Tag Archives: latest-articles

Federated Launches New Fund, Expands Alternatives Division

On December 17, Federated announced it was putting the Federated Prudent Bear Fund (MUTF: FVOAX ) under its alternatives/managed-risk product umbrella, expanding that fast-growing division. Federated’s alternative and managed-risk products, which are overseen by Michael Dieschbourg, include managed volatility, absolute return, and managed-tail risk strategies, in addition to the recent arrival of the Prudent Bear Fund. Federated’s Managed Volatility Fund had just launched on December 15, two days prior to the migration of Prudent Bear to Federated’s alternatives division. Both moves are seen as efforts by Federated to enhance its alternatives and managed-risk product team, on the heels of the explosive growth of liquid alts in 2014 and ahead of what’s likely to be another big year for the category in 2015. The Federated Managed Volatility Fund’s objective is to provide total return while minimizing volatility. Its co-advisors pursue this goal by investing in equity and fixed-income securities “with total return potential,” and overlay a managed volatility component to achieve a long-term volatility target of 10%, according to its prospectus . The fund has three co-advisors: Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania (FEMCO), which specializes in the equity portion of the fund’s portfolio, including equity-based derivatives; Federated Investment Management Company (FIMCO), which specializes in the fixed-income portion of the fund’s portfolio; and Fed Global, which along with FEMCO, implements the fund’s managed volatility portion using futures contracts. A couple key points from the prospectus regarding the allocation to equities and fixed income securities : Regarding the composition of the Fund’s portfolio, under normal conditions, it is anticipated that approximately 40% of the Fund’s assets will be invested directly into equity securities and 60% of the Fund’s assets will be invested in fixed-income securities and other investments. Fed Global and FEMCOPA may vary this allocation by +/- 10% for each asset class depending upon its economic and market outlook, as well as a result of favorable investment opportunities. A couple key points from the prospectus regarding the volatility overlay : The Federated Managed Volatility Fund is available in three share-classes: A (FVOAX), C (MUTF: FVOCX ), and IS (MUTF: FVOIX ); with a management fee of 0.75% and respective net-expense ratios of 1.05%, 1.8%, and 0.8%. The minimum initial investment for A- and C-class shares is $1,500; the minimum for institutional-class shares is $1 million. Although the growth in the liquid-alts product category is leading the launch of more alternative mutual funds and ETFs, and the expansion of many large firms’ alternatives divisions, not everyone is experiencing the growth equally. Douglass Nolan, a former manager of the Federated Prudent Bear Fund, has left or is leaving the fund. A December 17 SEC filing from Federated instructs investors to delete the information referencing Mr. Nolan from the Prudent Bear Fund’s prospectus “in its entirety,” but that the change won’t take effect until December 31.

The ABCs Of Mutual Fund Share Classes

Originally published on Nov. 19, 2014 You don’t need to read a prospectus to benefit from knowing the basics about mutual fund share classes. It will help you uncover your actual investing costs (especially when dealing with a broker), avoid unnecessary fees, and boost long-term performance. As you will see, even after you select a fund, it is crucial that you choose the most appropriate share class of that fund. Bringing Funds to the Marketplace Just like a farmer needs to get their crops to market, mutual fund companies work through multiple distribution channels to sell their products. These could include direct sales via online brokerages, sales to pension plans, through a broker, a registered investment advisor, and so forth. Each of these channels has different end clients and associated costs; and because of this, companies have developed different versions (share classes) of the same mutual fund to suit each situation. Typical Mutual Fund Fees Annual Expense Ratio – The ongoing fee to manage and administer the fund. Most investors will never notice this cost since it’s a tiny fraction taken from the share price (NAV) each day. Trading fee – A fee charged by the executing brokerage company/custodian, typically $0 to $50 per buy or sell order. Front-end Load – A sales charge applied when a fund is bought; it typically declines for larger purchase amounts. Back-end Load – A sales charge applied when a fund is sold; it typically declines over several years. Fund Share Classes with an Example “A” shares have a front-end load. “B” shares have a back-end load, but have a lower expense ratio if held long enough. “C” shares have no load after a short time, but have a higher expense ratio. Other shares such as “D” or “Institutional” exist. These shares typically have no load, but may have limited availability. The well-known Pimco Total Return Fund (MUTF: PTRAX ) provides a great illustration of how one mutual fund offers many different share classes of the same fund. Broker Assisted Investors After considering the overall costs from the table above, you will see where the costs are built into the mutual fund structure and sales channels. Brokers are typically compensated by the A, B, or C share classes, but also can get residual compensation via fees built into the mutual fund expense ratio (e.g. 12b-1 fees). Remember, brokers do not have a legal obligation to put you in the “right” share class. So if you are using a broker, be sure to give them more information on how you plan to invest or you could end up paying them larger fees than you should. With a broker for example, if you knew you were going to buy $10,000 of the Pimco Total Return fund, but sell it within 3 years, you will probably be better off with the “C” shares. However, if you have no idea how long you will hold the fund, the “B” shares may be a better bet – since the costs to own will decrease over time. If you had a substantial amount to invest for a long time, the “A” shares may ultimately be the cheapest option even though you are paying the 3.75% front-end load. Advisor Clients Registered Investment Advisors like us typically have “Institutional” share classes available to them. At our firm, we pay close attention to fund expenses and transactions costs for our clients. Because of this, we will frequently use more than one share class of the same fund, or two slightly different funds in the same asset class – all in order to minimize the long-term costs for our clients. It is certainly more complex to juggle the various share classes in a portfolio, but we believe you can use them to your distinct advantage.

Low Risk ETFs Beating SPY In 2014 – ETF News And Commentary

The U.S. economy had a shaky start to this year with a cold snap taking away all the warmth from Q1. To add to this, overvaluation concerns, worries over the withdrawal of QE support in the U.S. and stress between Russia and the West on the Ukrainian issue triggered a flight to safety in the initial months (read: 3 Low Risk ETFs for Market Turmoil ). Though spring sprung more jobs, better housing and manufacturing numbers, and raised confidence in the U.S. citizens leading the economy to advance 4.6% in Q2 and 3.9% in Q3, the global financial market again faltered to close out the year. Concerns over global growth especially in the big three foreign regions ─ Euro zone, Japan and China ─ and rising risks of a sooner-than-expected hike in the U.S. interest rates weighed heavily on stocks this month. Iraq instability, a protest in Hong Kong and Ebola crisis in West Africa have also taken a bite out of stock market returns. If this was not enough, oil prices have moved back to the recession-ridden phase of 2009, losing about 45% since the start of the year (read: Volatility ETFs in Focus on Oil Upheaval ). Russia has once again started to hit headlines for all wrong reasons, with the latest being an upheaval in its currency and bond markets. Notably, Russia resorted to an extremely steep rate hike on December 16 to plug the plunge in its currency which has halved in price against the greenback this year. However, such a desperate move was in vein as the ruble did not find success in arresting its protracted downturn. It seems that Russian tumult and the oil crash will contaminate the risk-on trade sentiment at the end of the year. Investors are getting out of high-growth and high-beta stocks across the globe and seeking refuge in safe and income-oriented assets thanks to sluggish global economic indicators. If this was the snapshot of the year, low risk equities ETFs have all reasons to perform impressively. After all, the S&P has added 12% this year compared to a stellar 35% returned last year. The market sentiment simply moved back and forth with each economic release in the event-loaded 2014. This is especially true as low risk investments can prove quite effective in one’s portfolio in arresting downside risks as compared to high beta products. It is one of the most popular investing themes at present, given the occasional jump in volatility since the start of the year. Below, we have mentioned two low risk ETFs which soothed investors’ nerves in 2014 having returned more than the broader market ETF SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) in the time frame. S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEARCA: XMLV ) This overlooked ETF looks to follow the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. The product invests about $53.2 million in assets in 80 stocks. From a sector look, financials takes half of the portfolio followed by about 15% of assets invested in utilities and 7.4% in materials. The portfolio has minimal company-specific concentration risk with no product accounting for more than 1.63%. Church & Dwight Co., Alleghany Corp and HCC Insurance Holdings are top three choices. The product charges about 25 bps in fees. The fund is up 16.8% so far this year. PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEARCA: SPLV ) This ETF provides exposure to about 100 U.S. stocks with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months by tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Like other two choices, the fund is also widely spread across a number of securities as none of these holds more than 1.27% of assets. However, the product is tilted toward financials at nearly 33% share while utilities (18.1%), consumer staples (18.1%), industrials (12.2%) and health care (7.93%) round off to the top five (read: 3 Utility ETFs Surviving the Market Turmoil ). SPLV is the largest and the most popular ETF in the low volatility space with AUM of $4.98 billion. The fund charges 25 bps in annual fees and is up about 15.3% year to date.