Tag Archives: gld

Gold Demand Drops 12%, Hurts SPDR Gold Trust ETF

The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) had a nice bump yesterday after the index closed with gains of 1.40% at $107.75. The gains contrast sharply with weak global demand for gold in the second quarter and it is unlikely that the ETF will keep yesterday’s gain in today’s session. CNBC reports that the global demand for gold has dropped to a 6-year low as buyers in China and India reduce their bullion purchases. A report released by the World Gold Council (WGC) this morning provided insight into the demand for the yellow metal. It was reported that the overall demand for bullion in the second quarter came in at 915 tons to mark a 12% year-over-year decrease. The low global demand for gold in Asia echoes earlier fears that the devaluation of the Chinese Yuan might be bad for Gold and Direxion Shares Exchange Traded Fund Trust. Demand for gold is weak in Asia Asians ( especially in India and China ) are buying less gold as the demand drops from 1,038 tons last year to 915 tons this year. The price of the yellow metal has plummeted more than 40% in the last four years from $1,920.94 a troy ounce in September 2011 to a narrow $1,200 to $1,230-per-ounce range during the April to June period. In fact, prices are already down 3% this quarter. Alistair Hewitt, head of market intelligence at the WGC says, “It’s been a challenging market for gold this quarter, particularly in Asia, on the back of falls in India and China.” The drop in the demand reflects the 14% decline in demand for gold jewelry from 594.5 tons in Q2 2014 to 513.5 ton in Q2 2015. It might interest you to know that gold jewelry holds 60% of the global gold consumption. A rough road ahead for gold ETFs GLD might start feeling the pinch of the poor demand for gold. For instance, Direxion Shares Exchange Traded Fund Trust was down 4.43% in pre-market trading to $4.53 and yesterday’s gains might be lost when the market opens and gold investors read that the demand for gold has slumped . However, the weak demand for the yellow metal and falling bullion prices might send the ETF up if the market believes that demand will increase in the second half of the year. If there’s a prospect for increased demand for gold in the second half of 2015, the yellow metal will find support , bargain-hunters will start buying and bullion-backed ETFs, like GLD, might not need to worry much about the drop in demand. Hewitt at WGC believes that the low demand coupled with the devaluation of the Yuan might support the bullish thesis for the yellow metal. In his words, “we often see people turning towards gold when threatened by weak currencies and I think that’s clearly the situation we’ve seen in China over the past few days”. Link to the original post on Learn Bonds Share this article with a colleague

Could A Strike Of The South African Gold Miners Push GLD Higher?

Summary All the three major labor unions in the South African gold mining industry rejected the proposed 13% pay hike. The labor unions demand 70%-100% increase of wages. The South African gold producers can’t afford to increase wages too much as labor costs are said to represent approximately 50% of gold mining costs in South Africa. A probable strike may help to support gold and GLD prices; however, it won’t push too them much higher, as the South African gold production isn’t important enough. As the gold price stabilizes in the tight range between $1,080 and $1,100 per troy ounce (toz), the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: GLD ) found its short term support at the $104 level. Although the long-term fundamentals are positive, the short-term development of the GLD share price is questionable. But the current developments in South Africa indicate that GLD may bounce off the recent lows. On August 2 , The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union that represents approximately one third of South African gold miners, rejected a 13% pay hike proposal. On August 7 , the National Union of Mineworkers did the same. Although the offer has been increased to a 17% pay hike, the unions demand an increase by 70-100%. Basic monthly wage is approximately $460 right now which really isn’t too much, given the harsh working conditions in South African gold mines. On the other hand wage costs are said to represent approximately 50% of gold mining costs in South Africa. This claim is supported by a 2011 estimate that labour costs account for 38% of total operating expenditures. It means that increasing wages by the rejected 13% or 17% would be extremely painful for gold producers given the current gold price. Increasing wages by 100% would ruin them. The South African gold producers can’t afford to increase wages too much. The discussions should continue on Wednesday but the difference between the demands of the miners and offers of the mining companies is still very large. The general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers claimed that they will go on strike if their demands are not met. The situation will most probably escalate in the coming weeks, however impacts of the possible strike on gold and GLD prices is questionable. South Africa And Gold Mining Although South Africa was the world’s biggest gold producer for the better part of the 20th century, its position has deteriorated significantly lately. According to the USGS data, South Africa produced approximately 150 tonnes gold in 2014. It equals to approximately 4.823 million toz. On the other hand China, the world’s biggest gold producer, mined 450 tonnes (14.468 million toz) gold and the total global gold production amounted 2,860 tonnes (91.951 million toz). It means that South Africa was the 5th biggest gold producer in 2014 (the 5th position is shared with Peru) and only 5.24% of the 2014 global gold production was attributable to this country. (click to enlarge) Source: own processing, using data of USGS Only 20 years ago, South Africa was the world’s biggest gold producer by far. It produced 580 tonnes (18.647 million toz) gold in 1994, which represented more than 25% of the global production. But poor infrastructure, labor problems and the fact that the miners must dig for gold deeper and deeper, resulted in a continuous decline of South African gold production. The South African gold production declined by 74% between 1994 and 2014, while the global gold production increased by 24% during the same time period. (click to enlarge) Source: own processing, using data of USGS The problems of the South African gold industry are well illustrated by the fact that 8 out of the 10 deepest mines are located in South Africa (chart below) and all of them produce gold. The world’s deepest mine, Mponeng , is owned by AngloGold Ashanti, which produces 405,000 toz gold per year and the operating depth ranged from 2,400 to 3,900 meters below surface in 2012. The mine life should be expanded to 2040 which means that the miners will probably dig much deeper. Source: own processing, using data of mining-technology.com Can the strike alone push GLD price higher? The strike alone probably won’t be enough to push gold and GLD price too much higher. South Africa is responsible for only slightly more than 5% of global gold production. In the case that all of the South African gold production would stop (which is not probable), global gold market would lost only slightly more than 0.4% of annual mine supply every month. And there is another problem. There was a major strike of the platinum miners last year in South Africa. The strike took place from January to June and some of the world’s biggest platinum producers (Lonmin ( OTCPK:LNMIY ), AngloAmerican Platinum ( OTCPK:AGPPY ), Impala Platinum ( OTCQX:IMPUY )) were affected. But the platinum price was relatively stable. The chart below shows price development of ETFS Physical Platinum Shares ETF (NYSEARCA: PPLT ), ETFS Physical Palladium SHares ETF (NYSEARCA: PALL ), GLD and iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SLV ). Share prices of all of the funds increased by 5-9% during the first half of 2014. Only palladium price increased more significantly, mainly due to the problems between Ukraine and Russia that is the world’s biggest palladium producer. Platinum and PPLT prices increased by less than 10% although South Africa is world’s biggest platinum producer and it was responsible for 72% of global platinum production in 2013, the year before the strike. The reason is that platinum producers were processing the stockpiled material. If the South African gold miners have stockpiles large enough, a similar scenario may repeat itself this time again. It means that the strike alone doesn’t have the potential to push gold price notably higher, however it may have a positive psychological effect and it may help gold and GLD prices to hold above the current support levels. Conclusion All in all, the possible strike of the South African gold miners doesn’t have the potential to move gold and GLD prices significantly. South Africa is not that important gold producer anymore. Moreover the miners have probably some stockpiled material that may help to offset the impacts of the strike for some time. On the other if there is a strike, it may have a positive psychological impact on markets and given that GLD price is consolidating above the $104 level and most of the gold producers are unable to generate any profit at current gold prices, it may help to avoid further price declines in the short term. Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More…) I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Dual Momentum August Update

Scott’s Investments provides a free “Dual ETF Momentum” spreadsheet, which was originally created in February 2013. The strategy was inspired by a paper written by Gary Antonacci and available on Optimal Momentum . Antonacci’s book, ” Dual Momentum Investing: An Innovative Strategy for Higher Returns with Lower Risk “, also details Dual Momentum as a total portfolio strategy. My Dual ETF Momentum spreadsheet is available here , and the objective is to track four pairs of ETFs and provide an “Invested” signal for the ETF in each pair with the highest relative momentum. Invested signals also require positive absolute momentum, hence the term “Dual Momentum”. Relative momentum is gauged by the 12-month total returns of each ETF. The 12-month total returns of each ETF is also compared to a short-term Treasury ETF (a “cash” filter) in the form of the iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: SHY ). In order to have an “Invested” signal, the ETF with the highest relative strength must also have 12-month total returns greater than the 12-month total returns of SHY. This is the absolute momentum filter, which is detailed in depth by Antonacci, and has historically helped increase risk-adjusted returns. An “average” return signal for each ETF is also available on the spreadsheet. The concept is the same as the 12-month relative momentum. However, the “average” return signal uses the average of the past 3-, 6-, and 12- (“3/6/12”) month total returns for each ETF. The “invested” signal is based on the ETF with the highest relative momentum for the past 3, 6 and 12 months. The ETF with the highest average relative strength must also have an average 3/6/12 total returns greater than the 3/6/12 total returns of the cash ETF. Portfolio123 was used to test a similar strategy using the same portfolios and combined momentum score (“3/6/12”). The test results were posted in the 2013 Year in Review and the January 2015 Update. Below are the four portfolios, along with current signals: (click to enlarge) As an added bonus, the spreadsheet also has four additional sheets using a dual momentum strategy with broker-specific, commission-free ETFs for TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and Vanguard. It is important to note that each broker may have additional trade restrictions, and the terms of their commission-free ETFs could change in the future. Disclosures: None. Share this article with a colleague