Tag Archives: lightbox

Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo-SABESP’s (SBS) Management on Q1 2016 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo-SABESP (NYSE: SBS ) Q1 2016 Earnings Conference Call May 17, 2016 9:30 AM ET Executives Mário Arruda Sampaio – Head-Capital Market and Investor Relations Analysts Henrique Peretti – J.P. Morgan Operator Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, we would like to welcome everyone to SABESP’s Conference Call to discuss its Results for the First Quarter of 2016. The audio for this conference is being broadcast simultaneously through the Internet on the website, www.sabesp.com.br. At that same address, you can also find the slideshow presentation available for download. We would like to inform you that all participants will be only able to listen to the conference during the company’s presentation. After the company’s remarks are over, there will be a Q&A period. At that time, further instructions will be given. [Operator Instructions] Before proceeding, let me mention that forward-looking statements are being made under the Safe Harbor of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of SABESP’s Management and on information currently available to the company. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to future events and, therefore, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Investors should understand that general economic conditions, industry conditions and other operating factors could also affect the future results of SABESP and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Today with us, we have Mr. Rui Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer; Mr. Mário Arruda Sampaio, Head of Capital Market and Investor Relations; and Mr. Marcelo Miyagui, Head of Accounting. Now, I’ll turn the conference over to Mr. Arruda Sampaio. Sir, you may begin your conference. Mário Arruda Sampaio Okay, thank you and good morning everybody. This is one more first quarter here at 2016 conference call. We have nine slides in front of us and as usual afterwards we will have a question-and-answer session. So let’s get started on Slide 3, here we show the company’s billed volume and then sewage volume, which was up by 1.9% in the first quarter of 2016 with an increase of 1% in water and 3% in sewage compared to the first quarter of 2015. Thanks to a greater water availability, which has allowed us to increase the volume distributed to our consumers this was the first quarter since the beginning of the crisis in the early 2014 in which we have recorded an increase in billed volume. It is important to bear in mind that since January 2016 we have not been using water from the technical reserve and the water pressure reduction in the distribution network has been limited to nine time period as was the case before the crisis. The Company is producing more water to be distributed to consumers and we are authorized now to move up to 23 cubic meters per second from the Cantareira systems since February as opposed to the 13 to 15 cubic meters per second we were authorized to withdraw in most of the period the greatest periods in months of 2015. As a result of the increased water availability we also increased water production volume by 8.8%. Now moving to slide 4, quickly over the financial results net operating revenue increased 22.7% over the same period last year, it produced 15.2% tariff increase since June 2015. The lower granting of bonus with an impact of 153.8 million in the first quarter of 2016 versus 211.2 million in first quarter 2015. The application of contingency tariff in the amount of 160 million in the first quarter this year against 79.3 in first quarter 2015 and a 1.9% up turn in total build volume and 1% of which is water and 3% is sewage as mentioned in the previous slide. Municipalities commercial and constructions costs increased 76.3% in the period adjusted and that totaled 907 million against 1.35 billion recorded last quarter. While the adjusted EBITDA margin came to 30% this quarter against 55% last years the same first quarter. If we exclude the effects of construction revenue in cost the adjusted EBIDA margin was 37.2% this quarter against 71.6 in 2015 first quarter. Net income totaled 628.8 million against 318.2 million first quarter 2105. Let’s move on to Slide 5. Let’s go through quickly the main variations in costs in relation to the same period last year. In comparison with the first quarter of 2015, there was a 76.3% increase in construction costs and expenses. We exclude the construction costs, cost expenses climbed by 127.4%. However, if we exclude the effects of the non-recurring GESP, it’s our agreement with the state of São Paulo that we made last quarter, and the reimbursement of R$696 million, costs and expenses increased 16.7%. The main items that influenced this upturn were the increase of 312% in general expenses, 51% in electricity, 18.6% in the allowance for doubtful accounts, and 7.4% in payroll, benefits and social security obligations. Again for more detail in all these costs variations, please refer to our earnings and any doubt, as usual, call us. Let’s go to Slide 6. Here, we represent again quickly the main variations year-over-year in the items that affected our net income, which again totaled R$628.8 million. Net operating revenue increased R$559.2 million, or 22.7%. Costs and expenses, including construction costs, increased R$1.41 billion, or 76.3%. Other operating revenue and expenses had a negative variation of R$25.6 million. Net financial expenses monetary restatement and foreign exchange variations had a positive variation of 1.3 billion, mostly due in great – almost all due to the depreciation of the dollar and the Yen against the Real in first quarter that is the dollar reduced 8.9% and the Yen 2.4%. All this compared within the appreciation in the first quarter of 2015 [Audio Disturbance] 20.8% for the dollar and 20.3% for the Yen. Finally, income tax and social contribution increased R$507.7 million, due to the increase in taxable income recorded in the first quarter 2016, when compared with the tax loss recorded in first quarter last year. Now let’s move on to Slide 7 and Slide 8. Here we will go through a brief update on rainfall and water inflow in the Cantareira System. On Slide 7 we can observe that after rainfall and water inflow inline with expected average for the rain period in the Cantareira system which ended in March, it was a very dry with very low rainfall. Now let’s move to Slide 8 and here we can see that in April despite this lower rainfall the Cantareira system recorded an average water inflow again which is the water that flows into the reservoir that will be built reservoir capacity and this was a 24.1 cubic meters per second volume that is below the historical average was a period was higher than the one absorbed last year in the year before that during the big crisis period. Going overall to the talking about the reservoir conditions when we compared with 2015 and 2014, as we have already mentioned during the rainy period which began in October last year and then end at March this year rainfall and water inflow return to the expected average was a period allowing the recovery of the reservoirs. Remember that we have the collaboration of the population in saving water and that reacts to that measures we’ve taken to manage water supply and demand, it merges you were just carried out by the company the water network pressure management to reduce water losses and again the return to rainfall is expected to on average was a period has allowed us to end April with a start volume of 1.34 billion liters of water compared with 589 billion liters in April 2015 and in these both cases we included that clinical reserve and 556 billion liters in it compared to April 2014 but in this case we do not include the technical reserve. Now again due to the investments undertaking to extract water from the technical reserve in 2016 the company has 545 billion liters more than 2015 and 578 billion liters more than 2014 obviously this figure last its prior to the technical reserve, our ability to tap technical reserve. Now again just a beginning of the bonus program in February 2014 to the end of April there was a savings of 332 billion liters of water, this is the amount of the water we saved, to give you an idea of what this represents this is equivalent to almost two Guarapiranga reservoirs and the amounts saved is sufficient to supply to entire population for the São Paulo metro region for approximately 100 days. Now from April to September, as you probably know, first the dry period and it was period of expected lower and less bulky rainfall. Remember also that along with the dry period there was a reduction in temperature and hence a reduction in the volume of water used by people. This is very important to set expectations for the upcoming month. Well then in some reservoirs received water during the rainy period in excess of demand, and the actual amount is unused during the drought. Remember, it’s very important to remember that. And then considering that the reservoir levels at the end of March, the beginning of the dry period, even with a very low rainfall in April as previously commented, it does not alter the decision taken by the company so far, especially concerning dam of the contingency tariff on this program and they increase in production and supply of trees and water. Now let’s move to Slide 10. Here we can see the evolution of water production in the metro region of São Paulo from the beginning of the water crisis in February 14 all the way to April 16. The increase in production since October 15 until now is reported by the recovery of the reservoirs and very much driven by two factors. The first factor is the authorization to increase water withdraw from the Cantareira system, again, which went from close to 14 cubic meters to 19 cubic meters in January this year and now 23 cubic meters since February. Second is the completion of the interconnection of the building’s reservoir to the Alto Tietê system which we have been commenting, which enabled the transfer of 4 cubic meters per second from back to the reservoir. Note, there’s greater water availability in the Alto Tietê system, increases the water security of this system consequently for the entire metro region. And so though the necessary works carried out by the company in the years of 2014 and 2015 resulted in 6.5 cubic meters of more water available for treatment. Furthermore, as already mentioned in previous calls, the Sao Lourenço water system with 31.9% of the work already carried out, is scheduled for completion in late 2017. Remember that this system is totally new and increase of the bulk water availability and treatment capacity for the metro region São Paulo at 6 cubic meters per second. Again, also on the construction, the Jaguari and Atibainha reservoir interconnection project will add an average of 5.13 cubic meters per second of bulk water availability to the metro region of São Paulo through the Cantareira system. In this case the construction has begun. It’s already on work since February this year and should be ready by 2017. So, in total, in the period of 2015 to 2017, there will be an expansion in the water availability and security of close to 21 cubic meters per second and an increase in production of 7.4 cubic meters per second. Just to put in perspective prior to the crisis, we have an approximately 75 cubit meters of both water availability and close to 70 cubic meters of water production capacity. So this is a very big leap in a very short-term, increasing substantially our water security for the metro region. So, in summary, our active management of water supply and demand in the region, the greater availability and increased water security and the average and favorable rainy seasons 2015-16 are all very positive factors that allow us to say that we are today in a better conjuncture and structural situation than last year and with a greater certainty to face the balance of this year and next year. Let’s go to our last slide. We will comment here on the tariff adjustment and the cancellation of the bonus program and the contingency tariff. As you probably know, on March 31, ARSESP accepted our request for the cancelation of the bonus program and the contingency tariffs for the bills metered as of May 1. This progress was made in light of the improved water conditions combined with the conclusion and the advanced progress of works to increase water security, which allows us for greater predictability of water source conditions and water security levels in the metro regions of São Paulo. This inception in February 2015 until the end of March 2016 as well this program resulted in a reduction of revenues in the period of R$1.456 billion. This reduction was partially offset by an additional revenue of R$660 million obtained with the implementation of the contingency tariff. So in net terms, during the application period, the bonus program and the contingency tariffs had a negative effect on revenues of R$796 million. As we move forward, we will not see that. So considering this, the cancellation of these two measures, especially the bonus program and with its incentive to reduce consumption, the effects of this reduction in billed volume and average price given that a lower consumption leads to a lower tariff rate no longer will occur suggesting a recovery of revenue in the coming quarters. On April 11, in line with the regulatory agenda, so we are exactly on time and moving on the regulatory agenda assessed public resolution 643 which authorized us to apply a tariff increase of 8.4478% as of May 12. This index comes from the inflation index implementation of 9.3864 estimated based on the EPCA variation from March 15 to March 16 and it excludes the productivity factor of 0.9386%, considering our consumption of – our consumption reading cycles and the procedures we have to go through. Please take note that the full impact of this tariff adjustment and the bonus cancelation will be observed only fully in the second half of 2016 were precisely as of August. The full impact of this adjustment as you can see we will see a better as we move on. So finally these are our remarks, now we will open for questions. Question-and-Answer Session Operator [Operator Instructions] It appears there are no questions now I will turn the conference back over to SABESP for their final remarks. Pardon me, sir. We do have one question from Henrique Peretti with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Henrique Peretti Hi, Arruda, thanks for the opportunity. I would like to understand why billed volumes increased only 1.9% if water production volumes increased 8.8% in the quarter, where is the gap here? Mário Arruda Sampaio Okay – Henrique, this is Mário. The reason they don’t match is that we have the take-or-pay range of zero to ten cubic meters. So if people consumed that we still tried the same thing. So that is the difference. So people are probably moving within that range, consuming more within that range, but not sufficient to trigger aggressively a change in category. So to the great extent the take-or-pay from zero to ten cubic meters is what causes this effect, okay. Henrique Peretti Okay thank you. Operator As there are no further this concludes our question-and-answer session. I’ll turn the conference back over to SABESP for their final remarks. Mário Arruda Sampaio Okay guys first let me just make a quick correction on my speech here. The bonus cancellation in the continuous direct cancellations will have immediate effect on revenues as of May 1. Okay different than I said it will be differed, if it’s not differed, it’s immediate, they only differ full effect if the tariff increase. So okay, made that correction thank you very much for your participation. So let’s comeback next quarter. Hopefully good news also. Thank you very much. Bye-bye. Operator The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect. Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY’S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS. If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com . Thank you!

Time For Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs?

Treasury bond yields are now at extremely low levels as investors are thronging this safe haven to beat global growth worries. Plus, monetary stimulus in various corners of the world and a still-dovish Fed have kept the yield low. The benchmark 10-year note yield was 1.71% as of May 13, 2016. Uncertainties are expected to remain in the marketplace for some more time because neither has oil recovered fully nor has any concrete solution been found yet for China, Japan and Eurozone. Yes, these economies are striving to boost growth, but sustained recovery is unlikely in the near term. In fact, the upheaval in global financial markets has forced the Fed to stay put so far this year even after raising the key interest rate for the first time after almost a decade. Many market watchers now expect the Fed to hike rates again in September and not in its next meeting in June. All these definitely point to lower Treasury yields, which is why Goldman Sachs cut its projection for 10-year US Treasury bond yields over the next few years. Many other banks also believe the same. Goldman Sachs now expects its year-end 10-year yield to be 2.4%, down from the 2.75% it projected in the first quarter. Bank of America Merrill Lynch pared down its forecast for the year-end 10-year yield to 2% from 2.65% at the beginning of the year. Morgan Stanley projects a lower 10-year yield at 1.75%, down from 2.7% when the year started. In short, yield-hungry investors intending to restrict their plays within the U.S. boundaries but not trying to expose themselves to the stock market uncertainties, would find investment grade corporate bonds compelling options. The investment grade U.S. corporate bond market has been on a decent path lately as these normally yield more than their Treasury cousins, with only a little rise in risk. Since corporate leverage is presently at its peak level in a decade (as per Goldman Sachs ), investors need to be aware of default risks. Now, default risk remains low if investors put their money into investment-grade bonds of some well-established companies. Further, if the global economic situation deteriorates and risk-off trade starts to prevail, high yield bonds will be hit harder than the investment grade bonds. Investors thus can take a look at below-mentioned investment-grade bond ETFs which offer solid yields and scope for decent capital gains. Investors should note that the below-mentioned ETFs yield higher than iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: TLT ) (as 30-day SEC yield of TLT was 2.44% as of May 11, 2016) and returned slightly better than it in the last one-month period (as of May 13, 2016). TLT was up about 1.4% in the last one month (as of May 13, 2016). SPDR Barclays Long Term Corp Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: LWC ) This fund intends to mainly measure the performance of U.S. corporate bonds that have a maturity of greater than or equal to 10 years. The corporate bonds have a high investment grade rating as well. The ETF has a weighted average maturity of 23.84 years and a weighted average duration of 14.03 years. The ETF is an appropriate choice for investors seeking high yield. The ETF’s yield-to-maturity hovers around 4.46% (as of May 12, 2016). The fund returned about 2.8% in the last one month (as of May 13, 2016). It has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 (Hold) with a High risk outlook. iShares 10+ Year Credit Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: CLY ) The fund holds a basket of 1,710 investment grade long-term bonds having a 30-day SEC yield of 4.20% (as of May 11, 2016). The fund does a good job by spreading its assets well among various sectors. Consumer Non-Cyclical tops the list with 13.90% allocation, followed by 12.30% to Communications and 9.8% to Electric. CLY has a weighted average maturity of 23.29 years and an effective duration of 13.11 years. The fund charges 20 basis points as fees. The fund was up about 1.6% in the last one month (as of May 13, 2016) and has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a High risk outlook. Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ: VCLT ) The fund holds a basket of 1,661 high-quality corporate bonds having a yield-to-maturity of 4.4%. The fund puts 69% weight in the industrials sector followed by 17.9% in finance. VCLT has a weighted average maturity of 23.9 years and an effective duration of 14.0 years. The fund charges 10 basis points as fees. The fund gained about 2.3% in the last one month (as of May 13, 2016) and has a Zacks ETF Rank #3 with a High risk outlook. Original Post

Why Some Funds Become Closet Trackers

By Detlef Glow Click to enlarge Closet trackers or closet indexing funds are a hot topic in Europe. Market observers are questioning the added value delivered by active managers who follow their index very closely, and regulators are looking into the business models of those asset managers. A number of funds under review with regard to closet indexing charge active management fees. Even though this seems to be a worthwhile topic for discussion, the critical discussion may go too far, as Jake Moeller-Thomson Reuters Lipper’s Head of U.K. and Ireland Research-described in his article ” Closet Trackers – Storm in a Teacup ” published earlier this year. From my point of view the discussion of closet indexing misses two very important reasons that may lead fund managers to a closed indexing approach: the size of the fund and the risk management process employed by the asset manager. Fund Size One point often neglected when discussing closet indexing is that funds may need to move in the direction of the index when they grow in size. The reason for this is quite simple: The larger a fund gets, the higher the order volume in a given security becomes. Since the securities in the index normally offer the best liquidity, the fund manager may need to buy these securities to fulfill the liquidity needs of the fund and its investors. Other than a fund promoter limiting access to a given fund by subscription rules, there are two common strategies a fund manager, driven by fund flows, can use to avoid becoming a closet tracker. Neither strategy may favor the fund promoter, since they limit fund sales, but both strategies seem appropriate to protect a fund from becoming too big. The first strategy is the so-called soft closing of a fund, meaning that only investors who already hold shares of the fund can buy additional shares. This technique is very commonly used by fund promoters, but it doesn’t help when the existing investors continue to buy more and more shares of the fund. In this case it is time for a hard closing, meaning no one can buy additional shares of the fund. Since investors can still sell shares of the fund, there is a chance the fund will reopen. In some cases the fund promoter maintains a waiting list, and all redeemed shares are sold directly to an investor from this list. As with a closed-end fund, it is always possible to list an open-end mutual fund on an exchange so that the redemptions can be directed to investors looking for shares of the fund. Risk Management Process A second reason for being a closet tracker might be the risk management process of the asset manager. Risk in this case is defined as additional risk to the benchmark (index) of the fund and not the risk of losing money. The holdings of the fund are monitored against the constituents of the benchmark, and the portfolio manager has only limited room to move away from the benchmark in terms of sector, country, and regional weightings. In some cases fund managers also are restricted at the securities level, so that a negative view on a single security means this security has a 10% lower weighting in the fund than in the benchmark. For example, the weighting for the security in the index is 3% while it is 2.7% in the fund. Such internal rules and guidelines lead automatically to closet indexing, and one can’t blame the fund manager for this. Even though the risk management process is a very important part of the due-diligence process of fund selectors, selectors need to think very carefully about the impact on the fund manager coming from the overall portfolio and risk management process. From my point of view every fund that charges a fee for active management should not stick too closely to its index, since this limits the ability to deliver an above-benchmark return to the investors. But on the other hand, it is the duty of the fund selector to identify those limits and to make a decision about whether the fund is the right vehicle for the investor. For retail investors it is even harder to evaluate the performance potential of a fund, since retail investors often have the chance to select a fund only based on its past performance and the official documents such as the fund prospectus and the key investor information document (KIID). This means a retail investor has to monitor the performance of the funds in his portfolio even more closely, since that might be his only chance to identify closet trackers and to make a decision as to whether to continue holding the fund. I think litigation, especially when institutional investors are involved, such as that being undertaken in the Nordic countries, is the wrong tack, and it will/should not be successful. The investor bought the fund for a reason and needs to check it frequently to see that the vehicle is still the right product for reaching a predefined goal. The views expressed are the views of the author, not necessarily those of Thomson Reuters Lipper.