Tag Archives: fn-end

Industrial Metals ETFs Investing 101

A stronger greenback, falling oil prices and an economic slowdown in China have lately emerged as major headwinds for the global metal industry. Moreover, excess supply has been a perennial problem for the industry. Iron ore has lost 50% of its value in 2014, the biggest annual decline in at least five years, impacted by excessive inventory along with abundant supply and slow economic growth in China. Global steel production has also been weak, mainly dragged down by a slowdown in China’s output, which affected demand for iron ore, its main ingredient. The low prices have squeezed margins of iron producers leading to the cancellation or suspension of mining projects. Moreover, softness in China amid an oversupply had led to a decline in copper prices in 2014. Copper prices further dipped to a four-year low in November end to $2.861 per pound on falling oil prices. Overall, copper fared the worst among all industrial metals, with prices declining 11% through the year. On the other hand, during 2014, the global aluminum industry went through a substantial change to correct the supply-demand imbalance. Major aluminum producers like Rusal and Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA ) cut their aluminum production, resulting in tightening of aluminum supply, which sent the metal’s prices northward. However, in the last months of 2014, falling oil prices and weak industrial data from China have led to a drop in aluminum prices. Aluminum is an energy intensive industry, with energy costs accounting for nearly 30% of the total cost of production. Falling oil prices tend to have a deflationary effect on aluminum. Nevertheless, aluminum prices ended the year with a 13% gain, higher than January levels. What’s in Store? Iron : The threat of oversupply looms large over the iron ore industry as major producers, Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE: BHP ), Vale S.A. (NYSE: VALE ) and Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. ( OTCQX:FSUGY ), continue to ramp up production. Australia, the world’s top exporter, cut its iron ore price estimate for next year by 33% as the surging output will outpace Chinese demand growth, leading to a supply glut. Global apparent steel use is expected to grow 2% in 2015 to reach 1,594 Mt. Softness in steel demand in China will continue to be a drag on the same. China is the largest consumer of iron ore, accounting for around 60% of the global seaborne market. Thus, the mismatch between the excess supply and demand for iron ore will keep iron ore prices subdued in the near term. Aluminum : Aluminum consumption is expected to improve on a global basis spurred by the automotive and packaging industries, its key consumer markets. The airline industry is also expected to boost demand for the metal. Following China, which accounts for over 40% of the global aluminum consumption, India appears promising given its current low level of aluminum consumption and high urban population growth. With demand remaining strong and the industry pulling in the reins on supply, the aluminum market is likely to witness deficits for a prolonged period. This will support high aluminum prices going forward. Copper : The copper market seems to be shifting into supply surplus. In the near term, prices will be influenced by economic activity in the U.S. and other industrialized countries. Revival in demand from China will also act as a catalyst. Notwithstanding the current volatility in prices, we have a long-term bullish stance on copper, supported by its widespread use in transportation, manufacturing and construction, limited supplies from existing mines and the absence of new significant development projects. To Sum Up A revival in the Chinese economy on the back of policy support and correction of the supply-demand imbalance will be instrumental in driving growth in the industry, while projected earnings growth for 2015 instills optimism in the same. ETFs to Tap the Sector An ETF approach can help spread out assets among a variety of companies and reduce company-specific risk at a very low cost. There are currently two ETFs available to play this sector. SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (NYSEARCA: XME ) Launched in Jun 2006, XME seeks to replicate the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index. The S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index represents the metals and mining sub-industry portion of the S&P Total Market Index. The fund currently has AUM of $390.4 million. XME has a trading volume of roughly 1.6 million shares a day, suggesting little or no extra cost in the form of bid/ask spreads. The ETF is a low-cost choice, charging a net expense ratio of 35 basis points a year, while the dividend yield is 2.30% currently. The fund currently holds 35 stocks in its basket, with only 38.12% of assets in the top 10 holdings. From a commodities perspective, the product is heavily weighted toward steel with 41% sector weightage, followed by coal and consumable fuels (17%), diversified metal and mining (13%), aluminum (11%), silver (7%), gold (7%) and precious metals and minerals (4%). Among individual holdings, top stocks in the ETF include Hecla Mining Co. (NYSE: HL ), TimkenSteel Corporation (NYSE: TMST ) and Compass Minerals International Inc. (NYSE: CMP ) with asset allocation of 4.19%, 4.14% and 3.88%, respectively. iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (NYSEARCA: PICK ) The ETF seeks to match the price and yield performance of MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. This index measures the equity performance of companies in both developed and emerging markets that are primarily involved in the extraction and production of diversified metals, aluminum, steel and precious metals and minerals, excluding gold and silver. Launched in Jan 2012, the fund has so far attracted AUM of $158 million. It has a trading volume of roughly 16,257 shares a day. The ETF is currently charging a net expense ratio of 39 basis points a year, with a dividend yield of 2.91%. The fund currently holds 209 stocks with 98% sector weightage toward basic materials. The fund allocates nearly 50% of the assets in the top 10 firms, which suggests that company-specific risk is somewhat high, as the top 10 holdings dominate half of the returns. Among individual holdings, top three stocks in the ETF include BHP Billiton Limited ( BHP ), Rio Tinto plc (NYSE: RIO ) and Glencore Plc (GLEN.L) with asset allocation of 10.81%, 8.4% and 6.76%, respectively. The fund is widely diversified across various countries, and Australia tops the list, holding 24.7% of the fund, followed by the United States (10.9%) and United Kingdom (9.96%). These three nations make up for nearly 46% of the assets.

Materials ETF: XLB No. 8 Select Sector SPDR In 2014

Summary The Materials exchange-traded fund finished eighth by return among the nine Select Sector SPDRs in 2014. The ETF was a winner in the first and second quarters, flattish in the third and a loser in the fourth. Seasonality analysis indicates its downward trajectory could continue in the first quarter. The Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLB ) in 2014 ranked No. 8 by return among the Select Sector SPDRs that section the S&P 500 into nine subdivisions. On an adjusted closing daily share-price basis, XLB progressed to $48.58 from $45.33, a yield of $3.25, or 7.17 percent. Accordingly, it lagged its sibling, the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA: XLU ) and parent proxy, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY ) by -21.57 and -6.29 percentage points, in that order. (XLB closed at $47.19 Wednesday.) XLB also ranked No. 8 among the sector SPDRs in the fourth quarter, when it behaved worse than XLU and SPY by -14.60 and -6.32 percentage points, respectively. And XLB ranked No. 6 among the sector SPDRs in December, when it performed worse than XLU and SPY by -4.13 and -0.30 percentage points, in that order. Figure 1: XLB Monthly Change, 2014 Vs. 1999-2013 Mean (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance . XLB behaved worse in 2014 as it did during its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly means calculated by employing data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 1). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the third, with an absolutely large negative return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely larger positive return. Inconsistent with this pattern last year, the ETF actually had a loss in Q4. Figure 2: XLB Monthly Change, 2014 Versus 1999-2013 Median (click to enlarge) Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on analyses of adjusted closing monthly share prices at Yahoo Finance. XLB performed a little worse in 2014 than it did during its initial 15 full years of existence based on the monthly medians calculated by using data associated with that historical time frame (Figure 2). The same data set shows the average year’s weakest quarter was the third, with an absolutely large negative return, and its strongest quarter was the fourth, with an absolutely larger positive return. It also shows there is no historical statistical tendency for the ETF to explode in Q1. Figure 3: XLB’s Top 10 Holdings and P/E-G Ratios, Jan. 14 (click to enlarge) Note: The XLB holding-weight-by-percentage scale is on the left (green), and the company price/earnings-to-growth ratio scale is on the right (red). Source: This J.J.’s Risky Business chart is based on data at the XLB microsite and Yahoo Finance (both current as of Jan. 14). LyondellBasell Industries NV (NYSE: LYB ) aside, XLB’s top 10 holdings appear to range between fairly valued and overvalued (Figure 3). And these kinds of valuations seem unlikely to function as tailwinds for the ETF this quarter, even though the numbers on the S&P 500 materials sector reported by S&P Senior Index Analyst Howard Silverblatt Dec. 31 indicated the sector’s valuation is not superstretched, with its P/E-G ratio at 1.26. However, I suspect XLB will continue to be a laggard among the Select Sector SPDRs in Q1, mostly because of the bias divergence in monetary policy at major central banks around the world. On the one hand, the U.S. Federal Reserve is oriented toward tightening; on the other hand, the Bank of Japan, European Central Bank and People’s Bank of China are oriented toward loosening. This bias divergence has had important effects on currency-exchange rates, such as the one centered on the euro and U.S. dollar pair: The EUR/USD cross dipped from as high as $1.3992 May 8 to as low as $1.1753 Jan. 8, a drop of -$0.2239, or -16.00 percent. This change in EUR/USD and similar moves in other currency pairs could pressure earnings of U.S. companies in sectors with substantial international businesses. It is noteworthy the Fed announced the conclusion of asset purchases under its latest quantitative-easing program Oct. 29 and may announce the beginning of interest-rate hikes April 29. Its ending of purchases under its first two formal QE programs this century is associated with a correction and a bear market in large-capitalization equities, as evidenced by SPY’s falling -17.19 percent and -21.69 percent in 2010 and 2011, respectively. If one were to argue that this time is different, then I would have to wonder: Why? Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein by the author do not constitute an investment recommendation, and they are unsuitable for employment in the making of investment decisions. The opinions expressed herein address only certain aspects of potential investment in any securities and cannot substitute for comprehensive investment analysis. The opinions expressed herein are based on an incomplete set of information, illustrative in nature, and limited in scope. In addition, the opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s best judgment as of the date of publication, and they are subject to change without notice.

Get Out Of Swiss Stocks Now: Barclays

By Michael Ide Swiss stocks took a beating yesterday (and are falling again today) after the Swiss National Bank ’s decision to end the 1.20 cap on the EUR/CHF exchange rate. But if you are a non-CHF investor the exchange rate shift more than made up for falling stock prices, pushing the Swiss Index up in USD even as it fell in CHF. Barclays PLC analysts Dennis Jose and Ian Scott think this is the perfect opportunity for those non-CHF investors to get out (although many would have argued that before the big drop would have been a better time). “The sudden appreciation of the Swiss franc has provided a windfall to non-Swiss denominated investors despite the decline in the stock market in domestic currency terms,” they write. “We advocate switching out of Swiss stocks into Euro Area stocks now… if as per our FX view, the CHF weakens hereon, the benefit to non-CHF returns should no longer be there.” Non-CHF investors should take advantage of temporary exchange rate effects: Barclays The obvious reason to take yesterday’s gains and get out of the Swiss market is that Swiss companies are expected to face earnings pressure now that their currency has gotten stronger. The SNB has said that the strength of the Swiss franc is still a concern, part of the reason Jose and Scott expect it to depreciate by other means, but it probably won’t return to the 1.20 EUR/CHF exchange rate naturally any time soon. Non-Swiss investors who stay invested risk watching the beneficial exchange rate effects wear off while stock prices continue to struggle and dividends probably get reduced. (click to enlarge) European QE could undermine the Swiss stock market The other reason to worry about Swiss stocks is the effect that European QE would have on Switzerland. Swiss stock market gains have been inversely correlated with German Bund yields for more than a decade. If that relationship continues, then when ECB QE pushes yields higher it would also pull Swiss stock prices down. We won’t know officially whether the ECB is going to start buying sovereign bonds until January 22, but all signs point to yes – the SNB decision being the most recent signal. Investors who wait until the end of the month to make their decision by may not be able to exit quite as easily. Jose and Scott removed Credit Suisse Group AG (ADR) (NYSE: CS ) and Adecco ( OTCPK:AHEXY ) from their recommended European portfolio and replaced them with Airbus ( OTCPK:EADSY ) and Publicis ( OTCQX:PUBGY ). (click to enlarge) Disclosure: None Editor’s Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks. Now that you’ve read this, are you Bullish or Bearish on ? Bullish Bearish Sentiment on ( ) Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Why are you ? Submit & View Results Skip to results » Share this article with a colleague