Tag Archives: government

BSJF: The Shortest Duration High Yield Bond Fund I Can Find

Summary This fund is designed with a target termination date at the end of 2015, but the holdings have been changing quite substantially. My expectation is that the fund will be gradually selling out of their longer positions and transitioning to treasuries and cash. BSJF is fairly low in volatility since there is little duration risk. The fund has been trading at a slight discount to NAV which is one source of return for investors since the fund should pay out NAV at termination. Investors should be seeking to improve their risk adjusted returns. I’m a big fan of using ETFs to achieve risk adjusted returns relative to the portfolios that a normal investor can generate for themselves after trading costs. One of the funds I’m looking into is the Guggenheim BulletShares 2015 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: BSJF ). I’ll be performing a substantial portion of my analysis along the lines of modern portfolio theory, so my goal is to find ways to minimize costs while achieving diversification to reduce my risk level. I’ll cover the holdings of the fund and then look at its performance in what I would consider a reasonable portfolio. Expense Ratio The expense ratio is .44%. Holdings Since this is a fairly interesting bond fund due to the presence of a termination date, I thought it would be useful to pull up their holdings a couple times before writing on them. Their holdings from early October are shown below: (click to enlarge) The first thing you should probably notice is that the ETF is the treasury bills being an ironic allocation for a junk bond fund. The situation is actually surprisingly simple. The bond ETF has an expected termination date of 12/31/2015. Most ETFs are long term investments, but BSJF appeared to be staying true to the name and expecting to simply terminate the ETF at the end of the year. The interesting thing is that when I went back to check on the fund in late October to see how much the Treasury allocation was increasing, I found it had disappeared instead. The most recent holdings are indicated below: (click to enlarge) As we get closer to the termination date I expect the percentage of assets coming from Treasury bill securities to increase materially. To be fair, the previous Treasury allocation did state that they were discount bills with a maturity of 10/22, which is two days ago. The irony for me at this point is the fact that the weighting for Kinetics has increased substantially from about 7% to roughly 10.8%. The par value of the position has not changed though, which suggests that the total assets have decreased substantially. The assets don’t appear to have been paid out, because the company makes their distributions very early in the month and the last distribution was $.03 per share on October 1st. Distributions The distribution is an area I really want to bring to investors. Have a look at the chart below (yeah, it is huge) and notice how the total distributions are paid out on a monthly basis but the size of the distributions has been shrinking lately as the fund is moving out of the higher yielding investments. (click to enlarge) The movement wasn’t really noticeably until the start of June, but now it is very clear that distributions are shrinking. Sectors The following chart breaks down the sector allocation of the underlying bonds. Finance is by far the heaviest weighting, but I’ve found that to be a trend when I’m examining these junk bond funds. If you’re going heavy on allocation to any junk bond fund with a strong exposure to a single industry, it would be wise to avoid overweighting the same sector in the equity part of your portfolio. Credit Credit risk is pretty significant here, but the bonds aren’t in default yet. Overall this is a fairly reasonable allocation for a junk bond portfolio. Building the Portfolio This hypothetical portfolio has an aggressive allocation for the middle aged investor, but should be fairly reasonable for a younger investor. Investors nearing retirement should aim for a significantly more conservative portfolio unless they have a high risk tolerance and a high ability to actually bear the risk. Retirees depending on the portfolio value should aim for something more conservative than this. A total of 40% of the portfolio value is placed in bonds. That makes it appear to be a fairly reasonable allocation for the middle aged investor. However the position in junk bonds is highly susceptible to losses at the same time as the equity positions because fear in the market will cause junk bonds to be sold off along with equity. You’ll also notice that emerging market bonds also have a positive correlation with domestic equity markets due to the influence of fear. The portfolio assumes frequent rebalancing which would be a problem for short term trading outside of tax advantaged accounts unless the investor was going to rebalance by adding to their positions on a regular basis and allocating the majority of the capital towards whichever portions of the portfolio had been underperforming recently. Because a substantial portion of the yield from this portfolio comes from REITs and interest, I would favor this portfolio as a tax exempt strategy even if the investor was frequently rebalancing by adding new capital. The portfolio allocations can be seen below along with the dividend yields from each investment. Name Ticker Portfolio Weight Yield Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF VYM 30.00% 3.16% iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF IYR 10.00% 3.82% Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF VEA 10.00% 2.94% Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF VWO 10.00% 3.12% Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index ETF VWOB 10.00% 4.73% Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index ETF VCLT 10.00% 4.54% Vanguard Long-Term Government Bond Index ETF VGLT 10.00% 3.12% I include the yield from each investment to aid investors looking for a higher yielding portfolio. If nothing else, this should provide a very quick reference point for which other ETFs mentioned here might also be useful in constructing your own portfolio. I picked VYM as a replacement for SPY in this portfolio due to it having a significantly stronger dividend yield and the assumption that domestic equity would be the core of the portfolio. The next chart shows the annualized volatility and beta of the portfolio since October of 2013, courtesy of Investspy.com. (click to enlarge) Risk Contribution The risk contribution category demonstrates the amount of the portfolio’s volatility that can be attributed to that position. To make it easier to recognize the risk impact of the various positions, I’ve built this portfolio to be equal weight with the exception of the position in VYM. Since this is the core of the portfolio, I’ve allocated 30% to the ETF. You can also see that VGLT has a negative total risk impact on the portfolio. When you see negative risk contributions in this kind of assessment it generally means that there will be significantly negative correlations with other asset classes in the portfolio. The position in VCLT is also very low in the impact on total portfolio risk. That is because these are very long duration high quality bonds. Even though they are not treasuries, they have a much higher correlation with treasury securities than with equity securities. Thinking of Modifications If an investor wanted to use something like this as a high yield portfolio while significantly reducing the risk, one way to do it would be to cut the allocations to VEA and VWO and to increase the allocations to VGLT and VCLT. That would create a lower risk portfolio overall and it would strengthen the yield on the portfolio. It should be noted that this modification would reduce the expected level of returns over the long term. A quick rundown of the portfolio I put together the following chart that really simplifies the role of each investment: Ticker Role in Portfolio VYM Core of Portfolio IYR Yield and exposure to equity REITs VEA International diversification VWO International diversification VWOB Strong Yield with International Diversification VCLT Moderate yield, moderate risk VGLT Strong Negative Correlation to Equity Correlation The chart below, created by Invest Spy shows the correlation of each ETF with each other ETF in the portfolio. Blue boxes indicate positive correlations and tan box indicate negative correlations. Generally speaking lower levels of correlation are highly desirable and high levels of correlation substantially reduce the benefits from diversification. (click to enlarge) Conclusion BSJF is an interesting junk bond fund because it has scheduled a termination date with the credit quality of the fund moving higher as it prepares for that date. Therefore, the correlation the fund has with other assets should be shifting over time. It is worth noting that the only negative correlation for BJSF is the correlation with long term treasury securities. Given that these are fairly short maturity instruments, I wouldn’t expect a strong correlation based on interest rate movements. You may notice that the correlation with VWOB is .40 which is much higher than the correlation with other bond funds. In that case the correlation is a combination of having some small amount of duration risk combined with substantial credit risk. Emerging market bonds tend to sell off in similar situations as domestic junk bonds which results in a higher correlation there. If you are interested in short duration bullet funds, this one would be a good one to keep an eye. Watch what happens with it over the next few months and see if it deviates materially from slightly longer duration bullet funds that won’t be expected to terminate. If nothing else, it should be interesting to watch the price movements. Investors interested in using the fund as a very short term holding should take note that the fund usually sells at a slight discount to NAV in the range of .1% to .2%. Since this is a short term holding, getting in with the discount is important to expected returns. I’ll be keeping an eye on how this fund does through the end of the year. If any readers are holding it, I’d love to hear from you in January about your experience with the liquidation of the fund so I can incorporate it into my analysis for other target date funds.

Is The Russian Bear Out Of The Woods?

Summary The Russian economy is still depressed, but may have found its bottom. Valuations are reflecting a collapse, which is no longer realistic. First signs of returning investor appetite and technical picture brightens. For risk-prone investors, it may be the moment to add Russia in their portfolios through RSX and RSXJ. Shortly after the publication of my previous article on the Russian market, we witnessed nothing less than a crash on August 24. The Russian stock market, the leading Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEARCA: RSX ) and its small-cap family member the Market Vectors Russia Small-Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: RSXJ ) saw a sharp drop during that day but failed to hit new lows compared to the previous ones in December 2014 (more on the charts later on). Since that day, the Russian market recovered, like most other stock markets, also helped by a recovery in commodity prices. So, did the August 24 turbulence mark the end of the bear market in Russia and thus for the above-mentioned ETFs? Let’s take a look at the underlying fundamentals and the technical picture. Economy in dire state Compared to two months ago, the Russian economy did not change for the better. According to Russian Deputy Economy Minister Alexei Vedev, in September, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) dropped 3.8% compared to last year. He added that preliminary data points to a 4.3% drop in GDP during the third quarter. Prospects for economic growth remain suppressed too. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects GDP to decline 3.8% this year. Next year will see a flat development at best. More likely is a small contraction before the economy can return to rates close to 1.5% in the next years. Compared to the previous recession, during the financial crisis, a sharp recovery is less likely since commodity prices are now low for an extended period of time. In the words of IMF’s Russia representative Gabriel Di Bella (source Reuters): “What we had in 2009 were shocks that were more temporary in nature and what seems to be the case right now is that the shocks are… not very short term,” Di Bella said. “They’re shocks that are more persistent.” Recent underlying numbers are close to miserable. For instance, retail sales dropped 10.4% YoY vs. -9.3% expected, and capital investment declined 5.6%, although this was better than the -6.9% expected. Also, real wages figures were slightly better than expected, but -9.7% is still poor. Compared to the nominal wage growth of 4.5% in September, it’s clear where Russia’s main problem lies. Inflation still troubling The biggest challenge for Russia is the current high inflation and expectations that are unanchored. Consumer price inflation (CPI) came in at 15.7% in September, far from the Central Bank of Russia’s (CBR) long-term target of 4%. The CBR aims to return to a CPI rate of 4% by the end of 2017. But roughly 70% of the Russian population doubt the institution will succeed in bringing down inflation to that target and this group is growing in the recent months. On the other hand, the IMF’s Di Bella and some analysts do see a slowdown in inflation in the coming months, partly due to a base effect. The problem is that the CBR’s key policy rate stands at 11% and is too restrictive for the current shape of the economy. But with inflation rate this high, a cut in the next monetary policy meeting (October 30) is tricky. The IMF calls the CBR to hold rates during the next meeting, but analysts of ING expect cuts of 50 basis points during the next two meetings (source: Bloomberg). According to CBR Governor Elvira Nabiullina, cutting the level of capital requirements may be another option to spur additional lending to the economy. The banking sector is stable and Governor Nabiullina said the sector would see a profit of around RUB 100-200 billion (USD 1.5-3 billion) this year. Companies show encouraging numbers Sberbank ( OTCPK:SBRCY ), which is the 2nd largest holding of RSX, was able to show a 9M-2015 RAS net profit of RUB 144.4 billion (USD 2.2 billion), although this was 50% lower than last year. This was mainly due to a 16% drop in net interest income. Net fee and commission income rose 6%. For a better picture, we have to wait for the IFRS numbers. The retail sector shows numbers which seem in contrast to the dire state of the Russian economy. Despite the poor aforementioned retail sales, listed retail companies showed encouraging numbers. For instance, discounter Magnit, a top 5 holding of RSX, was able to increase its revenues 27.2% YoY to RUB 690.4 billion (USD 10.6 billion) during the first nine months of 2015. Net income rose 27.6% to RUB 43.2 billion (USD 0.7 billion) during the same period. Supermarket-chain X5 Retail Group, also included in RSX, reported that its Q3 revenues grew 28.6% YoY on the back of a 13.1% like-for-like revenue growth. But also net income showed a decent increase with a plus of 21% YoY. To remind ourselves, Russian companies are still heavily undervalued compared to peers from other emerging and developed markets. For instance, Magnit is trading at a price/earnings ratio of 12.7 (2015e) and X5 Retail trades at a P/E of 12.8 (2015e). The average P/E of RSX is 5.9 and lists at a price-to-book ratio of 0.8. Its smaller family member, RSXJ, quotes a P/E ratio of 7.5 and a P/B of slightly below 0.5! First signs of a reversal The low valuations accompanied by relatively healthy company fundamentals are luring a growing number of investors back to the Russian market. Earlier this week, retailer Lenta, known for its budget hypermarkets, successfully sold new shares and raised USD 150 million in capital. The company intends to use the proceeds from the share placement to speed up store openings and aims to open at least 40 new hypermarkets in 2016, a number upped from the previous planned 32. For 2017, the company seeks to open a similar number of stores, or even more. Bond investors are returning to Russia as well and seek new or additional exposure. However, this is not because of the sound macro-environment surrounding Russia, but more so due to initial fears of a collapse accompanied by a wave of defaults did not materialize. Many investors who cut their exposure reenter due to attractive valuations. According to Reuters, USD returns on Russian bonds yielded 12% thus far in 2015 and corporate bonds even 20%. The country saw net capital inflows in the third quarter. What does the trick is that Russia and its companies have very low debt levels. Therefore, a number of asset managers are willing to rotate part of their funds back into the country. Though, it should be said that emerging peers, such as Brazil, have a much bleaker outlook which helps the move (back) to Russia. Stock market may have found the bottom Investors should realize that most of the gains are made when moving in front of the curve. Waiting for the economic turnaround may be too conservative and one could miss out on the big move. When looking at the charts of the main ETFs for the Russian market, one for the large caps and one for the mid and small caps, we notice that despite the crash of global markets on August 24, new lows stayed off. This is an encouraging sign from a technical point of view. Not hitting a new low on the selling pressure during August 24 may indicate that the remaining supply can easily be picked up by demand at current levels. RSXJ had a rougher day but set a double bottom pattern. In the field of technical analysis, double bottoms are regarded as the best chart patterns (see also Thomas Bulkowski thepatternsite.com ). Both ETFs are close to their 200-day moving average but already crossed the 50-day moving average. However, a so-called ‘Golden Cross’ has yet to appear, although this mostly will occur after a strong rally. An investor waiting for that sign may miss a large chunk of the move. (click to enlarge) When comparing RSX with the MSCI Russia Index, we see something interesting. The RSX is able to outperform the MSCI Index, despite the annual fees of 0.6% (see chart below). The outperformance amounts to 5% during the last four years. This highlights why RSX is a solid instrument to play the Russian market. Unfortunately, during the measured period, a loss of 37% was recorded. Risks remain, but the brave may enter The Russian economy continues to struggle. The government may be forced to finance its budget deficit by taking USD 35 billion from the International Reserves, managed by the CBR. But that’s why these funds are created for, and with reserves totaling USD 377.3 billion (as at October 17), there’s ample room. Next to that, Russia’s debt-to-GDP is still at a very low 17%. Nonetheless, the government should proceed with reforms. Encouraging is that government officials acknowledge that the country cannot navigate on oil prices. Oil prices stabilizing at around USD 50 or even rising to USD 60-70 will not be enough for a full-scale recovery. Russia’s budget is based on an oil price of USD 50. The government seems to realize that more taxes is not the solution. It is finally considering to raise the retirement age, although this may be a highly unpopular measure. The country is also strengthening its ties with China and overtook Saudi Arabia as China’s main oil trading partner. Nevertheless, China is known to prefer balanced ‘market shares’ when looking at its oil imports, so the upper bound in China exports might be near. Additional government initiative could be the last stage before an economic recovery can take off. The Russian financial market is now valued at distressed levels. So from that point of view, there’s a lot needed to push valuations even lower. It may be time to (start to) add Russia in the portfolio. As described in my previous article on Russia, small- and mid-cap companies should be preferred in a recovery, which points to RSXJ. Investors should be advised that the order book of RSXJ can show large spreads and, therefore, investors should make sure to check the NAV on the site of the ETF provider to prevent paying too much when placing an order on the screen. In addition, shares of RSXJ have limited liquidity and total assets of RSXJ is only USD 40 million. RSX may, in that case, be a better option (1x spread and ample liquidity, assets of USD 2 billion). But either choice could show a lot of potential for the long term. If an investor is interested in the Russian market and comfortable with the country-specific risks, this might be the time to enter.