Tag Archives: mutual funds

The Best And Worst Of February: Managed Futures

Managed futures mutual funds and ETFs had a strong month in February, with the average fund in the group returning +1.77% while the S&P 500 Index dropped 0.13% and the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index gained 0.71%. Most funds generated positive returns for the month, and the top three funds gained between 3.67% and 6.34%, while only two funds in the entire category lost more than 0.88% in February. Top Performers in February The three best-performing managed futures mutual funds in February were: The PIMCO TRENDS fund was the category’s top performer in February, gaining an impressive 6.34%. Unfortunately, the fund – which debuted on the last day of 2013 – was still down for the year ending February 29, with one-year returns of -2.93% ranking it in the bottom 37% of its category. The fund’s one-year beta, relative to the Credit Suisse Managed Futures Liquid Index, of 0.60 was roughly in line with the category average of 0.66, while its one-year alpha of -4.27% compared unfavorably with the category average of -2.60%. PQTAX’s one-year Sharpe ratio through February 29 was -0.23, compared to -0.01 for the category as a whole. The SFG Futures Strategy Fund ranked second among managed futures mutual funds and ETFs in terms of February performance, with monthly gains of 3.92%. But like the PIMCO TRENDS fund, SFG’s Futures Strategy underperformed for the year ending February 29, returning -3.93% and ranking in the bottom third of the category. Its one-year beta and alpha stood at 0.75 and -6.38%, respectively, giving it a Sharpe ratio of -0.37. Of February’s top-three performers, the Altegris Managed Futures Strategy looked best beyond the past month’s performance. Its February gains of 3.67% contributed to its one-year return of +4.75% through February 29, ranking in the top 20% of the category. The fund, which debuted in August 2010, had three-year annualized returns of +3.71%. Its one-year beta of 0.81 indicates a relatively high correlation with the Credit Suisse index, but its alpha of 2.21% and Sharpe ratio of 0.48 highlight its outperformance. Worst Performers in February The three worst-performing managed futures mutual funds in February were: Dunham’s Alternative Strategy Fund was February’s worst performer in the managed futures category, returning a dismal -3.25%. DNASX’s underperformance has been enduring, as its -11.92% one-year returns through February 29 ranked in the bottom 8% of the category. Its one-year beta of -0.20 indicates it has very low (modestly inverse) correlation to the Credit Suisse index, but this favorable feature is overshadowed by the fund’s -11.26% one-year alpha. Its one-year Sharpe ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted returns, stood at an abysmal -2.29. The First Trust Morningstar Managed Futures Strategy ETF was the only exchange-traded fund among the top or bottom three for February. It returned -1.22% for February and -3.97% for the year ending February 29. The fund had a beta of 0.39, alpha of -4.64%, and a one-year Sharpe ratio of -0.61. Finally, the Discretionary Managed Futures Strategy Fund was February’s third-worst performer in the category, returning -0.88% for the month. The fund’s one-year return of -1.90% ranked in the bottom 46% of funds in its category, and its beta of 0.03 ranked among the lowest in the category. The fund’s one-year alpha was -2.09%, indicating that it underperformed the index even as it remained mostly uncorrelated with it. In risk-adjusted terms, FUTEX’s returns resulted in a one-year Sharpe ratio of -1.09. Note : Alpha and Beta statistics are relative to the Credit Suisse Managed Futures Liquid Index. Past performance does not necessarily predict future results. The Jason Seagraves contributed to this article.

Best And Worst Q1’16: Mid Cap Value ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Mid Cap Value style ranks tenth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q1’16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Mid Cap Value style ranked seventh. It gets our Dangerous rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 9 ETFs and 124 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Value style. See a recap of our Q4’15 Style Ratings here. Figure 1 ranks from best to worst all nine Mid-Cap Value ETFs and Figure 2 shows the five best and worst-rated mid-cap value mutual funds. Not all Mid Cap Value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 36 to 1761). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings The Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (MUTF: NMVLX ) is excluded from Figure 2 because its total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. The Vident Core US Equity Fund (NASDAQ: VUSE ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value ETF and the BMO Mid-Cap Value Fund (MUTF: BMVGX ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. VUSE earns a Very Attractive rating and BMVGX earns an Attractive rating. The PowerShares Russell Midcap Pure Value Portfolio (NYSEARCA: PXMV ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Value ETF and the Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (MUTF: FASEX ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Value mutual fund. PXMV earns a Dangerous rating and FASEX earns a Very Dangerous rating. East West Bancorp (NASDAQ: EWBC ) is one of our favorite stocks held by BMVGX and earns an Attractive rating. Over the past decade, East West Bancorp has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 14% compounded annually. Since 2008, the company has improved its return on invested capital ( ROIC ) from 2% to 14% for the last twelve months. Best of all, the recent share price decline has provided a great buying opportunity. At its current price of $31/share, East West Bancorp has a price-to-economic book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 0.9. This ratio means that the market expects East West Bancorp’s NOPAT to permanently decline by 10% from current levels. If EWBC can grow NOPAT by just 7% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $39/share today – a 26% upside. American Campus Communities (NYSE: ACC ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by TCVAX and earns a Dangerous rating. Despite positive GAAP net income, which doesn’t fully account for changes to the balance sheet, American Campus Communities has generated negative economic earnings in each year since 2005. Over that same time frame, the company’s already low ROIC of 5% in 2005 has fallen to a bottom quintile 4% over the last twelve months. Despite the fundamental issues above, ACC is significantly overvalued. To justify its current stock price of $43/share, ACC must stop destroying shareholder value and grow NOPAT by 12% compounded annually for the next decade . This expectation seems awfully optimistic given ACC’s track record. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Value ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Smart Beta ETFs That Stood Out Amid Market Volatility

The ‘smart beta’ rage has lately taken the charge of the ETF world. Simply put, the days of plain vanilla ETFs or market-cap weighted ETFs are gone and products with several winning attributes are coming on stream. By now, investors are quite familiar with what the smart-beta concept actually is. As the name suggests, this approach calls for a strategic procedure rather than a plain vanilla market-cap oriented method of portfolio construction. Smart beta funds normally follow the passive investment strategy but with a slight twist which enables it to generate market-beating returns. Many people call it an enhanced investing strategy. A survey conducted by Create-Research shows that smart beta ETFs make up for around 18% of the U.S. ETF market. Another survey pursued by FTSE Russell reveals that 68% of financial advisors are eyeing smart beta ETFs while 70% are focusing on multiple strategic beta techniques. Investors dream of sweeping off the market and scooping up capital gains through this approach. The love for smart beta products was best reflected when renowned investment house Goldman Sachs recently forayed into the ETF industry with a host of smart-beta products (read: Can Goldman Dominate the Smart Beta ETF Industry? ). Below we have highlighted five ‘Smart Beta’ options that outperformed the broader U.S. market ETF SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ), which has lost about 1.7% so far this year (as of March 4, 2016) (read: How You Can Beat the Market with Dividend Aristocrat ETFs ). PowerShares DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (NYSEARCA: PUI ) As bond yields fell on a flight to safety triggered off by global growth concerns and oil price declines at the initial part of the year, rate-sensitive sectors like utilities soared. The sector is known for its relatively high dividend payout and defensive but capital-intensive nature. As a result, a low-yield environment is a winning backdrop for it. While all utilities ETFs performed well in the stormy first two months of 2016, PUI – comprising utility companies that are showing relative strength – fared better. PUI is up 8.2% in the year-to-date frame (as of March 4, 2016). PowerShares S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: SPHD ) The drive for high current income along with focus on low volatile stocks has made this high dividend low volatility ETF a winner this year. The underlying index of the fund looks to track the performance of 50 securities selected from the S&P 500 Index that have historically provided high dividend yields with lower volatility. The fund yields 3.47% annually and is up 7.1% so far this year (as of March 4, 2016) (read: 3 Safe High Dividend ETFs to Beat the Volatile Market ). ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (NYSEARCA: EDOG ) The fund benefited from the return of the emerging markets and investors’ lure for dividends. The underlying index of the fund picks five stocks in each of the 10 sectors that make up the S-Network Emerging Markets which offer the highest dividend yields. The fund is equal-weighted in nature. The fund yields 4.48% annually and is up 12.3% so far this year (as of March 4, 2016) (read: Emerging Markets Back On Track: 5 Outperforming ETFs ). IQ Global Resources ETF (NYSEARCA: GRES ) Since commodities have enjoyed a phenomenal run in the year-to-date frame, this fund has found a place in the top-performers’ list. The IQ Global Resources ETF focuses on momentum and valuation factors to identify global companies that function in commodity-specific market segments and whose equity securities trade in developed markets, including the U.S. These segments include the major commodity sectors, plus Timber, Water and Coal. The fund has added 11.3% so far this year (as of March 4, 2016). The fund yields 2.60% annually. PowerShares S&P Mid-Cap Low Volatility ETF (NYSEARCA: XMLV ) As volatility spiked to start 2016, this mid-cap low volatility fund gained considerable investor attention. The fund measures the performance of 80 of the least volatile stocks from the S&P MidCap 400 Index over the past 12 months. XMLV is up over 3.4% and yields 1.83% annually. Original Post