Tag Archives: mexico

How To Fly In Turbulent Emerging Markets

By Sammy Suzuki Emerging markets may be stormier these days, but they’re still brimming with opportunities. You just need to know how to find them. That’s going to take some skillful piloting – and highly sensitive downside-risk radar. The developing world’s economic growth engine is losing steam. Commodity prices have collapsed, and some of the largest nations are facing structural and political struggles. Demand in the developed world has been persistently weak, and the prospect of rising US interest rates is adding uncertainty to the outlook. In this environment, simply buying an index isn’t likely to generate the easy outsized returns it had for most of the past decade. Investors may be tempted to bail. But writing off the developing world altogether means missing out on many of the world’s most dynamic, fast-growing economies and companies. The secret to success, then, is being able to identify pockets of strength – even in weak economies – and to catch nascent trends before they become obvious to others. In our view, that means investing actively, taking the long view and adopting preemptive tactics for riding out stormy times. It Pays to Deviate Generally speaking, we are indifferent to the benchmark. The reasons for this are clear: it pays to deviate liberally from the crowd. Emerging equity markets are less transparent than developed ones, and news tends to travel more slowly than it does in the developed world. As a result, developing-market stocks are more prone to overreactions and mispricings – but also far richer in opportunities for attentive stock pickers to exploit. That’s the beauty of emerging-market investing. Being active means leaning into reliable, long-term sources of equity outperformance. In other words, simply follow the basic tenets of good stock-picking: Buy stocks when they are cheap, when they are delivering stronger-than-average and/or more consistent profitability, or are more likely to score positive earnings surprises. Because emerging-market indices are so inefficient, the payback potential from such a back-to-basics strategy is high. Buffett’s Rule #1: Don’t Lose Money In storm-prone emerging markets, defense counts more than offense. So we’re especially vigilant about avoiding excess volatility. For years, the conventional thinking was that volatility was part and parcel of being an emerging-market investor. Since those risks were fully understood and accepted, active emerging-market managers didn’t have to control for it. Many professional investors merely track the ups and downs of a benchmark and call that risk control. We see things differently. In our view, the key to success in emerging stocks is to hold onto as much of your gains as possible over a full market cycle. That means being proactive and thoughtful about absolute – not relative – risk. One way to do that is by maintaining a consistent tilt toward companies with stable cash flows, good capital stewardship and/or lower sensitivity to the business cycle. Another way is to be ever watchful for looming macro risks. We rely more heavily on our country-specific economic insights for avoiding risk than for selecting stocks or return potential. This risk-aware approach is akin to constantly buying downside protection, in our view. Hunt for Durable Trends In times of increased economic turbulence, earnings quality and consistency become paramount. Some examples of companies with these attributes include South Korean biopharmaceutical company Medytox, which is getting a lift from the surging demand for an improved, next-generation botulinum toxin (commonly known as botox), an affordable form of eternal youth. When they travel abroad, Chinese vacation-goers are snapping up expensive skincare products from South Korean luxury cosmetics company Amorepacific. And emerging-Asian yarn spinners, fabric mills and sneaker makers are riding the phenomenal growth of “athleisure” sportswear. All of these companies are beneficiaries of enduring lifestyle trends. While generally shunning commodity-centric countries, we see further growth potential for many of the low-cost manufacturing centers. For example, Mexico, Vietnam, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic should all continue to gain from China’s waning status as a source for low-cost labor. Winning investments can be found even in sectors with uncertain or dismal outlooks. For example, global demand for electronic devices appears to have reached saturation, from personal computers to laptops to tablets and smartphones. Yet certain niche players in the sector, such as camera lens makers and flexible printed circuit-board makers in South Korea and Taiwan, look headed for strong revenue growth as smartphone makers rush to add desirable features and slimmer designs. In the face of the likely economic squalls ahead, we believe that combining active, high-conviction investing with a greater sensitivity to risk is the best strategy. To get the most out of emerging-market equities, there’s no contradiction between finding returns and reducing risk. The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Sammy Suzuki – Portfolio Manager – Strategic Core Equities

NiSource: Unexciting Prospects, Unless…

NiSource is the third largest natural gas distribution company in the US. Unlike some peers, the spin-off of its MLP assets was structured with no residual income or ownership. Share prices seem fully valued unless a potential acquisitioner were to pony up a nice premium. NiSource (NYSE: NI ) is a 100% regulated natural gas and electric utility. After spinning off its natural gas midstream pipelines, the assets remaining are mainly regulated by state-PUC in seven states in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast and Midwest. Servicing 4 million customers total categorizes NI as a medium tier utilities by customer count and ranks third largest in natural gas distribution. Of this number 3.5 million are natural gas customers and 500,000 electric customers in Indiana. The company’s rate base assets are $5.0 billion in natural gas and $3.0 billion in electricity. While its natural gas interstate pipelines and the vast majority of its storage business was divested last July, NI retained 58,000 miles of distribution pipelines and about 5% of its previous storage facilities. These are reported as part of the natural gas distribution segment. NI also operates a network of four coal-fired plants with 2,540 MW capacity, along with natural and hydro plants generating an additional 745 MW. Management has previously indicated it would consider the possible sale of this business. The service territory is pictured below, from their most recent presentation . (click to enlarge) Management believes its current configuration and its capital expenditure forecast will drive earnings higher by 4% to 6% annually. Over the next 5 years, management forecasts capital investments of $6.9 billion, about evenly spread out at $1.3 billion a year, substantially increasing its rate base. The company recently received approvals for natural gas rate increases in MA and PA totally $60 million, and annual automatic “trackers”, or inclusions in rate base assets, cover about $1 billion a year of current multi-year investment projects. For example, similar to its peers, NI has an ongoing natural gas distribution infrastructure project to upgrade 7,200 miles of bare steel or cast iron pipes with plastic. Management expects to increase its rate base by 6% to 8% a year. Where is the capital for the cap ex budget going to come from? With the divestiture, cap ex needs are reduced from over $2 billion last year, but the reduced cap ex budget is accompanied by lower operating cash flow. Investors should pour over the next 3 quarters operating cash flow reports to evaluate the balance between cash flow and cap ex, with the understanding any shortfall will be made up by either more debt or dilutive equity raises. In early 2011, the company settled with the EPA concerning compliance of its coal plants. NI agreed to spend $850 million between 2011 and 2018 to bring its plants into compliance, and these improvements are part of its rate base calculations. While there is a risk the fight against coal power plants will continue to result in higher emission standards, translating into higher cap ex requirements for its aging fleet, the company should be in compliance with current standards. As with many of its peers, NI mainly uses pass-through natural gas pricing so the utility has very little commodity risk and offers a bit more stability in earnings. In addition, 45% of revenue is volume based while the balance of revenue is not, reflecting a more constant income model. According to the company, operating earnings are split 65% natural gas and 35% electric. Distractors of the company point to its high use of coal to generate electricity, the exit of top management to its MLP spin-off, and the substantial percentage of commercial and industrial customers. The CEO and CFO went with the MLP and while both replacements have extensive experience in the utility industry, they are fresh to their respective responsibilities. Residential gas deliveries accounted for 28% of volume and 55% of revenue, while industrial and commercial customers completed the balance. Some investors believe the company’s higher exposure to industrial volumes makes NI more susceptible to swings in economic growth. Of interest in the spinoff of its MLP is the lack of continuing ownership by NiSource. Many of the recent separations offer the sponsor a potentially lucrative General Partner contract and the sponsor retains a large percentage ownership of the MLP though its publicly traded unit holdings. The sponsor maintains a positive cash flow interest through MLP distributions, GP incentive distribution rights, and management fees. In the case of NI, however, shareholders received 100% ownership of both in a 1 for 1 stock distribution. The business split instills a bit more risk as the utility finds its own footing. With the recent separation and associated one-time fees, financial comparisons are difficult. Ongoing 2015 EPS are expected at slightly less than $1.00, not including the storage and transportation contribution for the first half. For 2016, the company is expected to earn $1.06, and investors may want to use this consensus number for their own due diligence research. There are few ETFs that offer sector comparisons, and the closest is the Hennessy Natural Gas mutual fund (MUTF: GASFX ) as a sector comparison. Using GASFX as a comparison, NI trades at a PE of 19.0 vs 20.6 for the fund; dividend yield of 3.2% for NI vs sector average of 3.82% and a fund yield of 2.46%. It seems at its current price, NI is fairly valued. It should be noted NI is one of only a few new additions GASFX made last quarter, buying an initial position of 1.5 million shares and NI now represents 1.77% of the funds portfolio. Within the longer term consolidation of the utility business and the current appetite for natural gas utilities, NiSource could become an acquisition target. Mario Gabelli offers an insightful quarterly review of sector events in its utility fund Shareholder Commentary report pdf. Using this report as a benchmark, a recent asset purchase by a merchant power producer pegs a ballpark price for 3,200 MW of coal and gas capacity at between $1.4 and 1.6 billion, plus the value of NI’s electric distribution assets. There have been several acquisitions in the natural gas distribution business which could be used for back-of-the-napkin comparisons. Based on customer count acquisition cost for recently acquired New Mexico Gas, Alabama Gas, and municipal utility Philadelphia Gas Works, NI’s 3.5 million natural gas customers could bring in $8 to $10 billion. With a current market capitalization of $6 billion and long-term debt of $6 billion, it would seem share prices are trading at about its value in an acquisition. While there has been a change in management in the corner office, and the other guys were open to merger discussions a year ago, with the then-CEO not directly rebutting conference call questions concerning a potential acquisition by one of the top-tiered utilities, investors should not bank on a repeat performance anytime soon. NiSource offers a steady income potential at slightly higher yields to its natural gas distribution peers, with earnings and dividend growth at industry averages, and a possible acquisition candidate. However, all these attributes are fully discounted in its current share price…Unless an acquirer decides a premium price is warranted. Author’s Note: Please review disclosure in Author’s profile.

The V20 Portfolio Week #5: Realizing Value And Nearing The End Of Earnings

Summary The V20 portfolio appreciated by 8% vs. S&P 500’s gain of 1%. Individual weights have not shifted, although there could be changes next week. magicJack’s Q3 earnings next week will impact portfolio return over the short term. The V20 portfolio is an actively managed portfolio that seeks to achieve annualized return of 20% over the long term. If you are a long-term investor, then this portfolio may be for you. You can read more about how the portfolio works and the associated risks here . Always do your own research before making an investment. Read last week’s update here ! It was a good week for the market, but it was even better for the V20 portfolio. As always, some of our holdings fluctuated wildly during the first week in November, but overall, the portfolio’s gain of 8% completely smashed S&P 500’s return of 1%. With my fifth week of coverage, I thought it might be a good idea to see how we’ve done over the past little while. Since the inception of the portfolio in January, the V20 portfolio is currently up 94% while the S&P 500 only achieved a return of 5% over the same period. (click to enlarge) A huge difference indeed! While the V20 portfolio has been much more volatile (as explained in the introduction), it is a necessary sacrifice that we must make in order to achieve better results over the long term. On Allocation Weights have been more or less the same. No shares have been purchased or sold. I’ve already written about my method for choosing when to allocate more capital to Conn’s (NASDAQ: CONN ) during last week’s update (so feel free to review it if this section doesn’t make much sense to you). Although I believe that the shares are still significantly undervalued, our largest holding, magicJack (NASDAQ: CALL ), did not outperform this week (-0.5%), hence no additional capital was made available for Conn’s. Nevertheless, Conn’s current allocation of 28% means that the entire portfolio will be significantly exposed to the stock’s appreciation in the future. Portfolio News Perion Network (NASDAQ: PERI ) reported earnings this week. The company remains undervalued. The company currently has $129 million in cash and generated $25 million of operating cash flow this year; meanwhile, the stock only has a market cap of $174 million. Although the management does not deploy capital optimally (as evident by the significant cash balance), a high level of dry powder means that our downside is fairly limited. The market seems to agree with my optimism, as the stock soared 13% after earnings. Conn’s also had a piece of noteworthy news this week. On November 2nd, the management announced that they’ve amended the credit facility, providing additional liquidity to the company while relaxing some covenants. The new covenants will allow the company to take on more leverage than before (something I’ve advocated since the very beginning ), allowing additional capital to be returned to shareholders or be used for expansion without having to worry about balance sheet restrictions. The previously announced $75 million repurchase program was used up and the management announced a new buyback program worth $100 million. With increased leverage covenants and more liquidity, I believe that the company will continue to quickly execute and institute new share repurchase programs in the future. Thus far, the strategy has been working, as shares have appreciated 26% over the past week. Whether this is the result of new buying pressure from the share repurchase program or a shift in market sentiment I cannot say. However, one thing is certain, the buyback program will at least decrease the downward pressure in the near term. The Week Ahead Next week marks the conclusion of earnings season for the V20 portfolio. However, it will also be the portfolio’s biggest test over the short term. Currently, magicJack accounts for 39% of the current portfolio, and Q3 results on Monday could dramatically impact our overall return. The stock has appreciated substantially over the past several weeks (19% in four weeks) without any news; clearly, the market sentiment has shifted for the company. Personally, I am not too worried; the company remains undervalued (though not as undervalued as before) when we consider the substantial cash balance, high cash flow generation, and the optionality of the Mexico expansion. If magicJack’s shares rise substantially next week without any change in fundamentals (e.g. new development in Mexico), the position will most likely be trimmed to increase the capital available for other positions, as suggested in last week’s recap.