Tag Archives: fuel

Buy United States Oil – Discovery Of Support Here

United States Oil (NYSE: USO) seemed to discover support Monday after a week’s slide with energy commodity prices. After the disappointment from OPEC on the supply front, more recently we’ve received good news on the demand front. Fresh economic data from China appears to show the start of stabilization and data Monday on the Eurozone showed a pickup in growth. Given my view that supply side concerns are well-priced in and could be overdone if Iran fails to come to fruition as many expect, demand improvement should serve USO long-term. Finally, Russia’s foray in the Middle East and its tensions with Turkey also present a near-term upside catalyst I believe not incorporated in price today. The United States Oil (NYSE: USO ) had an important discovery Monday; it found support. Some are pointing to technical analysis for reasoning, but there are fundamental factors to point to. Energy prices have stabilized for now thanks largely to supportive economic data out of Europe and China. Still, given recent supply stubbornness, energy could require a geopolitical catalyst to really get going to the upside over the near-term. Because I give weight to that possibility, I can recommend immediate purchase for aggressive investors and a buy and hold strategy for all others on a positive change in demand dynamics. 5-Day Chart of USO at Seeking Alpha The United States Oil security suffered a serious setback with energy prices over the past several weeks. Most recently, the OPEC decision to keep production quotas unaltered was deflating to say the least. Energy prices still held that day thanks to the strong jobs report that lifted all ships, but the week that followed (see chart) reset a course for energy more in line with the bad news. However, with the new week Monday brought fresh data to look over. The news was very good from both China and Europe in recent days. From China : retail sales, industrial output and fixed-asset Investment all exceeded economists’ expectations. Industrial Output increased 6.2% in November, year-to-year, far exceeding the economists’ consensus view for 5.7% (by Bloomberg). Fixed-asset investment increased 10.2% through the first 11 months of 2015. Retail Sales soared 11.2%, marking the best rate of growth for all of 2015. It finally appears that China is stabilizing. From Europe, we learned Monday that eurozone industrial production increased by 0.6% in October, month-to-month, in line with expectations. It’s a level consistent with 1.9% growth year-to-year, versus 1.3% previously seen. Growth was broad-based, with capital goods growth at 1.4% and durable consumer goods growth at 1.8%. Most of the eurozone members produced growth, save for Greece. November may still present a challenge if there was a shock to the regional economy due to terrorism and concern about terrorism, but October’s data shows a regional economy that is improving long-term. Given the U.S. economy has been in growth mode, the recovery of Europe and the stabilization of China is welcome news for the demand side of the energy equation. Economic recovery in Europe would also lend to euro stabilization and as a result, dollar stabilization. If the dollar can give back some ground on such a result, then oil prices should find further fuel to stabilize and look toward better days. Obviously, the supply side of the equation remains problematic, and it has been the key factor in energy’s demise. OPEC did not allay any concerns on this front when it effectively took no action to cut production at its December meeting. However, the pickup in demand that the latest data seems to point to would help to allay concerns as U.S. production continues to come offline. Also, I’m not a pure believer in Iran’s long-term return to production, unless it strengthens its security and defense relationship with Russia. Otherwise, I wonder how far it will be allowed to progress with its nuclear program, despite recent agreement with the West. With regard to Russia, I believe it is more likely to be a catalyst for oil price rise than for decline, as it remains active militarily in the Middle East. This is made clear by its recent foray in Syria and its conflict with NATO member Turkey. I expect there is a greater chance of escalation than for calmer heads to prevail in this regard. A significant enough mistake should serve as an immediate boost to energy prices, given Russia’s importance to the market and its relationship with Iran. So, after the latest price revaluation, taking the United States Oil down to important historic lows, I see upside opportunity for buyers. Monday’s gain, however questionable after the last week’s trading, appears to illustrate stabilization. It comes on tangible footing, given the latest economic data from both China and Europe. The wildcard of Russia’s presence in the Middle East and its friction with Turkey present the possibility for swift upside reward, but I see a long-term case for purchase as well. Demand should increase as the economies of Europe and China stabilize and return to health, and that appears to be starting now. Supply remains at issue, but the issue appears well-understood and priced in enough so that any change, for instance with regard to Iran’s production, would also serve upside. Therefore, I favor long stakes in oil and the USO now.

The Prospect Of A Warm Winter Hurts DTE Energy’s Short-Term Outlook

Summary Michigan electric and natural gas utility DTE Energy reported Q3 earnings that beat on EPS despite missing on revenue due to hot temperatures and low fuel prices. The company’s long-term outlook, which was already strong, continued to improve as national policy and low natural gas prices increased the value of its NEXUS pipeline project. Its short-term outlook has diminished, however, as the presence of a strong El Nino will likely result in a warm winter and a cool, early summer in its service area. The company’s shares are no longer so undervalued as to merit investment given this short-term outlook, although investors should consider selling near-the-money calls due to its weak short-term outlook. Michigan electric and natural gas utility DTE Energy (NYSE: DTE ) reported Q3 earnings last week that beat solidly on EPS despite missing on revenue. In a bullish article on the company written back in June, I noted that its operating outlook was not nearly as negative as investor sentiment was at the time, concluding that: Its shares certainly appear to be more attractive based on forward valuations than they were at the beginning of the year, a result that can be largely attributed to the prevalence of bearish sentiment toward dividend stocks in anticipation of one or more interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve later in the year. With a 3.7% yield, an improved operating environment, and plans to increase regulated capacity while expanding its non-regulated operations, DTE Energy is an attractive long investment candidate. In the subsequent four months, the share price increased by 12%, although it has settled a bit over the last two trading days. While I continue to like the company’s long-term operating environment, the development of a strong El Nino that is now expected to last well into Q2 2016 can be expected to impact its short-term earnings. This article re-evaluates DTE Energy as a potential long investment in light of these changing conditions. Q3 Earnings Report DTE Energy reported Q3 revenue of $2.6 billion (see table), virtually unchanged from the previous year, and missing the consensus analyst estimate by $80 million. The miss came despite the presence of a hot quarter in the company’s service area, with 48% more cooling degree days occurring compared to the previous year, albeit only 4% more than the long-term average. This gain was partially offset by the presence of self-imposed reduced rates resulting from the lower energy prices during the quarter on a YoY basis. Its electric sales volume to industrial customers also declined by 2% YoY, resulting in a total volume reduction of 1% over the same period. The service area’s warm weather persisted into the end of the quarter as well, resulting in a 53% YoY reduction to heating degree days, albeit from a much smaller base compared to cooling degree days. DTE Energy Financials (non-adjusted) Q3 2015 Q2 2015 Q1 2015 Q4 2014 Q3 2014 Revenue ($MM) 2,598.0 2,268.0 2,984.0 3,078.0 2,595.0 Gross income ($MM) 1,545.0 1,326.0 1,586.0 1,749.0 1,476.0 Net income ($MM) 265.0 109.0 273.0 299.0 156.0 Diluted EPS ($) 1.47 0.61 1.53 1.69 0.88 EBITDA ($MM) 678.0 466.0 715.0 832.0 578.0 Source: Morningstar (2015) The aforementioned presence of much lower energy prices during the quarter was reflected in reduced operating expense, which declined by 1% YoY. Operating income came in at $440 million, or an increase of 84% compared to the previous year, due to the presence of flat revenues and lower costs. Net income came in at $264 million, up 70% compared to the previous year, resulting in a diluted EPS result of $1.47 compared to $0.88 YoY. The EPS result included a beneficial $0.07 mark-to-market impact that, if ignored, resulted in an adjusted diluted EPS result of $1.40 that beat the analyst consensus by $0.15. EBITDA came in at $678 million, up from $578 million in the previous year. The company’s quarterly dividend was 6% higher YoY, reflecting its strong performance over the TTM period. DTE Energy’s Q3 earnings strength was reflected across almost all of its segments. DTE Electric reported a diluted EPS of $1.19, up from $0.76 YoY. The Gas Storage and Pipelines segment came in second at $0.15, up from $0.11 YoY, on strong demand for its pipeline and gathering services resulting from the presence of very low natural gas prices compared to the previous year. DTE Gas reported an EPS of -$0.06 that represented a gain over the previous year of $0.03 despite the presence of fewer heating degree days in the most recent quarter. Only the Power and Industrial Projects segment reported lower earnings, which declined from $0.21 to $0.17 YoY – a move that the company attributed to lower steel earnings. Finally, DTE Energy announced that it had increased its 33% stake in its NEXUS natural gas pipeline joint venture with Spectra Energy (NYSE: SE ) to 50%. Progress on the pipeline has continued over the last four months, and while the company’s increased stake caused its expected cost contribution to rise to $1 billion, the pipeline is expected to be in service by Q4 2017. Contracting was recently completed for the pipe itself, and the FERC filing is expected to be done in the current quarter. Outlook DTE Energy’s management felt confident after the Q3 earnings release to reaffirm its FY 2015 guidance range of $4.65-4.91 and increase the midpoint of the guidance to $4.78. While this result would represent a sequential decline from the company’s bumper FY 2014 earnings, it would still be one of its strongest on record. Furthermore, the company also released its first FY 2016 guidance with an EPS range of $4.80-5.05 – a move that it based on continued economic growth and falling unemployment in its service area. Existing investors will be pleased to know that management is also targeting dividend growth equal to EPS growth, suggesting a 3% increase in FY 2016 based on the midpoint of the guidance. While DTE Energy’s long-term outlook is very optimistic, I believe the company will struggle to achieve the midpoint of its FY 2016 EPS range. The reason for this is the development of one of the strongest El Ninos in the last half of a century over the last several months. These weather events are commonly associated with warmer-than-normal winter weather in the northern half of the U.S., including Michigan , and cooler-than-normal weather in the southern half. Historical records show that El Nino events are associated with substantially above-average temperatures in Michigan between October and May, in which case DTE Energy’s service area can expect to experience fewer heating degree days than normal in Q4 2015 and Q1 and Q2 2016. Furthermore, late Q2 will probably be both colder and wetter than normal, raising the prospects of a reduced number of cooling degree days during early summer. DTE Energy’s guidance already assumes that Q4 2015’s earnings will be lower on a YoY basis just due to the presence of abnormally cold weather in Q4 2014. That said, El Nino threatens to derail the company’s FY 2016 guidance by causing its H1 2016 earnings to come in below expectations. DTE Energy’s operating outlook improves after FY 2016, however, due to a combination of recent regulatory and market developments. Its Gas Storage and Pipelines segment is becoming an important contributor to earnings, and this is likely to continue so long as natural gas prices remain low relative to historical prices. The company’s JV NEXUS pipeline was already expected to provide a large boost to the segment’s contribution. Low natural gas prices will increase its expectations, however, by driving demand for natural gas as power plant fuel at the expense of coal. The recently announced acquisition of Piedmont Natural Gas (NYSE: PNY ) by Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK ) exemplified the larger trend by U.S. utilities to convert coal-fired plants to cheaper natural gas. Looking beyond just the current natural gas pricing environment, however, NEXUS is poised to benefit from two recent developments. The first is continued economic growth in Michigan, including Detroit. While the state and the city both suffered mightily in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, with the latter being hit especially hard by the abandonment of high-margin SUVs and other fuel-inefficient vehicles by cost-conscious drivers, the persistent presence of low petroleum prices over the last three quarters has caused the U.S. automobile industry to stage a strong comeback. Michigan’s economy has rebounded as well, with the Chicago Fed recently proclaiming it the fastest-growing economy in the Midwest. Falling unemployment and continued economic growth will cause natural gas demand in DTE Energy’s service area to also increase, with NEXUS ultimately making further such increases possible. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s recently released Clean Power Plan will increase demand for natural gas pipelines in Michigan and the upper Midwest. The Clean Power Plan requires each state to reduce its carbon intensity (units of greenhouse gas emissions per unit of electricity generated) over the next decade. Michigan must achieve a 24% reduction to its carbon intensity by 2024 and a 39% reduction by 2030. Importantly, its final carbon intensity target is very close to the carbon intensity of a gas-fired power plant, meaning that the state’s utilities can contribute by switching from coal to natural gas. This is already being done across the U.S. due to return of cheap natural gas, and the Clean Power Plan is expected to simply deliver a legal impetus to a market trend that already exists. This will serve to further increase demand for the type of service that the NEXUS pipeline will provide upon its completion. Valuation The consensus analyst estimates for DTE Energy’s diluted EPS results in FY 2015 have risen slightly over the last 90 days, while those for FY 2016 have remained stable. The FY 2015 consensus estimate has increased from $4.74 to $4.79, in line with management’s midpoint guidance, while the FY 2016 estimate has stayed flat at $4.96, slightly above the midpoint guidance. Based on a price of $82 at the time of writing, the shares are trading at a trailing P/E ratio of 16.1x on a non-adjusted basis and forward P/E ratios of 17.1x and 16.5x, respectively. All three of these ratios are higher than in June, but still low relative to their respective 3-year ranges. That said, I do expect that the company will struggle to achieve the FY 2016 consensus estimate if El Nino has a similar impact on Michigan’s winter temperatures to those that it has had in the past, in which case the shares are not clearly undervalued at this time. Conclusion DTE Energy reported solid Q3 earnings earlier this week as hot temperatures in the second half of the summer and low energy prices contributed to a large YoY earnings gain. Management was upbeat in the company’s Q3 earnings report and subsequent earnings call, outlining the rebounding nature of its service area’s economy, continued opportunities for additional future capex, and progress on its NEXUS pipeline JV. I further believe that the persistence of low energy prices and low natural gas prices in particular as well as the release of the Clean Power Plan will provide additional support for the new pipeline when it comes on-line. That is still two years away, however, and DTE Energy must first face the prospect of two consecutive warmer-than-normal winter quarters followed by a cooler-than-normal summer quarter as a strong El Nino makes its presence felt. Given the increase to the company’s share price that has occurred over the last four months and the prospect of multiple bearish quarters, I do not recommend buying DTE shares at this time. Existing shareholders who bought back in June and don’t want to incur the tax implications of a short-term sale, however, should consider selling near-the-money call options at this point to take advantage of the fact that the company’s near-term outlook is not as positive as its longer-term outlook. DTE Energy remains an attractive investment opportunity due to economic recovery in its service and its own strategic moves to benefit from rising natural gas demand, but it is not one that provides a sufficient margin of safety for me to recommend it as a “buy” at this time.

Suburban Propane: Better Alternative To AmeriGas

Summary Recent operating history between the two companies is incredibly similar. Long term, shares have traded in tandem. However, Suburban Propane has diverged recently. SPH seems better valued on most valuation methods. If you have to have one, choose the better value. My research on AmeriGas Partners (NYSE: APU ) took a little heat from Seeking Alpha readers. So rather than presenting just the negative case for AmeriGas, I’d like to show Suburban Propane Partners (NYSE: SPH ) as a possible, better alternative for investors looking to establish a new position in companies within this industry. Suburban Propane Partners is a distributor of propane and various refined fuels to more than a million customers throughout the United States by way of its extensive distribution network. The vast majority of the company’s sales are to residential customers who have very few alternatives for heating and cooking within their homes. While propane is generally more expensive on a BTU basis than alternatives like natural gas, it does have the advantage of being easily liquefied and transported. This characteristic makes it ideal to be sold to customers in rural areas with no alternatives other than electric heat or fuel oil. However, unlike peers like AmeriGas Partners, Suburban has diversified its operations to some degree. The company also sells fuel oil, kerosene, and diesel fuel (direct competitors of propane) in the Northeast and also sells natural gas and electricity in the deregulated New York and Pennsylvania markets. While the Propane segment constituted more than 80% of 2014 revenues ($1.6B of $1.9B), the added diversification here should let investors sleep a little bit better at night than pure-play alternatives in the sector. Operating Results Revenue is set to fall dramatically in 2015 because of cheap propane prices as propane reached a high of $3.69/gallon in February of 2014 compared to a high of $2.37/gallon in January of 2015. Investors should note that Suburban’s fiscal year ends at the end of September, so there is no risk to the above estimates due to a spike in price as we start the winter heating season. Operating income has remained stable, however, as the company passes along the costs of the underlying commodity to consumers, taking a fairly fixed margin. In periods of lower prices, like what occurred in 2015, SPH can actually achieve higher gross margins as there is little risk of consumers reducing consumption or switching to alternatives. Expected 2015 operating margins are in line with AmeriGas. From a cash flow perspective, the story here is also very similar to AmeriGas. Both businesses have very little in the way of capital expenditures, so the vast majority of distributions go to shareholders. Both companies made game-changing acquisitions in 2011/2012, resulting in larger cash flows in following years. As a refresher, AmeriGas picked up Heritage Propane and Suburban bought Inergy Propane. At face value, Suburban got a better deal, paying about 10x EBITDA while AmeriGas coughed up 11x for similar assets. Both deals were built around the same idea: larger customer base, new geographies, increased economies of scale resulting in synergies, etc. One area of concern for investors to consider when weighing Suburban Propane versus AmeriGas is the leverage involved. While Suburban has the smaller debt load, it is also a smaller company. Suburban coughed up 46% of 2014 operating income towards interest payments compared to 35% for AmeriGas. This has been a long-term trend that has likely contributed to the premium AmeriGas shares have generally commanded compared to Suburban. SPH will likely take the opportunity to refinance its 7.375% senior notes due 2020 and 2021 in a few years ($750M in face value) when there are no penalties on calling at face value if interest rates remain low for interest rate savings. If the bond market remains as it is for the next few years, the company will be able to shave 1.5% off the interest rates assuming similar terms. This will result in tens of millions in savings in annual interest expense, which could free up cash flow for debt retirement or dividend increases if management chooses to do so. Conclusion Over the past two years, SPH has diverged significantly from its larger peer, APU. They’ve largely traded at similar yields (7.44% five-year average for Suburban, 6.99% average yield for AmeriGas), but this spread has expanded noticeably over the past year. This premium has likely widened due to investors buying into the dividend growth at AmeriGas. Investors appear to be ignoring the sustainability of those increases going forward. Suburban has taken the safer route, electing to hold the dividend stable rather than increase the payout in an industry that is facing dramatic change. TTM profit and operating margins remain higher at Suburban Propane, and the company appears to be the better bargain on metrics like Enterprise Value/EBITDA. Because of this disconnect, investors can now capture over 10% yield on Suburban Propane compared to AmeriGas’ 8.3% yield. In my opinion, these two will return to historical yield spreads once the market realizes large future dividend increases are off the table for both. If this is the case, investors in Suburban Propane should enjoy higher payouts while having better preservation of their initial capital investment compared to AmeriGas if buying at current share prices. So, for investors that really do want exposure to this market segment and are wanting to start a new position, I believe Suburban Propane is the better value play here over the next five years. You would be buying into a better yield today dollar for dollar, better margins, a little added business diversification through the fuel oil/deregulated energy business segments, and be partnering with a management that has a less aggressive style.