Tag Archives: manager

What To Look For In A Successful Money Manager Today: Mindsets And Beliefs

We have been discussing for weeks the effects of globalization on all economies, financial markets, companies and money managers. Last week I listened to the speakers at the Sky Bridge Alternatives Conference in Las Vegas talk about the demise of the hedge fund industry. I say: Instead of dwelling on the past, let’s look at what is needed today to be a successful money manager regardless of asset class. In this article I will look at the mindsets and beliefs of a successful money manager. In the next article, I will examine the skill set and track record necessary to successfully manage money. Then in a third article, I will discuss the personal attributes necessary in the character of a successful money manager. In order to be successful, a money manager must have the right mindset and system of beliefs. To be specific, a successful money manager must: Have core beliefs that can be articulated and supported by the facts. You do not want a manager who reacts to every piece of news and trades out of his positions. Look for someone who gathers all the data; understands the inter-relationships between all markets utilizing a systematic approach; reflects and pauses before reacting; considers first the proper asset allocation with risk controls; and finally does in-depth independent research on each investment Think long term. Stop thinking as a trader. You cannot be overly concerned about daily performance, because in fact, it will impact/jeopardize your long-term returns. Market psychology is such that investors like the idea of buying low and selling high but unfortunately act in reverse. It is ironic that hedge funds were so hot after 2008 when risk management and protecting assets were the major emphasis but are so cold now as hedge funds have under-performed in an historic 7-year up market. Think globally regardless of asset class and have a holistic perspective. Linear thinkers who trade rather than invest unfortunately dominate the markets causing excessive volatility and confusion. Have cardinal rules for investing that can be applied to all economic environments, asset classes, regions, industries and companies. Think like a master chess player focusing both three or four moves down the board while contemplating the very next move. Be good for all seasons, which means protecting assets in down markets, performing reasonably well in up markets, therefore outperforming over market cycles. This is the mindset a money manager must have to be successful. He must think globally and long-term. In my next article, I will discuss the skill set of a successful money manager and also offer advice about what the track record of a manager you hire should be. Invest Accordingly!

Matthews Asia: Q&A With Robert Horrocks, PhD

Q&A With Robert Horrocks, PhD by Matthews Asia Chief Investment Officer and Lead Manager, Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Matthews Asia: How do you view the market environment for Asian economies? Robert Horrocks: The biggest negative in the short term is the U.S. Federal Reserve raising interest rates, meaning potential currency weakness and capital outflows for Asian markets. The main question is whether growth will pick up in an environment where markets are weak. In the short term, we are also seeing aggressive monetary stimulus across Asia: in China, India, Taiwan and Korea. The long-term outlook is, however, more upbeat. First, current accounts in Asia are generally positive: Asian countries are saving more domestically than they invest and are relatively less reliant on foreign capital. Asia has a higher share of manufacturing as a percentage of GDP and higher productivity growth, compared with the rest of the world. This started from a low base and has improved significantly over the past 20-30 years. Matthews Asia: How do you mitigate volatility? Robert Horrocks: The behavior of a dividend portfolio tends to be less volatile than the market: the security of receiving a dividend yield enables us to pursue a reasonable level of total return without chasing faster-growing, but more volatile investments. That is a double-edged sword, however: if the market goes up, we do not necessarily follow at the same pace. But in down times, we may have an element of protection. Matthews Asia: How is the Matthews Asia Dividend portfolio structured? Robert Horrocks: We take an all-cap approach, meaning we can invest in anything from small to mega caps. What is nice about Asia is that you see companies right down the market cap paying dividends. In small and mid-caps, you tend to find more entrepreneurial companies, family-owned commercial businesses, while large companies in Asia are often less commercially run and connected to governments. The market capitalisation of companies we invest in depends on the liquidity of underlying stocks in a particular market. For some markets, a liquid stock would have to be $1 billion, for others, only a few hundred million. But one thing this Fund will not do is morph into a blue-chip yield portfolio. Matthews Asia: What differentiates the Matthews Asia Dividend Fund from other Asia income funds? Robert Horrocks: We believe it is important to focus on the sustainability of the dividend stream. Many Asian equity income portfolios are built with a lot of emphasis on yield, containing stocks of Chinese and Australian banks and commodities, for example, which can be difficult underlying businesses. In our long-term total return approach, we use dividends as an indicator of core earnings growth and strength of the company. The companies we seek to invest in range from small and mid-caps that may be yielding 2% to solid businesses that may yield 4-5% but potentially growing their dividends at a 15% rate. This balanced approach seeks to create a portfolio that can benefit from an attractive dividend yield without giving up on growth. We have a lot of flexibility: If the market is hot, the natural thing for us is to take a step back and look in the other direction. If everyone is looking for yield, we would look for growth; if they start paying more for growth, we would move the portfolio back towards yield. We have a dedicated team of investment professionals that have 2,500 company meetings every year, looking at all businesses through the Asian dividends framework. We also meet with companies’ competitors and suppliers to gauge their outlook. Matthews Asia: Where are you currently wary of investing? Robert Horrocks: The Fund has currently no allocation in Australia. A lot of the time, the Australian banks or the material sectors are quite cyclical and exposed to shocks, both internally and externally. There are some countries that are more fertile ground than others. In India, for example, it is difficult to find high-quality companies, which are giving you a particularly high current yield. Now the reason for that is capital is quite scarce in India – after you have reinvested it into the business, there is less to pay out. Also, valuations there tend to be a little bit higher than in the rest of the region, so that is where the valuation discipline of the Fund comes in. In places like Korea, there is a lot of capital that can be shared with minority shareholders, but historically, the attitudes of management teams there has been less favorable to shareholders. That is where the corporate governance side of the discipline of our framework comes in. Matthews Asia: What are some of the most prevalent investment themes in Asia? Robert Horrocks: Looking at the past 30 years, inequality across the world has been decreasing (although it could be increasing within certain individual countries). This development has resulted in the rise of the middle class, so an opportunity for us is to find companies that will facilitate that middle-class life. This is an ongoing trend, likely to continue for the next 30 years. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s estimations, by 2060, Asia will account for two-thirds of middle-class spending in the world. Companies that should gain from that spending include businesses in industries as varied as retail, consumer staples and goods, consumer discretionaries, autos, media, leisure, entertainment, tourism, insurance and wealth management. Consumer and auto loan businesses of banks as well as healthcare are also expected to benefit – whether it is a high-street establishment or a more sophisticated business, such as a healthcare equipment manufacturer, a private hospital or a drugs company. Click to enlarge Robert Horrocks – Image source: Matthews Asia See full PDF below. Disclosure: None

How To Get Statistically Significant Alpha In A Hurry: Financial Advisors’ Daily Digest

MFS Investment Management argues active management can consistently deliver alpha; Mark Hebner says investors would be better off seeking beta. Ronald Surz says investors need not wait decades to determine statistically significant alpha; he offers “microwave alpha,” a quick way to measure manager skill. Jack Waymire gives five reasons why mobile-optimized websites are no longer a luxury for financial advisors. To frightened investors who sense something bad is due after a seven-year bull market and amidst a wobbly economy, MFS Investment Management’s commercials touting a “significant advantage to active management” may be striking just the right chord. These investment pros are working to reduce “downside volatility” and to “consistently deliver alpha,” says the investment firm’s one-and-a-half-minute commercial on the power of active management. But of course, not everybody’s having it. RIA Mark Hebner, a proponent of indexing, applies statistical tests to MFS’ fund lineup and suggests just one out of 87 funds has any alpha to offer (and even that one could be a fluke, Hebner further argues). He concludes that investors would be better served seeking beta. Hebner has previously argued that it could take something like a century to evaluate investment skill in a statistically significant way. Comes along SA contributor Ronald Surz, an innovative thinker, and proposes a method to deliver statistical significance in years rather than decades: “microwave alpha,” he calls it . This quick-cooking alpha is achieved through portfolio simulations: “The breakthrough determines statistically significant success in the cross-section rather than across time… A portfolio simulator creates all the portfolios the manager might have held, selecting stocks from a custom benchmark – thousands of portfolios… To state an extreme example, a return of, say, 1000% is significant, and you don’t have to wait 50 years to declare it significant.” With no further ado, we’ve got many other advisor-relevant stories to start your week with: Your comments on any of the above are, as always, most welcome below.