Tag Archives: government
A Vanguard Buy And Hold Mutual Fund Strategy With 9% Growth And -6% Maximum Drawdown
All of my previous investing strategies have focused on tactical asset allocation to reduce risk in a portfolio while maintaining moderate growth. My objectives for a low risk, moderate growth tactical strategy have been: 1) 10% Compounded Annual Growth Rate [CAGR], 2) -5% Maximum Drawdown [MaxDD], and 3) all positive years of return. In my research, I have found a combination of five Vanguard mutual funds that can be bought and held (rebalanced annually) that nearly meet my objectives. A passive strategy holding these funds eliminates the need (and cost and risk) of updating every month in a tactical asset allocation strategy. This article will describe the components of this buy & hold strategy and present backtest results from 1988 to the present. As an overview, portfolio growth of this buy & hold strategy is presented below. (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge The five Vanguard funds are: 1. Vanguard GNMA Fund (MUTF: VFIIX ), 2. Vanguard High Yield Tax-Exempt Fund (MUTF: VWAHX ), 3. Vanguard Health Care Fund (MUTF: VGHCX ), 4. Vanguard Long-Term Treasury Fund (MUTF: VUSTX ), and 5. Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Fund (MUTF: VFISX ). Five different classes of funds are represented in the basket of funds: 1) a GNMA bond fund, 2) a high yield municipal bond fund, 3) a healthcare equity fund, 4) a long-term treasury bond fund, and 5) a short-term treasury bond fund. The correlations between these funds can be seen below (taken from Portfolio Visualizer [PV]). It can be seen that the funds do not correlate well with each other, as desired. (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge Backtesting was performed from 1988 – present using PV. In order to backtest to 1988, Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (MUTF: FFXSX ) was substituted for VFISX. The backtest results are shown below. For comparison, results of an absolute momentum strategy and the Vanguard Total Bond Index Fund (MUTF: VBMFX ) are also presented. The absolute momentum strategy buys and holds all five funds unless any fund has a one-month total return that is less than a money market return. If that occurs, then the money from that fund is diverted into a money market fund until the one-month return is greater than the money market return. (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge (click to enlarge) Click to enlarge It can be seen that the buy & hold strategy has the highest total return with relatively low drawdown. The CAGR is 9.0% and the MaxDD is -6.0%. The worst year is -0.9% in 1994, and the only other year with negative return is 1999 (-0.4%). All other years have positive returns. The risk adjusted return numbers are: Sharpe Ratio = 1.2, Sortino Ratio = 2.2, and MAR (CAGR/MaxDD) = 1.5. The monthly win rate is ~73%. The buy & hold strategy has the highest annual return (over the other two investment vehicles) in 16 of the 28 years presented. Usually, an absolute momentum strategy such as the one presented here will help reduce drawdown at the expense of annual growth. And, indeed, we see that kind of result here. The absolute momentum tactical strategy has a CAGR of 7.4% and a MaxDD of -3.0%. So there is a tradeoff, higher CAGR for the buy & hold passive strategy (9.0% vs. 7.4%), or lower MaxDD for the absolute momentum active strategy (-3.0% vs. -6.0%). In this case, I would prefer the higher growth buy & hold strategy because of its simplicity and -6.0% MaxDD is still quite low. Disclosure: I am/we are long VFIIX, VWAHX, VGHCX, VUSTX, VFISX. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
On Currencies That Are A Store Of Value, But Maybe Not For Long
Picture Credit: Dennis S. Hurd I get letters from all over the world. Here is a recent one: Respected Sir, Greetings of the day! I read your blog religiously and have gained quite a lot of practical insights in financial field. Your book reviews are very helpful and impartial. I request you to write blog post on dollar pegs in Middle East and under what conditions those dollar pegs would fall. If in case you cannot write about it, kindly point me to some material which can be helpful to me. Thanks for your valuable time. Now occasionally, some people write to me and tell me that I am outside my circle of competence. In this case, I will admit I am at the edge of that circle. But maybe I can say a few useful things. Many countries like pegging their currency to the US dollar because it provides stability for business relationships as businesses in their country trade with the US, or, with other countries that peg their US dollar, or, run a dirty peg of a controlled devaluation. Let me call that informal group of countries the US dollar bloc [USDB]. The problem comes when the country trading in the USDB begins to import a lot more than they export, and in the process, they either liquidate US dollar-denominated assets or create US dollar-denominated liabilities in order to fund the difference. Now, that’s not a problem for the US – we get a pseudo-free pass in exporting claims on the US dollar. The only potential cost is possible future inflation. But, it is a problem for other countries that try to do so, because they can’t manufacture those claims out of thin air as the US Treasury does. Now in the Middle East, it used to be easy for many countries there because of all the crude oil they produced. Crude oil goes out, goods and US dollar claims come in. Now it is reversed, as the price of crude is so low. Might this have an effect on the currencies of the Middle East. Well, first let’s look at some currencies that float that are heavily influenced by crude oil and other commodities: Australia, Canada, and Norway: Click to enlarge Commodity Currencies As oil and commodities have traded off so have these currencies. That means for pegged currencies, the same stress exists. But with a pegged currency, if adjustments happen, they are rather large violent surprises. Remember the old saying, “He lied like a finance minister on the eve of the devaluation,” or Monty Python, “No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!” That’s not saying that any currency peg will break imminently. It will happen later for those countries with large reserves of hard currency assets, especially the dollar. It will happen later for those countries that don’t have to draw on those reserves so rapidly. Thus, my advice is threefold: Watch hard currency reserve levels and project future levels. Listen to the rating agencies as they downgrade the foreign currency sovereign credit ratings of countries. When the ratings get lowered and there is no sign that there will be any change in government policy, watch out. Watch the behavior of wealthy and connected individuals. Are they moving their assets out of the country and into hard currency assets? They always do some of this, but are they doing more of it – is it accelerating? Point 3 is an important one, and is one seemingly driving currency weakness in China at present. US Dollar assets may come in due to an excess of exports over imports, but they are going out as wealthy people look to preserve their wealth. On point 2, the rating agencies are competent, but read their write-ups more than the ratings. They do their truth-telling in the verbiage even when they delay downgrades longer than they ought to. Point 1 is the most objective, but governments will put off adjustments as long as they can – which makes the eventual adjustment larger and more painful for those who are not connected. Sadly, it is the middle class and poor that get hit the worst on these things as the price of imported staple goods rise while the assets of the wealthy are protected. And thus, my basic advice is this: gradually diversify your assets into ones that will not be harmed by a devaluation. This is one where your government will not look out for your well-being, so you have to do it yourself. As a final note, when I wrote this piece on a similar topic , the country in question did a huge devaluation shortly after it was written. Be careful. Disclosure: None.