Tag Archives: europe

Is Listed Infrastructure The Most Attractive Investment Avenue Now?

Summary In the current global scenario where traditional asset classes no longer assure stable returns, listed infrastructure is attracting investors in a big way. In 2015, investors have largely been cautious about the equity markets due to expectations of stable growth in the US and the likely interest rate hike by the Fed. However, inconsistent economic indicators, the Greek crisis, and a slowdown in China impacted returns. Even amid concerns about the global economy, bond yields were at their lowest in most developed economies, making fixed income investments unattractive. Global fund managers consider real estate an alternative investment avenue for stable returns on their investments, as real estate assets are likely to witness substantial price appreciation. By Ati Ranjan and Subarna Poddar Global fund managers consider real estate an alternative investment avenue for stable returns on their investments, as real estate assets are likely to witness substantial price appreciation. Listed infrastructure, an up-and-coming segment of the real estate sector, is gradually gaining traction among fund managers due to its monopolistic nature, price inelasticity, stable predicted cash flows, and inflation hedging characteristic. Although these assets are also traded in the form of equities, the underlying asset is immune to default risks due to strong government backing. Furthermore, these equities act as defensive plays during the downturn. Listed infrastructure assets are largely government or quasi-government owned. The sovereign backing makes ongoing infrastructure projects less likely to default compared with other privately held real estate asset classes. These assets work in a cost plus model; hence, profitability is already hedged. Also, listed infrastructure assets typically enjoy monopoly due to entry barriers set by the local governments, thus maintaining stable cash flows. Demand for these assets is often inelastic to price changes, such as electricity, water, toll, as people continue using these utilities despite tariff changes. Thus, this asset class provides stable returns even during an economic downturn. Although investment in infrastructure is capital intensive, the equity route makes it cheaper, investor friendly and keeps transactions transparent. High-return, moderate-risk asset class What is listed infrastructure? Listed infrastructure is a comprehensive and diversified asset class of largely state-owned or public-private partnership (NYSE: PPP ) companies that develop, manage, and own assets related to energy, communications, water, transportation, and other systems essential for an economy. This asset class is segmented into small units and listed as equities on stock exchanges. Hence, the quantum of investment is lower than that of a direct investment in real estate. Furthermore, these equities act as defensive plays and protect investors during market corrections as they carry low default risk and are backed by sovereigns. The asset class outperformed during pre and post crisis period If we compare the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index with its peers over the pre and post economic crisis period, we can see that infrastructure clearly outperformed during the pre-crisis (2006-07) and post recovery period, i.e., 2012 onward. During the recovery period (2010-2011), the asset class clearly outperformed equities (S&P 500 Index). The chart below shows that the asset class has remained superior to equity investments over 12 years and, hence, we can conclude that it offers better returns irrespective of the economic conditions. Performances of various asset classes over last 12 years: Source: Bloomberg Most attractive features of listed infrastructure Financial and operational performance · Access: Direct exposure to global basic infrastructure facilities that are monopolistic · Liquidity: Liquid exposure to infrastructure investments, and no issue with deal flows and fixed investment horizon · Transparency: Access to existing and established infrastructure facilities, and no issue with blind pool investing · Low impact of regulatory changes: Regulatory changes are managed by governments; as these assets are primarily government or PPP projects, the regulatory changes are likely to have low impact on them · Diversification: Allows global investors to easily diversify their portfolio holdings as per the specific risk profile (e.g., geographic allocation, currency, level of gearing, and regulatory and political risks) · Cost: Cost is lower than unlisted infrastructure investments or direct buying/selling of properties · Level of gearing: Lower level of gearing than unlisted infrastructure and real estate firms, and primarily backed by government funding Classification of listed infrastructure Source: Aranca Research Cash generation and return · Higher dividend: Dividend accounted for over 33% of the overall returns of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index in the last 10 years; average dividend growth outpaced average inflation. · Predictable cash flow: The assets work in a cost plus model; therefore, future profitability is secured. · Inflation protection: Revenues of listed infrastructure companies are linked to inflation, thereby providing protection against it. (i.e. concessions permitting rent escalations linked to inflation, regulated price mechanisms that consider rate of inflation) Growth in dividend per share of listed infrastructure companies vs. CPI (click to enlarge) Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, IMF, Bloomberg, Aranca Research Operational risks Delays: Since these kinds of projects are majorly government owned, there are possibilities of delays in project execution; this could interrupt income generation from the project. Financing: As many emerging market economies are facing funding shortage, there is possibility of slower disbursement of resources as well, as big funding organizations may not sanction adequate grants. Recovery of other alternative asset classes: Other asset classes could recover at a faster pace and make investment in listed infrastructure assets less attractive. Why listed infrastructure? Since the beginning of 2015, global equity markets have witnessed significant volatility due to a series of global events. Slowdown in China’s economy, declining GDP of Japan and the Greek debt crisis dampened investor sentiment. The Eurozone still has a long road ahead in terms of complete recovery. Amid a strengthening dollar, emerging economies such as China and India are not offering encouraging signs to equity investors. The US is the only market that has performed fairly well in 2015 compared with other geographies, supported by a bullish dollar and an expected rate hike by the US Federal Reserve later this year. The ongoing volatility in oil prices have kept investors directionless. Oil prices witnessed a steep fall until mid-2015, primarily due to strong non-OPEC oil production forecast. The OPEC’s refusal to reduce oil output worsened the situation. Furthermore, the withdrawal of sanctions on Iran after the nuclear deal exerted pressure on oil prices. The weak outlook for oil prices impacted the earnings of companies in the energy sector across the world, which consequently reflected in their stock prices. In addition, the ongoing drop in commodity prices affected investor sentiment across global markets. Separately, possibility of new drug pricing rules triggered negativity about biotech stocks, which was once considered the most defensive sector. Performance of major global equity indices (2015 YTD) Source: Bloomberg Among the investment options available, portfolio managers prefer fixed income or bonds, real estate investment trusts (REITs), bullion, and listed infrastructure to create a balanced portfolio. Bond yields globally are already under pressure and reached their all-time lows in January 2015 (US 30-year Treasury yield at +1.7%, UK 10-year gilt yield +1.4%). Moreover, any increase in the rates, especially a rate hike by the US Fed, would make them an unattractive investment option. With regards to gold, a sharp drop in its prices has severely impacted its safe-haven status. With continued decline in commodity and gold prices, the bullion price is expected to remain under pressure in the near term. Real estate is another alternative that provides higher capital gains; however, it is capital intensive and, hence, represents higher risk. In such a scenario, where most of the sectors are underperforming, a defensive play with stable returns and moderate risks is likely to gain attention of the global fund managers. Listed infrastructure is an asset class with all the above mentioned qualities. It offers high returns as well as steady income and assured capital benefits. The equity route makes it less capital intensive and provides benefits of the bull-run during positive economic scenario. Furthermore, this asset class is inflation protected. The inflation-linked nature of revenue from infrastructure businesses enables an automatic hedging against any rise in interest rates, thereby providing listed infrastructure an edge over other investment options. Market size of listed infrastructure assets to rapidly increase According to McKinsey Global Institute, infrastructure investment of around USD57 trillion would be required to achieve the projected global GDP by 2030, accounting for 3.5% of the expected global GDP in 2030. Furthermore, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates a required global investment of USD40 trillion in new and existing infrastructure projects by 2030. With such large infrastructure spending, opportunities in listed infrastructure are expected to substantially increase. Market capitalization of listed infrastructure assets has increased to USD3.3 trillion in 2015 YTD as compared to USD861 billion in 15 years ago. Market capitalization of global listed infrastructure Source: Aranca Research The advancements in the global listed infrastructure market have enabled easier access to an asset class that has been traditionally illiquid. Historically, the global listed infrastructure market has performed robustly irrespective of the market scenario. This asset class offers higher returns at moderate risk. Currently, in addition to several smaller-sized funds, six major global funds are operating in this segment, with a combined asset size of USD4 billion. Some major players in the listed infrastructure segment that hold investments from top global fund managers are: Source: Fund fact sheets, Aranca Research Larger players attract major portion of investments in listed infrastructure The S&P Global Infrastructure Index comprises 76 companies, with a combined market capitalization of nearly USD1.2 trillion. The top 10 companies account for a large portion of the market capitalization. In terms of sector classification, Industrials accounts for 40.7% of the total index weight, followed by Utilities (39.3%) and Energy (20.0%). The key index players attract higher investments from global fund managers. S&P Global Infrastructure Index Country Number of constituents Index weight (%) US 22 35.1% Canada 7 7.9% Australia 4 7.8% Italy 4 7.1% UK 4 6.9% France 3 6.9% China 8 5.9% Spain 2 5.2% Japan 4 4.1% Germany 2 2.7% Singapore 3 2.6% Mexico 2 2.3% New Zealand 1 1.3% Switzerland 1 1.3% Brazil 3 1.1% Chile 2 0.7% Austria 1 0.4% Hong Kong 2 0.4% Netherlands 1 0.3% Source: Index fact sheet Listed infrastructure – an attractive alternative investment in current scenario Listed infrastructure assets have high potential for steady returns, low volatility, diversification, higher income, longer duration, and abundant capacity. Such investment options were traditionally considered off-market activities; however, listed infrastructure is an upcoming and promising real estate investment alternative, and is likely to be widely accepted globally. We believe the asset class is not overvalued and is trading at a fair projected 12-month P/E of 8.05x (P/E of S&P Global Infrastructure Index) compared with 15.2x P/E of S&P 500, offering significant opportunities for investors. Emerging investment opportunities in the water, communications and transmission, transportation, and distribution sectors are expected to substantially influence the listed infrastructure segment, driving growth in this segment and attracting long-term investors. Upgrading infrastructure is expected to become one of the key focus areas for governments of emerging economies. Demand for electricity, water, and sanitation would significantly increase due to higher population growth and urbanization. Hence, despite the recent drop in commodity prices, resource-rich governments would continue investing significant capital into infrastructure investments. Key drivers of listed infrastructure assets across the world are: Global population growth: According to the IMF projections, the global population is expected to grow over 8 billion by 2020. Increasing population requires additional housing and power supply, public transport, clean water, healthcare, and education facilities, which would further increase demand for public spending in the infrastructure sector. Increasing wealth: With per capital income growing in developing countries, the population would start expecting world-class infrastructure facilities. Economic expansion: Economic expansion in Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC nations) and Southeast Asia would boost government spending on social infrastructure. Urbanization: With growing urbanization in the developed as well as developing countries, demand for road transportation, telecom, and energy utilities is expected to significantly rise. Climate change: Improved long-distance infrastructure is essential not only for more efficient provision of energy but also for potentially remote and renewable energy resources such as solar and wind. Climate change represents both a challenge and an opportunity for development in emerging markets. Limited supply: Roads, airports, and pipelines can only operate up to a fixed maximum capacity, beyond which additional assets are required. As emerging markets develop, governments typically focus on ensuring the transport infrastructure is sufficiently robust to support growth. Shift in financing: As governments worldwide increasingly face fiscal constraints, particularly in the developed world, the private sector is expected to be involved greatly in construction responsibilities through the PPP route. The private sector is actively involved through PPP into listed infrastructure projects in Australia, Europe, Canada, and the US, and this trend is expected to continue. Performance of two of the largest listed infrastructure funds Source: Fund fact sheets Major listed infrastructure funds and their asset size (click to enlarge) Source: Fund fact sheets, Aranca Research Breakdown of the listed infrastructure investment universe Source: Aranca Research.

The Smart Beta Rally That Many Investors Missed In 2015

By Luciano Siracusano, III One of the big trends in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry has been this year’s flow of new money into developed world equity ETFs, both unhedged and currency hedged. WisdomTree estimates that nearly $100 billion of this year’s $171 billion in ETF industry inflows cascaded into these funds through the end of October. But the vast majority of assets in international equity ETFs-and the vast majority of net inflows this year-has been concentrated primarily in developed world large-cap strategies. While equity returns for the MSCI Europe and MSCI Japan indexes have, thus far in 2015, exceeded those generated by the S&P 500 Index, the bigger bull market has actually occurred in the smaller-company segment of the developed world. If we look at year-to-date returns through October 30, we can see by how much small-cap indexes have outperformed compared to broad market indexes comprising primarily large-cap companies in Europe, Japan and the developed world. (click to enlarge) For definitions of indexes in the chart, visit our glossary . What’s interesting is that the excess return produced by the small caps compared to their large-cap brethren is not just a 2015 phenomenon. Excess returns have held up over the last year, three years, five years and the better part of the last decade going back to the inception of the WisdomTree Indexes back in May of 2006. When One Compares Returns across Asset Classes, Additional Light Bulbs Light Up The double-digit gains European and Japanese small caps have generated thus far in 2015 have not only surpassed the broad European and Japanese benchmarks (MSCI Europe and MSCI Japan), they have outperformed the major asset classes investors typically tap to construct a globally diversified portfolio: large caps and small caps in the U.S. 1 ; MSCI EAFE Index and MSCI Emerging Markets Index; REITs 2 , U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds 3 ; commodities 4 and gold 5 . Moreover, year-to-date in 2015, small caps measured by the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index and the WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend Index outperformed each of the major indexes designed to measure how each smart beta factor is performing: MSCI Momentum, MSCI Quality, MSCI Value, MSCI Low Volatility or MSCI Size. What accounts for the divergence in returns? Part of it can be explained by sector concentrations, country and currency exposure. Another reason: Small-cap stocks are less tied to the global economy and often more sensitive to inflections in local economies. This can be partly explained by the historic tendency of small-company stocks to outperform large caps. This is one of the reasons that back in 2006 WisdomTree became the first ETF manager to launch international small-cap ETFs. At that time, WisdomTree knew that international small caps not only added potential for higher returns compared to large caps but they could also provide diversification benefits to a globally diversified portfolio. Since its inception in 2006, for example, the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index had a correlation of .49 to the S&P 500. Adding components with lower correlations to one’s U.S. equity exposure has the potential to lower the overall volatility of a globally diversified portfolio. Conclusion Because most passive indexes and active international managers tend to concentrate primarily on large-cap stocks, international investors may miss the potential of small-cap companies unless they make a conscious effort to include them in their portfolios. We believe international small-cap exposure can help investors complete their international allocations. Returns this year in Europe, Japan and the developed world add additional real-time evidence to support our thesis. Unless otherwise stated, data sources are Bloomberg and WisdomTree. Sources S&P 500 and Russell 2000 Index. MSCI US REIT Gross Total Return and S&P Global ex-U.S. REIT USD Index. Barclays US Agg Corporate Yield-To-Worst and Barclays U.S. High Yield 2% Issr Cap Yield To Worst. Commodity Research Bureau BLS/US Spot all Commodities Index. Gold Spot Price Index. Important Risks Related to this Article Performance, especially for very short periods, should not be the sole factor in making your investment decision. Foreign investing involves special risks, such as risk of loss from currency fluctuation or political or economic uncertainty. Investments focusing on certain sectors and/or smaller companies increase their vulnerability to any single economic or regulatory development. Investments in commodities may be affected by overall market movements, changes in interest rates, and other factors, such as weather, disease, embargoes and international economic and political developments. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. Luciano Siracusano, III, Executive Vice President-Head of Sales and Chief Investment Strategist Luciano Siracusano, III has served as our Executive Vice President-Head of Sales and Chief Investment Strategist since March 2011. Prior to serving in those positions, Mr. Siracusano served as our Director of Research from 2001 until October 2008, and as a research analyst and editor of our various media publications from 1999 until 2001. Mr. Siracusano, together with Mr. Steinberg, was responsible for the creation and development of our fundamentally weighted index methodology.

Why The U.S. Stock Market Never Completely Recovered

Clearly, the global economic slowdown remains a headwind for U.S. stocks. The same canaries in the investment mines that stopped serenading last summer are straining their vocal chords once again. In sum, the S&P 500 has never fully recovered because global economic headwinds, equity overvaluation and anemic market breadth remain. Some things go unnoticed. For example, the S&P 500 rallied 13% off its closing lows (1867) set in late August. Lost in the shuffle? The popular benchmark has yet to revisit its closing highs (2130) registered back in May. In essence, the corrective activity that began in the springtime as a function of a faltering global economy, overvalued equities and weakening market internals has yet to run its course. What’s more, these factors that led to the August-September sell-off in risk assets are unlikely to dissipate quickly. Let’s start with the macro-economic backdrop. Data show that quantitative easing (QE) in Europe is not stimulating borrowing activity the way that it stimulated borrowing activity in the United States. If European consumers and European businesses are fearful to take out loans – or if creditors are unwilling to extend credit – the euro-zone economy is unlikely to show improvement. Similarly, European stocks would not experience much of a boost from share buybacks. Not surprisingly, then, the Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (NYSEARCA: VGK ) failed to rise above its 200-day moving average; it never came close to recapturing its 52-week high. At this moment, the euro-zone proxy is still 12% below its high-water mark. Europe is hardly the only canker sore on the world stage. Japan recently revised its economic growth projections lower. China is slowing dramatically. And nations that depend upon natural resources exports (e.g., Australia, Canada, Brazil, Chile, etc.) are witnessing yet another downturn in commodity prices. In fact, the PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking ETF (NYSEARCA: DBC ) has plummeted back to levels not seen since the late August free-fall for U.S. stocks. The bullish case for U.S. stocks continues to rely on the notion that the rest of the world does not matter. Ironically, the Federal Reserve did not raise borrowing costs in September and cast doubt on any rate hike this year when it stated that “…global economic and financial developments may restrain economic activity.” The central bank subsequently backtracked at its October meeting by removing its commentary on global issues altogether. So do the economic hardships abroad matter or not? They matter with respect to corporate earnings and revenue. Consider the reality that corporate profits as well as sales were negative for the recent quarter (Q3) and that multinationals with greater overseas exposure witnessed steeper year-over-year declines. Clearly, the global economic slowdown remains a headwind for U.S. stocks. What’s more, declining earnings and declining revenue continue to pressure U.S. stock valuations . We are now looking at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.84 – one of the highest P/S ratios on record. The third component that sent stocks tumbling back in August was the softening of market internals . In particular, the discrepancy between the S&P 500’s Advance-Decline (A/D) Line and that of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) pointed to fewer and fewer large companies holding up the benchmark. Here in November, the disparity appears to have resurfaced. Some researchers have been particularly outspoken on the lack of market breadth. Heading into the current week of trading, Strategas Research Partners noted that ” the 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 have contributed more than 100% of the year’s roughly 2% gain .” They added that ” the 10 biggest stocks in the index accounted for just 19% of the gains last year and 15.2% of the index’s return in 2013 .” We should let the above data sink in for a moment. In 2013 as well as 2014, the S&P 500’s appreciation was attributable to most of its components. In 2015? Only the 10 biggest large-caps account for the positive spin. It gets worse. The same canaries in the investment mines that stopped serenading last summer – high yield junk bonds, emerging market stocks, small company stocks, commodities – are straining their vocal chords once again. The iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: HYG ) appears destined to retest its 52-week lows in the same way that commodities via DBC have. In sum, the S&P 500 has never fully recovered because global economic headwinds, equity overvaluation and anemic market breadth remain. Transporters, industrials, energy, materials, retail, leisure, household products, utilities, real estate, media, healthcare – a wide variety of sectors and sub-sectors have been buckling. It follows that it should not be all that surprising to see the S&P 500 buckle as well. Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.