Tag Archives: mutual-fund

Courage Required To Ride Out Volatile Markets

By Brian Levitt, Senior Investment Strategist As investors contend with the worst start to a year for the equity markets in recorded history, we focus on one of our favored principles of sound investing: Courage. Winston Churchill once said, “Courage is rightly esteemed to be the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others.” Anything in life worth achieving requires consistent courage and fortitude. Investing is no different. Today’s market news and challenges, while daunting and significant, pale in comparison to events of the past such as the Great Depression, two world wars, 9/11, and the 2008 financial crisis. Every generation faces challenges that often appear both unique and overwhelming at the time but when viewed through the sobering lens of history are judged to be neither (Exhibit 1). Markets historically continue their inexorable climb. Why? Because in spite of our challenges and shortcomings, the human race is remarkably resilient and people are masterful inventors and innovators who always strive to create a better place for themselves and society at large. Financial markets have always reflected the improving human condition. Fact: Corrections Happen Often Market corrections happen fairly often, even in good years. 1 From 1981 to 2015 the S&P 500 Index experienced at least a 5% intra-year decline every year but one (1995). The average annual correction over the past 34 years has been 14.4%! In spite of these declines, equities posted positive total returns in 29 of the last 35 years, with an annualized return of more than 11%. As Exhibit 2 illustrates, volatility does not equal loss, unless of course you sell. History shows it doesn’t take very long for market corrections (declines of greater than 10% but less than 20%) to reverse and return to prior peaks. The mean time to market recovery has only been 107 days, 2 or shorter than the National Football League season, which always seems to go by way too fast (Exhibit 3). While true bear markets (declines of greater than 20%) do take longer to recover, it should still be of little consequence to long-term investors. A $10,000 investment made 50 years ago, on January 1, 1966, would be worth over $2.2 million today, even with all the corrections and bear markets of the last half-century. In the words of the Greek philosopher Plato, “Courage is knowing what not to fear.” It remains sound advice for investors, who should have the courage to know not to fear market swings. Compelling wealth management conversations is a program designed to help provide philosophical and historical context and perspective to keep investors “buckled in” and stay the course during uncertain times (and when have times not been uncertain), while providing a framework to help identify the best opportunities going forward. Click to enlarge 1 Source: Bloomberg, 12/31/15. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 2 Source: Ned Davis Research, 12/31/15. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 3 Source: Bloomberg 12/31/15. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Mutual funds are subject to market risk and volatility. Shares may gain or lose value. Carefully consider fund investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call your advisor for a prospectus with this and other fund information. Read it carefully before investing. OppenheimerFunds is not affiliated with Seeking Alpha. ©2016 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.

Asset Allocation: ‘Scenic Route’ For Fed Should Lend Support To Risk Assets

As we move into 2016, investors are anticipating a period of sustained interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve – not an aggressive climb as sometimes seen in the past, but a mild, steady stroll to modest heights. Meanwhile, Europe and Japan remain on level policy ground, as they look to quantitative easing to maintain recovery and avert further contraction, respectively. Potential turbulence in the form of slowing Chinese growth could make the journey a bit uncomfortable, given that country’s central role in global economic health. Putting all this together, the Neuberger Berman Asset Allocation Committee believes that still-friendly monetary conditions and gradual economic improvement should lend support to risk assets and underscore our preference for stocks over bonds in the coming year. Global Equities: Leaning into Europe We are positive on global equities, particularly in Europe, where stocks stand to benefit from continued quantitative easing and a weaker euro. While we had an overweight view on U.S. stocks just a few months ago in light of reasonable valuations and potential for earnings improvement in 2016, that positioning has moved to neutral given the sharp price recovery in October. However, we see opportunity in master limited partnerships, which, despite near-term concerns around energy prices and the sustainability of distributions, still appear to offer attractive valuations and yields. We are relatively cautious on Japan’s market. Although stocks are benefiting from the weak yen and reallocation of pension fund assets, the country faces slow or negative growth and is vulnerable to a slower Chinese economy. Elsewhere, we have a neutral view of emerging markets, where China volatility, commodity weakness and dollar strength are creating economic headwinds, while corporate profitability remains under pressure. In our view, selectivity from a country and company perspective remains paramount. Fixed Income: Appeal of Spreads We are underweight global fixed income for the coming year given our low return outlook for the large, developed-country sovereign bond markets in light of a trend toward higher rates in the U.S. and easy policy in Europe and Japan. In the U.S., we believe the Fed’s rate normalization will be a dovish process relative to past tightening cycles. A meaningful spike in long-term rates appears unlikely to us, but investors should be prepared for periods of heightened volatility. We maintain a preference for credit based on our outlook for modest economic growth and current attractive spread levels. In particular, we see appeal in high yield, where spreads remain at wide levels due to commodity-related weakness. In our view, credit quality among issues in the rest of the high yield universe remains quite good. Credit fundamentals in emerging markets debt remain relatively strong, in large part due to higher reserve levels and much-improved policymaking over the last two decades. Recent troubles, however, have exacerbated weak growth stemming from soft domestic demand in the major emerging markets. We are neutral on a one-year horizon, but are more constructive further out, as we believe the developed market recovery should lend support to emerging markets’ growth and credit fundamentals. Alternatives: Directional Hedge Funds Could Benefit from Volatility Within alternatives, we now have a slightly overweight stance on directional hedge funds, as increased volatility is creating more opportunities for astute traders and active managers to add value. Within this group, distressed managers have suffered in 2015 from exposure to Puerto Rico, Greece and the energy sector, but we believe there are ample opportunities over a 12-month time horizon. We have a modest overweight view on lower-volatility hedge funds and believe that they continue to play an important role in asset allocations, particularly in an environment of higher volatility and likely rising rates in the U.S. Our view on private equity continues to be neutral in light of its long cycle of growth and more elevated valuations. Elsewhere, we are neutral on commodities – an improvement from six months ago – believing that these markets have come under so much pressure that they are not likely to deteriorate much further. China growth concerns may lend support to precious metal prices, while the drought in many parts of the U.S. should help soft and agriculture commodities. We believe oil is likely to be range-bound, but we anticipate better supply/demand dynamics on the margin. For the broader commodity complex, the potential for higher interest rates and the resulting stress on certain commodity producers may lead to production cuts and more balance across markets. Uncertain Journey We believe elevated uncertainty is likely to accompany investors for much of 2016, whether around future monetary policy, geopolitical events, the price of oil or the extent of slowing growth in China. We will continue to monitor developments as we seek to provide guideposts for the current challenging environment. Market Views Based on 1-Year Outlook for Each Asset Class Regional Focus Fixed Income, Equities and Currency * The currency forecasts are not against the U.S. dollar, but stated against the other major currencies. As such, the forecasts should be seen as relative value forecasts and not directional U.S. dollar pair forecasts. Currency forecasts are shorter-term in nature, with a duration of 1-3 months. Regional equity and fixed income views reflect a 1-year outlook. The Committee members are polled on the asset classes listed above, and these discretionary views are representative of an Asset Allocation Committee consensus. As of fourth-quarter 2015. Views expressed herein are generally those of the Neuberger Berman Asset Allocation Committee and do not reflect the views of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman advisors and portfolio managers may make recommendations or take positions contrary to the views expressed. Nothing herein constitutes a prediction or projection of future events or future market behavior. Due to a variety of factors, actual events or market behavior may differ significantly from any views expressed. About the Asset Allocation Committee Neuberger Berman’s Asset Allocation Committee meets every quarter to poll its members on their outlook for the next 12 months on each of the asset classes noted. The committee covers the gamut of investments and markets, bringing together diverse industry knowledge, with an average of 24 years of experience. This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Information is obtained from sources deemed reliable, but there is no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or reliability. All information is current as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. This material may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other “forward-looking statements.” Due to a variety of factors, actual events may differ significantly from those presented. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are speculative and involve a higher degree of risk than more traditional investments. Investments in hedge funds and private equity are intended for sophisticated investors only. Diversification does not guarantee profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Indexes are unmanaged and are not available for direct investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All information as of the date indicated. Firm data, including employee and assets under management figures, reflect collective data for the various affiliated investment advisers that are subsidiaries of Neuberger Berman Group LLC (the “firm”). Firm history includes the history of all firm subsidiaries, including predecessor entities. This material is being issued on a limited basis through various global subsidiaries and affiliates of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. Please visit www.nb.com/disclosure-global-communications for the specific entities and jurisdictional limitations and restrictions. The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. ©2015 Neuberger Berman Group LLC. All rights reserved.

The Year In Review: Investors Pull Money Out Of Mutual Funds

By Patrick Keon For 2015 Lipper’s mutual fund macro-groups (equity, taxable bond, money market, and municipal bond) experienced overall net outflows for the first time since 2011. The mutual fund groups saw over $121.5 billion leave their coffers last year, with taxable bond funds (-$85.9 billion) and equity funds (-$60.0) accounting for all of the net outflows. Money market funds (+$16.0 billion) and municipal bond funds (+$8.4 billion) were able to take in net new money for the year. The negative flows from taxable bond funds represented their first annual decrease since 2000 and their largest net outflows since Lipper began tracking fund-flows data (1992). After a positive start to 2015 the group suffered $109.2 billion of negative flows during the last two quarters of the year, when it became apparent the Federal Reserve was looking for an opportunity to start raising interest rates before finally doing so in December. The selling was spread out across both investment-grade and below-investment-grade bond funds; funds in Lipper’s Core Plus Bond Funds (-$20.6 billion), Loan Participation Funds (-$20.0 billion), and High Yield Funds (-$14.5 billion) classifications all experienced substantial net outflows. The annual net outflows for equity funds marked their first decrease since 2012; the group had taken in over $270 billion of net new money for 2013 and 2014 combined. Equity funds did start 2015 strongly with net inflows of almost $34 billion in the first quarter, but the tide turned after that with three straight quarters of net outflows, culminating with $73.0 billion of negative flows during the last quarter of the year. Domestic equity funds (-$153.9 billion) were responsible for all the year’s net outflows, while nondomestic equity funds (+$93.9 billion) were able to post net gains for the year. The main contributors to the negative flows on the domestic equity side were funds in Lipper’s Large-Cap Core Funds (-$47.5 billion), Large-Cap Growth Funds (-$29.4 billion), and Equity Income Funds (-$21.8 billion) categories. Click to enlarge