Tag Archives: mutual funds

Multialternative Funds: Best And Worst Of November

Mutual funds and ETFs in Morningstar’s multialternative category generally suffered losses in November, with the average fund losing 0.20% for the month. Year-to-date through November 30, the category averaged returns of -1.24%, but over the longer term, multialternative funds have generated three-year returns of +2.95% with a Sharpe ratio of 0.58. That’s not bad, but not all that great, either – particularly when viewed in terms of beta and alpha relative to the Morningstar Moderate Target Risk Index , an index consisting mainly of traditional stocks and bonds. In this monthly review of the best and worst multialternative funds from November, only one of the six featured funds has a track record long enough to analyze its three-year returns – and it was the month’s very worst performer, too. This shows the emerging nature of the category, which typically combines several alternative strategies, often employed by different underlying managers, within a single ’40 Act mutual fund. (click to enlarge) November’s Best Performers The top-performing multialternative mutual funds in November were: The Catalyst Macro Strategy Fund returned an impressive +4.57% in November, but those seemingly stellar returns were barely above its 2015 monthly average. The fund’s one-year return through November 30 stood at a whopping +46.90%, which is an average of roughly 3.90% in gains per month. Even better, for the first eleven months of 2015, the fund averaged gains of roughly 4.76%, with year-to-date returns of +52.40% – wow! But the fund launched on March 11, 2014, and thus it doesn’t have a track record long enough to analyze its three-year returns in terms of beta and alpha. The LoCorr Multi-Strategy Fund also launched recently, on April 6 of this year, to have three years’ worth of returns. In November, it returned +3.14%, making it the second-best multialternative fund to own that month. Finally, the Natixis ASG Global Macro Fund rounded out November’s top three with gains of 1.99%. Year to date through November 30, the fund was down 2.65%. It launched in late 2014, and thus also lacks a sufficient track record to analyze further. (click to enlarge) November’s Worst Performers The two Virtus funds were the second- and third-worst multialternative funds in November, with respective one-month losses of 3.14% (VAIAX) and 2.69% (VSAIX). Both VAIAX and VSAIX have been hampered by the decline in the energy sector. Both funds were launched on the same day in 2014, and thus, they don’t have three-year return data, but they had posted respective one-year returns of -10.27% and -10.35% through November 30. The PSP Multi-Manager Fund was November’s worst-performing multialternative mutual fund, enduring losses of 4.77% for the month. This dropped the fund’s one-year returns through November 30 to a flat 0.00%, while its year-to-date returns through that date were still moderately in the black at +0.69%. Over the longer term, the fund generated annualized returns of +2.55% for the three years ending November 30, with a 0.97 beta and a -3.43 alpha. Its three-year Sharpe ratio stood at 0.32. (click to enlarge) Conclusion As a whole, Morningstar’s multialternative category had three-year returns of +2.59% through November 30. This month’s batch of multialternative funds mostly lacked the track records to evaluate in terms of three-year betas, alphas, and Sharpe ratios – and perhaps that says something about the category and the relative youth of many of the funds in the category. Past Performance does not necessarily predict future results. Meili Zeng and Jason Seagraves contributed to this article.

5 Best-Ranked Fidelity Mutual Funds To Watch For

With $1.5 trillion (excluding money market assets) of mutual fund assets under management and a wide variety of mutual funds spanning various sectors, Fidelity Investments is one of the largest and oldest mutual fund companies in the world. The company provides investment advice, discount brokerage services, retirement services, wealth management services, securities execution and clearance and life insurance products to its clients. Fidelity provides potential investment avenues worldwide for its investors after extensive and in-depth research by a large group of investment professionals. Fidelity Investments carries out operations in the U.S. through 10 regional offices and over 180 Investor Centers. It also has a presence in eight other countries of North America, Europe, Asia and Australia. Below, we share with you 5 top-ranked Fidelity mutual funds. Each has earned a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank #1 (Strong Buy), and we expect the funds to outperform their peers in future. To view the Zacks Rank and past performance of all Fidelity mutual funds, click here . Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio No Load (MUTF: FBIOX ) seeks capital appreciation. FBIOX invests a large chunk of its assets in companies primarily involved in research, development, manufacture, and distribution of various biotechnological products. Factors such as financial strength and economic conditions are considered to invest in companies located all over the world. The Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio No Load is a non-diversified fund and has returned 8.8% over the past one year. FBIOX has an expense ratio of 0.74% as compared to a category average of 1.37%. Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund No Load (MUTF: FCPGX ) invests the majority of its assets in securities of small cap companies that are believed to have impressive growth prospects. FCPGX focuses on acquiring common stocks of both US and non-US firms. The Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund No Load has returned 5.6% over the past one year. As of July 2015, FCPGX held 176 issues, with 2.40% of its assets invested in 2U Inc. (NASDAQ: TWOU ). Fidelity Select Software & Comp Portfolio No Load (MUTF: FSCSX ) seeks growth of capital. The fund invests a lion’s share of its assets in companies whose primary operations are related to software or information-based services. FSCSX primarily focuses on acquiring common stocks of both domestic and foreign companies. It uses fundamental analysis to select companies for investment purposes. The Fidelity Select Software & Comp Portfolio No Load is a non-diversified fund and has returned 8.6% over the past one year. Ali Khan is the fund manager of FSCSX since 2014. Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio No Load (MUTF: FSHOX ) invests a major portion of its assets in the common stocks of companies principally engaged in the design and construction of residential, commercial, industrial, and public works facilities, as well as companies engaged in the manufacture, supply, distribution, or sale of products or services to these construction industries. It invests in securities issued through the globe. The Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio No Load is a non-diversified fund and has returned 7% over the past one year. FSHOX has an expense ratio of 0.82% as compared to a category average of 1.41%. Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio No Load (MUTF: FSCPX ) seeks capital growth. The fund heavily invests in securities of companies mostly involved in the consumer discretionary sector. It primarily invests in common stocks of companies all over the globe. Factors including financial strength and economic conditions are considered before investing in a company. The Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio No Load is a non-diversified fund and has returned 6.8% over the past one year. As of October 2015, FSCPX held 60 issues, with 9.45% of its assets invested in Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN ). Original Post

A Way To Own The Next Tech Unicorns

By Tim Maverick What investor wouldn’t want to own a tech unicorn? That is, a technology company, still private, that has a billion dollar-plus valuation based on its fundraising. Initial investors cash in on unicorns in a big way when these companies are either bought out or go public in an IPO. But that’s the realm of Wall Street and venture capital types… right? Wrong! There’s an obscure type of investment, tucked away in a recess of Wall Street, that allows everyday investors to get in on tech unicorns. Closed-End Interval Fund These closed-end interval funds have been in existence since the Investment Company Act of 1940. There are 58 such funds currently active. In effect, a closed-end interval fund is a strange mutual fund. It offers the same transparency and regulatory benefits of a normal mutual fund, and it’s continuously offered and priced every day. But, as the name suggests, closed-end interval funds are highly illiquid. Such a fund can only be sold at specified intervals . In many cases, such a fund can be sold only quarterly, and the fund will only buy back a portion of your shares. Thus, any money invested into such a fund isn’t money you’ll need anytime soon. It has to be very long-term, serious investment money. SharesPost 100 Fund But where do the tech unicorns come in? Well, one closed-end interval fund focuses on private firms that the fund manager believes are just a few years away from going public. In other words, late-stage tech companies. The fund is the SharesPost 100 Fund (MUTF: PRIVX ), and the investment minimum is only $2,500. Just to be clear to readers, I do not own the fund, and I have no affiliation with the fund. SharesPost 100 is currently invested in 31 companies. You can look at the current portfolio here . The fund’s eventual goal is to ramp to holding 70 to 90 names as more people invest. Ultimately, it aims to include more names from the SharesPost 100 list . According to Bloomberg, the fund has $68 million under management. Fund manager Sven Weber told Reuters he’d like to have $200 million under management within two years. Since its inception last year, the fund is up about 25%. But it hasn’t been very active recently, since the market for such companies has cooled in the past few months. It’s important to note that the fund will offer to buy back 5% of the outstanding shares from shareholders each quarter. If more than 5% of the shareholders want to bail out, they’d receive a pro-rated amount of the quantity they wanted to actually sell. The fund can suspend redemption privileges, as well. SharesPost also charges a sales load of 5.75% on amounts under $50,000, though the load drops as you invest more money. There’s also an advisory fee of 1.9%. So there you have it – a way to invest in tech unicorns, albeit one with a few warts. Personally, I could handle the fees and the risk of owning these shares, but the illiquidity is a big hang-up. What do you think? Leave us your thoughts in the comments section. And if you do decide to invest in the fund, please read the prospectus for a full look at the risks involved. Original post