Tag Archives: lightbox

You Do Not Get Paid For Knowing Yesterday’s News

You do not get paid for knowing yesterday’s news… unless you work as a pundit! In that case you just need to go on TV and repeat what you read that morning in the Wall Street Journal or the FT. Like the “B” student in a class, you learn the conventional wisdom and repeat it. You can sound very confident – even smug – and seem right because you are describing the past. For traders and investors, yesterday’s news is history – already reflected in market prices. Unlike other aspects of life, being well-informed provides you no edge. It might even be a disadvantage. The post-hoc explanations for market moves twist theory to fit perceptions. As humans, we crave to make sense of everything; we are very creative in finding explanations. This may build a view of the world that is quite wrong. Finding an investing or trading edge requires an accurate view of the future, not the past. You can do this in several ways: Better information – possession of facts not widely known; Speed – getting news faster and drawing the right conclusions; Interpretation of data – understanding and using an indicator or technique that is not widely followed; Contrarian investing Determine the conventional wisdom Find important mistakes in the popular, oft-repeated viewpoints Consider what sectors and stocks would benefit if there is a return to reality Examples If you start asking yourself the right questions, following the points listed above, you will find some fresh ideas. Here are a few examples: Information – There are many important facts that are not widely known. Worldwide demand for energy has increased every year, more this year than last. Using energy prices as a gauge for the world economy is too pessimistic. Bank exposure to energy companies is relatively modest and reserves are much better than in 2008. If you accept this information, you can shop economically sensitive companies and banks. This information is hiding in plain sight. Speed – Good luck with this approach! You really need to have a plan in advance and jump on breaking news, beating the computer algorithms. Indicators – The page-view payoff for pessimistic news has inflated the perceived probability of a recession. Insider buying has been strong in several crucial sectors. CEO’s generally express confidence about their own business, even when less optimistic about others. The relevant data is easy to find. Contrarian Analysis – The conventional wisdom has punished biotech because of a political debate about drug prices. Oil prices are seen as hovering at a permanently depressed level. Banks are targets for political rhetoric and exposed to bad loans. Apple is too big and lacks new products. And more. Do we really believe that an aging population will not embrace the new drug discoveries? That China, India, and other countries will not need enough energy to close a 1% gap between supply and demand? That banks will not escape the political noise with more profit? Conclusion I do not expect everyone to agree with the specific trade ideas in this post, but I hope readers will consider the basic approach. If you want trading or investment profits, think for yourself and think ahead! Reading the news only helps to know what others are doing. Disclosure: I am/we are long AAPL. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I have positions in biotech, energy, cyclicals, and regional banks.

Top 10 Drivers Of Valuation

Business Valuation Framework Over the years I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about and working on business valuations across a broad range of transactions. Given that I’m a visual learner, I thought it would be helpful to illustrate my thoughts in a diagram. Click to enlarge Source: CFI Top Down vs. Bottom Up As I look at the diagram it logically flows from top to bottom, however, when building a financial model to value a business I usually think about it bottom up, and in an iterative way. I start in the bottom left corner of the diagram with historical financials, working my way up to the top, then back down again to build the forecast financials (and repeat the process again). 1. Historical Financials The first place to start when valuing a business is usually with historical financial statements. The past matters a lot when performing a valuation as it informs a view of the future and what’s realistically possible. The future, of course, is heavily influenced by what the company’s assets, management team, competition and markets will do going forward. 2. Assets Examining the asset base in conjunction with the historical income statement will paint a picture of the business’ ability to generate a return on those assets (“ROA” net income divided by total assets), and most importantly, generate free cash flow (operating cash flow less capital expenditures). When evaluating a business’ assets it’s important to look at both tangible (property, plant, equipment, etc.) and intangible assets (brands, customer lists, intellectual property, etc.). 3. Management Track-record Assessing management can be quite challenging, especially if you don’t have the opportunity to meet them in person (which is the case for most retail investors). An easy way to evaluate their performance is to look back at historical guidance (if a public company) and measure it against results achieved. Do you see a consistent trend of missing, meeting, or beating guidance? Measuring the track-record combined with in-person meetings to assess integrity, honesty, work ethic, etc. will be the best way to decide whether you assign a “management premium” or “management discount” to the business. 4. Competition What is the current state of competition in this industry? Are barriers to entry high or low, and how much pricing power does the company have? Answers to these types questions (and others listed in the diagram above) will help shape your view of risk and the company’s ability to protect profits (which will be reflected in the forecast financials). 5. “Moat” Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger are notorious for buying business that have wide moats around them, or more literally, have durable competitive advantages. Examples of companies with big moats around them include Google (NASDAQ: GOOG ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL ) (Alphabet), railroad companies (infrastructure), Coca Cola (NYSE: KO ) (its brand), and business with network effects like Facebook (NASDAQ: FB ) and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN ). The wider the moat, the longer the company will be able to earn above average profits, and the lower the risk of the investment. The inverse it true for companies with little to no moat. 6. Culture & Strategy I group these two together because they are two of the main objectives of the CEO. Culture is critical as it drives the “Why” of an organization (see Simon Sinek) and motivates people to create a business that can change the world (even if in some small way). Culture is also critical for driving company behavior such as honesty and integrity, which lowers the risk of the business. Next in importance is strategy (i.e. “strategy eats culture for breakfast” ?) as this will be critical in maintaining any durable competitive advantage that a company has, or is attempting to gain/increase. 7. Future Assets Based on the strategy of the business, what will the assets look like in the future? Will the company have to significantly invest to grow the asset base, and if so, what types of ROA will they earn? It’s important to think carefully about how much capital is required to sustain and grow the assets (based on the strategy) and how those assets will create value in the form of free cash flow generation. The details/inputs behind these assets will generate the “principles” or drivers of the financial model. 8. Forecast Financials With a deep understanding of the industry, management (culture & strategy), and the business’ assets it’s now possible to forecast future financial statements. A good model will dis-aggregate the various drivers of revenues, expenses, etc. and present them as inputs that can easily be changed. Depending on the industry or maturity of the business you may forecast out anywhere from 5 years to the end of an asset’s life. 9. Discount Rate Once the financial forecast is in place, setting up the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model is just simple mechanics in Excel. The most challenging and subjective part of the DCF model is determining what discount rate to use. There are specific formulas you can use based on interest rates and relative volatility, but the essence of the discount rate is captured in most of the qualitative issues discussed above: stability of assets, durability of a moat, competence of management, risk of changes in competitive dynamics, and risk of changes in markets (i.e. government regulation). Taking all of these into account will determine what discount rate you think is appropriate to account for the riskiness of the investment. To the extent you have risk-adjusted the cash flows directly in the model (for the risks discussed above), you don’t need to include those risks in the discount rate (i.e. a perfectly risk adjusted cash flow forecast would be discounted at only the appropriate risk free government treasury rate). 10. Price The net present value (“NPV”) of future cash flows gives you the value of the business, but how much are you willing to pay for it? Value investors will typically want to build in a margin of safety (say 20-30%) by paying less than the intrinsic value. Other investors pay full value if they are willing to accept the discount rate as their internal rate of return (“IRR”). Investors typically look at comparable companies or past transaction (acquisitions) to see what other people are willing to pay for similar business (this adds an element of game theory or “greater fool theory” and moves away from intrinsic value). Conclusion This is how I think about valuation when building a financial model and I hope you found it insightful. I’m a visual learner and find it useful to organize mental models, like valuation, on paper. The key takeaway for me is that valuation is an iterative process — you really have to cycle through things like markets, competition, management, and assets multiple times before you can build a reliable financial forecast and discount it back to today. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

General Mills (GIS)

On Friday, I sent out an e-mail to our e-mail subscribers, like we always do whenever we are about to have a transaction in our portfolio. I don’t usually address our portfolio transactions on the blog, but I thought I should clear something up. Some readers have been questioning why we recently sold out of certain stock positions, specifically General Mills (NYSE: GIS ) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ). These sales have been several months in the making honestly. Over the past two months, I have written a couple of posts about changes to our Portfolio Allocation and the ETFs that will make up the core of our future portfolio. Part of the focus of our portfolio has been to generate income from the dividend growth in our portfolio, but the other part of our focus is to grow our portfolios’ value by investing in undervalued business… that will prosper over the long term. Part of that concept means that we do need to take profits when the value of some of our assets become overvalued. A while back we sold out of our utility company investments, for instance. At that time (and currently), we felt that the valuations and growth prospects that the market was assuming did not justify our continued investment. Something similar has occurred over the past several months, in regards to consumer staples companies. While I consider General Mills a good company, it’s a mature business and its model is dependent on consumers continuing to pay a premium for the company’s name brand products and agricultural commodities remaining low. Therefore, I don’t believe it has the characteristics of a company we should own over the next 30 years. Profits over the past couple of years have been goosed by unusually low agricultural input costs, low transportation costs, and good consumer demand. Will these trends continue? I don’t know, but given the company’s current metrics, I am happy to book our profits. The other part of why we took our profits, is I am not particularly optimistic about the global economy. That outlook, which may or may not be justified, and our desire to shift our core holdings over to passive index investments… encouraged us that some of our capital was better in cash for the time being. While I never expect to time our portfolio’s transition from mostly individual stocks… to mostly passive index investments… perfectly, it makes sense to me to do some selling while those assets are at elevated levels. For the past few years, dividend growth investments have been very popular with investors…largely as a result of the current (artificially) low interest rate environment. Therefore, some consumer staples and utility companies are trading at price to earnings ratios approaching 30. That wouldn’t concern me at all if the underlying businesses were growing at a rapid pace, but instead, many are only growing (revenues and profits) at 2%-6% annually. At some point, the companies will likely need to grow faster, or the share prices will need to come down. The exception being if we are entering a sustained period of mild deflation, but that situation comes with its own problems. I have been called everything from a contrarian to a “nut” on this blog, but I have found most readers receptive to our ideas. I don’t know that I am really a contrarian and I don’t strive to invest the opposite of how most people invest. I just try to think independently, and follow the path that’s best for me and my family. So our portfolio is largely in cash and we’re happy to remain that way for the near term. I think we will have dramatically better investment opportunities within the next year. If I can leave you with a concept, without going on about all the virtues of cash, it’s that in the current economic environment Cash is Not Trash! In round numbers, our sale of General Mills freed up $11,500 in capital. We had owned the shares for about 2 years and enjoyed capital appreciation of 20.5%, as well as 2 years’ worth of dividend income. The cash has been added to our growing “war chest”. We will reinvest this capital in the global equity markets as soon as we see a great long-term opportunity, but we also invest a small portion of our portfolio in deep value investments. Time will tell what our next investment will be, but for now, I am happy to hold plenty of cash and wait for the proverbial “fat pitch”. Do you ever book profits, or are you strictly a “buy and hold” investor? Disclosure: I do not currently own shares in GIS or PG. This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a recommendation for anyone to buy, sell, or hold any equities. I am not a financial professional.