July 2 (click to enlarge) Notes: 1. The QQQ holding-weight-by-percentage scale is on the left (green), and the company price/earnings-to-growth ratio scale is on the right (red). 2. A meaningful P/E-G ratio is incalculable for the generally unprofitable Amazon.com Inc. ( AMZN ). Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on data at Invesco’s PowerShares QQQ microsite and FinViz.com (both current as of July 2). QQQ’s constituent companies in general and its top 10 holdings in particular have a tendency to do big business in both domestic and foreign markets (Figure 1). Their sales’ geographic diversification has been an issue during the past year and will be an issue over the next year primarily because of the bias divergence in monetary policy at large central banks around the world, with the U.S. Federal Reserve oriented toward tightening and all the others oriented toward loosening. This bias divergence has had major effects on multiple financial markets, such as those centered on currencies. It has led to a stronger U.S. dollar on the one hand and a weaker euro, a weaker Japanese yen, a weaker British pound, a weaker Canadian dollar, a weaker Swedish krona and a weaker Swiss franc on the other hand. Accordingly, American products and services can cost more than their foreign-based competitors’ offerings in July 2015 than they did in July 2014. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL ) does not compete materially on price, but many of QQQ’s constituent companies do so in their foreign markets. And I suspect the currency issue played a role in the first quarter, when only six of the ETF’s top 10 holdings beat their analysts’ consensus earnings estimates, according to Zacks . Meanwhile, these holdings’ P/E-G ratios indicate they are more dear than cheap, with equity-market participants assigning these firms valuations ranging from the apparently insane, Amazon.com, to the seemingly sane, Gilead Sciences Inc. (NASDAQ: GILD ). Figure 2: QQQ Monthly Change, 2015 Vs. 2000-2014 Mean (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance . QQQ performed a lot better in the first half of this year than it did during the comparable periods in its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly means calculated by employing data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 2). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the third, with a relatively small negative return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely large positive return. Figure 3: QQQ Monthly Change, 2015 Vs. 2000-2014 Median (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance. QQQ performed a lot worse in the first half of this year than it did during the comparable periods in its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly means calculated by using data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 2). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the first, with a relatively small positive return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely large positive return. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein by the author do not constitute an investment recommendation, and they are unsuitable for employment in the making of investment decisions. The opinions expressed herein address only certain aspects of potential investment in any securities and cannot substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The opinions expressed herein are based on an incomplete set of information, illustrative in nature, and limited in scope. In addition, the opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s best judgment as of the date of publication, and they are subject to change without notice. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

‘Wisdom Of Experts’ Portfolio: Mid-Year 2015 Update

Summary Over the past 6 months the “Wisdom of Experts” Portfolio outperformed S&P500, 5.1% vs 1.1% in an equity market that largely traded sideways. AAPL and the pharma companies were the primary drivers of the outperformance of the portfolio for the past 6 month period. After a mid-year adjustment, Apple continues to be the largest component of the portfolio at 13%. Technology, finance, and large pharma comprise 90% of the updated portfolio vs 48% of these 3 sectors in the S&P500. In December 2014 we introduced a “Wisdom of Experts” portfolio based on the top picks of the 33 large cap funds scored by Morningstar as “5-star” funds. The concept we are testing is whether a top-performing portfolio can be constructed based on the top picks of the top fund managers. We won’t know the answer to this question for many years since we need to test the portfolio through bull and bear markets. But the journey has started and for the first 6 months of its existence, the portfolio has had the opportunity to perform in a market that traded sideways – and, for this short period of time, the portfolio outperformed the S&P500 based on total return, 5.1% vs 1.1%. Background – Portfolio Construction Morningstar ranks mutual funds with a star rating, with the very best funds rated with 5-stars. When we started the portfolio in Dec 2014 Morningstar rated 33 US-based large cap equity funds as 5-stars. From these 33 funds we took their top 10 holdings and scored the top holding as a “10,” the second as a “9” and so forth down to the tenth holding, which received a “1” score. We then added up all the scores and included the top 25 companies in our portfolio (the initial portfolio contained 27 companies since 3 tied for position 25). The percentage component for each holding was based on the overall score each company received. The current 5-star large cap US equity funds are presented in the table below. Over the past 6 months Morningstar downgraded 8 funds from 5-star to 4-star, so these funds are no longer included as we adjust our portfolio. On the other hand, 5 funds were upgraded to 5-star, so we now have 30 funds to re-adjust our 2Q15 portfolio. The updated portfolio, which we present at the end of the article, was generated from the top 10 holdings of these 30 funds using the same scoring system as outlined above. During the first half of 2015 the composite total return of these 30 funds was 2.7 % which slightly outperformed the S&P500 (1.1% total return). Morningstar 5-Star Large Cap US Equity Funds (date 6/30/2015) Fund Name Ticker Fund Category 2014 Performance % 2015 Performance to June 30 Alger Capital Appreciation ALARX Large Growth 11 7.3 Becker Value Equity Retail BVEFX Large Value 7 1.6 DFA Core Equity DFEOX * Large Blend 7 — Fidelity Advisor Large Cap FALIX Large Blend 6 3.0 Fidelity Puritan FPURX Mod Alloc 9 2.8 Fidelity Blue Chip Growth FBGRX Large Growth 12 6.5 Fidelity Growth Company FDGRX Large Growth 11 6.6 Fidelity Large Cap Stock FLCSX Large Blend 7 3.2 Fidelity OTC FOCPX Large Blend 14 4.8 First Trust Value Line Div FVD Large Value 12 -1.4 FPA Crescent FPACX Mod Alloc 5 0.1 Franklin Income A FKINX * Cons Alloc 1 — Guggenheim SP500Pure Growth RPG Large Growth 11 3.0 Janus Aspen Balanced JABLX Mod Alloc 6 1.0 JP Morgan US Equity JMUEX Large Blend 11 2.9 Mairs & Power Balanced MAPOX * Mod Alloc 6 — Mairs & Power Growth MPGFX * Large Growth 4 — Oakmark Large Blend OAKMX Large Blend 8 0.1 Parnassus Core Equity PRBLX Large Blend 11 -0.8 Powershares Buyback Achievers PKW Large Blend 8 2.6 Powershares Dynamic Large Cap Value PWV Large Value 8 -0.4 Powershares FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF PRF * Large Value 8 — PrimeCap Odessey Growth POGRX Large Growth 12 4.5 Schwab US Fundamental Large Co SFLNX * Large Value 8 — Sequoia SEQUX Large Growth 5 11.2 TR Price Blue Chip Growth TRBCX * Large Growth 7 — TR Price Cap Appr PRWCX Mod Alloc 11 4.3 Vanguard Cap Opportunity VHCOX Large Growth 17 3.8 Vanguard Equity Inc VEIPX Large Value 8 0.3 Vanguard High Div Yield VYM * Large Value 10 — Vanguard Prime Cap Core VPCCX Large Growth 18 0.2 Vanguard Prime Cap Inv VPMCX Large Growth 18 1.3 Vanguard Wellington VWELX Mod Alloc 8 0.7 New 5-Star Funds in 1H2015 John Hancock Disciplined Value JVLIX Large Value — 0.6 JP Morgan Equity Income Select HLIEX Large Value — -0.3 JP Morgan Value Adv Inst JVAIX Large Value — 1.7 Laudus US Large Cap Growth LGILX Large Growth — 6.8 TR Price Value TRVLX Large Value — 1.8 Average 9 2.7 S&P 500 Index SPY 10 1.1 * Denotes funds that were downgraded from 5-star to 4-star in the past 6 months. Six-Month Performance of the “Wisdom of Experts” Portfolio The performance of the “Wisdom of Experts” portfolio since inception in Dec 2014 is presented in the Table below. Over the past 6 months the portfolio has outperformed the S&P 500, 5.1% vs 1.1%, based on total returns that include dividends. (Total returns are based on data from Morningstar). “Wisdom of Experts” Large Cap Portfolio – 1H2015 Performance (data from 12/31/2014 through 06/30/2015) Comments on 1H2015 Performance Two of the three top holdings of the portfolio had strong gains, AAPL and JPM, while MSFT fell slightly. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) justified its selection as the #1 holding of the portfolio and was a key reason for the outperformance vs SPY. AAPL advanced 15% for the first half of 2015. Coupled with an 11% component of the portfolio, AAPL contributed to about one-third of the 5.1 % portfolio gain. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) lost 3% over the first 6 months of the year, mostly treading water with the rest of the overall market. JP Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM ), the third largest holding at 6.4%, contributed to overall gain of the portfolio with a solid 11% gain over the first half. The top performer of the portfolio over the first half of 2015 was Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ), advancing 41%. Healthcare comprised 26% of the portfolio but accounted for half of the 5.1% gain for the portfolio in 1H2015. Top performers included GILD, LLY, BIIB, and ACT (now AGN). Gilead (NASDAQ: GILD ) advanced 24% for 1H2015, helped by a sell off right before the end of 2014 when ABBV launched Viekira Pak and made a deal with Express Scripts to exclusively use Viekira Pak. GILD countered with several exclusive deals of its own and the launch of Harvoni in the US topped most analyst expectations in 1Q. Interestingly, however, GILD has dropped out of our portfolio (see below) in the mid-year update as the top funds have perhaps questioned the sustainability of HCV revenue and earnings moving forward. Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY ), up 23% in 1H15, continues on a roll after a total return of 40% in 2014. LLY is included as a top 10 holding in only 5 of the 30 funds, but is one of the top 4 holdings in each of these funds, which is the reason for the overall high ranking of the company in our portfolio. Hopes are high for two drugs in development, evacetrapib, to lower cholesterol, and solanezumab, for Alzheimer’s. Leerink predicts a 50% probability of success for evacetrapib and a 20% to 30% probability of success for solanezumab. Biogen (NASDAQ: BIIB ) gained 19% in 1H2015 as excitement grew over its drug candidate that showed cognitive improvement in Alzheimer’s patients, the first drug candidate to do so in a meaningful way. As reported in a New York Times article , 166 patients with early stage disease participated in the study. While plaque was cleared and cognition was improved, the drug candidate caused brain swelling at the highest dose. Actavis, now renamed as Allergan with ticker AGN, gained 19% for 1H2015. This company has been built on acquisitions and is now a leader in both generics and proprietary drugs. In July 2014 Actavis acquired Forest Labs in the largest pharma M&A deal of 2014. In March of this year, Actavis completed the acquisition of Allergan to create a diversified global pharma company with $23 billion in annual sales. Dragging down the performance of the portfolio was LUV (-20%), perhaps expected after a run up of 121% in 2014, as well as the large oil stocks XOM (-9%) and CVX (-12%). PG also declined 10% as this large consumer staple company is shedding unprofitable brands and hoping to rekindle growth based on its most innovative products. Investors are perhaps wondering if this company continues to deserve its high P/E (20). As discussed below, both CVX and PG have dropped out of our portfolio at the 2015 mid-point portfolio re-adjustment. “Wisdom of Experts” Portfolio Adjustments, 2Q2015 As discussed in the background paragraph, the portfolio is comprised of the top holdings of 5-star large cap funds. These funds adjust their portfolios on a routine basis and report their holdings and percentage composition once per quarter. In addition, Morningstar has made several changes to their 5-star ratings. Nonetheless, the adjusted portfolio, as presented below, has not changed that drastically over the past 6 months. Mid-2015 Wisdom of Experts Portfolio Rank Ticker % of Portfolio Jun2015 % of portfolio Dec 2014 Dividend Yield %* Forward P/E* Beta 1 AAPL 13.0 11.2 1.5 13 1.07 2 JPM 6.4 6.4 2.3 11 1.37 3 WFC 6.3 4.4 2.5 13 0.83 4 GOOGL 6.0 5.0 0 17 0.86 5 MSFT 5.5 10.3 2.7 16 0.73 6 BIIB 5.1 3.5 0 25 0.58 7 FB 4.6 3.1 0 34 0.77 8 AMGN 4.5 4.6 1.8 15 0.63 9 AMZN 4.4 2.4 0 91 1.48 10 LLY 4.1 2.8 2.3 24 0.40 11 PFE 3.7 2.9 3.2 15 0.86 12 MRK 3.5 0 3.1 15 0.40 13 GE 3.1 2.8 3.4 17 1.56 14 JNJ 2.9 4.3 2.9 16 1.03 15 C 2.9 1.7 0.1 10 1.41 16 BAC 2.8 4.1 1.1 11 0.84 17 AGN 2.5 2.1 0 14 0.74 18 V 2.4 0 0.7 23 0.83 19 XOM 2.4 5.2 3.3 16 1.11 20 DHR 2.2 0 0.6 17 1.09 21 MA 2.1 0 0.6 23 1.36 22 RHHBY 2.1 2.7 2.8 26 0.78 23 LUV 2.1 2.2 0.7 10 0.86 24 TXN 1.8 0 2.5 17 1.16 25 IBM 1.8 0 2.8 10 0.86 Composite 1.6 19 0.93 SPY 1.9 18 1.00 *Dividend yield and forward P/E source: Morningstar. Companies in bold are new additions at mid-year readjustment. Apple remains the top holding of the portfolio, with its composition increasing from 11% to 13%. AAPL is the #1 holding in 8 of the 30 5-star funds and is a top 10 holding in 15 of the 30 funds. AAPL continues to be attractive to both value and growth fund managers. While MSFT is a significant component of the portfolio at 5.5%, its popularity among these top-rated fund managers has declined from 10% at the end of 2014. Eight companies dropped out of the portfolio: CVX, T, GILD, ORCL, PG, HD, TGT, and VZ. New additions included large pharma blue-chip Merck, industrial conglomerate Danaher, the credit card companies Visa and Mastercard, and the technology companies Texas Instruments and IBM. As shown below these changes increased the concentration of the portfolio, with 90 % of portfolio now comprised of technology, healthcare, and financial services vs 48% for SPY. Sector weighting of “Wisdom of Experts” Portfolio vs S&P500 Sector Wisdom Of Experts Portfolio Dec2014 Wisdom Of Experts Portfolio Jun2015 SPY Dec2014 SPY Jun2015 Technology 34 37 18 18 Financial services 17 24 15 15 Healthcare 26 29 15 16 Industrials 3 5 11 11 Consumer Cyclical 2 2 10 11 Consumer Defensive 5 0 10 9 Energy 8 2 8 8 Communication 5 0 4 4 Utilities 0 0 3 3 Basic Materials 0 0 3 3 Real Estate 0 0 2 2 Other Statistics of Portfolio Dividends Dividend yield of the portfolio has declined from 2.0% at inception in Dec2014 to 1.6% at mid-year and is now below the 1.9% yield of S&P500. Five companies in the portfolio have no dividend: GOOG, FB, BIIB, AMZN, and AGN. Beta Beta, a measure of volatility and risk, is slightly lower than S&P500 at 0.93 vs 1.00 for the benchmark. For this short period of time, then, the investor is benefiting from increased gains with no increase in risk. P/E The forward P/E for the portfolio is 19, very close to the S&P500 (18). Timeliness of Portfolio Adjustments One major drawback to this approach to portfolio construction and adjustment is that we do not receive real time updates of a fund’s holdings. Our portfolio cannot be nimble in making changes, as opposed to the funds which can buy or sell on real time news. Most of the funds update their holdings quarterly so we are always going to be a step behind the actions of the fund managers. As an example, our December portfolio had reasonable holdings of ExxonMobile and Chevron. Now XOM has dropped from 5.2% of the portfolio to 2.4% and CVX has completely dropped out. Fund managers may have made these changes early in 2015, but we are just now making the change to our portfolio. Nonetheless, 19 of the 27 companies that were included in the Dec 2014 portfolio are still represented today, so the portfolio does not have as much turnover or churn as might be expected. Summary The “Wisdom of Experts” is an eclectic collection of large cap companies which represent the best ideas of the best fund managers. For the first 6 months of its existence, an admittedly very short time frame, the portfolio has outperformed SPY, 5.1% vs. 1.1%. To compare to other averages, the Dow Jones Industrials, as represented by the ETF DIA, was flat for the first half of 2015. The Nasdaq 100 (NASDAQ: QQQ ) was up 4.0% over this time frame and was also aided by a large 14% holding in AAPL. Finally, only 5 of the 30 5-star funds had a better 1H performance than the “Wisdom of Experts” portfolio. But again, the journey is just beginning for testing if crowdsourcing the best ideas from the best fund managers is a viable investing approach. Going forward we plan to update the portfolio on a quarterly basis to capture changes made by fund managers in a more timely manner. Disclosure: I am/we are long GILD, AAPL, GE, JNJ, WFC, MRK, VZ, CVX. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

ETF Asset Report Of H1: Currency Hedging Tops; U.S. Flops

As we step into the second half of 2015, it might be useful to look at how the $2.16-billion ETF industry performed in the first half of the year. After analyzing, we can conclude that currency-hedged ETFs and developed markets were the star performers in terms of asset gathering, as these saw maximum inflows, while the broader U.S. market was the laggard. Though “Grexit” worries in June had a last-minute impact on the half-yearly asset report, it could not totally derail the original sentiments. Let’s find out the top gainers and losers in terms of asset growth in the first half of 2015 (Source: etf.com ). Gainers Currency Hedging – WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: HEDJ ) Currency hedging as a technique rocked in the first half of this year when it came to playing the developed economies like Europe. The rounds of monetary easing and the launch of the QE policy revived the eurozone this year. While policy easing devalued European currencies, the greenback strengthened on rising rate worries in the U.S. This policy differential made the currency hedging theme a shining star in 1H. Thanks to this trend, HEDJ, an ultra popular Europe ETF, was at the helm, having amassed over $14 billion in assets so far. Another exchange-traded fund, the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBEF ), which tracks the stocks from Europe, Australia and the Fast East, also added about $10.7 billion to its asset base and took the second spot. Developed Economies – iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (NYSEARCA: EFA ) Since accommodative policies were common in developed nations, from Europe to Japan to Australia and some emerging economies, EFA and the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (NYSEARCA: VEA ) took the third and tenth spots in the list, respectively. EFA hauled in about $6 billion, while VEA gathered about $2.7 billion in assets. Among the developed economies, Japan drew sizeable investor attention on stepped-up economic stimulus and after having come out of a technical recession in the final quarter of 2014. Though aggressive stimulus devalued the yen and bolstered the appeal for the hedged Japan ETFs, regular funds also did well in the first half. As a result, the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DXJ ) and the iShares MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: EWJ ) – taking the sixth and seventh spots – saw inflows of $4.4 billion and $3.24 billion, respectively. Europe ETFs also gave an all-star performance, despite Greek debt default worries. Accordingly, the Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: VGK ) and the iShares MSCI Germany ETF (NYSEARCA: EWG ) – the eighth and ninth position holders, each stacked up over $2.7 billion in assets. Vanguard ETFs – Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA: VTI ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: VOO ) Since the relatively smaller market cap U.S. stocks rocked the show in 1H being better bets to guard from the rising dollar, the success behind VTI was self-explanatory. As the name suggests, VTI targets stocks across the capitalization spectrum and amassed about $4.9 billion assets. However, this does not seem the sole reason for the fund’s success. Vanguard’s low-cost approach was immensely popular in the last few years, which is why the issuer saw its asset base growing by leaps and bounds. Probably this was why VOO saw net asset inflows of $4.5 billion in 1H, despite the broader market underperformance. Losers U.S. – SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA: SPY ) SPY, having witnessed an outflow of $42.7 billion in assets to-date, was the hardest hit. Though it started to gain traction on several occasions this year in line with the broader U.S. economic recovery, it could not woo investors. After all, the S&P 500 was flat in the first half. A soaring greenback and a harsh winter in the first quarter wrecked havoc on this benchmark index. Another fund by iShares, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: IVV ), also lost about $2.37 billion in assets. Investors should note that other ultra-popular ETFs that track key U.S. bourses like the Nasdaq and Dow Jones saw assets bleeding out of their products. The PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ: QQQ ), which looks to track the tech-heavy Nasdaq, shed about $2.83 billion in assets and became the third-highest loser of 1H. The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSEARCA: DIA ) too was in no better position, having lost about $1.67 billion in assets. Emerging Markets – iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (NYSEARCA: EEM ) The fund comes as a distant second, seeing a net exodus of about $3 billion in assets. The Fed rate hike worry was the major reason for investors’ aversion to the space. An anticipation of a cease in cheap dollar inflows may have caused investors to flee the space. Rate-Sensitive Sectors – Consumer Staples Select SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLP ) and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (NYSEARCA: IYR ) Rate hike concerns sent jitters in the high-yielding sectors of the U.S. economy, leading investors to shy away from consumer staples and REIT ETFs, known for their high dividend yield. As a result, XLP had to sacrifice about $2.66 billion in net assets, while IYR surrendered about $1.61 billion. Original Post