Tag Archives: government

The iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF: AOK Is A-OK

An atypical fund of funds. An unusual construct containing non-traditional ETF sectors. Surprisingly good capital appreciation and consistent monthly dividends. Any individual investor who might catch equity and bond market news in bits and pieces during the course of the day is most likely feeling a bit of angst. Analyst and economist have seemed to become ‘polarized’ in their thinking. Some argue that impending inflation looms on the horizon; other that a fathomless deflation has already begun. Some argue that the global economy is still growing at an above average pace while others claim we’re on the verge of a deep global recession. Who has time to study markets and also go about the daily routine? Then again, what investor can ignore the change in sentiment over the past year? Well, there’s a way to continue with a well-disciplined, consistent investment strategy without taking undo risks and still do quite well. BlackRock’s iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (NYSEARCA: AOK ) ma y be the exact right place to stick with a long term disciplined investment plan and protect those hard earned retirement or future college fund savings until the time is again right to diversify. There are advantages in choosing this ‘fund of funds’ over traditional conservative investments. First, investment dollars are not being locked in as they would be if one had purchased U.S. Treasuries or a major financial institution’s certificate of deposit. Further, its Treasury holdings diversify across the span of all maturities. It’s not exclusively fixed income U.S. Treasuries, but also allocates among equities via other iShares “Core” funds including S&P 500 large, mid and small caps, European and Asia-Pacific core holdings as well as a small emerging market allocations. However, the greatest portion of all of the fund’s asset classes are U.S. focused, or global companies whose business is mostly in U.S. markets. (Data from BlackRock) In order to grasp this fund as a good safe haven play in uncertain times, a closer examination of the allocations, individual components and returns need to be examined in greater detail. For example, a large portion of the fund is classified as ‘ Other ‘ and as ‘ Supranational’ . That’s an unusual name for a sector to say the least! (Data from BlackRock) According to Investopedia, Supranational is: … an international organization, or union, whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision-making and vote on issues pertaining to the wider grouping … As examples, the European Union, the International Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organization are ‘Supranational organizations’. Indeed, scrolling through iShares comprehensive asset listings, there is indeed a ‘Supranational’ sector. The breakdown is summed up in the following table, and well worth noting. Supranational Organization Fund Symbol Fund Weighting Brief Description African Development Bank Medium Term Notes AFDB 0.06% NGO for economic development in Africa Asian Development Bank Medium Term Notes ASIA 0.13% NGO for economic development in Asia Development Bank of Latin America CAF 0.01% NGO Financing and Technical Assistance Council of Europe Development Bank COE 0.06% NGO Social Investment Projects European Bank for Reconstruction Medium Term Notes EBRD 0.07% NGO for Entrepreneurship European Investment Bank EIB 0.43% Bank of the European Union for EU Member States Inter-American Development Bank IADB 0.17% NGO Financial and Technical Support Latin America and Caribbean International Bank for Reconstruction Medium Term Notes IBRD 0.24% WTO Sponsored for Developing Countries International Finance Corporation IFC 0.10% NGO Private Sector Development in Emerging Markets Nordic Investment Bank NIB 0.03 NGO Financial Development for Nordic and Baltic Countries Total 1.3% (Data from BlackRock) Most, if not all of the above mentioned Non-Government Organization (NGO) Banks do receive support from governments, or other supranational organizations but operate mostly independent of governments for the social and economic betterment in developing regions. The point of the matter is that the ‘medium term notes’ or other NGO investments seem reasonably secure since they are ‘backed’ by larger ‘parent’ organizations or part of a government’s foreign aid budget. The second undefined label, ‘ Other ,’ is a bit more complicated, to say the very least. Scrolling through the holdings, it seems that ‘Other’ includes a wide ranging, globally diversified collection of assets. The number of global holdings was quite surprising. There are small holdings of equities, bonds and agency notes allocated in over 52 countries. They are summarized in the Bar chart below. The sum total of ‘other’ holdings is 7.7%. Other Holdings: All less than 1.00%; Total: 7.7% of all holdings. (Data from BlackRock) Hence, there’s a bit more risk in that sector; however to be fair, these other holdings are extremely diverse, and very lightly weighted. What remains to be examined then, are the actual funds in the fund. A little care must be taken here, too. First, when the number of holdings is considered in each of the funds, all part of iShares “Core” ETFs theme, there is bound to be ‘overlaps’. So the fund does lack efficiency. However, with most of the Fund in U.S. Treasuries and S&P large cap equities, it should serve its purpose as a defensive holding in the current global economic environment. The investor should keep in mind, though, that the steady capital appreciation may have much the do with the extraordinary advanced economy bond purchasing programs and flight to quality trade into sovereign bonds. That being said, the fund has, in fact, performed rather well and has consistently paid monthly dividends since inception, November of 2005. (click to enlarge) As noted, the fund is composed mostly of fixed income; about 69%. Investors should also take note that it has become a common practice for corporations or governments to issue bonds denominated in stronger foreign currencies, for example, in Euros, Pound Sterling, Yen or U.S. Dollars. There are many good reasons for this strategy. It might be that two nations share a special trade relationship, for example the U.S. and Mexico. Another is to attract foreign fixed capital investments by having a large foreign currency reserve of the foreign investor. Also, it is a means to make bonds with weak domestic economies more attractive to investors seeking an added measure of security. However, the strategy could backfire if the issuer’s native currency weakens sharply against the stronger currency, thus making it more expensive to service the debt. Bond ETF Funds Symbol Number of Holdings Type of Holdings Distribution Yield Weighted Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity Premium / Discount Expense Fee Weight in AOK Fund iShares Core U.S. Treasury Bond ETF GOVT 120 1 to 30 year U.S. Treasuries 1.36% 2.24% 7.05 years Premium 0.02% 0.15% 16.18% iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF IUSB 1547 Global U.S. Dollar Denominated Bonds 1.68% 3.26% 7.11 Years Premium 0.18% 0.15% after 0.01% waiver 41.93% iShares Core U.S. Credit Bond ETF CRED 2542 U.S. Dollar denominated, sovereign, supranational, corporate, local authority notes and bonds 3.35% 4.17% 10.18 years Premium 0.16% 0.15% 11.49% (Data from BlackRock) Next, the fund extends globally with comprehensive U.S., European and Pacific index equity holdings. It’s also important to keep in mind, as described above, that the “Supranational” and the “Other” holdings have a “theme” all their own as well as a structure just like a sector with merely a skeleton of weightings. However, in total, the ‘Other’ and ‘Supranational’ sectors carry a rather heavy allocation weight: Supranational ranks between Switzerland and China, and the “Other” is the fund’s second largest ‘geographic allocation’. Equity ETF Fund Symbol Number of Holdings Type of Holding Distribution Yield Price / Earnings Price / Book Equity Beta Premium / Discount Weight in AOK Fund iShares Core S&P 500 ETF IVV 505 S&P 500 2.20% 19.13 2.75 1.20 Discount -0.04% 13.83% iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF IEUR 991 Large, Mid and Small Cap Europe 4.02% 17.65 1.83 0.99 Premium 0.49% 7.31% iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF IPAC 861 Large, Mid and Small Cap Pacific 2.45% 14.31 1.37 0.82 Premium 0.19% 4.62% iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF IEMG 1787 Large, Mid, Small Cap emerging Market 1.93% 19.21 3.13 0.72 Premium 1.10% 2.81% iShares Core S&P MidCap ETF IJH 401 Mid Cap S&P 500 1.51% 20.08 2.29 1.09 At NAV Par 0.00% 1.21% iShares Core S&P SmallCap ETF IJR 602 Small Cap U.S. Equities 1.30% 20.57 1.96 0.97 Premium 0.02% 0.51% (Data from BlackRock) Lastly, just a few quick facts about the fund in the table below. iShares AOK Symbol Number of Holdings Type of Holding Distribution Yield 12 Month Trailing Yield Expense Ratio Equity Beta Premium / Discount Average Volume iShares Core Conservative AOK 9 ETFs plus Supranational and Diversified Global Assets Mostly Equities plus Government, Agency, Corporate Fixed Income 1.46% 2.10% 0.39% 0.25% Discount -0.08% Appx 6000 daily; Recent 11,000 Appx (Data from BlackRock) All said and done, on the surface the fund seems rather simple: nine ETF holdings mostly in U.S. assets. However, when the details are examined, there’s nothing small nor simple about this fund, at all. Although a core conservative fund of funds, it’s quite diversified, global, comprehensive and complex! The main point being that either for short term safety or in terms of long term performance, the fund is, without a doubt, A-OK!

Take Your PIIC – Philippines, Indonesia, India Or China

Summary Consider to invest in Asia. Within Asia I believe the best countries to invest in are the Philippines, Indonesia, India, China and Vietnam. All have high growth driven by domestic consumption. All except China have incredibly low household debt to GDP compared to their Asian peers, which will allow them to easily borrow more and build more. The “Asian Century” has arrived and if you fail to invest in it you are missing an enormous long-term opportunity to grow your wealth. In this article, I discuss what I believe to be the top five Asian destinations for investment and why. But first, why invest in Asia? The answer is simply because it is growing more rapidly than any other continent on the planet. By 2030, Asia Pacific is estimated to contribute a staggering 59% of global consumption , up from 23% in 2009. Some key points from DBS on where Asia is heading in the next 25 years: · Asia adds a Germany (in economic terms) every 3.5 years, and will add three Europe’s in 25 years (by 2040), or if Asian currencies appreciate one to two percent pa (as is the norm for developing economies), Asia will add 5 or 6 Euro zones by 2040. · The Asian middle class is set to triple (to 1.8b) in size between 2015 and 2020, and to have increased 615% (6.15 fold) between 2009 (525m) and 2030 (3,228m). · China (59%) and India (16%) will dominate the Asian middle class. · For every addition to the US population, Asia’s headcount will rise by seven. · China’s growth is moving inland, and also towards Central Asia. · Capital will flow to Asia like never before. Why? Businesses want to be where the growth is. Ever hear one say different? In 2039, when Asia has added three Euro zones, it will be creating a Germany every seven months. That’s a pretty big attraction. Inflows mean currency appreciation. Asian currencies will rise against the dollar, euro and yen. · China’s per-capita energy consumption is one-eighth what it is in the US, India’s is one-twentieth. Rising incomes mean Asia’s energy demand will continue to soar. Asian, not G3 demand, will drive the price of energy. Source The World’s largest economies in 2010 and 2050 Source You can read more about the rising Asian middle class in my previous article here . Why Philippines, Indonesia, India and China? I choose these as my top 4 Asian countries to invest because they have high growth (domestic driven), low household debts (see chart below), and a rising middle class (with jobs and wage growth). The best time to buy is ideally when valuations are good (PEs below 15), or dollar cost averaging. Source No1- Philippines The Philippines’ main advantage is their cheap, young and skilled labour force with excellent English skills. The BPO industry is growing around 20% pa (it grew 18.7% in 2014). The Philippines is currently growing around 5.6% pa (with a long term growth rate estimated at 7.3% pa), with the main growth drivers being overseas foreign worker’s remittances, and the BPO (call centre, back office administration) industry. Tourism, manufacturing (electronics, ship building), mining and farming also contribute. This money is being channeled into the property sector, combined with increased lending (household debt is a mere 6% of GDP). Demographics are excellent with around half the population below 25, and salaries are rising at least 6.5% pa, or higher in the BPO industry where staff are paid sign on bonuses. The property boom can run for many years as pent up demand for housing is huge and prices are still low at just USD 3,156 psqm or less in Manila. The banks are making good net interest margins around 3.02 %, and growing their loan books 20% pa, with non-performing loans at a very low 1.8% and double digit profits. Investors can buy iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (NYSEARCA: EPHE ), currently on a PE of 21.17 as of 30 September 2015. No 2 – Indonesia Indonesia has a huge population with strong demographics, a rising middle class, and improving Government. Indonesia GDP was 5.0% in 2014, however it is expected to average 6.8% pa in the long term (see table below). Along with Philippines and India, it has very low household debt, and rising employment and wages. The new Government seems focused to reduce debt and build infrastructure. In October 2015, they announced a USD 5 billion high speed railway from Jakarta to Bandung in a JV with China Railway Group (00390:xhkg) (PE 10.1). Property prices are low at just USD 2,766 psqm, and rising . Investors can buy iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (NYSEARCA: EIDO ), currently on a PE of 18.19 as of 30 September 2015. No 3 – China China is off course the booming manufacturing hub of the World, but is changing to be a more consumer led economy. This is causing a slowdown in fixed asset investment, and the so called “China slowdown” and “commodities rout”. Their GDP is currently 7.0% and slowing. Demographics and household debt levels are not so good; however, the rising middle class is still huge. The best way to play China is to buy into the consumer sector via a fund or individual stocks. A suitable fund would be db x-trackers CSI300 Consumer Discretionary 1D ETF. Chinese (Shanghai, Beijing) property is not as expensive as India (Mumbai), and is priced at USD 6,392 psqm. Investors can buy iShares MSCI China ETF (NYSEARCA: MCHI ), currently on a PE of 14.56 as of 30 September 2015. Another good choice is db X-trackers Harvest CSI 300 CHINA A-Sh ETF (NYSEARCA: ASHR ). No 4 – India India has perhaps the best growth potential but is expensive on current valuations (PE around 30), so best to wait for opportunity to buy in or average into the market over time. Current GDP is around 7.3% pa, and the long term average is expected to be around 8.0% pa. Indian labour is cheap with strong English and IT skills. Property is growing but expensive in the major cities such as Mumbai at USD 11,455 psqm, which may be a drag on the short term growth (as in China). By 2050, India is expected to be the World’s largest economy (see earlier table). Investors can buy iShares MSCI India ETF (BATS: INDA ), currently on a PE of 30.75 as of 30 September 2015. No 5 – Vietnam Vietnam is my preferred short-term pick as PEs are around 13, so great value now. Long term its prospects are also good, as it is a cheaper manufacturing hub to China and jobs are booming as a result. Household debt is low at around 20% to GDP. Investors can buy db x-trackers FTSE Vietnam ETF (GR). I would avoid Malaysia (household debt to income of 146% ) and Thailand (debt 121% ), based on high personal debts and economies that are heavily dependent on exports. Many frontier markets will also offer good returns for investors but perhaps at greater risk, so invest accordingly. Other high growth countries (listed below) to consider are Nigeria, Iraq, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Mongolia, Sri Lanka and Egypt. Source : Finally, for those that want something different, then consider to invest in either Pakistan (PE 9.2) via db x-trackers Pakistan (03106:xhkg), or Central Asia and Kazakhstan via Global X Central Asia & Mongolia Index ETF (NYSEARCA: AZIA ) (PE of 16.7), as China is pushing infrastructure and growth in that direction.

How I Created My Portfolio Over A Lifetime – Part VII

Summary Introduction and series overview. What I put into my taxable accounts. What I put into my tax-deferred accounts. How I deal with foreign stock dividend withholding. Summary. Back to Part VI Introduction and Series Overview This series is meant to be an explanation of how I constructed my own portfolio. More importantly, it I hope to explain how I learned to invest over time, mostly through trial and error, learning from successes and failures. Each individual investor has different needs and a different level of risk tolerance. At 66, my tolerance is pretty low. The purpose of writing this series is to provide others with an example from which each one could, if they so choose, use as a guide to develop their own approach to investing. You may not choose to follow my methods but you may be able to understand how I developed mine and proceed from there. The first article in this series is worth the time to read based upon some of the many comments made by readers, as it provides what many would consider an overview of a unique approach to investing. Part II introduced readers to the questions that should be answered before determining assets to buy. I spent a good deal of that article explaining investing horizons, including an explanation of my own, to hopefully provoke readers to consider how they would answer those same questions. Once an individual or couple has determined the future needs for which they want to provide, he/she can quantify their goals. If the goals seem unreachable, then either the retirement age needs to be pushed further into the future or the goals need to become attainable. I then explained my approach to allocating between difference asset classes and summarized by listing my approximate percentage allocations as they currently stand in Parts III and III a. Part IV was an explanation of why I shy away from using ETFs and something akin to an anatomy of a flash crash. In Part V I explained the hardest lesson about investing that I have had to learn: why holding cash is not a bad thing at certain times. Part VI was an explanation of why and how I sell long-held positions. In this article I will address some of the decisions investors should consider that concern taxes on gains and dividends. I will admit that I am not an expert on taxes. Even though I am a CPA (retired), I was focused on the corporate side and financial statements. I avoided preparing taxes for anyone outside of family, so my experience in the area is more akin to that of an average investor. If readers have more advice or tips to include in the comment section, I encourage leaving comments to share sage advice with others. This is not intended to be a treatise on tax planning; rather some simple-to-follow advice that could help some investors avoid the occasional unnecessary tax bill or loss of irretrievable withheld taxes. What I put into my taxable accounts I start off with an investment I have absolutely no intention of selling ever, and that will have no capital gains: municipal bonds. These securities have long been a stalwart of retirees looking for federal tax-free income. These securities are also targeted by those in higher income brackets. Historically, municipal bonds have enjoyed a very low default rate averaging just 2.7 defaults per year from 1970-2009. During that 40-year span, only five general obligation [GO] bonds have defaulted amounting to only about seven percent of total municipal bond defaults. Most municipal bond defaults historically occurred in issues supporting healthcare and housing projects (73 percent of all defaults). How times have changed! Since the financial crisis, we need to do more homework on selecting municipal bonds. The total number of municipal bonds rated by Moody’s in 2011 was about 17,700. But, even then, the majority of municipal bonds were rated A3 or better by Moody’s. By the end of 2013, Moody’s was rating approximately 2,000 fewer municipal bond issues. The overall default rate has risen from .01 percent prior to 2007 to .03 percent since then; still a very low rate. But a trend is emerging according to Moody’s. Headlines have covered many of the concerns about major municipal bond defaults like Harrisburg, PA, Stockton, CA, Jefferson County, AL, and Detroit, MI. Puerto Rico is in trouble now and both Chicago and the State of Illinois are raising concerns in the headlines. I have some simple rules to avoid municipal bond defaults and I hope readers can add to my list in the comments. I avoid GO issues in cities, counties and states where the pensions are funded below 75 percent. Here is a list of states with underfunded pension plans from Bloomberg (as of December 31, 2013). Another site that appears to be more up-to-date and comprehensive (including funding by individual plan) can be found here . If you want to look up distressed pension plans of local governments you can easily “Google” (search) for what you want to know. I searched for Pennsylvania (because I know there are many problems in local pensions there) and got this link about 562 of the local municipality pension plans being underfunded by $7.7 billion. That equates to 46 percent of the locally administered pension plan in the state! This does not include all underfunded plan, just the ones considered in distress. The point is that we need to be very selective when buying GO bonds and do a little due diligence. I prefer revenue bonds backed by a sustainable stream of revenue such as a toll road or airport. But even then, I take a long, hard look at the financial history and projected financials to make sure that revenues have been covering debt service obligations fully after operating expenses as well as fully funding the required sinking fund for the eventual debt repayment. That information should be available in a prospectus for the issue. You should also be able to get research reports and a prospectus from your brokerage, usually online. I only buy municipal bonds rated “A3” (by Moody’s) or better and only when I can secure a yield of at least five percent per year to maturity. Those are my rules. Adjust them as you see fit to suit your needs or make your own. With all the talk about underfunding of public pensions and with the unspoken problem of underfunded post-retirement benefits (think health insurance) by many issuers of municipal bonds, I expect some more major defaults coming in the future. When a Chicago or State defaults on one or more issues we will see rates rise again giving the patient investor another opportunity to lock in above average rates. I do not plan on providing that much detail about each investment category in this article but felt that municipal bonds tend to get ignored so I thought it might be helpful to provide more information. I did not begin to buy municipal bonds until my early 60s as I began looking for solid yield with tax avoidance benefits. Next, I also hold some stocks in taxable accounts. It depends upon where I have cash available (taxable or tax-deferred accounts) and what type of equity I am buying as to which account I use for the purchase. This is important because you can let several percentage points slip away to taxes if you do not plan ahead. Foreign stocks will generally go into my taxable account so that I can get either a refund of withheld taxes or a tax credit on my tax return. It all depends on the bilateral agreement between the U.S. and the country where the company is based. I will get into this later on in the article.**** High quality domestic or foreign companies that tend to do better than the overall market in downturns and have a long history of increasing dividends with no dividend cuts can go in either account depending on where I have cash available. I do not worry so much about the capital gains tax on these holdings because I intend to keep them forever. Dividend income is taxed at a relatively low rate currently, but that could change. I tend to put more of these securities into my tax-deferred accounts because of the potential for the dividend and capital gains taxes to be increased in the future. One thing that most investors do not think about is that as long as one has some earned income he/she is usually able to contribute shares instead of cash to an IRA account (especially Roth IRA) each year. If the tax laws change and tax on dividends increases too much I plan on using this method to move some shares each year to tax-deferred accounts to lower my tax bill. For me, anything over a 20 percent tax rate on dividends will prompt some movement to my wife’s or my Roth IRA accounts. All rental real estate properties are held as taxable investments. One could put real estate into a Roth IRA, but the tax advantages are significant already without taking that step. The only time it can get expensive tax-wise is when one decides to sell a property. Well, it also gets somewhat expensive when the mortgage gets paid down and the property is fully depreciated, but there is a way around paying the taxes. Admittedly, I have not yet done this but one could enter into a like exchange to purchase another rental property of greater value and defer the capital gain. An example would be to trade a single family residential rental property for either a larger, more expensive single family property or for a multi-family property up to four units. More than four units may not be considered a like exchange, if I recall correctly when I was looking into this a few years ago. The value of exchange is limited to the equity in each property. If the equity held by each party is nearly equal, there would be little or no capital gain involved. One party is looking for current income while the other (buyer of the larger property) is looking for future income and, thus, more current leverage and tax deductions. This strategy is worthwhile for those who get started in real estate early in life and get to the point where too much positive income is being generated from a property. One can also trade one residential property for two or three single family residences, each with lower equity built up, so that the total of the equity on both sides of the trade is nearly equal. But this requires more time inspecting and verifying expenses for each property as well as more time to manage. But it is an option for those interested in sticking to single-family properties. Of course, I also hold all my precious metals in taxable form. It can be added to an IRA, but because there is no income, I do not choose to go that route. Finally, I also hold cash and VFIIX in both types of accounts. What I put into my tax-deferred accounts My tax-deferred account may hold some corporate bonds of companies that I expect to be around long after I am gone. Currently, I do not hold any bonds, corporate or government (other than VFIIX). When I do buy bonds (and I will again when interest rates are higher), I stick with investment grade bonds issued by companies that I know and understand. I prefer rates much higher than have been available since before 2008. My cut off is seven percent. I realize that such a high rate may seem crazy in the current interest rate environment, but that should explain why I do not have any right now. There is nothing available of quality anywhere near that rate at this time. Once again, I will be patient and pick up the bargains when availability improves. I do not expect that to occur unless there is a general financial crisis or inflation rears its head again. The reason I hold bonds, especially long-term bonds, in my tax-deferred accounts is that the income is taxed at my personal income tax rate. That rate is not very high currently, but I expect it to go up instead of down, so I am trying to do the prudent thing. When I was fully employed and earned an above average wage this was far more important. As to inflation relative to equity values, a little is good for stocks but too much is a killer. The same holds true for bonds. Sustained inflation above five percent will cause long-term interest rates to rise to levels where investors may be able to capture quality issues yielding eight percent or more. Locking in a long-term yield above eight percent is something which every investor needs to take advantage of. I do not expect such an environment for several more years here in the U.S. But I do believe we will see it again before too long as the deflationary pressures begin to lift as the millennial generation hits its earnings potential stride sometime in the mid-2020s. If I am still writing when the time comes, I will be sure to provide my viewpoint about when interest rates seem to be hitting a top. Basically, the Fed stops raising the discount rate and inflation begins to taper slightly when the top has been reached. I may not get the top but I will definitely be loading up shortly after it has been achieved. Even if rates go a little higher, I will refrain from crying tears of regret as I will have my eight percent or more each year to console me. Treasuries fit the same profile as corporate bonds but I prefer corporate bonds over Treasury bonds for the higher yield, assuming the relationship remains in the future. I doubt that we will see another period like the one we had in the 80s when 30-year Treasury bonds hit 15 percent. But with all the debt around, who knows? If Treasuries were to get near that level again, I would need to reconsider and weigh the options. Foreign sovereign bonds are an asset I would only hold in my tax-deferred account. The reason is two-fold: while I might be giving up some withholding of interest in some cases, the relative currency values [FX] and current income tax issue outweigh that consideration, in my opinion. Of course, I would want to do my due diligence on the withholding issue to make sure I was not stepping into something egregiously unfair first. But consider the impact on FX on Japanese bonds. As the US$ increases in value (over 100 percent in the last few years), the value of a yen-denominated bond fall precipitously on a US$ basis. The FX part of the equation can be the biggest benefit of investing in foreign bonds. I also do not like to pay income tax on interest if I can avoid it. Foreign sovereign bonds issued by creditworthy nations can be a boon to your portfolio for a couple of reasons. First, you may be able to earn a higher interest rate on the bonds as many countries generally hold interest rates higher than the U.S. That is because of the implied safety of the U.S. sovereign bonds relative to most other sovereign bonds. Another reason is that it adds more diversity to a portfolio since there is generally less correlation between US bonds and equities relative to foreign bonds. Finally, and this is my favorite part, the FX gains can be huge. Be careful, though, now is not the time to buy foreign sovereign bonds because the US$ is still gaining in strength relative to most other currencies. When the US$ hits a high and begins to fall again relative to other currencies, it behooves us to seek out the countries with both higher yields and faster growing economies (without high debt burdens) for potentially outsized future gains. If interest rates are high and beginning to fall in that country, then can earn three ways: gains from principal value of bonds rising as interest rates fall, locked in high interest rates and gains from changes in relative values of currencies. Such circumstances do not come often, but when it happens, you want to be in the mix with at least a small portion of your portfolio. Finally, I only hold these securities in my tax-deferred accounts because of the volatility of the FX. These are investments that may do well for several years at a time, but there is a cyclicality to investing in this area and one must be ready to sell when the environment begins to change. Because I expect to be taking gains and not holding to maturity I like to avoid taxes, especially on the gains which can be substantial. Stocks of companies that I plan to hold forever, those quality companies that have an established record of growing revenues, earnings and dividends (especially dividends) can usually go into my tax-deferred accounts. As I pointed out in the previous section, it depends on where I have the cash available when I spot a great bargain. I prefer to keep these issues in my tax-deferred accounts for tax reasons even though the tax rate on dividends is low now; the rate tends to move over time, so I prefer to keep the income out of reach of our dear uncle Sam. Some folks like to keep royalty trusts and limited partnership units in a taxable account to avoid going over the limit on “income earned from other than normal business.” There is a limit of $1,000 that can be earned in tax-deferred account per individual in a year without becoming taxable. An investor needs to keep this in mind and look at previous K-1 schedules from a company (usually limited partnership or trust) to get a sense of how much income is likely to be distributed for each share annually that falls into this category. It does not take long to make that investigation and do the math. The information can usually be found under the “investors” tab on the company website as “tax treatment of distributions.” I do not own any such shares/units presently but have in the past. I did very well owning Canadian royalty trusts before the government north of the border decided to change how distributions were taxed. I sold as soon as I read what was being proposed and did not wait for the law to be voted on. It hurt because my monthly distributions from those units were about $1,900. The nice part was that a portion of each distribution was considered return of capital and free from taxes. The distributions were also considered qualified dividends then, too. I held those units in my taxable account because the effective rate on the distributions was only about ten percent. But then, I do my own taxes, so I do not have to pay an accountant to file each K-1 for me. That can cost a pretty penny (or about $80 per K-1). So, if you only want to own a hundred units and you have your taxes prepared professionally, you may save money by either holding the units in a tax-deferred account or just telling the preparer to declare the full amount as taxable income instead of filing the K-1. Here is a link to an example of how the math can work depending on your incremental tax rate. The example is about half way down the page. If annual distributions from a single K-1 total less than $1,000, it might be cheaper to pay tax on the whole amount instead of paying your preparer. The blog I linked is not the definitive answer to the question of where should I hold this type of security. The answer lies in the answers to these questions: How much of the asset do you want to own? What is your tax rate? Do you pay a preparer to file your taxes? Then do the math. It seems complicated but it really is not. And the yields can be very good. The point is that an investor could conceivably own these types of securities in either taxable or tax-deferred accounts. It depends of the answers and the math as to which is better. How I deal with foreign stock dividend withholding In a nutshell: it depends upon the bilateral tax treaty between the U.S. and the nation in which the foreign company resides. Here is a link to the IRS page with links to all the current tax treaties with foreign governments. I apologize that the treaty language is in legal jargon and may be difficult to understand. When you click on a country it brings up the original treaty document. Scroll down to the articles list and find articles that cover dividends (usually article ten) or royalties (usually article 12) if you are considering a royalty trust). First, look for the rate at which the countries have agreed to tax dividends, often 15 percent, but may be higher. Then look within the section titled “relief from double taxation” for information about refunds and/or tax credits. Some developed countries have a form to apply for a refund of withheld taxes. Often, the best you can hope for is to report the withheld tax on your filed return and then receive a tax credit equal to the difference between what you paid and what you would have paid if the dividend had been paid and taxed in the U.S. When the tax withheld is below what our tax rate is, you may find you owe additional taxes to the U.S if held in a taxable account. What you want to be certain of is that you will be able to avoid being taxed at more than the prevailing U.S. rate. In the end, by holding such securities in a taxable account, you are able to keep the tax rate down to the dividend tax rate in the U.S. One thing to remember is that if the tax rate is lower than the U.S. tax rate, you can actually keep more of your dividend by owning it in a tax-deferred account. Do your homework and save some money from the tax man every year you hold the stock. If you are a long-term investor and buy a high quality dividend paying foreign stock the savings could add up over the decades to a very nice sum. Summary This article is intended as an explanation of what I have learned from my own experience and how I plan to avoid taxes. In some cases, I find that there is no clear-cut definition of what is best without doing a little homework. I am not a tax expert nor is any of the information included in this article meant to be advice other than to provide some perspective for other investors. If any readers have better source of information links, especially for the foreign tax treaty information (in plain English), please leave a comment with those links. Any reader that has a different perspective on how to avoid or defer taxes on investments and is willing to share that information is welcome and encouraged to do so. We can all learn from each other here on SA. For convenience to readers new to this series, I have created an instablog, ” How I Created My Own Portfolio Over A Lifetime ,” with links to all the articles of this series. I will usually add a link to the blog for each new article within a day of it being published. As always I welcome comments and questions and will do my best to provide details and answers. This is one of the best aspects of the SA community. We can learn from each other and share our perspectives so that other readers can benefit from the comprehensive knowledge and experience represented here.