Tag Archives: fn-end

The SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF: Let’s Analyze It Using Our Scorecard System

Summary Analysis of the components of the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SLY) using my Scorecard System. Specifically written to assist those Seeking Alpha readers who are using my free cash flow system. Compares the results of the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF. Back in late December I introduced my free cash flow “Scorecard” system here on Seeking Alpha, through a series of articles that you can view by going to my SA profile . My purpose in doing so was to try and teach as many investors as I could, how to do this simple analysis on their own as I believe in the following: “Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day, Teach a person to fish and you feed them for life” I have been very pleased with the positive feedback that I have received so far, but included in that feedback were many requests by those using my system, to see if they did their analysis correctly or not. Since the rate of these requests have been increasing with every new article I write, I decided to concentrate my attention on articles analyzing indices and industry ETF’s covering a broad range of sectors. That way those of you using my system will have something like a “teacher’s edition” that will give you all the correct calculations for each component. Obviously I couldn’t include the financials used to create the results for all my ratios (as I would need to write you a book instead), so instead I will provide just my Scorecard results for each index or ETF and then let everyone go back and analyze each company and see if you get the same answers that I did. My data source will always be Y-Charts . I designed this system for the newbie investor, whom may have limited knowledge of investing, and assure them that with just a little effort, anyone can master the system I have presented here. As I write more articles, my hope in doing so is that everyone will be able to follow my work and then go investigate the stocks that seem interesting to them. Think of this project as sort of like the game show “JEOPARDY”, where I give you the final answers and then you go figure out the questions. Hopefully these articles can be used as reference guides that everyone can use over and over again, whenever the need arises. Again this analysis will just be my final Scorecard for the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (NYSEARCA: SLY ) and for those new to this analysis, I suggest that you read my introductory Scorecard article on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) by going HERE . That article will send you HERE . There you will find the data on my “Free Cash Flow Yield” ratio which is one of three parts that I use it tabulating my final “Scorecard”. While free cash flow yield is a Wall Street ratio (Valuation Ratio), I also wrote an article that concentrated on my “CapFlow” and “FROIC” Ratios, which are Main Street ratios, which you can read about by going HERE . In this article I will generate my Scorecard results for each component and basically combine all three ratio results to generate one final result. Once completed, my Scorecard should give everyone a clearer understanding on how accurate the valuation is that Wall Street has assigned each company relative to its actual Main Street performance. Before we show you the final results of my Scorecard, here is brief introduction to how it works: Scorecard The Scorecard is the final score for any company under analysis and this is done by combining the three ratio (listed below) final results into one analysis, we grade each company with either a passing score of 1 or a failing score of 0 per ratio where a perfect final score per stock would be a 3. The ideal CapFlow results are anything less than 33%. The ideal FROIC score is any result above 20%. The ideal Free Cash Flow Yield is anything over 10%. So in analyzing Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) for example, we get for TTM (trailing twelve months). For the conservative investor: CAPFLOW = 16% PASSED FROIC = 34% PASSED FREE CASH FLOW YIELD = 7.6% FAILED SCORECARD SCORE = 2 (Out of possible 3) For the aggressive or “Buy & Hold” investor, we get a Scorecard score of 3 as Apple’s 7.6% free cash flow yield would be classified as a buy. These are the parameters for the Free Cash Flow Yield. It is important before preceding to determine what kind of investor you are as determined by the amount of risk you are willing to take. Then once you have done that, then pick the parameter list below that fits your risk tolerance. So without further ado here are the final Scorecard results for the components that make up the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF . What my Scorecard also achieves, besides telling you which individual stocks are attractive and which are not, is that it also allows you in “one shot” to see how overvalued or attractively valued the stock market is as a whole. For example, for the conservative investor now is the time to be extremely cautious as only these fifteen stocks came in with a perfect score of “3” As you can see I only found 15 bargains out of 600 for the conservative low risk investor and that comes out to just 2.5% of the total universe being bargains! As for the aggressive investor, who is willing to take on more risk, we have only 28 stocks that are considered higher risk bargains. That comes out to only 4.6% being attractive and 95.4% being holds or sells. So as you can see as a portfolio manager I have to work extremely hard just to find one needle in the haystack, while in March 2009 there were probably 300 bargains for the conservative investor at that time. Thus this data clearly shows that we are at the opposite extreme of where we were in 2009 and are in my opinion, at an extremely overvalued level. Here is the same analysis using the Dow Jones Index where I actually analyzed that index for 2001, 2009 and 2015. You can view those results by going HERE . In getting back to the main table above, the “TOTALS” you see at the end are the sum of each ratio divided by 600. The totals for both Scorecards are out of 1800 (1 point for each ratio result) as a perfect score were every stock would be a bargain. Therefore the conservative scorecard result is 374/1800 or 20.77% out of 100% and the more aggressive/buy & hold scorecard came in at 476/1800 or 26.44% out of 100%. The beauty of this system is that you can now compare this index result to any other index or ETF in juxtaposition. For example the S&P 500 Index for the conservative scorecard result is 384/1500 or 25.6% out of 100% and the more aggressive/buy & hold scorecard came in at 488/1500 or 32.5% out of 100%. Both clearly are not inspiring and could be a clear sign that the markets are ready for serious correction going forward. Always remember that the results shown above should not be considered investment advice, but just the results of the ratios. The system outlined in this article is just meant to be used as reference material to be included as just “one” part of everyone’s own due diligence. So in other words, don’t make investment decisions based on just my Scorecard results, but incorporate them as part of your own due diligence.

Virtus To Acquire Majority Stake In ETF Platform

Founded in 2012, ETF Issuer Solutions (ETFis) is a turnkey platform available for investment manager looking to launch new exchange traded funds (ETFs), but don’t want to create and manage their own ETF infrastructure. Currently, the firm has three exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the market and seven more in registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), all of which are, or will be, managed by external sub-advisors. All of this looked appealing to Virtus Investment Partners who yesterday announced an agreement to acquire a majority interest in the firm, in a deal expected to close in March. Active and Passive ETF Platform According to a statement from Virtus, the transaction will add to Virtus’s product lineup by improving its “manufacturing capabilities” for both active and passive ETFs. Currently, Virtus has two alternative mutual funds in registration: The Virtus Long/Short Equity Fund and the Virtus Multi-Strategy Target Return Fund, both of which had paperwork filed on January 22. ETFis will become a Virtus affiliate and continue to operate as a multi-manager ETF platform. ETFis’s co-founders Matthew B. Brown and William J. Smalley will stay on with the firm. Currently, Mr. Brown is ETFis’s head of operations and technology capabilities, and Mr. Smalley is the firm’s head of product strategy and management. Said Mr. Smalley: We developed ETF Issuer Solutions to provide a technology-driven, ETF-specific platform that offers significant cost and operational efficiencies. The partnership with Virtus gives us the resources and support to execute on our long-term vision of building a leading multi-manager ETF platform. Focus on External Sub-Advisors All of ETFis’s ETFs, including the seven yet to launch, have external sub-advisers. The firm’s current products include the InfraCap MLP ETF (NYSEARCA: AMZA ), sub-advised by Infrastructure Capital Advisors; and the BioShares Biotechnology Products ETF (NASDAQ: BBP ) and BioShares Biotechnology Clinical Trials ETF (NASDAQ: BBC ), both of which are sub-advised by LifeSci Index Partners. ETFis’s products currently in registration with the SEC include: The Newfleet Multi-Sector Unconstrained Bond ETF; The Eccles Street Event Driven Opportunities ETF; The Tuttle Tactical Management U.S. Core ETF; The InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF; and The Manna Core Equity Enhanced Dividend Stream Fund. Of these, the Newfleet Multi-Sector Unconstrained Bond ETF will be the first managed by a Virtus affiliate added to ETFis’s platform. The fund is to be sub-advised by the experienced team at Newfleet Asset Management and will “have the flexibility to capitalize on opportunities across all sectors of the bond markets.” The fund’s paperwork was filed with the SEC on January 26. Said George Aylward, Virtus CEO: There is growing interest among financial advisors and investors to use exchange-traded funds in their retail and institutional portfolios because of the tax efficiency and liquidity benefits that ETFs offer. This partnership with ETFis will expand our product capabilities and allow us to offer compelling investment strategies in an actively managed ETF format.

Adding The Agriculture ETF And A Portfolio Update

One of our holdings, (Nestle) may have lower profits in the short term due to the strength of the Swiss Franc. Nevertheless we are holding this stock long term. Our long bond position is performing very well. It gives our portfolio stability and it acts as a hedge against falling prices in our equities. We have added 2 new agricultural ETFs to our portfolio. We are investing with the trend for the time being but I expect to deploy more capital into DBA soon. First of all, an update on our 1% portfolio. In our equity asset class, we are holding Nestle ( OTCPK:NSRGY ). As many of you know, the Swiss National Bank announced the abandonment of the currency peg with the euro. The following day a follower emailed me and asked if we were going to continue to hold Nestle as this company is headquartered in Switzerland. The answer is a definite yes! We may have some downward movement in Nestle in the short term as the Swiss Franc strengthens against other currencies. Nestle sells all over the world in other currencies and if these international currencies weaken substantially against the Swiss Franc, then Nestle profit margins may be hit as their accounts are filed in Swiss Francs. Nevertheless this is a currency issue, not a fundamental issue. The stock has excellent fundamentals and has been in strong bull mode since 2001 (see chart). The company is yielding just under 3% and has increased its dividend for the past 18 years straight! Similar to American Express (NYSE: AXP ), we are going to stay the course with this holding. (click to enlarge) Our bond position in the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NYSEARCA: BND ) is creating a lot of controversy as many think our stake in this asset class is too large. Currently we have $100k invested in this asset class. Let me explain the reasoning behind this decision. I learned early on in my investing career that if your money is divided equally but your investments are not equal in their risk, you are not balanced. Most portfolios are made up of stocks and the problem with these types of portfolios is that they don’t protect you in bear markets. Today (27-1-2015) we have the S&P falling sharply and bonds rallying. This has been the case more or less since the 2008 equity crash. U.S. Bonds have been a flight to safety when U.S. equities have fallen. A portfolio is not just made up of asset classes in equal proportions. We must also understand how these asset classes compare to each other. In the short term, our bond position is going to act as a hedge against our stock positions and we will also collect the 2% yield it pays out. We need to have a portfolio that will make us money if we have inflation or deflation or if we have economic growth or recessions. Every asset class has its bull markets and bear markets and nobody (no matter who they are) can predict the future. We have had the real estate bull market in the early 2000’s and then the stock market revival since 2008. What asset class will provide the next bull run? Gold, Agriculture, will real estate come back strong? The fact of the matter is that nobody knows and until new trends start to take place, we will stay long our bond position Finally, we are going to add an agricultural presence to our portfolio. These ETFs are going to give our portfolio stability as they are not volatile. I compared the Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (NYSEARCA: MOO ) and the PowerShares DB Agriculture ETF (NYSEARCA: DBA ) (see chart below): (click to enlarge) We will invest an initial $70k into this sector with $50k going into the Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF and $20k into the PowerShares DB Agriculture ETF. The Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF has vastly outperformed The PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund over the last 7 years because it’s a fund invested in U.S. companies in this sector. Moreover, it definitely has been helped by the stock market rally since 2008. However, I expect the trend in the above chart to change in the near future. When it does, we will rebalance this sector and invest more heavily into DBA. This fund solely concentrates on price movement of the agricultural commodities (corn, sugar, wheat, etc.) and that is where I think the big gains will be in this sector going forward. Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Now that you’ve read this, are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Sentiment on ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Why are you ? Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague