Tag Archives: manufacturing

Japan ETFs To Tap On Renewed Stimulus Hopes

After logging in the biggest weekly drop of 11% in more than seven years on a rising yen, fears of a global slowdown and the sell-off in banks, the Japanese stocks bounced back strongly at the start of this week. Notably, the Nikkei 225 index jumped 7.2% in Monday’s trading session, representing the biggest daily gain since September, and extended gains of nearly 0.2% in today’s trading session. With this gain, the index has reversed the bearish trend it saw last week. Impressive two-day gains came on the back of bargain hunting and hopes for further stimulus from the central banks in Europe and Japan. In particular, renewed contraction in the Japanese economy brought back the need for more easing measures to stimulate the economy. Additionally, the yen has weakened from the highest level of ¥110.98 reached last week against the greenback that will benefit exporters and the manufacturing industry. This is because Japan is primarily an export-oriented economy, and a weaker currency makes its exports more competitive. More Stimulus in the Cards The economy contracted 1.4% year over year in the final quarter of 2016, worse than the Wall Street expectation of a 1.2% contraction. A drop in consumer spending, weak exports and lower private consumption continued to weigh on the growth of the world’s third-largest economy. The persistent slump in Japan’s biggest trading partner – China – added to the woes. The slowdown is the major setback for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his reform policy, Abenomics, which is aimed at pulling the country out of deflationary pressure and putting it back on the growth trajectory. Sluggish growth has raised speculation over additional fiscal stimulus by the central bank. Earlier this month, Bank of Japan (BoJ) adopted measures similar to the European Central Bank (ECB) by pushing interest rates to the negative territory. Additionally, the central bank maintained its bond buying program of 80 trillion yen ($675 billion) per year and invested in exchange-traded funds and real estate investment trusts. Now, an analyst at J.P. Morgan expects BoJ to cut interest rates further to minus 0.5% from the current minus 0.1% anytime soon, plus increase its Japanese government-bond purchases. Further, many economists expect Japanese growth to rebound in the coming months. As per the survey by the Japan Center for Economic Research, 38 analysts project that the economy would expand by an average of 1.4% in the first quarter, which would mark the best growth in five quarters. Given this, Japanese ETFs are poised for a rebound, especially in the session right after the Presidents’ Day holiday in the U.S. As a result, investors could tap the current opportune moment by investing in Japan ETFs. ETFs in Focus Currently, there are several Japanese equity ETFs trading on the U.S. market. While there are a handful that are relatively specialized, either tracking small-cap benchmarks or dividend-focused indexes, the most encouraging funds right now are the ones that are not confined to one segment, but provide exposure to the broad Japanese equity market. Below, we have highlighted some of them that could fetch substantial returns in the coming days on the expectation of additional stimulus. Of these, the ultra-popular fund is the iShares MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: EWJ ), with a total asset base of $17.7 billion. This fund tracks the MSCI Japan Index and holds 318 stocks in its basket. Though it is slightly skewed toward the top firm – Toyota Motor (NYSE: TM ) – at 5.8%, other firms do not account for more than 2.12% of assets. It trades in heavy volume of 50.3 million shares per day and charges 47 bps in annual fees. Another fund that provides a similar broad exposure to the Japanese stock market is the Precidian MAXIS Nikkei 225 Index ETF (NYSEARCA: NKY ). This fund does not have the same level of AUM or volume as EWJ, having nearly $41.6 million in assets and exchanging 40,000 shares a day. But it follows a much more widely known index – the Nikkei 225. Here, Fast Retailing ( OTCPK:FRCOF , OTCPK:FRCOY ) makes the top firm with 8.4% share, while other securities hold less than 4.3% share in the portfolio. The ETF has a slightly higher annual fee of 50 bps. Investors should note that both EWJ and NKY are large-cap centric funds with minor allocations to mid and small caps, and having consumer discretionary and industrials as the top two sectors. The products also have a Zacks Rank of 3 or “Hold” rating. Apart from these, Japan hedged funds – the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DXJ ), the Deutsche X-trackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: DBJP ) and the iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: HEWJ ) – seem excellent picks. These ETFs offer exposure to the broad Japanese stock market, while at the same time provide a hedge against any fall in the Japanese yen. The trio has a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 or “Buy” rating, suggesting that they will outperform the markets in the coming months. Risk-aggressive investors seeking to make big profits from the bullish sentiments in a very short period could go long on either of the three leveraged products, namely the ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan ETF (NYSEARCA: EZJ ), the Direxion Daily MSCI Japan Currency Hedged Bull 2x Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: HEGJ ) and the Direxion Daily Japan Bull 3X Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: JPNL ) – available in the space. EZJ provides two times (2x, or 200%) leveraged exposure to the daily performance of the MSCI Japan Index, while JPNL creates a triple (3x, or 300%) leveraged long position in the same index. Meanwhile, HEGJ seeks two times leveraged exposure to the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Original Post

Otter Tail’s (OTTR) CEO Chuck MacFarlane on Q4 2015 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Operator Good morning and welcome to Otter Tail Corporation 2015 Earnings Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded and there will be a question-and-answer session after the prepared remarks. I will now turn the call over to the Company for their opening remarks. Loren Hanson Good morning, everyone and welcome to our call. My name is Loren Hanson and I manage the Investor Relations area at Otter Tail. Last night, we announced our 2015 results and issued 2016 guidance. Our complete earnings release and slides accompanying this earnings call are available on our website at www.ottertail.com. A replay of the call will be available on our website later today. With me on the call today are Chuck MacFarlane, Otter Tail Corporation’s President and CEO and Kevin Moug, Otter Tail Corporation’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that during the course of this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are covered under the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include statements regarding Otter Tail Corporation’s future financial and operating results, or other statements that are not historical facts. Please be advised that actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by our forward-looking statements due to certain risks and uncertainties, including those described in our most recent Form 10-K and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Otter Tail Corporation disclaims any duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, developments or otherwise. For opening remarks, I will now turn the call over to Otter Tail Corporation’s President and CEO, Mr. Chuck MacFarlane. Chuck? Chuck MacFarlane Good morning and thanks for joining our call. During the last several years, Otter Tail Corporation has been moving toward a business model with two platforms and one common vision. Result is a focused manufacturing platform combined with a core utility platform. Our vision includes attention on growth, operational excellence, talent development. The electric platform continues to execute on a robust rate base expansion effort. Slide 5 shows our rate base expansion and a compound annual growth rate of 8%. This has been adjusted to account for the impacts the recent five-year extension to bonus depreciation and additional renewable and natural gas generation projects. During the 2016 to 2020 timeframe, Otter Tail Power plants to make $858 million capital investments. Slide 6 shows our regulatory framework, which continues to be constructive. As noted on the bottom of the slide, half of the projects are eligible for rider recovery while under construction. And the majority of the balance of the capital spend is at current depreciation levels effectively in existing base rates. Presence of our manufacturing and plastics companies continue to guide improvement in each of their businesses. And I’ll discuss some of the examples in a moment. All of our operating companies focus on our long-term compound annual earnings per share growth goal of 4% to 7% as measured from 2013 earnings per share of $1.50. While we’re currently below this goal, we are confident we will be back in this range given our pipeline of rate base projects and our effort to return our companies to historic return on sales levels when the current down cycle manufacturing segment improves. Otter Tail Corporation ended 2015 with earnings per share of $1.56 from continuing operations, a return on equity of 10% and a dividend yield of 4.6%. We accomplished this by managing through difficult end market conditions in our manufacturing segment. In addition, tax law changes made late in the year negatively impacted our consolidated results. Kevin will cover this in more detail. Otter Tail Power’s results benefited from strong project management and regulatory recovery. And despite weather challenges, Otter Tail Power finished the year with 10.7% increase in net income. Of note, Big Stone plants’ air quality control system reached commercial operation on December 29, ahead of compliance deadlines and under budget. Looking ahead, construction has begun on 70-mile 345-kv transmission line running from Big Stone South substation to Brookings, South Dakota. This should be completed in 2017 The structure will begin in mid-2016 on a 170-mile line from Big Stone South substation to Ellendale North Dakota with an expected completion date of 2019. In addition, Otter Tail Power management is evaluating options for natural gas plant given the plant retirement of Hoot Lake Plant in 2021. Otter Tail Power’s Minnesota approved integrated resource plan calls for up to 300 MW of additional wind energy by 2021, and before 2020, enough solar to power 1.5% of Minnesota retail sales. This equates to approximately 30 MW of new solar. Today, 19% of the Company’s retail load is served by renewals. The extension of the renewable production tax credit and the investment tax credit will benefit customers by allowing Otter Tail Power to continue adding low-cost renewables to the supply portfolio. One more utility item before turning to the manufacturing platform is to let you know that we will file a rate case in Minnesota before the end of the month. This will be the first Minnesota general rate case since 2010. More details will be available after the filing. Our manufacturing companies continue to be impacted by economic headwinds in agriculture and energy end markets, and the general contraction in US manufacturing. While we continue to position them for future growth. For example, BTD’s Minnesota optimization plan is on track. By the end of the first quarter, the Detroit Lakes portion of the plan will be complete. And a new state-of-the-art paint line is already operational in the expanded Lakeville facility. BTD’s world-class OEM customers are impressed with the facility and we expect to receive paint system approval from all remaining OEMs by the end of the first quarter. Another example positioning for the future growth is BTD’s September acquisition of Impulse Manufacturing, now known as BTD-Georgia. Integration is going well. BTD-Georgia has made significant progress on integrating the estimating function as increased services and improved on-time delivery. Vinyltech and Northern Pipe Products, our plastic segment, a 2015 results similar to those of 2014, which is evidence of a nimble management team that managed through reduced demand and declining sales in resin prices. Overall 2015 included a number of important events for Otter Tail Corporation. We have captured some of the highlights on slide 8. In addition to what I’ve already discussed, the EPA announced its final Clean Power Plan rule, Otter Tail Power continues to work with stakeholder groups at states develop their implementation plans. Survey results from two nationally recognized customer satisfaction firms rated Otter Tail Power highest in overall customer satisfaction among electric utilities in various categories. And the John Deere plant in Fargo, North Dakota recognized BTD with its highest supplier award. And Vinyltech set a record for pounds of pipe sold in 2015. Now I’ll turn it over to Kevin for the financial perspective. Kevin Moug Good morning. Our guidance for 2015 was to be in the middle to upper half of the range of $1.50 to $1.65 a share from continuing operations. This was based on current tax law at the time the guidance was issued. We also disclosed this guidance could be reduced by $0.02 to $0.04 a share if the tax law was changed. The federal government did change the tax law on December 18, 2015. A large amount of capital we placed in service in December of 2015 combined or taking [ph] bonus depreciation put us in a consolidated net operating tax loss for the year. As a result, we weren’t able to take Section 199 deduction but did pick up the research and development credits that is now permanently placed in the tax law. And our 2015 results were negatively impacted by $0.03 a share. Without the effects of the tax law changes, our earnings per share from continuing operations would have been in the middle to upper half of the guidance range we had previously given. Please refer to slide 9 for an overview of 2015 earnings from continuing operations. Our electric segment had strong earnings in 2015 in light of milder weather. The key factors of the $4.7 million increase in net earnings were increased environmental and transmission costs recovery riders, increased conservation incentives and increased sales to pipeline customers. Year-over-year, weather negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.08. And compared to normal, weather negatively impacted earnings per share by $0.05. Lower operating and maintenance travel and administrative costs also favorably impacted earnings. For our manufacturing segment, net earnings declined between the years at BTD by $4.9 million and at T.O. Plastics by $200,000. An overview of these results by each company is as follows. BTD’s revenues declined $6.6 million due to continued softness in sales to customers served by BTD in agricultural as well as oil and gas end markets, lower scrap sales due to a reduction in scrap metal prices and a reduction in scrap volume related to lower production and the sales volume. Softness in scrap metal prices continues to be plagued with excess steel capacity in the US market and low-priced steel imports. Scrap revenues as a percentage of part sales were 4% in 2014 compared to 2.2% of parts sales in 2015. This item alone accounted for $1.9 million reduction in net earnings between the years and lower tooling revenues also contributed to BTD’s revenue decline. These declines were offset by additional revenues of $8.8 million from the BTD Georgia acquisition in September of 2015 and BTD’s results were also negatively impacted by higher costs and expedited freight, manufacturing consumables and cost of quality. T.O. Plastics’ revenues increased $2 million as a result of increased sales in horticultural and custom products, but while these revenues increased year-over-year for T.O. Plastics, margins declined due to a change in product mix. Our Plastics segment earned $0.32 a share in 2015 compared to $0.33 a share in 2014. Revenues declined year-over-year mainly due to lower PVC pipe prices. Pounds sold were down 1.4%. Earnings, however, were flat as we were able to maintain operating margins in light of declining sales prices and our corporate costs were $0.16 a share compared to $0.22 a share in 2014. Since 2013, corporate costs have been reduced by more than 36%. Please move to slide 12 for a discussion of our 2016 business outlook. Our 2016 earnings guidance is expected to be in the range of $1.50 to $1.65 earnings per share. This guidance reflects our current mix of businesses and the current economic challenges being faced in our manufacturing platform. Our Electric segment’s 2016 net earnings are expected to be slightly higher than 2015 based on normalized weather for 2016, a constructive outcome of the Minnesota rate case, which is expected to be filed before the end of February 2016, rider recovery increases including riders in Minnesota and North Dakota related to the Big Stone Plant AQCS environmental upgrades and transmission riders related to CapX2020 and increased investments in MISO MVP transmission projects, Increased volumes from pipeline and commercial customers and lower pension costs as a result of a decrease in projected benefit expenses due to an increase in the discount rate. These items are primarily offset by the effect of the 2015 adoption of bonus depreciation for income taxes which reduces 2016 earnings by $0.06 a share, higher depreciation and property tax expense due to large capital projects being put into service, higher short-term interest costs to fund major projects and increasing operations and maintenance expenses. BTD, in our manufacturing segment, has significant exposure to the ag, oil and gas and recreational vehicle end markets. Customers served in these end markets are forecasting 2016 sales to be lower than 2015. Despite these challenges, we expect increased net earnings from our manufacturing segment in 2016 due to increased sales at BTD Georgia due to a full year of ownership. Expected full-year sales for BTD Georgia are $33 million. Excluding the full-year impact of the BTD Georgia, revenues are planned to grow approximately 7% based on BTD’s new paint line being placed into service in January of 2016 and its expected impact on sales growth and improved operating margins from improved productivity and efficiencies gained in our manufacturing processes. These items are offset impart by continued lower scrap revenue due to lower commodity prices from excess capacity and lower-priced imported steel. Scrap revenue is currently expected to be about 1% total part sales for 2016 and higher facility costs associated with BTD’s expansion. T.O. Plastics’ earnings are expected to be lower in 2016 primarily due to a shift in product mix and backlog for this segment is approximately $134 million for 2016 compared with $140 million a year ago. We expect Plastics segment net income to be down from 2015 as sales volumes are projected to be flat compared to 2015 and lower operating margins are expected due to tighter spreads between raw material costs and sales prices along with increased labor and trade and we expect corporate costs to be lower in 2016 compared to 2015. On February 5, 2016, we issued a $50 million two-year note with an ability to borrow an additional $50 million with lenders’ consent. Proceeds were used to pay down borrowings on the line of credit used to fund BTD’s Minnesota facility expansion as well as fund the BTD Georgia acquisition. The borrowing costs under this facility are lower than the interest costs of our corporate credit facility. This facility also positions us to have a backstop to retire the remaining $50 million of 9% notes due in December of 2016. Let me provide an overview of our capital expenditure plans as shown on slide 14. We expect capital expenditures for 2016 to 2020 to be $858 million for the electric utility. This is an increase over our previous year’s guidance as we have included additional wind and solar projects as well as the completion of our natural gas generation facility. We expect capital expenditures for the manufacturing platform to be $114 million over the same time period. Our updated compounded annual growth rate in rate base is 8% from 2014 through 2020. This reflects our updated capital plans and the impact of the recently extended tax loss related to bonus depreciation. Our need for equity over this timeframe before the change in bonus depreciation was in the range $140 million to $150 million. We expect this need to be reduced by $25 million to $35 million as a result of the extended bonus depreciation. We also expect to use our existing stock programs to satisfy these equity needs. Based on our solid 2015 performance and the 2016 outlook, the board of directors increased our indicated annualized dividend rate from a $1.23 a common share to $1.25 a common share. Our 2016 guidance is dependent on the business and economic challenges our two platforms face in 2016. Key initiatives include a constructive outcome of a rate case expected to be filed in Minnesota by the end of February 2016, BTD’s successful growth in sales from its new paint line along with our operational improvements needed to further improve our return on sales margins, and full integration of BTD’s new facility in Georgia to better serve our growing customer base in the Southeast. These are key initiatives that must be successful in light of continuing end market softness in ag, oil and gas and recreational vehicle and continued strong earnings, cash flows and returns on invested capital in our Plastics segment. We remain confident in the future earnings ability of our two platforms to meet our long-term stated growth goals of 4% to 7%, compounded annual growth rate of earnings per using 2013 as the base year. We are now ready to take your questions and after the Q&A, Chuck will return with a few closing remarks. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. And our first question comes from the line of Paul Ridzon with KeyBanc. Your line is open. Paul Ridzon Good morning. When do you expect Minnesota rates to kick in? Kevin Moug We would anticipate a filing by the end of February. There is a 60-day period within the filing complete and so interim rates would go in by May 1. Paul Ridzon May 1? Okay. And then with the drilling slowing down, you’re forecasting higher pipeline sales, is that just the system is still backfilling with takeaway capacity? Chuck MacFarlane The majority of our pipeline load is associated with Canadian oil, not directly with drilling in the Bakken and a majority of those capital processing investments in plants in Canada continue to operate. Paul Ridzon And then what’s driving higher sales to commercial customers? Chuck MacFarlane Paul, we just collectively have grouped the pipeline in the commercial sales together and the increases in — it’s mostly the pipeline. Paul Ridzon And then, if we pro rate, I think 8.8 million that Georgia earned since September 1, that gets me about $26.4 million on an annual basis, but you’re forecasting 33. Is that business ramping, are you realizing some synergies or what drives that increase? Was it just seasonality? Kevin Moug Yes. Well, we’re expecting additional — as a result of the acquisition, we’re expecting additional volumes coming from other customers that BTD was serving before the acquisition that we can now also better serve them down in the south-east. Paul Ridzon So is it revenue synergy and cost synergies? Kevin Moug There is revenue synergies and then there is cost synergies as well, but the 8.8 million just to clarify earned was, that’s revenue in 2015. And we’re forecasting approximately 33 million of revenue in 2016. So that’s roughly a $24 million increase. One just now the benefit of having it owned for an entire year plus some additional growth from being able to better serve customers in the southeast that we hadn’t been able to necessarily serve as a result of not having a location and then additional sales growth from some of the other customers that we’re serving there. Paul Ridzon Got it. Thank you. And then lastly, excluding Georgia, you are looking for revenues to be up 7% at BTD. What are the end markets that’s driving that increase? Kevin Moug Well, a lot of the stuff that’s coming is the bringing the paint line in effective here January, because we know there is additional opportunities with existing customer base as to now provide them additional product or services if you will, given that we have paint. So we would expect that that growth is coming across a number of the end markets as we’re now able to paint for egg, recreational vehicle and other lawn and garden and other end markets that we’re serving. Paul Ridzon And you’ve got, at this point, good visibility on that business coming in? Kevin Moug We have, as Chuck mentioned, we’re mostly qualified for — I think we’re expected to have remaining qualifications wrapped up by the end of the first quarter and the line [ph] is running. We were just there last Tuesday with our board and saw the line running and painting parts and so the visibility obviously, we’ve still got to go out and win the work, but we’ve got a line that’s operating well, it’s in service and it is past a number of the qualifications for paint specs by customers. Paul Ridzon Okay, thank you very much. Kevin Moug Welcome. Operator Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Mike Bates with Robert W. Baird. Your line is open. Mike Bates Good morning, gentlemen. How are you? I was hoping to get a little bit more color on your upcoming rate case filing. Can you talk to us a little about the expected breakdown in your F between just rolling rider recoverable projects in to rate base and things like that as opposed to evolution of your operating expenses, changes in demand forecast, things like that? Chuck MacFarlane Yes. I mean our case will continue to work, the riders will be in place and generally and at the finalizing of the case, we’ll roll some of those riders into, we would anticipate, the emissions equipment at Big Stone whatnot would be rolled into base rates. So our filing is an adjustment above what we’re getting currently in rider covered. Kevin Moug Mike, this is Kevin. Until the rate case is filed, there is really nothing that we can give in terms of additional detail on it. When we file the rate case, there will be an 8-K filing that we’ll go along with that and that will have more details in it. Mike Bates Sure. Absolutely. And don’t want to get too deep into the weeds before we have that finally in front of us. One other question though is, should investors expect to see a multi-year rate plan or would you expect it to be a more traditional single test year type of deal? Chuck MacFarlane It will be more a single test year, forward-looking test year, single year case. Mike Bates All right. And then any color you can offer in terms of when we might see rate cases filed in your other jurisdictions? Kevin Moug We will start in the middle of this year with our — as we do every year, our cost of service studies and allocations between jurisdictions and would make a decision probably earlier in the third quarter, if there would be any additional filings this year in either of the Dakotas. Mike Bates Absolutely. Okay. And just the last question before I hop off, in terms of your new generation resources we’re looking at, over the next several years, will you be required to hold a competitive RFP as we think about the likelihood of these projects being owned resources put into rate base as opposed to PPAs? Chuck MacFarlane We’ll continue to lease gauss planning, we currently are not under a requirement to RFP there in any other jurisdictions. Mike Bates And remind me, do you have the ability to get preapproval or predetermination for either type of resources? Chuck MacFarlane We have the ability in both Minnesota and North Dakota to file for a Advance Determination of Prudence on these facilities and also incorporate those into our integrated resource plan as filed with Minnesota, that plan, an update to that is due in June of ‘16. Mike Bates Excellent. Thank you very much. Operator Thank you. And we have a follow-up from Paul Ridzon with KeyBanc. Your line is open. Paul Ridzon What was the impact of weather versus normal for the full year? Sorry, if I didn’t get that? Kevin Moug The impact of weather versus normal was $0.05. Paul Ridzon So if we were to add that back to 15 results, you’re looking for a down year at the utility? Chuck MacFarlane Well, I mean weather is arguably offset by the first year in this bonus depreciation. Paul Ridzon Okay. That was $0.06 Chuck MacFarlane That was $0.06. Paul Ridzon Thank you for that clarification. Thanks. Operator Thank you. And this does conclude today’s Q&A session. I would now like to hand the call over to Mr. Chuck MacFarlane for closing remarks. Chuck MacFarlane Thank you. I’ll summarize by saying that we remain committed to a diversification strategy focused on two distinct platforms, manufacturing and the core utility. Our companies will continue to focus on customers and we’ll take a long term view. Our strategic objectives are to grow our businesses, achieve operational excellence and develop our talent. We thank all of our employees for their hard work and we thank you for joining the call and for your interest in Otter Tail Corporation. We look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Operator Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This concludes the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!