Tag Archives: fn-start

Alts Pioneer Calamos Launches A Pair Of Alternative Mutual Funds

Calamos Investments was one of the first firms to launch a liquid alts product in the early 1990s, and the firm maintains its tradition as a trailblazer in the industry with the recent launch of two alternative mutual funds: The Calamos Global Convertible Fund and the Calamos Hedged Equity Income Fund, both of which “leverage core competencies of the firm,” according to a statement issued by Calamos. “These new funds are a logical extension of our product suite,” said John Calamos Jr, CEO and co-CIO of Calamos Investments: We have managed global convertible strategies for institutional clients for 20 years, and have managed U.S. convertibles for more than 35 years. Additionally, we were an early leader in the liquid alternatives space. Both funds were launched on December 31, 2014, and join the lineup of other Calamos convertible and alternative mutual funds, including the following: Calamos Convertible Fund (MUTF: CCVIX ) – A $1.3 billion fund that was launched in June 1985 and focuses on the U.S. convertible bond market. Calamos Long/Short Fund (MUTF: CALSX ) – A $57 million long/short equity fund with a focus on the U.S. equity market. The fund was launched in June 2013. Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund (MUTF: CVSIX ) – A $4.2 billion fund that started in September 1990 and aims to maintain a low correlation to the U.S. equity and fixed income markets while generating income through covered call writing and convertible arbitrage strategies. The two new funds will be managed by portfolio management teams led by John Calamos, Sr., Chief Executive Officer and Global Co-CIO, and Gary Black, Executive Vice President and Global Co-CIO. Global Convertible Fund The Calamos Global Convertible Fund blends global investment themes and fundamental research, providing broadly diversified exposure to the global convertible bond universe. The fund seeks to provide upside participation in equity markets with less exposure to downside than an equity-only portfolio over a full market cycle. According to Calamos, the fund can also serve a role within a fixed income allocation, as convertibles have historically performed well during periods of rising interest rates and inflation. The fund is available in five different share classes (A Shares: CAGCX ; C Shares: CCGCX ; R Shares: CRGCX ; I Shares: CXGCX ), has a management fee of 0.85% and expense ratios of 1.35%, 2.10%, 1.60%, and 1.10%, respectively. Further information can be found on the fund’s website . Hedged Equity Income Fund The Calamos Hedged Equity Income Fund invests in a diversified portfolio of stocks and sells options with the aim of generating income while participating in equity market upside with lower volatility over the long term. The Calamos Hedged Equity Income Fund is also available in four share classes ((A Shares: CAHEX ; C Shares: CCHEX ; R Shares: CRHEX ; I Shares: CIHEX ), has a management fee of 0.75% and expense ratios of 1.25%, 2.00%, 1.50% and 1.00%, respectively. Further information can be found on the fund’s website .

Reaves Utility Income Fund: Dividend Stability In Good Markets And Bad

Like so many CEFs, UTG lost ground during the last recession… but it managed to maintain and subsequently grow its distribution. Impressively, UTG’s distribution has, so far, never contained any return of capital. Although leverage is a concern, UTG has proven it’s a worthwhile utility option. One of the most frequent concerns about closed-end funds, or CEFs, is return of capital distributions. So it should come as a pleasant surprise that Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSEMKT: UTG ) has never had to use return of capital, despite a notable, though not excessive, yield of around 5.5%. And the dividend has never been cut, either. If you are looking for a long-term utility fund that provides steady, monthly income, Reaves should be on your watch list. Core sector fund Reaves Utility Income Fund , obviously, focuses on the utility sector. The portfolio is largely comprised of utilities (electric, gas, water, and telecom), with some small exposure to railways, media, and real estate investment trusts. However, even in these non-utility areas, the focus is on utility-like or focused businesses. Its media exposure, for example, is largely comprised of cable companies. And the real estate exposure is in the cell phone tower space. Railways, meanwhile, are core suppliers to the utility industry. So Reaves provides fairly broad exposure to the utility space, but not exclusive exposure to the electricity industry. Management uses both qualitative and quantitative approaches as it looks for investments. For example, it conducts interviews with potential investments, their competitors, and suppliers. This helps create both an outlook for a company and for the broader industry. That, in turn, feeds into models that Reaves builds to help get a handle on a company’s, “…robustness under differing business scenarios…” Another key factor is an evaluation of a company’s management, examining such things as the competence of corporate leaders, their track record, and their alignment with shareholders’ interests. And while all of the above effort may point to a great company, Reaves also takes a stern look at valuation, considering measures such as Price to Earnings, Price to Book, and Price to Cash Flow. It also examines, “…historical absolute and relative dividend…” yields and such technical factors as short interest and liquidity. Reaves also has the leeway to use leverage. According to the Closed-End Fund Association , leverage recently stood at nearly 30%. It can go as high as 38%. Leverage can be a double-edged sword, enhancing performance in good markets and exacerbating losses in bad ones. It’s an issue to keep an eye on, with at least the expectation of increased volatility if you own the CEF. Leverage is also one of the reasons that the fund’s expense ratio is a bit high at around 1.7%. Although the CEF does not have a stated dividend mandate, it pays monthly and has elected to keep a level distribution. That distribution is at the discretion of the board of directors. Impressively, the dividend has been increased seven times since the fund started paying dividends in April of 2004. It has never been cut, not even during the deep 2007 to 2009 recession. And, perhaps even more impressive, it has never included return of capital. That’s an important feature for investors who are concerned that distributions are just giving them back their principle and eating away at the fund’s net asset value over time. That’s not the case at Reaves Utility Income Fund and while the yield is likely less then you might get elsewhere, that seems a decent trade-off if you want to avoid return of capital. Performance With this as background, how has Reaves Utility Income Fund actually performed? Over the tailing 10 years through year end 2014, Reaves posted an annualized return of 12.8% based on market price and 11.5% based on net asset value, or NAV, according to Morningstar. For comparison, Vanguard Utilities ETF returned an annualized 9.5% over the same span. That’s a pretty compelling record, to the say the least. That said, it’s worth noting that 2008 was a terrible year for Reaves Utility Income on both an absolute and relative basis. For example, while Vanguard Utilities ETF fell around 28%, Reaves’ share price fell nearly 50%, with an NAV decline of roughly 43%. Clearly, leverage made things worse in 2008. That said, in 2009, Reaves’ NAV advanced 35% with a market price recovery of 75%. Vanguard Utilities ETF was up a far less impressive 11.5% or so that year. That’s the happier edge of the leverage sword. And while the fund doesn’t always beat the broader utility group, it has done so often enough and with large enough margins that it has put up a very compelling long-term record. UTG data by YCharts And while Morningstar’s trailing performance data include distributions because they are total return figures, the fund’s share price is up some 60% or so over the last decade. It has more than made up for the decline during the recession and not only protected investors’ capital, but grew it. All while paying a growing dividend. That’s in sharp contrast to many other closed-end funds, which fell hard during the “great recession” and have lingered at relatively low levels. Often that’s because of return of capital limiting, or even detracting from, NAV growth. That’s frequently the trade-off for high yields. Of course, dividend cuts have also been a common occurrence, too, at other funds, which can make what was a large income stream much smaller. A worthy option If you are in the market for a utility fund, you should take a look at Reaves. Although a little expensive and potentially volatile, the fund’s long-term performance has been strong while supporting a growing dividend. The fund’s roughly 3% discount isn’t a compellingly cheap entry point, but the average discount over the past decade is around 5.5%. So, yes, it could be cheaper, but if you are looking for a good fund right now, I wouldn’t let this stop you. All in, this is a fund I’d recommend to my own father.

S&P 500 FCF Analysis: What You Do Depends On Who You Are

Analysis of the S&P 500 Index and its individual components using the “Free Cash Flow Yield” ratio. Specifically written to assist those Seeking Alpha readers who are using my free cash flow system. Generates a final result for the S&P 500 Index and explains that result to each reader depending an what type of investor they are. Back in December of last year, I introduced my free cash flow system here on Seeking Alpha, through a series of articles that you can view by going to my SA profile . My purpose in doing so was to try and teach as many investors as I could, on how to do this simple analysis on their own, as I believe in the following: “Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day, Teach a person to fish and you feed them for life” I have been very pleased with the positive feedback that I have received so far, but included in that feedback were many requests by those using my system, to see if they did their analysis correctly or not. Since the rate of these requests has been increasing with every new article I write, I have decided to start a new series of articles here on Seeking Alpha analyzing the S&P 500 Index, where I will analyze each of its components individually. That way those of you using my system will have something like a “teacher’s edition” that will give you all the correct calculations for each component. Obviously I can’t include the results for all my ratios in one article, so I will thus be doing a series of articles, where each ratio’s results for the S&P 500 Index will have its own article devoted to it. Hopefully these articles can be used as reference guides that everyone can use over and over again, whenever the need arises. Having said that, at the same time we will be “killing two birds with one stone” as we will also be analyzing the S&P 500 Index and give one final result for it as well as its individual components . That way these series of articles will also be able to give us a real time analysis of whether the S&P 500 Index is attractively priced or overvalued. In order to save space in this article (as the table that will soon follow is quite long) I would welcome everyone to read my article on how to analyze a portfolio/Index by clicking on the following link first: Warren Buffet s Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio: A Free Cash Flow Analysis That way those of you who are new to this analysis will get a complete introduction and for others already familiar with my work, let it act as a refresher course. This article with concentrate on my “Free Cash Flow Yield Ratio” Free Cash Flow Yield = Free Cash Flow per Share / Stock Market Price One key point to always remember in using this system, is that it is designed for all kinds of investors, whether you would be conservative (like I am) or a more aggressive/buy & hold investor. I have created the following parameters for each type and they are as follows: Finally it is also important to understand that I personally do not invest in financial firms as a rule, because it is quite difficult to get a very accurate free cash flow result. This is so because financial firms generate very little in the way of capital expenditures, thus the results you find below are basically just cash flow from operations. I still analyze them as they are part of the S&P 500 Index, but again I don’t invest in them as I find financial firms too complicated to analyze. This belief of not investing in financials, saved me from suffering the huge losses that this sector suffered in 2008-2009, which cost investors dearly. For those who disagree we can start a discussion on the matter in the comment section below, which will allow me to further elaborate on the matter. So without further ado here is my “Free Cash Flow Yield Analysis of the S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA: SPY ) and its components: (click to enlarge) The final free cash flow yield result of 5.11% for the S&P 500 Index would be classified as a ” Strong Hold” for the more aggressive/ buy & hold investor and a “Weak Sell” for the more conservative investor, using the parameter tables I included at the beginning of the article . The weightings that you see in the index were generated by mirroring those used in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF . Also remember that the results shown above are just for one ratio and that this is not investment advice, but just the results of the ratio. The system outlined in this article and all that will follow, as part of this series, are just meant to be used as reference material to be included as just “one” part of everyone’s own due diligence. So in other words, don’t make investment decisions based on just this one result, but incorporate it as one part of your own due diligence.