Tag Archives: market lab report

Market Lab Report – Premarket Pulse 3/11/16

Major averages finished yesterday flat to lower on higher but below average volume. The ECB lowered interest rates once again which sent markets higher at first. But when the ECB president said he sees no need for further rate cuts, markets reversed hard serving up another roller coaster of a day as they then clawed back some of their losses by the close to finish midbar. With the Eurozone’s inflation rate falling to -0.2% in February, deflation is staring Europe straight in the face. The failure of QE to stimulate global economies is due primarily to the purchasing of government debt instead of corporate debt while raising taxes as much as possible to pay for QE. In 1913, the Federal Reserve was established with the directive to buy only corporate debt, never government debt, to stimulate the economy. Thus, when banks were reluctant to lend, the Fed would buy the corporate paper and that would prevent rising unemployment by stimulating growth in corporations. But then World War I came along in 1914, and directive of the Fed was changed so they would start to buy government bonds. The directive was never undone. With the three types of inflation – asset, demand, and currency inflation – only government debt serves to eventually increase asset inflation while devaluing the currency. Only corporate debt can increase demand inflation which is a true sign the economy is recovering. In the meantime, negative rates and deflationary conditions are in the offing while the global economy desiccates. Futures are up around 1% as oil continues to rebound, closing in on $40/barrel. The rip tides this year caused by quantitative easing vs. the loss of confidence in central bank policies are pronounced. Indeed, it is easy to feel the markets are behaving in an absurd manner as the rip tides play out. But it goes to show that governments rule the day in excessive fashion.

Market Lab Report – How Experience Can Work Against You

Experience can work against a trader especially in this age of quantitative easing where statistics and tendencies that used to be true are now false. One of the biggest challenges has been to take every signal the VIX model issues. Due to my, call it over-experience, I have not taken two signals this year that were issued by the model, both which were highly profitable (+24.67% and +7.39% using 2x ETF UVXY) . I also delayed taking this morning’s fail-safe which would have resulted in a loss of -3.2% (using 2x ETF UVXY) instead of a -6.89% loss (using 2x ETF UVXY). I did so with good intention because experience showed blah blah blah… If we substitute the word “experience” with the word “ego”, only then does the learning begin. The backtests are what they are and have shown the model to work well across a variety of markets. So it is key for me at this point to let the model and its self-learning fail-safes do its thing without overriding any of its signals or fail-safes . That means having a strong stomach to withstand the very rare time when it might get whipsawed three times in a day. The very rare times this has occurred in backtests, the losses from all three losing trades never amounted to more than 6% (using 2x ETF UVXY). Any losing trade typically has a loss of breakeven to -3%.  That said, the model has scored a few 15%+ intrasignal gains as we have indicated in the reports since its launch in late December 2015. Those who took such quick, steep profits are still up nicely this year. That said, the backtests and results shown in the VIX performance table excludes taking such early intrasignal profits . Still, even without early profit taking, the model was up in every rolling 12-month period over the entire testing period. With that in mind, a complete rundown of all trades, both backtested and real-time, showed that taking certain profits early has further increased reward overall without increasing risk. Thus, the model will now include early profit taking on certain buy signals as we know some members are unable to watch their positions but instead monitor emails from VoSI to guide their trades. We will only do this for buy signals (buying volatility) since the market tends to take the stairs up and the trapdoor down, thus the +15% profits achieved in a day or two as demonstrated in real-time by the model. As we have mentioned, it is important to know that the model can have a string of small losses. Indeed, the model is going through a drawdown at present if we exclude the intrasignal 15%+ profits . Losing periods can last a few months. The key is to take every signal since losses tend to be small while gains can be quite large, especially on buy signals where the model buys volatility. Unfortunately, it is improbable to know the magnitude of potential profit of any given signal. Nevertheless, the model has well outperformed the major averages every year in the backtests. Keep in mind that the only thing that does not change is change, so past results can never guarantee that future results will be equivalent. Indeed, it was easy to become overconfident when the model would go on hot streaks at certain times in prior years only to be sometimes followed by a drawdown period. It did this most recently in 2015 from February to August when its sizable profits were followed by a lengthy drawdown. The sizable profits over this period were especially surprising given the trendless nature of 2015, a year which by some media accounts was the toughest year in 78 years. With regards to the model, overconfidence ruled the day. But then the model had a drawdown so oversizing would have been a bad strategy. Keeping greed, fear, and over-experience in check is always a valuable lesson as greed can lead to oversizing a position while fear and over-experience can lead to not taking a trade. The model’s two signals that I overrode can make a big difference, especially in these markets that seem to grow increasingly challenging with each passing year such that finishing the year up 15-25% is astounding, let alone making that return in one trade. The reassuring news is that the model is working as it should, with or without the early taking of profits. But the early taking of profits in place serves to further increase reward without increasing risk.

Market Lab Report – Premarket Pulse 3/10/16

Major averages finished yesterday higher on lower, below average volume ahead of today’s ECB meeting. Oil continued higher finishing above $38. Futures are higher by roughly half a percent as the European Central Bank on Thursday cut its key lending rate to zero from 0.05% and pushed the rate on its deposit facility from -0.3% to -0.4%. It will also expand the size of its monthly bond purchases to 80 billion euros from its current level of 60 billion euros beginning in April. Yet since other countries announced negative rates, their stock markets have fallen. The eurozone announced negative rates for the first time in June 2014 but its market has fallen -4.6% since that announcement. Japan announced NIRP in late January 2016 and its market has fallen another -6.7% since then. Indeed, the markets seem to be losing confidence in the easy money policy of central banks as they grasp at straws to combat low inflation as they seem to be losing the battle. The European Central Bank slashed its eurozone inflation forecast for 2016 to 0.1%, much lower than the 1% it forecast in December. The ECB said inflation is expected to be weaker than previously expected into 2017 as low oil prices and a slowing global economy continue to slow the economic recovery. The issue is that demand inflation, a real measure of a growing economy, is non-existent as global economies continue to falter, creating a potential state of depression while the sovereign debt crisis worsens.Â