Tag Archives: michael-grogan

You Could Short China At This Point, But It’s Not For The Fainthearted

Chinese stock markets could be set to fall by 50 percent. Given concerns of a stock market bubble in China, I take a bearish view on Chinese equities at this point in time. The ProShares Short FTSE China 50 ETF could potentially provide an opportunity to take advantage of a downturn. However, this strategy carries high risk given the degree of volatility inherent in Chinese stock markets. Once a booming economy at which a growth rate of below 8 percent annually was unheard of, things have certainly been changing for China in the past five years. Stock markets in China have certainly seen periods of abnormally high returns. However, such returns have come with significant volatility and sustained growth has remained elusive. For instance, the Shanghai Composite Index (000001.SS) has seen significantly high returns in the past year, up over 100 percent from the beginning of 2014 to May of this year. However, the trend now appears to be reversing, with the index having lost as much as 12 percent since the beginning of June, along with various experts predicting that the index could in fact fall by 50 percent. While I had previously commended China’s rise in stock prices and was optimistic on its continuation, I am less so in light of the recent volatility. Firstly, high stock market returns have not been matched by correspondingly high growth. China’s stock markets appear to have been taking a similar course as that of Europe, where quantitative easing and lower interest rates have forced investors to seek higher returns in the stock market. Moreover, this situation is being exacerbated in China given that returns from the property sector have been significantly lower than in previous years. In this context, I take a bearish view on China at this point in time. Given the historical nature of volatility across Chinese stock markets, the market appears to be at a significant risk of correction. This is especially possible given that stock returns are increasingly being driven by margin; i.e. investors are now borrowing to fund their positions. Should contagion develop in China and investors pull out their funds, then it is quite conceivable that a 50 percent drop would be possible under such circumstances. While a 50 percent drop seems rather drastic, it would not be that unusual when taking into account that the Shanghai Composite has already appreciated by over 100 percent in the past year. Moreover, China’s stock markets have precedent for demonstrating that they are not immune to contagion, with the Shanghai Composite having dropped almost 60 percent between 2007-08 in spite of higher economic growth rates above 8 percent at the time. Additionally, with China trading at a cyclically-adjusted price-earnings ratio of 20.5, this is significantly higher than the overall emerging markets ratio of 16.5. In this regard, China’s stock markets are likely overvalued and could be due for a pullback. While China’s quantitative easing has spurred increased investment in the stock market due to lower borrowing costs, this is unsustainable and there is always a risk of a sharp pullback in response to a rise in US interest rates, as investors seek more stable returns elsewhere. For investors wishing to take advantage of a specific short position on Chinese stock markets, one way of doing so is through the ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (NYSEARCA: YXI ), which has returned over 7 percent since the beginning of May. This ETF corresponds to the inverse of the FTSE/Xinhua China 50 Index and has succeeded in capturing a broad downturn in the Chinese market over the past two months. However, a significant risk remains in that investors would likely have to time the trade very well; returns on the ETF as a whole have been negative. Moreover, 5 of the 10 largest companies on the index originate from the financial sector. In this regard, it is likely that stock performance would move down in response to a broader economic downturn in China. However, with Chinese banks gaining traction internationally, it could be the case that this in fact lifts stock market performance higher. To conclude, I take an overall bearish view on the Chinese stock market at this point and a short opportunity likely exists. However, investors would likely endure significant volatility in doing so which would make this quite a risky trade. Disclaimer: Investing in emerging markets carries a high degree of volatility and as such, the above strategy is not recommended for conservative investors. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The Long Norway/Short Sweden Pairs Trade – Still Viable In Light Of Declining Markets?

Macro, currencies, arbitrage, statistical analysis “}); $$(‘#article_top_info .info_content div’)[0].insert({bottom: $(‘mover’)}); } $(‘article_top_info’).addClassName(test_version); } SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function(){ setEvents();}); Norway’s stock market has come under short-term pressure owing to growth concerns arising from lower oil prices. I still maintain that Norway’s stock market is undervalued relative to Sweden’s. However, it could take longer than anticipated for the Norwegian market to reach fair value. On June 3 , I had published an article arguing that a possible pairs trading opportunity exists through taking a long position on the Norwegian stock market through the iShares MSCI Norway Capped ETF (BATS: ENOR ) and a short position on the Swedish stock index through the iShares MSCI Sweden Index Fund* (NYSEARCA: EWD ). However, for this month we have seen the Norway ETF decline by 3.35 percent from $25.02 to $24.18, while the Swedish ETF has also declined by 2.57 percent from $34.97 to $34.07. The drop in Swedish stock market performance was not surprising and in line with my initial expectations. I had previously anticipated that lower than expected growth could translate to lower stock market returns as a result, and this has been the case for the month of June; with the consumer confidence indicator falling to 97.9 this month from a previous 99.0 in May. However, the decline in Norwegian stock market activity was less anticipated. Firstly, it appears that the Norwegian economy as a whole is still sensitive to oil price fluctuations, as the overnight deposit rate was cut to 1 percent this month as the effects of lower oil prices begin to take their toll on economic growth. Moreover, while lower wage growth remains a concern, house prices continue to rise in Norway which may give rise to speculation of a credit bubble similar to that of Sweden. For instance, it is anticipated that on the whole, Norwegian citizens now owe creditors twice as much as they make in disposable incomes. Additionally, house prices have increased by 7.5 percent in May from the previous year. In this regard, does the aforementioned pairs trading strategy still hold merit? It does if you have patience. Norway’s stock market remains undervalued on a P/E basis, and a major reason behind my bullish view on Norway was that various companies in the oil and financial sectors trade at lower than average P/E ratios while continuing to show impressive returns. However, it could take longer than anticipated for fair value to be reached as Norway grapples with short-term economic problems. In this context, this pairs trading strategy is best oriented over a longer-term horizon; i.e. 1 year or longer. *Note: The iShares MSCI Sweden Index Fund is not an inverse ETF and an investor would need to short-sell to take a short position in this instance. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Share this article with a colleague