Tag Archives: lightbox

What Is Your Sell Criteria?

Every stock market cycle has its darlings – the stocks investors believe can do no wrong. I remember 1999 all too well. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT ) and Dell (private since 2013) were two of the stocks that investors fell in love with during that era. However, those investors soon learned that loving a stock could have nasty consequences, because it is difficult to part with something you love. These stocks, and many others, were devastated in the ensuing months and years. The “unattached” owners of these stocks disposed of their holdings as prices dropped or earnings failed to materialize. These disciplined investors had pre-defined criteria to alert them it was time to sell. The stock lovers lacked such discipline and went through various stages of denial, justification, rationalization and other emotions as they watched their beloved stocks sink lower and lower. In the current market cycle, it’s hard to imagine a stock that is more loved than Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ). Back in 1999, it was despised, and many analysts were not convinced the company would even survive, let alone flourish. Fast forward to 2012, it became the most valuable company in history in terms of market capitalization, surpassing Microsoft’s December 30, 1999, valuation. Yesterday, it was still the largest component of the S&P 500 Index, accounting for 3.17% of the Index. However, Apple’s stock price peaked 14 months ago at $133. On Tuesday, it closed below $105, and yesterday it closed below $98. That is more than 26% drop in 14 months. Apple released its quarterly earnings report, which is the reason for the new downdraft. Earnings fell short of expectations by coming in at $1.90 per share, which was 10 cents below expectations and 18.5% below a year ago. Revenue fell by 13%, marking its first revenue decline in 13 years, and the first ever since the stock achieved “darling” status. Apple also reported that iPhone sales fell for the first time in history. Now might be a good time to ask yourself if you are an investor or lover of Apple stock. It is already in a bear market, so if you haven’t sold it yet, then when will you sell it? You didn’t sell when it dropped 15%, and you didn’t sell when it dropped 25%. What will it take? A 50% drop? A 70% drop? Two quarters of declining revenue? Many people are selling their Apple shares, perhaps because it posted its first revenue decline in 13 years or perhaps because its price dropped below $100. Then again, an equal number of shares are being bought. It’s a high volume day for Apple. I’m not predicting further demise for Apple stock, as this could turn out to be a great buying opportunity. What I’m suggesting is that you objectively consider your criteria for selling Apple or any other stock. Be sure to have an exit plan, preferably before you buy. As expected, the Federal Reserve took no action at the conclusion of its FOMC meeting yesterday. Analysts are parsing the contents of the press release, so you can expect to see some forecast revisions for when the Fed will make its next move. Sectors: Signs of a significant sector rotation are visible again this week. The smokestack group of sectors, discussed here a week ago, are firmly in the leadership role again today. Energy and Materials swapped the top two positions, with Energy now completing its climb from last to first in the span of three weeks. Materials, now in second, has been no lower than fourth place for eight consecutive weeks. The Industrials sector rounds out the trio by maintaining its third-place position. Financials was a big upside mover, jumping from eighth to fourth. Healthcare also climbed four spots higher to grab sixth. These ascents forced the higher yielding sectors lower with Telecom sliding one place to fifth, Real Estate dropping to eighth, and Utilities plunging to tenth. Technology lost momentum, but it was able to hang on to its ninth-place ranking. Consumer Staples is now the weakest sector and sits on the bottom for a second week. Styles: Small-Cap Value assumed the lead, ending Mid-Cap Value’s seven-week stint at the top. Small-Cap Value has been the most volatile of the style categories, bouncing between second and sixth during these past seven weeks. Mid-Cap Value did not fall far, easing just one spot lower to second, while remaining prepared to resume the lead if Small-Cap Value’s volatility returns. Micro-Cap was the big upside mover, climbing three spots to third after being in last place just two weeks ago. Mid-Cap Blend fell four places to seventh, becoming the largest casualty of the relative strength rankings. However, it only gave up two momentum points in the process, while Mega-Cap lost six points and held its decline to a single spot. Large-Cap Growth is on the bottom for a second week. Global: The upper tier of the global rankings remains very steady with Latin America and Canada supplying the one-two punch for nine consecutive weeks. Pacific ex-Japan and Emerging Markets have not been as consistent as the top two, but the third and fourth place duo have held those spots the majority of these nine weeks. The top three are all resource-rich regions, and they are benefiting from strength in the Materials and Energy sectors. Fifth through tenth-place categories are compressed, allowing Japan to jump four places higher without much effort. A week ago, China was above this grouping, but it plunged six places lower and now sits at the bottom. Disclosure: Author has no positions in any of the securities mentioned and no positions in any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. No income, revenue, or other compensation (either directly or indirectly) is received from, or on behalf of, any of the companies or ETF sponsors mentioned. – See more at: http://investwithanedge.com/what-is-your-sell-criteria#sthash.AfaA2gBD.dpuf

PPL (PPL) William H. Spence on Q1 2016 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

PPL Corp. (NYSE: PPL ) Q1 2016 Earnings Call April 28, 2016 8:30 am ET Executives Joseph P. Bergstein – Vice President-Investor Relations and Treasurer William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Robert A. Symons – Chief Executive Officer, Western Power Distribution, PPL Corp. Vincent Sorgi – Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President Gregory N. Dudkin – President & Director, PPL Electric Utilities Corp. Analysts Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC Operator Good morning, and welcome to the PPL Corporation First Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After this presentation there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this – that it’s (00:38) being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Bergstein, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Joseph P. Bergstein – Vice President-Investor Relations and Treasurer Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the PPL conference call on first quarter results and our general business outlook. We’re providing slides of this presentation on our website at www.pplweb.com. Any statements made in this presentation about future operating results or other future events are forward-looking statements under the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. A discussion of factors that could cause actual results or events to differ is contained in the Appendix to this presentation and in the company’s SEC filings. We will refer to earnings from ongoing operations or ongoing earnings, a non-GAAP measure, on this call. For reconciliations to the GAAP measure, you should refer to the press release, which has been posted on our website and has been filed with the SEC. At this time I’d to turn the call over to Bill Spence, PPL Chairman, President and CEO. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Thank you, Joe. Good morning, everyone. We’re pleased that you’ve joined us this morning. With me on the call today are Vince Sorgi, PPL’s Chief Financial Officer; and the Presidents of our U.S. and U.K. utility businesses. Moving to slide three, our agenda this morning starts with a discussion of our 2016 ongoing earnings forecast, an overview of our first quarter 2016 earnings results, and an operational overview. Following my remarks, Robert Symons, Chief Executive of our Western Power Distribution subsidiary, will provide an update on expected U.K. incentive revenues for 2017 and 2018, which we are increasing today. And Robert will also provide a general update on the completion of our first year under RIIO-ED1. Vince will then review our segment financials and provide a more detailed financial overview. Let’s move to slide four for a discussion of our 2016 earnings forecast. As we note on this slide, we’re reaffirming our 2016 forecast of $2.25 to $2.45 per share. The midpoint of this range, $2.35 per share, represents growth of 6.3% compared to 2015 earnings from ongoing operations. Our first quarter results were in line with our expectations, and we remain on track to deliver on this forecast despite the warmer-than-normal weather we experienced across our service territories to start this year. The significant investments we continue to make to build tomorrow’s energy infrastructure, coupled with our ability to begin recovering more than 80% of that investment in near real time, will drive our long-term sustainable growth. We expect to achieve compound annual EPS growth through 2018 of 5% to 6% off of our adjusted 2014 earnings from ongoing operations of $2.03 per share. We continue to expect strong EPS growth of 11% to 13% through 2018 from our U.S. operations, with 1% to 3% growth expected in the U.K. Turning to slide five. Today we announced first quarter 2016 reported earnings of $0.71 per share, compared with $0.96 per share from our first quarter 2015 results. Adjusting for special items, first quarter 2016 earnings from ongoing operations were $0.67 per share, compared with $0.77 per share a year ago. As expected, we saw a decline in earnings from ongoing operations in the first quarter as a result of lower earnings in the U.K. This stemmed from lower revenues due to the new price control period that began on April 1 of 2015. Higher domestic margins from rate increases at our Kentucky and Pennsylvania businesses were partially offset by lower sales volumes due to milder winter weather. Vince will go into greater detail on first quarter results a little later in the call, including a discussion of the timing of our U.K. earnings. As Vince will discuss, we did expect variability between quarters, with increased earnings weighted towards the back half of this year. Now let’s move to slide six for an update on our utility operations. This month, PPL Electric Utilities energized its Northeast Pocono transmission line a year ahead of schedule. The project includes 60 miles of new transmission lines, three new substations and additional improvements focused on making the grid more reliable, resilient and secure. We’re confident this line will deliver significant benefits for our customers. Completing major transmission project like this one, or like the Susquehanna-Roseland line we completed last spring, takes expertise in construction and project management. It also requires working closely with the public and coordinating with various permitting agencies. We’ve shown our ability to excel in these areas and deliver successful outcomes for our customers and our share owners. Turning to Kentucky, Louisville Gas and Electric and Kentucky Utilities continue to invest in environmental upgrades at existing generation facilities, while strengthening the diversity of our generation fleet. In late January, we filed environmental compliance and cost recovery plans with the Kentucky Public Service Commission, seeking approval and environmental cost recovery for $1 billion in upcoming environmental improvement projects. These projects are largely aimed at ensuring compliance with the EPA’s new Coal Combustion Residuals rule, which took effect the last year. The projects will involve capping and closing remaining ash ponds at our coal-fired power plants, building process water facilities and completing the second phase of a dry storage landfill project at our E.W. Brown generating station. The application review process before the Kentucky Public Service Commission is proceeding as we would expect. We expect to begin investments in these environmental improvements in the second half of 2016, and those will continue through 2023. In addition, we’re on track to complete the final baghouse installation at our Mill Creek generating station by June. This follows previous installations of baghouses at our Trimble County and E.W. Brown generating stations. We also expect to complete Kentucky’s largest solar facility in June. The 10-megawatt facility under construction at our E.W. Brown generating facility represents a cost-effective way to expand the benefits of solar to all customers. While portions of the project continue, we began generating our first solar power from the facility on April 14. Moving to the U.K., we continue to achieve strong performance against our RIIO-ED1 incentive targets, and Robert will now discuss that in more detail. Robert? Robert A. Symons – Chief Executive Officer, Western Power Distribution, PPL Corp. Many thanks, Bill, and good morning. Moving to slide seven. March 31, 2016 marked the end of the first full regulatory year under RIIO-ED1, and we are pleased to be providing an update on our full year performance against the RIIO-ED1 incentive targets. Before I go into the details, I would like to review a few key points of the incentive framework. The primary incentive mechanisms that contribute to incentive revenues include the interruption incentive schemes and the Broad Measure of Customer Satisfaction. Interruption incentive schemes include Customer Interruptions and Customer Minutes Lost. The broad measure of Customer Satisfaction measures the performance of customer satisfaction on a scale from one to 10 against the targets Ofgem has established with customers experiencing interruptions, requesting a connection, or making a general inquiry. Both of these incentive mechanisms are designed to encourage DNOs to invest and operate their networks so as to reduce both the frequency and duration of power outages. Turning to slide eight. On this slide, you will find our full year results against the performance targets set by Ofgem for regulatory year 2015 to 2016. WPD has improved Customer Minutes Lost and Customer Interruptions performance metrics by approximately 8% over the 2014 throughout 2015 regulatory year, which resulted in earning 77% of the maximum potential payout. This year, our operational efforts contributing to this success included several major asset replacement projects, significant rural network automation, and outperforming previous years’ reliability performance. As it relates to broad measure of customer satisfaction, WPD has also received reaccreditation to the U.K. government-sponsored customer service excellence standard and has once again achieved the highest level of compliance, which further demonstrates our continued commitment to excellent customer service. As shown back on slide seven and based on our better-than-expected performance on the quality of service and customer satisfaction, we now expect to achieve $115 million in total incentive revenue in calendar year 2017, above our prior range of $90 million to $110 million for 2017. As a reminder, these incentive revenues, while earned during the 2015 to 2016 regulatory year, will be received in the 2017/2018 regulatory year. These amounts are internal estimates until final determination is received from Ofgem in November 2016. We expect these favorable results to continue into the next regulatory year. Even with targets that get progressively tougher, we are increasing our guidance range from $75 million to $105 million in incentive revenues in calendar year 2018, to $85 million to $115 million. Overall, the first year of RIIO-ED1 is broadly in line with our published business plan as accepted by Ofgem. We are focused on delivering excellent customer service, achieving the outputs and incentives while delivering safe, reliable and sustainable network service. We’ve been also recognized by Ofgem for our innovative work on providing quicker and alternative network connections for solar, and we continue to hold stakeholder workshops reviewing our results from the first year of RIIO-ED1, while planning for the future by discussing long-term strategic priorities, such as reporting smart networks and affordability. Vince will now walk you through a more detailed look at segment earnings. Vince? Vincent Sorgi – Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President Thank you, Robert. And good morning, everyone. Let’s move to slide 10. Our first quarter regulated utility earnings from ongoing operations decreased from last year, driven primarily by expected lower U.K. Regulated segment earnings as a result of the April 1, 2015 price decrease, as we began our first year under the RIIO-ED1 framework and the effects of foreign currency, offset by an improvement in the Pennsylvania Regulated segment. While the Kentucky Regulated segment and Corporate and Other remained flat compared to a year ago. Let’s briefly discuss domestic weather for the first quarter compared to last year and compared to plan. Mild temperatures during the first quarter of 2016 had an unfavorable impact for our domestic segment, a total of $0.04 compared to the prior year, with $0.02 in Pennsylvania and $0.02 in Kentucky. Compared to our plan, weather had a negative $0.02 impact, with a $0.01 impact in each of the domestic segments. Heating degree days were about 11% lower than normal in the first quarter 2016 for both Kentucky and Pennsylvania. While weather in the U.K. was also unfavorable to plan and the prior year, with Q1 being the mildest winter in recorded history for the U.K., it was not a primary driver of our results for the U.K. segment. And as Bill mentioned in his remarks, despite this unfavorable weather for Q1, we remain confident that we will continue to meet our 2016 earnings guidance of $2.25 to $2.45 per share. Let’s move to a more detailed review of the first quarter segment earnings drivers, starting with the Pennsylvania results on slide 11. Our Pennsylvania Regulated segment earned $0.14 per share in the first quarter of 2016, a $0.01 increase compared to the same period last year. This increase was due to higher distribution margins as a result of the 2015 rate case that became effective January 1, 2016, and higher transmission margins due to additional capital investments, partially offset by lower volumes due to unfavorable weather. Higher margins were partially offset by higher O&M, primarily due to higher support costs and maintenance related work, mostly attributable to timing. Moving to slide 12. Our Kentucky Regulated segment earned $0.16 per share in the first quarter of 2016, flat compared to a year ago. This result was due to lower O&M, primarily due to the closure of the Cane Run and Green River coal stations in 2015, offset by higher financing costs due to higher debt balances to fund CapEx. Higher gross margins from higher base rates that went into effect July 1 of last year were offset by lower sales volumes, primarily due to the less favorable weather. Turning to slide 13. Our U.K. Regulated segment earned $0.39 per share in the first quarter 2016, an $0.11 decrease compared to last year, primarily driven by lower prices in RIIO-ED1 and the effects of foreign currency. In our plan, we had expected about a $0.10 decrease year-over-year for Q1, so the actual results are consistent with our expectations. I’ll provide additional details on the shape of our 2016 U.K. earnings forecast after I walk through the quarter compared to last quarter’s results. The quarter-on-quarter decrease was due to lower gross margins resulting from lower prices as we transitioned to RIIO-ED1 on April 1, 2015 of about $0.08 per share, and unfavorable effects of foreign currency of about $0.03 per share, which included some 2016 restrikes executed during the quarter to hedge 2018 earnings. The other variances for the U.K. were not significant and offset each other. So taking a closer look at our full year U.K. segment forecast. As noted on our year-end earnings call and the 2016 ongoing earnings update that Bill just provided, we are projecting a $0.01 decrease in U.K. segment earnings year-over-year. However, there is significant variability between the quarters with lower earnings in Q1 and Q2 and higher earnings in Q3 and Q4. We expect lower margins in the first half of the year as a result of the RIIO-ED1 revenue reset. That revenue reset occurred at the beginning of the regulatory year on April 1, 2015. And since we report WPD on a one-month lag, we will still see some effect of that revenue reset continue into the second quarter, an additional $0.02 per share above the $0.08 for Q1. This decrease is expected to be primarily offset by the price increase beginning April 1, 2016 and allowed revenues under the RIIO-ED1 framework, and from the recovery of prior customer rebates beginning April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017, which will positively impact 2016 earnings by about $0.05. We also expect this revenue recovery to positively affect 2017 earnings by another $0.02 to $0.03. In addition, we are projecting lower O&M expenses in the back half of the year, primarily related to higher vegetation management in Q4 of last year and lower expected pension expense in 2016. All of these factors contribute to the shaping of our earnings for the U.K. this year compared to last year. Moving to slide 14. On this slide, we provide an update to our GBP hedging status for 2016, 2017 and 2018, including sensitivities for a $0.05, $0.10 and $0.15 downward movement in the exchange rate compared to our budgeted rate of $1.60 on open positions. First, we are 93% hedged for the remainder of 2016 at an average rate of $1.54. For 2017, we’re still hedged at 89% at an average rate of $1.58. And for 2018, we’ve continued to layer on hedges during the quarter and have increased our hedge percentage from 20% at year-end to 41% today, at an average rate of $1.56. You can see from the sensitivity table that there’s minimal exposure in 2016 and 2017, and about $0.03 of exposure in 2018 for every $0.05 below our budgeted rate of $1.60. As I mentioned during our year-end call, our business plan provided enough capacity to hedge about 50% of our 2018 U.K. earnings exposure through restrikes. However, at this point, we will refrain from adding additional 2018 hedges until after the U.K. referendum vote on June 23. Moving to slide 15. On this slide, we are providing an update on RPI. Now that 2015/2016 regulatory year has concluded, the final RPI rate was 1.1% and was based on the Office of National Statistics’ average RPI index from April 2015 through March 2016. If you recall, in the third quarter of 2015, we had incorporated a 1.3% RPI rate in our 2015/2016 planning assumptions, compared to the 2.6% included in our tariffs. That true-up will flow through allowed revenues in 2017 and 2018, and has already been incorporated in our earnings growth projections. The additional downside from our budgeted 1.3% rate will not have a material impact on earnings in either 2017 or 2018. Our planning assumptions for 2016/2017, 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 have not changed since our year-end update. And as you can see, the current forecast from the HM Treasury for all periods are in line with our current assumption. That concludes my prepared remarks, and I’ll turn the call back over to Bill for the question-and-answer period. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Great. Thank you, Vince. And thanks for everyone’s participation on today’s call. I’d like to first summarize by saying that we remain confident in where we’re headed. We’re solidly on track to deliver on our earnings forecast for 2016, and we expect to deliver compound annual EPS growth of 5% to 6% through 2018. We’re pleased the WPD team has had such a successful first year under RIIO-ED1, and have outperformed incentive expectations. As Robert mentioned earlier, we are raising our expectation for incentive revenues from $90 million to $110 million, to $115 million for 2017, and from $75 million to $105 million, to $85 million to $115 million for 2018. This level of performance is consistent with WPD’s long history of operational excellence. Across all of our businesses, we continue to invest in tomorrow’s energy infrastructure, the strength and the diversity of our generation fleet, and to drive continuous improvements aimed at exceeding customer expectations and delivering power safely, reliably and affordably. And as I stated in my recent message to shareowners in the annual report, I am convinced that our best days are ahead, and I’m very excited about our future. With that, operator, let’s open the call to questions, please. Question-and-Answer Session Operator Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Our first question will come from Paul Zimbardo of UBS. Please go ahead. Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC Hi, good morning. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Good morning, Paul. Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC First, I just wanted to confirm that the U.K. environmental spending you discussed on the prepared remarks is included in the CapEx plan? William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer In the CapEx plan that we have for U.K., there’s very little that I would classify as environmental spending. You may be referring, perhaps, to the… Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC Sorry, that’s KU. Kentucky. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Yes. Oh, I’m sorry. Yeah. So, within Kentucky Utilities, yes. The environmental spending for the plans, as articulated, really deal with the match rule (22:25) and a lot of the combustion ash disposal costs that we need to incur. It does not include any Clean Power Plan CapEx spending, which would be incremental, should that come back into play. But with the stay at the Supreme Court level of the CPP, we’re not anticipating to update the capital at this time. Vincent Sorgi – Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President But the billion that we filed is in the plan. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Yes. Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC Okay. Great. And then, turning to Compass, could you give a brief update on kind of the initial segment? And then, with respect to future segments, should we expect the in-service on those is ahead of this one with 2023, or longer dated? William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Okay. I’ll ask Greg Dudkin, President of our Electric Utilities Group in Pennsylvania to address that. Gregory N. Dudkin – President & Director, PPL Electric Utilities Corp. Yeah. So where we are in Compass, we put together an interconnection request for the New York ISO on the 95-mile segment, I guess we call it mini Compass. So what we’re waiting for is for the ISO to come back with an approval that all the specifications and reliability impact is positive and then we proceed with what’s called an Article 7 (23:46) which is a siding application, basically. So that’s where we are there. We’re still, for that portion, at 2021 to 2023 timeframe. We’re continuing to look at the other components of Compass. And at this point, it wouldn’t be before 2021 or 2023, it would be during that time or maybe a little after. Paul A. Zimbardo – UBS Securities LLC Okay, great. Thank you very much. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Thanks, Paul. Operator Our next question will come from Anthony Crowdell of Jefferies. Please go ahead. Mr. Crowdell? William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Good morning, Anthony. Operator Your line is open, Mr. Crowdell. It may be muted. Mr. Crowdell, your line is open. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Okay, operator. We’ll move on if there are any other questions in the queue. Operator Okay, thank you. At this time, I am not showing any further questions in the queue. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Okay. We do have – as far as you can tell, operator, the lines are all open and available for questions, correct? Operator Yes. That is correct. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Okay. I just wanted to verify. Operator Okay. William H. Spence – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer Okay. Well, since there are no further questions, we’ll assume that everything was crystal clear, and that we look forward to the second quarter earnings call. So thanks for joining us today on the call. Thank you, operator. Operator Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect your lines. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

Loans And Write-Downs And Shares… Oh My!

My family and I recently went to see the musical Wicked . Having already been with my wife when it first opened in 2003, I was thrilled to relive the awesome and spine-tingling performance with my kids. The creative genius of Wicked is its backstory – the plot that no one hears throughout the Wonderful Wizard of Oz . Turns out, the wizard isn’t really all that wonderful, and the witch isn’t so wicked after all. This got me thinking about parallels to the world of finance and how things aren’t always as they seem. We all know that the S&P/TSX Composite Index is heavily skewed toward the financials (37%), energy (20%) and materials (12%) sectors, but attitudes towards these industries have become rather split lately. In the past few years, financials have been all aglow thanks to consistently improving quarterly results, whereas the resource sectors have been a source of pain amid lower earnings, dividend cuts and write-downs. While faith in the financial sector may be justified, investors might not realize just how dependent the Canadian stock market has become on its earnings and dividends. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, while financials make up more than a third of the market cap, the sector accounts for more than 50% of the earnings and slightly less than half of the dividends paid on the S&P/TSX Composite Index. Click to enlarge Something wicked this way comes? Outsized dependencies are rarely a good thing in investment portfolios. For example, in the late 1990’s investors became overly dependent on technology companies trading at ever higher multiples, and then found themselves in a post-financial-crisis love affair with emerging markets. In both of these cases, investors paid too little attention to the backstory: technology had become more than a third of the S&P 500 and paid no earnings, and emerging markets had become reliant on leverage and an ever-expanding China. Investors also became overly dependent on U.S. financials a decade ago when the sector contributed more than 50% of the S&P 500’s earnings and dividends in 2006 only to fall off a cliff when the financial crisis hit two years later. The financial sector also grew to almost a quarter of the listed market in 2006, well above today’s level of 17% (still high but just not as high). Does this mean Canadian financials are due for some sort of rude awakening? Not necessarily. It depends on whether Canadian banks will report more bad loans and will have to incur larger write-downs than are currently reflected in loan loss provisioning or the share price. Intuitively, the nearly 70% decline in oil prices over the past two years and the broadening difficulties in the Canadian energy patch would imply a greater risk of loan defaults. Moreover, banks could see declining revenue growth and weaker revenues as the indirect consequences of low oil prices work through the extensive supply chain. But for now, these worries are the backstory. Canadian share prices are following the lead story: The banks’ exposures are manageable, the banks are prepared, and they continue to stress-test their loan book. Importantly, investors should know what their exposures are. Right now, investors in Canadian stocks are highly dependent on earnings and dividends from the big banks. If Canadian financials were to dip, investors could be in for a rude awakening. With any luck, the energy and materials stocks won’t seem as wicked if the rise in commodity prices in recent weeks supports upward earnings revisions in the next few quarters. The best outcome for reducing dependency on the financials is growing earnings from other sectors, not falling earnings from the banks. What can Canadian investors do to help reduce dependencies and limit outsized domestic exposures to the financial, energy and materials sectors? I would recommend considering allocations to two sectors that are underrepresented in the Canadian equity markets, such as global healthcare and technology, where there has been better dividend growth and stronger secular growth trends. Source: Bloomberg. This post originally appeared on the BlackRock Blog