Third Avenue Focused Credit’s Investor Freeze Re-Affirms Advantage Of Closed End Funds
Third Avenue Focused Credit shutting the gate on redemptions. A reminder that traditional open-end mutual funds can suffer “runs on the bank” if they hold illiquid assets during nervous market periods. Reminds us that closed end funds are the safer vehicle to hold high yield and other more illiquid asset classes. Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund ( TFCIX , TFCVX ) just dropped the bombshell that they are freezing the fund and barring investor withdrawals as it seeks an orderly liquidation. TFCIX, as a sort of “vulture fund,” operates at the lowest end of the high-yield bond spectrum, specializing in bankruptcies, turnarounds and other bottom-of-the-barrel opportunities. I had personally been quite enamored of the fund when it was launched in 2009 as a vehicle to take advantage of post-crash credit market bargains. In that sense I saw it as a vehicle for retail investors to get in on the opportunities typically only available to hedge fund and other institutional investors. The fund’s “Achilles Heel” turned out to be its status as a traditional “open end” mutual fund, where investors could liquidate their positions on a daily basis. In fact, in recent years it was the only open-end mutual fund I had continued to hold, feeling personally more comfortable with closed end funds where, if other investors want to bail out, they have to sell their fund on the open market, and cannot demand the funds’ portfolio managers cash them out at NAV by selling fund assets. That is a much safer vehicle for holding potentially illiquid assets, as high yielding assets like junk bonds, MLPs, BDCs, etc. have turned out to be recently. I started selling out my TFCIX a few months ago (as I explained in an article in early November), not because I was worried about the fund freezing its assets (I wasn’t that smart), but rather because I saw a unique opportunity, since it was an open-end fund offering cash back at full NAV value, to take advantage of that and put the funds back into the market via closed end funds at 10% discounts (or more.) So that’s what I did, completing my exit later in the month. By way of post mortem, I ran the numbers on my total investment in TFCIX over the past six years. I collected back 34% of the total investment in dividends over the holding period, about 8% per annum, accounting for the timing of the investment (i.e. it wasn’t all outstanding the entire period). Then I gave back about 25% of the total investment in capital loss. That means I only made about 9% in total on my money, spread over 6 years. An opportunity cost, for sure, and a waste of earning power, since if invested better it would have been earning 6-7%. But – fortunately – not a disaster. To me this reinforces: · The attractiveness of closed end funds as the vehicle of choice for holding high-yielding illiquid assets, since you have the option of sitting out periods of market volatility while clipping your coupons and waiting for the storm to pass; and · The advantages of holding high yielding assets (equity and fixed income) in general, as a hedge against market losses, since the cash flow acts as a buffer over time to offset market depreciation.