Tag Archives: gold

HSBC, Custodian Of GLD’s Gold, Is Closing 7 London Vaults

Summary HSBC, custodian for the SPDR Gold Trust’s gold, is closing its 7 gold vaults. SPDR Gold Trust investors should be aware that their gold might be on the move and that they are not necessarily protected if it is lost or stolen en route. Traders might consider shares in the iShares Gold Trust for the time being as an alternative without this added risk. Longer-term investors in gold are encouraged to invest in funds that specify the location of their gold and who’s in charge of guarding it. My readers might recall a couple of articles I wrote in 2013, in which I suggested that gold investors consider alternatives to the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSEARCA: GLD ), namely the Central Gold-Trust (NYSEMKT: GTU ) or the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (NYSEARCA: PHYS ). There were (and still are) several reasons why long-term gold investors should choose these funds over the SPDR Gold Trust (although I conceded that the SPDR Gold Trust was a better trading vehicle, given its liquidity and superior gold price tracking), but one that stood out in particular was custodianship. The SPDR Gold Trust has HSBC (NYSE: HSBC ) as its custodian, but HSBC doesn’t specify where it keeps its gold. Furthermore, HSBC doesn’t have to retain its custodian status of the fund’s gold. If it chooses to – and SPDR Gold Trust shareholders have no say in this – HSBC can call on sub-custodians to hold the fund’s gold. The only stipulation is that HSBC deems that the institution is suitable as a custodian of the fund’s gold although the stipulation in the prospectus is extremely vague. Furthermore, HSBC is not responsible in the event that a sub-custodian loses the fund’s gold so long as it can prove in court that it was acting in the best interest of the fund’s shareholders. I never stipulated that there was any sort of fraud, but it seemed that the language was broad enough so that it wasn’t impossible. Considering that there are other funds that offer exposure to gold, and considering that these funds’ prospectuses are very clear regarding the custodianship of their respective gold hoards, it seemed fairly straightforward to go ahead with one of these two other funds. What’s Happened Since? Just recently, there has been a development in this situation that has prompted me to issue a cautionary note to shareholders of the SPDR Gold Trust. HSBC is closing each of its 7 London gold vaults. Now, there is no evidence that SPDR Gold Trust gold is found in any of these vaults, because HSBC doesn’t have to disclose the location of the fund’s gold. After all, HSBC is a massive international banking conglomerate with other gold vaults, including in, say, New York. Furthermore, we don’t even know whether HSBC is acting as the trust’s custodian, because, as we’ve seen, it can hire a sub-custodian to do the work. But if we look at the simple facts, it is clear that the trust’s counterparty risk will rise as a result of this, and the trust’s shareholders need to at least consider them should they choose to continue to hold on to the shares. If the trust’s gold is held in one or more of these London vaults, then when they close in a couple of months, the gold will inevitably have to be moved. Whether it is to a sub-custodian’s vault or to another HSBC vault, there is added counterparty risk in the fact that this gold will have to be shipped. This means it will come into contact with numerous people, and it might even be shipped over water where a ship could sink or a plane could crash, thereby leading to a loss of the gold. Again, let me remind investors that HSBC is not responsible for losses so long as it can prove that its actions are in the best interest of trust holders in court. This means that if HSBC puts some gold on a plane and it crashes into the ocean, then this gold is gone and the shareholders will suffer, not HSBC. What Investors Should Do Announcements such as this should remind investors to study very carefully what it is exactly that they own when they own an ETF, especially one that is supposed to own a physical commodity such as gold. This gold will sometimes need to be handled and shipped, and this means risk to the fund’s shareholders. So in the past, I have suggested investors look at the other gold funds although short-term traders would be fine in the SPDR Gold Trust. Given the upcoming vault closures and the added counterparty risk – as minute as it might be – I think gold traders would be wise to suspend trading activities in the SPDR Gold Trust. There are alternatives. The iShares Gold Trust (NYSEARCA: IAU ) will not be impacted by this. This is an $11.25/share issue that trades several million shares per day, meaning that there should be plenty of liquidity for most traders reading this article. Options are less liquid for this fund relative to the SPDR Gold Trust, so that could be an issue. I also think investors would be wise to at least consider the less liquid Central Gold-Trust as a trading vehicle, which keeps its gold in Canada and which currently trades at an incredible 7.8% discount to its NAV. This is a $40/share issue that trades nearly 50,000 shares daily, so there is nearly $2 million in daily volume. Most retail investors should have no liquidity issues, and the fund is therefore an acceptable trading vehicle for the time being unless you are looking for very short-term intraday trades. The Bottom Line Maybe I’m being a bit paranoid in my warning, but I really do think there is a risk here. While it is probably a remote one and while it is impossible to quantify, those who trade the SPDR Gold Trust should have it in mind and watch out for more news on this front over the next few months. Finally, I want to reiterate that I think knowing where your gold is and who is in charge of protecting it is important, and for this reason, I think the Central Gold-Trust and the Sprott Physical Gold Trust both offer investors with better, safer opportunities. This statement is especially true when we consider that part of the justification for holding gold in your portfolio is that it is a safe asset that comes with limited counterparty risk. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

GLD Drops 1.78% After FOMC Lockhart’s Confident Florida Speech

There are 2 main forces affecting gold price, Europe and FOMC. The drama in Europe has deflected the media attention which the FOMC deserves. Atlantic Fed President and FOMC Voter Lockhart deflected weak inflation arguments against liftoff in mid-2015. Lockhart argued that confidence in the progress towards maximum employment and stable prices is sufficient for policy tightening given the lag in monetary policy. Lockhart’s compelling argument forced GLD to drop 1.78% and reinforced the bearish trend on GLD. FOMC Neglected Amid Excessive European Drama Coverage In today’s context, there are 2 primary forces that are actively influencing the price of gold which we should always keep in mind when we evaluate our gold investment. On one hand, we have the headlines news about Europe and Greece on CNBC, CNN and all the major news outlet. These news station give us an overexposure to the latest flip-flops in the sovereign debt negotiations simply because it is good non-fiction drama that will keep their viewership high. In what comes as news, we have Greece taking on a seemingly compromising stance to offer a ‘menu of debt swap’. Germany rejected it and asked the Greek government to forgo its campaign promise of ending its austerity measures by repudiating its official debt and increase social spending. Greece then refuted that and take a hard stance in its debt negotiations which eventually lead the European Central Bank to cut off Greece of its cheapest debt financing using its sovereign bond as collateral. The Greek response was to demand for $11 billion euros of repatriation for World War II which Germany swiftly rejected. Greece responded with its latest initiative by involving OECD to provide credible 3rd party alternative to its reform imperative over that proposed by its official creditors, collectively known as Troika. In the background during this period of rapid change is the uncertainty of Greece membership within the European Union and the spillover effects in terms of geopolitical security such as the possibility of Greece leaving NATO to back Russia in the Ukraine conflict. Given the extensive media coverage on Europe, it is easy to forget the other side of the picture. In my earlier article, Hold GLD In The Tug Of War Over Financial Stability In 2015 , I have argued that it is the primary issue of financial stability that is driving the price of gold for now. As much as we care about the European drama, we have to keep in mind the powerful Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) which is not receiving its fair share of attention from market participants due to inadequate media coverage. The FOMC is a dominant force of financial stability with its clear intention of policy normalization which will provide meaningful risk-free interest rates for conservative investors such as insurance companies and pension funds. These conservative investors hold significant amount of retirement funds which may not be willing to chase the riskier equity market and should not be there in the first place. Their absence will provide the forming of financial bubbles. Lockhart Neutralized Weak Inflation and Wage Growth Constraint Let us pay some due attention the Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart who is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Lockhart gave his speech titled, Considerations on the Path to Policy Normalization at the Southwest Florida Business Leaders Luncheon on 06 February 2015. In my opinion, his speech is very supportive of the mid 2015 liftoff in the Federal Funds rates and this is putting pressure of gold as much as it is supportive of the strength of the USD. Lockhart gave a balanced assessment of the economy and discussed the possible constraint on the liftoff alongside with the factors supporting it. He came to the conclusion that based on current data, he is confident that the economy would have recovered to the point where it is conducive for a liftoff in mid 2015. I think the economic recovery of the United States is well established in the market right now and so before we go into the reasons supporting the liftoff, we shall look at how Lockhart address the issue of inflation. The obvious problem with inflation is that it is below 1% and far from the 2% inflation target no matter which measure of inflation you look at. For example, if you were to look at the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) shows that prices increased by 0.8% in December 2014 when compared to December 2013. Annual core CPI might look better at 1.6% in December 2014 but it is part of a falling trend of 1.8% and 1.7% in October and November 2014 respectively. If we were to refer to the core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) on a monthly basis, we will observe 2 conservative months of 0% growth for November and December 2014. (click to enlarge) Source: Tradingeconomics The chart above which compares U.S.inflation and core inflation rate according to CPI and this should anchor the point that inflation is still a distance from the 2% inflation target in the U.S. The other potential deterrent for a mid year liftoff is the low wage recovery. Given the tight labor market and the pace of jobs recovery, wages should be raising at 2%-4% based on the experience of previous recovery instead of the 0.5% increase as reported by the Department of Labor recently for January 2015. We have to keep in mind that the strong economy added 257,000 jobs in January 2015 after 329,000 jobs were added in December 2014. This has encouraged 155,000 discouraged workers to apply for jobs and re-enter to labor market. The expanded labor pool increased the unemployment rate from 5.6% to 5.7% resulting in a 0.2% increase in labor force participation of 62.9%. This quote from Lockhart sums up the challenges of weak inflation and wages increment that is facing the United States today. Just as current readings of inflation give some pause, broad wage trends seem to suggest we are not yet on the cusp of full employment. The quite modest growth of wages across the economy does not seem normal given the solid growth numbers we’ve seen in recent quarters. The Lockhart Defense Given all these headwinds against mid year liftoff, we shall look at how Lockhart defends his support for it in the next section of this article. Lockhart has 3 main points to decide his support which is scattered throughout his speech for the sake of a logical flow of ideas. I shall summarize it here as confidence in the projected economic recovery, improving market inflation compensation data and finally the requirement to ignore transient low energy prices given the lag in monetary policy. These 3 main points are actually linked towards the final destination of a mid 2015 rate hike. Lockhart expressed confidence in the sustained recovery of the economy. He foresaw growth of 3% for 2015 and 2016. This is supported by the strong economic data published recently. In addition, he has confidence that the dual mandate of maximum employment and stable prices would be achieved within 1-2 years. Lockhart shares the same view as the FOMC majority that inflation is transitory and would pass. The previous FOMC has mentioned before that market based inflation compensation remains weak while survey based inflation expectations remains well anchored. In his speech, Lockhart mentioned that market based inflation compensation has recovered and this gives him renewed confidence that inflation will catch up. This is Lockhart in his own words: Since mid-January, some inflation-compensation measures have shown signs of reversing. A firming in the inflation compensation data from their year-end lows is an example of the kind of encouraging development that will bolster my confidence in the medium-term outlook. If we look at the inflation data above, it started to show signs of weakening with July 2014 reading of 2.0% down from 2.1% in May and June. This coincides with the decline in oil prices which the FOMC attribute to the disinflation influence. Lockhart is a more dovish as he focus on the weak inflation numbers instead of the strong employment numbers indicating less capacity slack. Inflation is appropriately a focal point because its firming will reduce concerns that the economy is somehow stalling, that prophesies of long-term stagnation have any basis, and that chances of accomplishing the FOMC’s policy goals are receding. Lastly it is noteworthy that for this policy dove, there is no need for the 2% inflation target to materialize before he would move policy forward. Lockhart stressed in his speech that there is no such thing as 100% confidence and he would accept sufficient confidence. He would require the confidence that economy would move towards the Fed’s dual mandate would suffice due to the time lag between monetary policy implementation and the effects being seen on the economy. The distance between current conditions and our goals doesn’t have to be completely closed for the FOMC to start moving interest rates higher. Monetary policy is, of necessity, forward looking. If, as we look forward, it seems likely we will achieve our policy objectives, then we can consider beginning to adjust policy. Lockhart Impact on the SPDR Gold Trust ETF ( GLD) Lockhart has effectively swept away the reminding credible objection to the Fed’s interest rate hike in mid 2015. He devoted the bulk of his speech to that with a smaller part of his speech reinforcing the idea that the economy is on a strong growth trajectory to his audience. As his primary target audience are Florida businessmen, he made the point that the FOMC is expressing confidence in the economy when it raises rates and this will be self-reinforcing. From a Main Street perspective, the important point for business planning is that monetary policy is likely to shift sometime this year, and a higher interest-rate environment will ensue. The decision to begin normalization should be a signal that the FOMC is confident the economy is on track to achieve its objectives and that the economy should have sufficient strength and momentum to handle higher rates. The start of the process of normalization should itself instill confidence on Main Street. (click to enlarge) If we look at the chart daily above for GLD, we can see the extent of Lockhart’s influence on gold prices. It is noted that Lockhart speech came on the same day as the strong January 2015 labor data report so one might argue that it is the labor report which pushed down the price of gold. However we should remember that it is the FOMC members who interpret and give meaning to the labor numbers in the monetary policy decision making process. GLD opened at $119.15 on the day of his speech and closed at $117.07, marking a 1.78% decline over 4 trading days. This would be something that investors would have missed out on if they placed too much attention on Europe at the expense of the FOMC. It is clear that there is a shift in gravity from Europe back to the FOMC. The Greek drama is old news, expected and hence priced into the market. Unless there is a significant move such as a Grexit or large scale violence, further rhetoric from Europe no matter how much headlines they grab, will not move GLD up. This should be the case until the end of the month and I note that GLD is crossing in the $117 price neckline. Lockhart’s speech is persuasive and its makes a compelling case for a lift-off in mid 2015. Its serves to further reinforce the bearish sentiment in the gold market which would have otherwise rebounded on the $119 resistance level. Once again, Lockhart speech is a timely reminder of the market influence for the FOMC members. Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Gold-Stock Trading Volume Really Growing

Gold-stock trading volume is high and growing, revealing much trader conviction behind the strong early-year rallies in gold and silver stocks. The higher the volume underlying any particular move, the greater its strength and staying power. And the volume in the gold juniors, which are slaved to sentiment, is incredible. Since trading volume generally grows as uplegs mature, seeing such high volume already in such a young gold-stock upleg is a very bullish omen. There’s no doubt the gold-mining stocks remain deeply out of favor, collateral damage from the Fed’s gross financial-market distortions of recent years. But sentiment is shifting, with stock traders starting to regain interest in this left-for-dead sector. Gold-stock trading volume is really growing as capital returns. And since higher volume is an essential precursor to major new uplegs, its growth is a very bullish portent. The leading gold-stock sector benchmark these days is the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDX ). Its excellent basket of the world’s elite gold and silver miners, which are effectively market-capitalization weighted within this ETF, deftly mirrors the stock-market fortunes of this entire industry. And they’ve certainly been ugly thanks to the Fed’s artificial stock-market levitation. As the US stock markets soared in 2013 on the Fed’s wildly unprecedented QE3 debt monetizations , all demand for alternative investments including gold withered. Gold’s resulting epic plunge on extreme selling of SPDR Gold Trust ETF ( GLD) shares obliterated the gold stocks. GDX plummeted 54.5% in 2013, and then drifted another 13.0% lower last year. It’s no wonder stock traders utterly despise gold stocks today. But they sure shouldn’t, as the most out-of-favor battered-down sectors always have the greatest upside potential. And stock investors and speculators are starting to understand this. In January 2015, heavy gold-stock buying catapulted GDX 21.3% higher! Gold stocks were almost certainly the best-performing sector in the entire stock markets. And that buying was even more impressive coming on heavy volume . Naturally price action itself is the most-important technical indicator, since it exposes underlying supply-and-demand trends. Ultimately all stock prices are determined by the balance between shares offered and bid for. But trading volume, how many shares change hands daily, is a critical secondary indicator. It reveals traders’ overall conviction for any particular move, and thus its strength and potential staying power. While low-volume moves are likely to soon fizzle out as they quickly exhaust themselves, high-volume moves often signal major trends . And this young new year’s gold-stock buying has happened on big volume. This greatly increases the odds that a major reversal happened in gold stocks late last year as they hit apocalyptic fundamentally-absurd lows, and that a major new upleg is just getting underway. This bullish revelation is readily apparent in a long-term gold-stock volume chart. Since GDX is easily the most-popular destination for stock-market capital seeking gold-mining exposure, its trading volume is an excellent proxy for this sector’s as a whole. But since gold stocks are usually excessively volatile, raw GDX volume isn’t a great measure over a long span of time. Share-price fluctuations mask the real trend. At GDX’s unadjusted record high approaching $67 in September 2011, 100 shares were worth $6700. But after subsequently collapsing 75% to its recent nearly-all-time-record low under $17 in November 2014, those same shares were only worth $1700. Obviously shares traded at high GDX prices were a lot more significant than shares traded at low prices. So it’s important to adjust for such divergent prices. This is easily accomplished through a simple construct called capital volume . Each day’s actual share trading volume is multiplied by that day’s adjusted (for stock dividends and splits) closing share price. That shows the amount of capital actually changing hands in GDX shares in perfectly-comparable terms across long periods of time. And even from this perspective, the growth in GDX trading has been massive. This chart shows GDX capital volume over the past 4 years or so, rendered in red. Since trading volume is such a hyper-volatile dataset, a 21-day moving average (one month) is included in yellow to distill out the underlying volume trend. Finally GDX itself is superimposed over the top in blue for reference. The trading-volume growth in GDX shares recently has been very impressive, even in capital-volume terms. The recent extremely-low gold-stock price levels reflect the universal antipathy for this sector. In early November, GDX was trading at the same levels only seen for a single trading day in the dark heart of late 2008’s once-in-a-century stock panic! Gold stocks had almost never been so deeply out of favor as they were late last year. The great majority of stock traders had forgotten about this sector or left it for dead. In such an exceedingly-bearish environment, gold-stock trading volume should’ve shriveled away to nothing. With stock investors and speculators presumably having virtually zero interest in owning gold stocks, GDX’s capital volume ought to have totally collapsed. But incredibly just the opposite happened! The total value of this benchmark gold-stock ETF’s shares changing hands continued to steadily grow. This trend actually began way back in mid-2012, thanks to the underlying gold-price action which is the ultimate driver of gold-mining profits and hence gold-stock price levels. After gold soared to extremely-overbought levels in August 2011, it needed to correct. And this happened naturally over the next 9 months or so, where gold retreated about 19%. This fueled a 41% GDX correction over a similar span. The gold stocks were bottoming in mid-2012, and soon started surging again as gold recovered. But that nascent gold rebound was short-circuited by the Fed’s radically-unprecedented third quantitative-easing campaign launched just before the critical presidential elections. The stock markets started to soar on the Fed’s massive inflationary money printing and endless promises of a lot more if necessary. So gold started to collapse, crushed by the deluge of new supply unleashed by stock traders dumping GLD gold-ETF shares far faster than gold itself was being sold. Gold stocks immediately followed gold lower, and leveraged its downside like usual. So GDX’s capital volume grew despite lower share prices throughout 2013 on heavy selling. That kicked off the longstanding volume uptrend shown in this chart. There were certainly episodes in GDX’s anomalous Fed-sparked collapse that reflected selling surging to capitulation levels. Inevitably in any long downtrend, the great majority of investors and speculators give up and throw in the towel. The numbers of capitulating traders swell during particularly sharp plunges to major new lows. Such periodic flushing events of traders fleeing GDX helped ramp its volume. Since stock traders are typically-emotional human beings, their collective decisions on when to buy and sell as a herd are fueled by popular greed and fear. And these dangerously-misleading emotions for traders grow very asymmetrically . While greed mounts gradually as uplegs power higher, fear flares up quickly in major selloffs. So high-volume selling episodes marking widespread capitulation are normal. But provocatively, recent years’ biggest gold-stock volume spikes didn’t merely come in capitulations. Instead they also arrived in this sector’s periodic sharp rallies. Note that GDX capital volume soared in the summer-2013 rally, spring-2014 rally, and summer-2014 rally. That is very contrary to normal market behavior, defying expectations. It likely reflects sizable latent investor interest in gold stocks despite their struggles. This surprising buy-like-crazy-on-gold-stock-rallies trend continued since GDX plumbed its latest major low in mid-December. As gold stocks recovered in the 7 weeks since, GDX capital volume just soared. And it’s really at incredible levels these days. In January 2015, GDX capital volume averaged $1.2b per day. That’s considerably higher than August 2011’s $0.9b, which was heading into GDX’s record high! This is extraordinary and exceedingly bullish for the beaten-down gold stocks. In major uplegs, trading volume grows gradually . It tends to start out small as the early contrarians buy in, and then slowly ramps up. As prices rise, they capture the attention of more traders who decide to buy in later and ride the upleg. So if gold-stock trading volume is already this high now, imagine how high it will balloon later. Volume and interest are steadily growing in gold stocks, despite epically-bearish sentiment still plaguing this sector. The early contrarian investors buying in now ahead of the thundering herd are likely to earn fortunes as gold stocks mean revert higher. This sector is tiny relative to general stocks, and still has vast room to rally yet coming off such extreme lows. It won’t take much capital to catapult it far higher. After the last time GDX’s price briefly fell to such extreme lows in late 2008’s crazy stock panic, this gold-stock ETF would more than quadruple over the next several years. And the late-2014 lows were even more extreme than the stock panic’s in valuation terms. In late October 2008, gold had plunged near $732. Yet in early November 2014 when GDX hit those same lows, gold was fully 56% higher near $1144! As I’ve been pounding the table about in recent months, it is fundamentally absurd for gold stocks to be trading as if gold was far lower than it really is since the yellow metal drives their profits and hence ultimately stock prices. In terms of the venerable HUI/Gold Ratio , gold stocks were trading at levels last seen over 11 years earlier when gold was near $350. Seeing the same levels at $1150 was ludicrous . And that’s probably the primary motivation behind the early contrarian stock investors and speculators already flooding back into this deeply-out-of-favor sector. They understand stock prices are forever cyclical , that huge mean reversions higher always follow extreme lows. Their buying is the vanguard of a major sentiment shift getting underway in gold stocks, which will eventually eradicate the excessive fear dogging them. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the junior gold stocks . Unlike the elite gold and silver majors that comprise GDX, the juniors generally don’t have operating mines. And without cashflows, there’s no fundamental case to be made for them needing to mean revert far higher merely at current prevailing gold prices. With no operations, junior-gold stock levels are far more based on sentiment than fundamentals. GDX conveniently has a sister ETF that tracks junior explorers and smaller miners, the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSEARCA: GDXJ ). While GDX’s capital-volume chart is very encouraging, GDXJ’s is just shocking . It offers the most conclusive evidence I’ve yet seen that gold stocks as a sector have decisively bottomed, with a major new upleg underway as sentiment starts to shift. While major gold and silver miners have suffered an exceedingly-rough couple of years thanks to the Fed’s gross financial-market distortions, the juniors have been destroyed. No one has ever seen such carnage in these explorers and small miners, it’s radically unprecedented. GDXJ certainly reflects this, even though it contains the biggest and best of the juniors. It plummeted a staggering 60.8% in 2013 alone! Things got so bad in the middle of that year that GDXJ’s custodians felt compelled to execute a risky 1-for-4 reverse stock split . Investors generally hate reverse splits, because the lower share numbers in their accounts leave them feeling cheated. And it certainly didn’t help GDXJ, which continued to sell off into the end of 2013. Volume and interest continued steadily shrinking, as they had been doing for years. And it’s not hard to understand why. Without operations, junior gold companies have to rely on share offerings to finance their efforts to find deposits and bring them to production. With share prices falling seemingly forever with no bottom in sight, investors overwhelmingly fled this risky sector. Countless juniors were forced to shut their doors, unable to obtain financing in the most-hostile environment ever witnessed. So even hardcore contrarians largely abandoned the juniors, they were just too risky. But when gold started to show some signs of life early last year, capital flooded back into this tiny subsector. As GDXJ shot higher, capital volume exploded to record average levels. It faded again as gold retreated in the spring of 2014, but then skyrocketed as gold surged mid-year on Janet Yellen claiming there was no inflation. After averaging a trivial $52m per day of GDXJ shares changing hands in 2013, capital volume in this leading junior-gold-stock benchmark had multiplied dramatically to $393m on average in July 2014. After a drought of investor interest lasting years, they were finally starting to return. Then unfortunately extreme gold-futures shorting crushed gold late last year, pulling the rug out from under the juniors. The resulting capitulation selling was staggering beyond belief, just gargantuan. In November 2014 as gold-stock prices collapsed to brutal new lows, stock traders fled GDXJ so aggressively that average daily capital volume hit an astounding $639m! If that isn’t the king of all capitulations, I don’t know what is. Just look at the recent capital-volume spike in GDXJ’s chart compared to everything that came before it. Once again junior gold stocks are a pure sentiment play , they are difficult if not impossible to value on a fundamental basis with no operations. And seeing such an epic capitulation late last year just has to mark peak fear in this subsector, and therefore gold stocks as a whole. Once every trader susceptible to being spooked into selling low is scared out, that signals maximum fear and therefore the ultimate bottom . Such a crazy capitulation extreme in a gold-stock subsector wholly hostage to sentiment is the best bottoming indicator I’ve ever seen. It vastly increases the odds that gold stocks are not going any lower and a new upleg is getting underway as sentiment starts shifting away from extreme fear. And GDXJ itself actually supports this thesis. Though it lagged GDX in January 2015, it still climbed 15.9% higher. But much more important than juniors’ still-anemic gains was GDXJ’s huge capital volume last month. It averaged $488m per day in January, which is absolutely enormous compared to this ETF’s entire history outside of late 2014’s extreme capitulation! When GDXJ approached its all-time record high near $152 split-adjusted in April 2011, capital volume averaged just $88m per day in March 2011. Remember that upleg life cycles see rising trends in volume. Initially as new uplegs are born, they are driven by a relatively small fraction of contrarian investors. Then as prices gradually rise, they attract in more and more capital so volume grows on balance. And if the junior-gold trading volume is already this high, just imagine how much investor interest is coming as GDXJ continues to march higher. Gold and silver stocks have vast room to keep running. Not only were they just trading at fundamentally-absurd price levels, but investors are radically underinvested in this sector after abandoning it over the past couple years. The market capitalization of the gold and silver stocks remains so small that this sector could easily quadruple and still account for well under 2% of stock investors’ overall portfolios. And with stock traders now flocking back to gold via GLD shares in a big way, gold itself is starting to mean revert dramatically higher. That will drive great investor interest in the precious-metals miners’ stocks. The growing capital inflows will ultimately power this tiny sector far higher. And stock investors and speculators can definitely ride these great coming gains in GDX and GDXJ, which are fine ETFs. The bottom line is gold-stock trading volume is high and growing. This reveals much trader conviction behind the strong early-year rallies in gold and silver stocks. The higher the volume underlying any particular move, the greater its strength and staying power. And the volume in the gold juniors, which are slaved to sentiment, is incredible. Their extreme capitulation just witnessed likely marks the final bottom. And volume grows as uplegs mature, so seeing such high volume already in such a young gold-stock upleg is a very bullish omen. As gold stocks continue powering higher on balance, more and more traders will jump in for the ride accelerating their climb. And there is vast room for buying after a couple years of investors totally abandoning this sector. Gold stocks will have to soar far higher to normalize. Adam Hamilton, CPA February 6, 2015 Copyright 2000 – 2015 Zeal LLC (ZealLLC.com) Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it. The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Additional disclosure: I own GDXJ call options, as well as extensive positions in gold and silver stocks which have been recommended to our newsletter subscribers.