Tag Archives: lightbox

Stock Selection: The Top-Down And Bottom-Up Approaches

So, you want to trade a stock. Well, you’re not going to trade any stock, of course. So the question is: what stock are you going to trade? There are a lot of stocks out there and you’re going to need a way to narrow down your search. For this, there are two approaches you could take: bottom-up, or top-down. Click to enlarge TOP-DOWN In the top-down approach, you go from big to small. First, you take a look at the prevailing market trends in terms of what industries are experiencing favorable trends. Within those industries, you take a look at the sectors that are trending well. And finally, within those favorable sectors, you look at the specific stocks that are performing well. Some of the reasons that stock traders prefer this method of stock selection is because it allows them to approach the market with an open mind. Rather than trying to formulate a trading plan on the basis of liking a particular stock, it starts traders out on a path that lets them discover a stock that may work for them. Also, the practice of identifying strong sectors in and of itself can be useful for traders looking to get a good sense of the overall market. Some traders also favor this approach because it may help them discover opportunities for diversification . Again, instead of you saying, “I know lots of things about tech, so I’ll focus on tech,” it allows you to consider all sectors, as long as they’re favorably trending. On the other hand, some traders feel the top-down approach is not the best way of selecting stocks. This method forces the trader to be aware of the entire market, which can be challenging and requires a greater amount of research. But also, by ruling out entire sectors, some traders feel that they are missing out on many trading opportunities. BOTTOM-UP As you might have guessed, the bottom-up process is pretty much the opposite of the top-down approach. Here, you consider particular stocks that you believe are poised for growth, and then confirm that the sectors they are in are trending favorably, and that the industries that those sectors are in are also trending well. Some traders like this, as it allows them to investigate stocks one-by-one, rather than having to research the market as a whole. It may also allow traders to select stocks that they might have otherwise passed up in a bear market, when the top-down approach could make most sectors look unattractive. But mostly, it’s a stylistic choice: some traders are interested in a certain set of stocks, and it allows them to use those stocks as starting points. Of course, some traders eschew this method, as it may play too well into pre-conceived notions (if you’re already “rooting for” a stock, you may only find good things when you’re researching it). And, of course, by focusing on the individual stock, a trader could miss larger, macroeconomic trends and shifts, which could impact their trade down the line. Ultimately, no particular way is better than the other. But what both of these approaches allow you to do is be thoughtful and prepared as you formulate your trading plan. And that thoughtfulness and preparedness should not only give you an idea about what stocks to buy, but also at what point you should sell the stock. In other words, as you look at trends and the viability of a stock, don’t just think about buying stock; think about when the time comes to sell it, and what level you expect that will be at. After all, it’s all part of the plan. Important Disclosures Schwab Trading Services (formerly known as Active Trader or Active Trading services) includes access to StreetSmart® trading platforms, the Schwab Trading Community, and priority access to Schwab trading specialists. Schwab reserves the right to restrict or modify access at any time. Access to electronic services may be limited or unavailable during periods of peak demand, market volatility, systems upgrades or maintenance, or for other reasons. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and cannot protect against losses in a declining market. The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. Examples are not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Best And Worst Q1’16: Mid Cap Blend ETFs, Mutual Funds And Key Holdings

The Mid Cap Blend style ranks sixth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q1’16 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter , the Mid Cap Blend style ranked eighth. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 18 ETFs and 319 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Blend style. See a recap of our Q4’15 Style Ratings here. Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Mid Cap Blend style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 19 to 3336). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings. Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Blend style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Four ETFs are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5 Click to enlarge * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Five mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums. The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEARCA: XMLV ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and the ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (MUTF: LSIRX ) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. XMLV earns an Attractive rating and LSIRX earns a Very Attractive rating. The Guggenheim Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: RYJ ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and the RBC Mid Cap Value Fund (MUTF: RBMAX ) is the worst-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. RYJ earns a Neutral rating and RBMAX earns a Very Dangerous rating. Amdocs (NASDAQ: DOX ) remains one of our favorite stocks held by LSIRX and earns a Very Attractive rating. Since 1998, Amdocs has grown after-tax profit ( NOPAT ) by 16% compounded annually. The company has earned a double-digit return on invested capital ( ROIC ) every year for the past decade and currently earns a 12% ROIC. The impressive profit growth achieved by Amdocs has not gone unnoticed, as the stock is up 90% over the past five years. However, shares remain undervalued. At its current price of $55/share, Amdocs has a price-to-economic-book value ( PEBV ) ratio of 1.0. This ratio means the market expects Amdoc’s NOPAT to never meaningfully grow from current levels. If Amdocs can grow NOPAT by just 6% compounded annually for the next decade , the stock is worth $72/share today – a 29% upside. Zayo Group (NYSE: ZAYO ) is one of our least favorite stocks held by Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds. Zayo earns a Dangerous rating. Since Zayo’s IPO, the company’s economic earnings have not only remained negative, but also declined from -$137 million in 2013 to -$165 million over the last twelve months. Over this same time, Zayo’s ROIC has consistently ranked in the bottom quintile and is currently a bottom quintile 4%. Despite the deterioration of the business, ZAYO remains overvalued. To justify its current price of $24/share, Zayo must grow NOPAT by 13% compounded annually for the next 13 years . The expectations embedded in the stock price provide no room for error and only large downside risk. Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds. Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds Click to enlarge Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings D isclosure: David Trainer and Kyle Guske II receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

U.S. Hires More Than Expected In Feb.: ETFs And Stocks To Buy

The U.S. labor market continued its strength with solid hiring in February, easily dodging the global slowdown and a tumultuous stock market. The economy added 242,000 jobs in February, much above the market expectation of 190,000. The majority of the additions were seen in healthcare, retail, bars and restaurants, and construction that more than offset the decline in the mining sector. Unemployment remained unchanged at an eight-year low of 4.9% while job gains for December and January were revised upward by a combined 30,000. However, average hourly wages unexpectedly dipped 0.1% after a strong 0.5% increase in January. This reflects the first monthly drop since December 2014 and lowered the year-over-year wage increase to 2.2% from 2.5% for January. The robust data eased fears of a recession in the U.S. and infused further signs of confidence into the economy. Investors’ sentiment thus turned toward risk-on trade once again. While a solid hiring number is strong enough to support the Fed’s gradual interest rates hike this year, tepid wage growth remains a matter of concern. Market Impact The news extended the U.S. stock market’s three-week winning streak seen this year. In particular, the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed to over 17,000 for the first time since January 5 while the S&P 500 surpassed 2,000 during the trading session but closed at a lower level. Yields on two-year and 10-year Treasury bonds soared to one-month high levels but fell at the close. On the other hand, U.S. dollar remained volatile given that the solid pace of hiring was tarnished by a drop in average hourly wages. Given this, we have highlighted three ETFs and stocks that will be the direct beneficiaries of job gains and see smooth trading in the days ahead. ETFs to Buy PowerShares DB USD Bull ETF (NYSEARCA: UUP ) A healing job market and the resultant improving economy will pull in more capital into the country and lead to appreciation of the U.S. dollar. UUP is the prime beneficiary of the rising dollar as it offers exposure against a basket of six world currencies – euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona and Swiss franc. This is done by tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index Futures Index Excess Return plus the interest income from the fund’s holdings of the U.S. Treasury securities. In terms of holdings, UUP allocates nearly 57.6% in euro and 25.5% collectively in the Japanese yen and British pound. The fund has so far managed an asset base of $830.6 million while sees an average daily volume of around 1.6 million shares. It charges 80 bps in total fees and expenses, and lost 0.3% on the day following the jobs report. The fund has a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 or “Buy” rating with a Medium risk outlook. SPDR Homebuilders ETF (NYSEARCA: XHB ) Solid labor market fundamentals along with affordable mortgage rates will continue to fuel growth in a recovering homebuilding sector, creating a buying opportunity in homebuilders and housing-related stocks. In addition, slower and gradual rate hikes will not impede the growth prospect of the sector, at least in the short term. The most popular choice in the homebuilding space, XHB, follows the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index. In total, the fund holds about 37 securities in its basket with none accounting for more than 5.21% share. The product focuses on mid-cap securities with 67% share, followed by 24% in small caps. The fund has amassed about $1.5 billion in its asset base and trades in heavy volume of more than 3.7 million shares. Expense ratio comes in at 0.35%. XHB added 0.2% on the day and has a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 with a High risk outlook. SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEARCA: XRT ) Retail will also benefit from accelerating job growth though soft wage growth points to reduced spending power. XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, holding 100 securities in its basket. It is widely spread across each component as none of these holds more than 1.78% of total assets. Small-cap stocks dominate about three-fifths of the portfolio while the rest have been split between the other two market cap levels. XRT is the most popular and actively-traded ETF in the retail space with an AUM of about $617.2 million and average daily volume of around 4.4 million shares. It charges 35 bps in annual fees and gained 0.5% on the day. The product has a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 or “Strong Buy” rating with a Medium risk outlook. Stocks to Buy Though several sectors will benefit from healthy hiring, the direct beneficiary is the staffing industry. The industry bodes well at least for the near term given its superb Zacks Industry Rank (in the top 11%) at the time of writing. Investors seeking to ride out the optimism could look at a few top-ranked stocks handpicked by us using our Zacks Stock Screener . These stocks have a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 (Buy), a Growth or Value Style Score of B or better, and an above-average industry earnings growth of 13.7%. Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCRN ) Based in Boca Raton, Florida, Cross Country is a leading healthcare staffing services’ company which primarily focuses on providing nurse and allied, and physician staffing services and workforce solutions. The stock is expected to deliver year-over-year earnings growth of 26.9% in fiscal 2016. It shed 1.2% in Friday’s trading session and currently has a Zacks Rank #2 with a Growth Style Score of “A”. TrueBlue, Inc. (NYSE: TBI ) Based in Tacoma, Washington, TrueBlue is a leading provider of staffing, recruitment process outsourcing, and managed services in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The company’s earnings are expected to growth 48.4% year over year in fiscal 2016. TBI gained 0.7% on the day and has a Zacks Rank #1 with a Value Style Score of “B”. Insperity, Inc. (NYSE: NSP ) Based in Kingwood, Texas, Insperity provides an array of human resources and business solutions to enhance the performance of small- and medium-sized businesses in the United States. The company has an incredible earnings growth projection of 53.8% for fiscal 2016. The stock was down 0.2% in Friday’s session and has a Zacks Rank #1 with Growth and Value Style Scores of “A” each. Original post